Hi All-
I've decided that I will not be running for Astara PTL this coming cycle.
It's been great helping the project grow and find its place within the
OpenStack tent over the last 8 months or so. We're a small group of
developers and I think its important to stir the pot and let another
Hi All-
I mentioned this in todays meeting but wanted to drop a note here since
most of us are out on a US holiday...
This week is Mitaka-2 [1] and we still have quite a few outstanding bugs
that still need resolution. The good news is that (i think) all of them
have had patches up for review
Thanks for the heads up, Andreas. I've opened
https://bugs.launchpad.net/astara/+bug/1526527 and hope to resolve it in
the coming days.
Cheers
Adam
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Astara team,
>
> The requirements proposal job complains about
been noted on the etherpad [1], but feel free
to add more if there's something you'd like to discuss.
Cheers,
Adam
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/akanda-mitaka-planning
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Adam Gandelman <gandelma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Should we shoot for a co
Should we shoot for a contributor meetup Friday in the developer lounge,
alongside the other project meetups? Does this *not* work for anyone? Is
afternoon better than the AM? I propose we meet before lunch and carry on
into the afternoon if necessary. Please jot your name down on the etherpad
Hi All-
The Astara team is pleased to announce the availability of the Astara
Liberty release. You can find a list of closed bugs, implemented
blueprints and release tarballs on launchpad at
https://launchpad.net/astara/+milestone/7.0.0. We are proud of what we've
accomplished this release and
Correction. Also included in the list of released projects for 2014.2.3,
Sahara: https://launchpad.net/sahara/juno/2014.2.3
Apologies,
Adam
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Adam Gandelman gandelma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone,
The OpenStack Stable Maintenance team is happy to announce
Hello everyone,
The OpenStack Stable Maintenance team is happy to announce the release
of the 2014.2.3 stable Juno release. We have been busy reviewing and
accepting backported bugfixes to the stable/juno branches according
to the criteria set at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch
A
FWIW the Ironic microversion test patch mentioned on gerrit is only
targeted at Tempest because thats where the API tests currenty live and
from which our infra is setup to run. The eventual goal is to move all of
tempest.api.baremetal.* to the Ironic tree, there's no reason why those
proposed new
Hi all,
We are scheduled to publish 2014.2.3 on Thursday April 9th for
Ceilometer, Cinder, Glance, Heat, Horizon, Keystone, Neutron, Nova,
Sahara and Trove.
We'd appreciate anyone who could test the candidate 2014.2.3 tarballs, which
include all changes aside from any pending freeze exceptions:
Hi All-
We'll be freezing the stable/juno branches for integrated Juno projects this
Thursday April 2nd in preparation for the 2014.2.3 stable release on
Thursday April 9th. You can view the current queue of proposed patches
on gerrit [1]. I'd like to request all interested parties review
Big +2 on both those, but will leave it up to Alan make the final call
Cheers
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2015 12:21 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
Hi,
next Icehouse stable point release
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
It sounds like you are suggesting we take the tool we use to ensure that
all of OpenStack is installable together in a unified way, and change
it's installation so that it doesn't do that any more.
Which I'm fine with.
But
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
It'd be interesting to see what a distribution (canonical, redhat...)
would think about this movement. I know yahoo! has been looking into it for
similar reasons (but we are more flexibly then I think a packager such
Hello-
The Ironic team is pleased to announce the release of the 2014.2.1 stable
Juno release. This release contains a number of backported fixes that have
accrued in our stable branch since the release of 2014.2. These updates to
Juno are intended to be low risk with no intentional
regressions
This creates a bit of a problem for downstream (packagers and probably
others) Shipping a requirements.txt with explicit pins will end up
producing an egg with a requires.txt that reflects those pins, unless there
is some other magic planned that I'm not aware of. I can't speak for all
packaging
with the libraries from git-or-master but
we can probably add something to warm the system with dependencies from the
compiled version prior to calling pip/setup.py/etc
Adam
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Adam Gandelman ad
Hi-
I believe I'm the one who was volunteered for this on IRC. I'm still fine
with being the contact for these matters, but making the meetings at
0800/1500 UTC will be difficult for me. Feel free to sign me up if that
is not a blocker. I've been driving the ironic CI/QA stuff over the last
Looking at the image build logs @ nodepool.openstack.org, it *looks* like
package dependencies are not being installed properly on one of the slaves
(hpcloud-b2.bare-precise): http://paste.ubuntu.com/9886045/ The failing
periodic jobs all land on this b2 node. nodepool is, however, pre-caching
https://review.openstack.org/150120 should address it.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Adam Gandelman ad...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Looking at the image build logs @ nodepool.openstack.org, it *looks* like
package dependencies are not being installed properly on one of the slaves
(hpcloud-b2.bare
Thanks, Ihar. Lets make this the 'official' tracking pad for stable
branches. We were previously using branch-specific pads (ie,
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/StableJuno) but it makes sense to track
both releases in one place. I've updated it with current staus there and
added a reference on
So eventlet 0.16.x has started hitting slaves and breaking stable branches
(its not like we weren't warned :\ )
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1410626
Should hopefully be resolved by eventlet versions caps in icehouse + juno's
requirements:
Hiya-
Flavio has been actively involved in stable branch maintenance for as long
as I can remember, but it looks like his +2 abilities were removed after
the organizational changes made to the stable maintenance teams. He has
expressed interest in continuing on with general stable maintenance
Heads up here since IRC seems to be crickets this week...
