On 08/08/2014 02:53 PM, jswar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'm unable to retrigger the turbo-hipster verification job on a change
(recheck migrations comment retriggers Jenkins but not turbo-hipster)
and I sent an e-mail to rc...@rcbops.com two days ago and still have not
received a reply.
On 08/08/2014 10:06 PM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Sumit-
When I try to paste a large log text into paste.openstack, It is giving me
image verification and says its spam.
Let's not confuse paste.openstack.org's spam blocker from spam blockers
on servers. They are two separate
On 08/08/2014 07:58 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
With the incredible growth of OpenStack, our development community is
facing
the access where it has
given access to view the website before.
Thanks a lot again for the brief email.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: Saturday, August 09
On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
Cisco Folks,
I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
Edgar
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
Cisco Folks,
I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
I don't ever recall seeing that as a name of a third party gerrit
account in my
On 08/11/2014 06:31 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
On 8/11/2014 7:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
Cisco Folks,
I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being
On 08/11/2014 06:26 PM, John Griffith wrote:
Hey Cinder folks that have their CI systems up and running; first off...
awesome!!! I do have one favor to ask however though. Please, please,
please monitor your jobs and if they're not working either fix them or
disable them.
Currently the it
On 08/12/2014 01:16 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
Henry,
That makes a lot of sense to me.
If the code will be remove in Juno, then there is nothing else to discuss.
Thank you so much for providing detailed information and sorry for
bothering you with this issue.
Edgar
I don't think it is a
On 08/12/2014 03:23 PM, Hemanth Ravi wrote:
Kyle,
One Convergence third-party CI is failing due to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1353309.
Let me know if we should turn off the CI logs until this is fixed or if we
need to fix anything on the CI end. I think one other third-party
OpenStack is OpenStack. The use of openstack is also acceptable in our
development conversations.
OS or os is operating system. I am starting to see some people us OS or
os to mean OpenStack. This is confusing and also incorrect[0].
No alterations: When using OpenStack Marks, you shall never
On 08/15/2014 09:12 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/15/2014 11:00 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote on 08/15/2014 10:38:20 AM:
OpenStack is OpenStack. The use of openstack is also acceptable in our
development conversations.
OS or os is operating system. I am
On 08/15/2014 08:51 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info
To: openStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
OpenStack is OpenStack. The use of openstack is also acceptable in our
development conversations.
OS or os
On 08/18/2014 09:43 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote:
Hi,
Mellanox CI is going down for maintenance.
We will notify as soon as the system is up and ready.
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Omri
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 08/18/2014 10:18 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote:
Mellanox CI is up and ready.
Thanks
From: Omri Marcovitch [mailto:om...@mellanox.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 6:44 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Mellanox CI Third party
On 08/22/2014 07:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
We all know being a project PTL is an extremely busy job. That's because
in our structure the PTL is responsible for almost everything in a project:
- Release management contact
- Work prioritization
- Keeping bugs under control
On 08/25/2014 12:29 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/25/2014 12:08 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
http://www.quora.com/Why-would-the-creators-of-OpenStack-the-market-leader-in-cloud-computing-platforms-refuse-to-use-it-and-use-AWS-instead
Would you mind please not posting to the developer's mailing
On 08/26/2014 05:13 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison
or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic
development (this is not about suppressing PTLs, just a framework to let
them delegate along predetermined
On 08/26/2014 03:43 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Hi Nader,
Sorry about that failure.
We have temporarily stopped mine sweeper for neutron while we update our
devstack images.
However, unfortunately some jobs did not complete properly, and therefore
you had failures without logs being
On 08/27/2014 03:43 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 08/27/2014 03:33 PM, David Kranz wrote:
On 08/27/2014 02:54 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Note: thread intentionally broken, this is really a different topic.
On 08/27/2014 02:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Chris Dent
On 08/27/2014 02:46 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2014 03:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 08/27/2014 08:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been thinking about what changes we can bring to the Design Summit
a timeline when I can say
this would happen, at least from me.
The knowledge isn't specific to me, if someone else is inclined.
Thanks Chris, I appreciate the encouragement,
Anita.
On 27 Aug 2014, at 21:48, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 08/27/2014 02:46 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Wed
On 08/28/2014 03:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 08/28/2014 03:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/28/2014 02:21 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 08/28/2014 01:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:34 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Hi
On 09/03/2014 02:03 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi Neutron team,
There are many third party CI in Neutron and we sometimes/usually
want to retrigger third party CI to confirm results.
A comment syntax varies across third party CI, so I think it is useful
to gather recheck command in one
On 09/05/2014 10:33 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Hi Mykola,
On 09/05/2014 04:09 PM, Mykola Grygoriev wrote:
Hi,
My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on
deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver.
