Re: [openstack-dev] Problem in visualizing port-mirroring information

Hi All, I am facing an issue in visualizing port-mirroring information. 1.)Created 2 VMs: VM1: ubuntu3(10.0.0.3, floating IP: 192.168.200.252) - Tap service created VM2: ubuntu2(10.0.0.12, floating ip: 192.168.200.250) - Tap flow created 2.)Connected to bridge router:

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][heat] Removal of Aodh combination alarms

Zane, as I understand, all related code was removed. Probably we may to remove our Hidden resource too. If we want to have hidden resource, then probably as you mentioned will be enough to raise Exceptions and execute nothing for handle_delete. On 28 February 2017 at 01:36, Zane Bitter

[openstack-dev] [murano]An error occured when I executed environment-deploy

Hi everyone, I tried to execute "environment-deploy", but failed. 2017-02-27 15:40:21.066 13046 ERROR murano.common.engine [-] keystoneauth1.exceptions.catalog.EndpointNotFound: Endpoint for unknown service (Omitted) auth_uri is equal to that one in nova.conf. I refered to

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] Transition your devstack-gate based CI to local.conf

Hello Mikhail, We are operating CI for Veritas HyperScale, Due to this changes our CI started failing, Could you please help us by providing the sample local.conf file as per new changes. It will be great if you can point us to any of the working CI with your changes for reference.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Summary

On 28 February 2017 at 02:28, Rob Cresswell wrote: > Quick summary of the PTG for those who missed it. Here's the etherpad, with > notes inline: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-ptg-pike Was there much discussion around project health, and the lack of core

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] keystonauth catalog work arounds hiding transition issues

On 27 February 2017 at 08:56, Sean Dague wrote: > We recently implemented a Nova feature around validating that project_id > for quotas we real in keystone. After that merged, trippleo builds > started to fail because their undercloud did not specify the 'identity' > service as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Choose a project mascot

Hi all, We discussed the mascot choice a few times. At the last team meeting, we decided to choose dolphins as the Zun’s mascot. Thanks Pradeep for proposing this mascot and thanks all for providing feedback. Best regards, Hongbin From: Pradeep Singh [mailto:ps4openst...@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ansible]Octavia ansible script

Thanks Major Hayden, Hello German, I don't have access to repo git:// git.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia Can you provide us access ? Thanks, Santhosh On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Major Hayden wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Pike PTG recap - cells

Matt, Thanks for the recap, it's a pity I cannot attend PTG due to personal reason, I will be willing to take the work you mentioned, and will check the details with you. And another thing, I don't know whether you guys discussed or not, I saw in [1] we are talking about adding tags field(and

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The end-user test suite for OpenStack clusters

Hi Dims, Hi gmann, Thanks guys. Slowly recovering from PTG jet lag OK then.., I will start working on this. I would also like to coordinate this work with LCOO [1] team, where we can get valuable feedback and contributions.. I will give you update on next QA IRC on 0900 UTC meeting, which

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

I think IRC is more effective for real time collaboration then waiting a week for a meeting. We shouldn’t have to rant at all since we are all part of OpenStack ☺ Regards -steve -Original Message- From: Michał Jastrzębski Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

So first, I'd like to say that my poor English skills aren't enough to emphasize how much I love this idea. I think instead of adding yet-another-irc-channel how about create weekly meetings? We can rant in scheduled time and it probably will get more attention. That, mailing list with dedicated

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Summary

Hi forks, I added the English version which I had at the top of the page without deleting current one. As far as I see, there looks no points missing in former. but if anyone know the recent change and find differences, I'd be so happy if you reflect that diff. I'm so sorry and thanks for

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] PTG summary

On 02/27/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-02-25 00:07:21 +0800: Oslo folks, This is summary of oslo PTG schedule during one and half days. You can check the details in etherpad link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-ptg-pike 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Summary

Hi, forks I'm very very sorry that when I see this page, I'd translated to another language with mistake.. Can anyone do back to previous one? --- Kenji Ishii > -Original Message- > From: Rob Cresswell

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen

It's been great working with you, you've done a lot for our community and it'll be sad not seeing you around. Congratulations on the new position and I wish you all the best! Take care. -- Kevin Carter IRC: Cloudnull On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Major Hayden wrote: > On

[openstack-dev] [kubernetes][kolla][openstack-helm][magnum] Kubernetes Day at OpenStack Summit NA 2017 announced!