Fallout from newer pip's creation and usage of ~/.cache is still biting the
sideways ironic grenade job:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1405626
This is blocking patches to ironic, nova, devstack, tempest, grenade master
+
This is fallout from a new upstream release of pip that went out earlier in
the week. It looks like no formal bug ever got filed, tho the same problem
discovered in devstack and trove's integration testing repository. Added
some comments comments to the bug.
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:59 PM,
Hi All-
Daviey was an original member of the stable-maint team and one of the
driving forces behind the creation of the team and branches back in the
early days. He was removed from the team later on during a pruning of
inactive members. Recently, he has began focusing on the stable branches
The stable-maint team has been more active in the last couple months of
keeping on top of stable branch specific gate breakage (usually identified
by periodic job failures). We managed to flush a bunch of reviews through
the gate over the last couple weeks [1] Yea, many required rechecks, but
the
Hi all,
We are scheduled to publish 2014.1.3 on Thurs Oct. 2nd for
Ceilometer, Cinder, Glance, Heat, Horizon, Keystone, Neutron, Nova
and Trove.
The list of issues fixed so far can be seen here:
https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/2014.1.3
Hi All-
We'll be freezing the stable/icehouse branches for integrated projects this
Thursday September 25th in preparation for the 2014.1.3 stable release on
Thursday October 2nd. You can view the current queue of proposed patches
on gerrit [1]. I'd like to request all interested parties review
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Peeyush Gupta gpeey...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
What I am interested to know is if this is a problem with precise or with
devstack script?
As mentioned, we test this in the gate using Ubuntu Trusty 14.04. When we
were using Precise, we would setup access
Yes, its to be expected. IIRC, you were helping me investigate the same
thing at the TripleO mid-cycle. :) The port gets the necessary
configuration setup by the DHCP agent to take care of PXE, but this being
baremetal there is no hypervisor on which some agent is running and
plugging VIFs into
I've opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1329430 to track
the progress of getting the ironic job in better shape. Monty had a great
suggestion this morning about how cache_devstack.py can be updated to cache
the UCA stuff for any job that may need it. I'm putting together a patch
It's been a while since I've used these tools and I'm not 100% surprised
they've fragmented once again. :) That said, does pcs support creating the
CIB configuration in bulk from a file? I know that crm shell would let you
dump the entire cluster config and restore from file. Unless the CIB
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
Yeah, we've already got plans in place to get Cinder to use the
interface to provide us more detailed information and eliminate some
polling. We also have a very purpose-built notification scheme between
nova and cinder
Hi All--
We've finally got the check-tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic passing
successfully in the Ironic gate. Among other things, this test runs the
tempest.scenario.test_baremetal_basic_ops which is a functional
provisioning test directly stressing Ironic, Nova and Neutron as well as
devstack and
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Agreed. Though I think we probably want the Nova API to be explicit
about what parts of the API it's ok to throw a Not Supported. Because I
don't think it's a blanket ok. On API endpoints where this is ok, we can
convert not
Hi all,
We are scheduled to publish the 2013.2.3 release on Thursday April 3 for
Ceilometer, Cinder, Glance, Heat, Horizon, Keystone, Neutron and Nova.
The list of issues fixed so far can be seen here:
https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/2013.2.3
Hi All-
We'll be freezing the stable/havana branches for integrated projects this
Thursday March 27th in preparation for the 2013.2.3 stable release on
Thursday April 3rd. You can view the current queue of proposed patches
on gerrit [1]. I'd like to request all interested parties review current
Hi--
We've made some progress over the last week or so toward more thorough
Ironic CI:
* Initial devstack support has been merged enabling an all-in-one Ironic
environment that uses libvirt+VMs+OVS to support baremetal deployments [1]
* Devananda and myself have been getting patches pushed into
On 10/10/2013 04:42 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Trunk - https://review.openstack.org/50904
Stable/Grizzly - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50905/
There is an alternative patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50873/7
I recall seeing the same problem a few month ago and the bot version was
On 10/01/2013 12:02 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
1) Please *do not* Approve or Reverify stable/* patches. The pyparsing
requirements conflict with neutron client from earlier in the week is still
not resolved on stable/*.
Also there's an issue with quantumclient and Nova stable/grizzly:
41 matches
Mail list logo