Hello everyone, On behalf of Kubernetes Community and OpenStack SpeciaI Interest Group [0], I'm happy to announce Kubernetes Day at OpenStack Summit NA 2017. The event will be hosted by CNCF as a part of OpenStack’s Open Source Days in Boston [1]. The CFP process is already open - feel free to

[openstack-dev] [nova] Pike PTG recap - cells

We talked about cells on Wednesday morning at the PTG. The full etherpad is here [1]. Searchlight integration --- We talked a bit about what needs to happen for this, and it starts with getting the data into searchlight so that it can serve the REST API, which is being

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] On the road to Pike

Here's a summary of what was said at PTG. Feel free to comment if I missed something. # NFV Driver: skramaja Summary: Support for OVS 2.6, Multi-queue and Jumbo Frames are already making good progress. Need to investigate how to make "Role Specific Parameters" for complex deployments. Etherpad:

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][heat] Removal of Aodh combination alarms

On 24/02/17 06:15, Julien Danjou wrote: Hey, We're about to remove the code for the deprecated combination alarm. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429405/ I checked and as far as I can tell that should not break Heat gate, but I'd prefer to be sure. So, Heat developers if you have some code

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Spinning up multinode environments using Heat

I wanted to share some work I've done around setting up multinode environments and reproducing tripleo-ci jobs on those environments on OpenStack using Heat: https://github.com/slagle/traas traas is a set of Heat templates and wrapper scripts arond toci_gate_test.sh mostly. You can think of

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] PTG summary

Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-02-25 00:07:21 +0800: > Oslo folks, > > This is summary of oslo PTG schedule during one and half days. You can > check the details in etherpad link: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-ptg-pike > > 1. oslo.messaging: consistent names for general

[openstack-dev] [nova][keystone] Pike PTG recap - quotas

We talked about a few things related to quotas at the PTG, some in cross-project sessions earlier in the week and then some on Wednesday morning in the Nova room. The full etherpad is here [1]. Counting quotas --- Melanie hit a problem with the counting quotas work in Ocata with

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are fascinated to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. PTG summary

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

Comments in-line On 2/27/17, 4:02 PM, "Steven Hardy" wrote: If I go ahead and do this is "deployment" a sufficiently project-neutral term to proceed with? I think so. I'd suggest we start with an informal WG, which it seems just requires an update to the

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib pep8 hacking checks

If your project is or plans to use neutron-lib moving forward, please read on. At the PTG we discussed how to roll-out new hacking checks in neutron-lib. In summary we decided to move forward using a single set of hacking checks, as proposed by [1] (see 'doc/source/usage.rst' in that patch for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-02-27 15:43:12 -0500: > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800: > > Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Summary

On 28 February 2017 at 02:28, Rob Cresswell wrote: > Quick summary of the PTG for those who missed it. Here's the etherpad, with > notes inline: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-ptg-pike Thanks, Rob! > - Use [horizon-plugin] mailer tag to keep people up to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800: > Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Shamail wrote: > > > The single openstack-dev list works fine for me. I am not using anything to > filter either beyond what my default mail clients offer. > > Could we modify the question slightly to also ask how people are dealing with

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On 2017-02-27 12:54:33 -0500 (-0500), Shamail wrote: [...] > Could we modify the question slightly to also ask how people are > dealing with reading through the single list? That might help us > write a page that newcomers could read to get tips on how to best > handle the mailing list traffic

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:26:48PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote: > [...] > > do you believe that the single openstack-dev mailing list is > > working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what problems > > has it created for you? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

> > On Feb 27, 2017, at 8:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, > we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various > deployment teams. > > It's clear that we share many common

[openstack-dev] [deployment][kolla][openstack-helm] OpenStack on Helm Workgroup Meeting

We will be holding an OpenStack on Helm Workgroup meeting on Tuesday, February 28 at 19:30 UTC/11:30 PT. On the agenda will be the transition of the meeting from an informal working group to the kubernetes-sig-openstack efforts, with a proposal to seed the applications side of the sig-openstack

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Does your plugin support updating network provider extended attributes?

Today, most, if not all plugins forbid updating network provider extended attributes. Our docs [1] even say so: "Most Networking plug-ins and drivers do not support updating any provider related attributes." To formalize this we were discussing the possibility of forbidding updates (PUT) at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

I see Jordan's opinion here and I also faced this situation before. I proposed a hacking patch [1] to notify wrong usage of Tempest methods to projects and I saw some users of these methods didn't know the definition of stable interfaces of Tempest. We always face this issue on developments which

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote: [...] > do you believe that the single openstack-dev mailing list is > working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what problems > has it created for you? [...] Perhaps my case is unusual, but I find the current activity on this ML

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2017-02-27 13:03:56 -0500: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:18:10PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > > Dean Troyer wrote: > > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > >> This is not for users who only want to see some

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Thanks for your reply. The proposed change is meant to benefit > readers of openstack-dev who do not have access to, or ability with, > sup/procmail/sieve/IMAP/etc., but do want to be able to be able to keep > up with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:18:10PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Dean Troyer wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > >> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well > >> understood space and the mailman filtering does

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600: >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: >>> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well > > understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Dean Troyer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > >> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well > >> understood space and the mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

-Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: February 27, 2017 at 11:19:25 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: 

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tagging: rebuild config drive upon instance reboot to refresh metadata on it

Not afaik, first time I've heard about this type of device/data. Tim Bell wrote: Is there cloud-init support for this mode or do we still need to mount as a config drive? Tim On 20.02.17, 17:50, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2017-02-20 15:46:43 + (+), Daniel P.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Dean Troyer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: >> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well >> understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for >> those who want to monitor the overall health of the

[openstack-dev] [docs] Docs PTG summary

Hi everyone, The OpenStack manuals project had a really productive week at the first PTG in Atlanta, collaborating with the I18n team on the Monday and Tuesday for the horizontal sessions. We were able to have several key leaders in the room, including previous documentation PTL, Anne Gentle

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:25:46AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote: > >comments inline. > >On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Steven Hardy > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Over the recent PTG,

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:25:46AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote: >comments inline. >On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, > we've had some productive

[openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Oslo weekly meeting time poll request

We discussed the Oslo weekly time during the PTG, current time slot UTC 16:00 is not good for folks from Asian, so wonder if we can try to figure out another time candidate, please vote on https://framadate.org/9Q15UYR19fzdqhol and add comments if all of candidates don't work well for you . --

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel][openstack-ansible] Next steps for cross project collaboration

Adding openstack-ansible to the subject tags (apologies, sdake pointed out I got that wrong in the initial mail, here's the top of this thread): http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/112960.html On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:02:54PM +, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

comments inline. On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, > we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various > deployment teams. > > It's clear that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, > we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various > deployment teams. > > It's clear that we share many common

[openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

Hi all, Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various deployment teams. It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major version upgrades (even if the workflow isn't

[openstack-dev] [tc][swg] Summary - Atlanta PTG Stewardship Working Group Session

Hi everyone! I thought I'd send a summary of the Stewardship Working Group activities from our time at the PTG this past week to the list to add voices to our discussions, and start the work of organizing our work for the next cycle. The SWG had a room to ourselves for all of Monday, which was

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] keystonauth catalog work arounds hiding transition issues

On 02/27/2017 10:49 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 02/27/2017 09:36 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Sean Dague > > wrote: >> >> On 02/27/2017 10:22 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> >> > I agree we should kill the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] keystonauth catalog work arounds hiding transition issues

On 02/27/2017 09:36 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Sean Dague > wrote: > > On 02/27/2017 10:22 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > I agree we should kill the discovery hack, however that is a break in > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Managing project requirements

On 2017-02-27 11:42:22 +0100 (+0100), Andreas Scheuring wrote: > Thanks all for your feedback. Seeing things much clearer now. > > One last thing: How is the requirements bot being triggered? > > - For OpenStack libraries by the jenkins job that handles the tag > (if the metadata is provided)?

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] keystonauth catalog work arounds hiding transition issues

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 02/27/2017 10:22 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > I agree we should kill the discovery hack, however that is a break in > > the keystoneauth contract. Simply put, we cannot. Keystoneauth is one of > > the few things

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tagging: rebuild config drive upon instance reboot to refresh metadata on it

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > > - virtio-vsock - think of this as UNIX domain sockets between the host and > >guest. This is to deal with the valid use case of people wanting to use > >a network protocol, but not wanting an real NIC exposed to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well > understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for > those who want to monitor the overall health of the community, address >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tagging: rebuild config drive upon instance reboot to refresh metadata on it

> - virtio-vsock - think of this as UNIX domain sockets between the host and >guest. This is to deal with the valid use case of people wanting to use >a network protocol, but not wanting an real NIC exposed to the guest/host >for security concerns. As such I think it'd be useful to

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] keystonauth catalog work arounds hiding transition issues

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > We recently implemented a Nova feature around validating that project_id > for quotas we real in keystone. After that merged, trippleo builds > started to fail because their undercloud did not specify the 'identity' > service

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Le 27/02/2017 15:50, Matt Riedemann a écrit : > On 2/26/2017 11:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: >> >> You have taken the folder approach, and that is a bit less complicated >> to set up than sup+offlineimap, but still does require that you know >> how to filter by tag. It also means that you are

[openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Summary

Hi everyone! Quick summary of the PTG for those who missed it. Here's the etherpad, with notes inline: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-ptg-pike We spent the first morning discussing plugins, with several plugin devs dropping in to discuss their issues. Several issues were mentioned

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] keystonauth catalog work arounds hiding transition issues

On 02/27/2017 10:22 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > I agree we should kill the discovery hack, however that is a break in > the keystoneauth contract. Simply put, we cannot. Keystoneauth is one of > the few things (similar to how shade works) where behavior, exposed > elements, etc are considered a

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Openstack packaged on Gentoo

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 08:44:30AM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: After a short delay for reasons Openstack is now up to date on Gentoo. Just `emerge =sys-cluster/openstack-meta-2017.1.` with your desired use flags to pull in the head of the services stable branches and their dependencies.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

On 2/26/2017 11:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: You have taken the folder approach, and that is a bit less complicated to set up than sup+offlineimap, but still does require that you know how to filter by tag. It also means that you are experiencing one of the problems with cross posting whenever

[openstack-dev] [packaging] Openstack packaged on Gentoo

After a short delay for reasons Openstack is now up to date on Gentoo. Just `emerge =sys-cluster/openstack-meta-2017.1.` with your desired use flags to pull in the head of the services stable branches and their dependencies. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description:

[openstack-dev] [murano]

Hi everyone, Currently two of our gates are breaking and so everything is blocked until we resolve the issues with them. I have introduced to patches for Murano [0] and Murano Dashboard [1]. Please review these patches so that we can unblock all other patches that are currently failing

[openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] keystonauth catalog work arounds hiding transition issues

We recently implemented a Nova feature around validating that project_id for quotas we real in keystone. After that merged, trippleo builds started to fail because their undercloud did not specify the 'identity' service as the unversioned endpoint.

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]reschedule the weekly meeting

Hello, Currently the Tricircle weekly meeting is held regularly at UTC 13:00~14:00 every Wednesday, it's not convenient for contributors from USA. The available time slots could be found at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lQHKCQa4wQmnWpTMB3DLltY81kIChZumHLHzoMNF07c/edit#gid=0 Other

[openstack-dev] [QA] Pike PTG Summary

Hi everyone, thanks to everyone who joined the QA track, hands-on session and discussions at the first PTG in Atlanta. I think it was a very productive week, it was great to meet so many of you in person. We also received a lot of feedback from the community [0]. The list of sessions is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

Thank you! On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi wrote: > I'm pleased to welcome Alexander to the fuel-web core team! > > https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/664,members > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fedor Zhadaev > wrote:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] no upgrades meeting today

Hi, Sorry for short notice but I figured some of us just met on PTG and where still traveling back in last several days and would appreciate getting the hour back to settle pending post PTG items. This week I will work with PTG participants on producing a detailed report on the event where it

[openstack-dev] [QA][blazar][ceilometer][congress][intel-nfv-ci-tests][ironic][manila][networking-bgpvpn][networking-fortinet][networking-sfc][neutron][neutron-fwaas][neutron-lbaas][nova-lxd][octavia]

Hello folks, TL;DR: if today you import manager,py from tempest.scenario please maintain a copy of [0] in tree until further notice. Full message: -- One of the priorities for the QA team in the Pike cycle is to refactor scenario tests to a sane code base [1]. As they are now,

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Managing project requirements

Thanks all for your feedback. Seeing things much clearer now. One last thing: How is the requirements bot being triggered? - For OpenStack libraries by the jenkins job that handles the tag (if the metadata is provided)? - for external libraries? Is the a cronjob every 2 weeks or so? Or is it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

I'm pleased to welcome Alexander to the fuel-web core team! https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/664,members On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fedor Zhadaev wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:36 AM Булат Гайфуллин > wrote: >> >> +1

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting today cancelled

Hello Kuryrs, Due to preparations for this week's VTG, today's meeting is cancelled. Looking forward to see you all tomorrow! Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][gnocchi] How to push compute node metrics to gnocchi?

Thanks for the reply. Is there any documentation available for helping me to add the fields in gnocchi_resources.yaml. Thanks, Pradeep Singh On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25 2017, Pradeep Singh wrote: > > > I installed devstack and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Excerpts from Luigi Toscano's message of 2017-02-27 03:02:45 -0500: > > - Original Message - > > Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500: > > > Hi Clint, > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > > > Excerpts

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

- Original Message - > Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500: > > Hi Clint, > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-02-26 19:48:50 -0600: > > > > On 2/26/2017