Great, thanks!
Following instructions on
email both myself Anita Kuno (anteaya) email:
ante...@anteaya.info and Tristan Cacqueray (tristanC) email:
tristan.cacque...@enovance.com so that we may address your concerns.
Please Note: There is a chance I may have to step aside from my duties
for personal reasons, should that happen Jeremy
On 09/07/2014 09:12 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Lets prevent blogs like this: http://jimhconsulting.com/?p=673 by making
users happy.
I don't understand why you would encourage writers of blog posts you
disagree with by sending them traffic.
Anita.
1) Consistent/easy upgrading.
all
On 09/07/2014 09:37 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 09/07/2014 09:12 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Lets prevent blogs like this: http://jimhconsulting.com/?p=673 by making
users happy.
I don't understand why you would encourage
On 09/08/2014 11:12 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On Sep 7, 2014, at 9:27 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 09/07/2014 09:12 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Lets prevent blogs like this: http://jimhconsulting.com/?p=673 by making
users happy.
I don't understand why you would encourage
On 09/08/2014 12:00 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On Sep 8, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
Wow, we are really taking liberties with my question today.
What part of any of my actions current or previous have led you to
believe that I want to now or ever have silenced
On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it
should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have
per-program contributors meetups on the Friday. The schedule would go
as follows:
Tuesday:
On 09/12/2014 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Anita Kuno wrote:
My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least
Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party
ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am
wondering about
On 09/12/2014 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Anita Kuno wrote:
My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least
Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party
ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am
wondering about
On 09/16/2014 02:11 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
Hi,
Neutron would like to move the distributed virtual router (DVR)
tempest job, currently in the experimental queue, to the check queue
[1]. It will still be non-voting for the time being. Could infra
have a look? We feel that running this on
On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
[1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that
has been posted.
I would
On 09/18/2014 05:05 PM, openstack technology wrote:
Hi All:
Is there any documentation on how to write a neutron plugin drivers
(including what files need to be changed), I could not find this on
OpenStack documentation pages. I tried to use the Hdn example plugin and
tried to integrate it
On 09/19/2014 01:15 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Sep 19, 2014, at 3:33 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete
suggestions here.
A couple more:
1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1
.
The electorate is requested to confirm their email address in gerrit,
review.openstack.org Settings Contact Information Preferred
Email, prior to September 26, 2014 05:59 UTC so that the emailed
ballots are mailed to the correct email address.
Happy running,
Anita Kuno (anteaya)
[0]
http
confirmed
On 09/19/2014 04:12 PM, Michael Still wrote:
I'd like another term as Compute PTL, if you'll have me.
We live in interesting times. OpenStack has clearly gained a large
amount of mind share in the open cloud marketplace, with Nova being a
very commonly deployed component. Yet, we
confirmed
On 09/19/2014 04:40 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
All:
I am writing to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Networking
(Neutron) PTL role.
I am the current Neutron PTL, having lead the project during the Juno
cycle. As a team, we have accomplished a lot during the Juno cycle. We
confirmed
On 09/19/2014 05:14 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Hello Everyone!
After contributing consistently to OpenStack since the Grizzly cycle and more
specifically to Keystone since Havana, I’d like to put my name into the hat
for the Keystone PTL role during the Kilo release cycle. I’ve
On 09/19/2014 05:03 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 09/19/2014 08:13 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
I've spent the better part of the last 2 weeks in the Nova bug tracker
to try to turn it into something that doesn't cause people to run away
screaming. I don't remember exactly where we started at open bug
On 09/22/2014 12:31 PM, Mykola Grygoriev wrote:
Hi,
We finished deployment of 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver.
Following instructions on
http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requesting-a-service-account we
are asking to add gerrit CI account (coraid-ci) to the Voting Third-Party
On 09/24/2014 02:51 PM, Tracy Jones wrote:
SORRY – please ignore that email – it was clearly internal…… I used the wrong
ML (blush)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 12/10/2013 07:32 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 10/12/13 14:57 -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
Sphinx 1.2 was just released and it is incompatible with distutils in
python 2.7. See these links for more info:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2013 08:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Current Gate Length: 12hrs*, 41 deep
(top of gate entered 12hrs ago)
It's been an *exciting* week this week. For people not paying
attention we had 2 external events which made things terrible
earlier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2013 09:39 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 12/12/2013 08:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Current Gate Length: 12hrs*, 41 deep
(top of gate entered 12hrs ago)
It's been an *exciting* week this week. For people not paying
attention we had 2
, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 11/16/2013 01:14 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 11/16/2013 12:37 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/15/2013 10:36 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:10 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Neutron Tempest code sprint
In the second week
Matt Trenish wins this round of spot Anita's typo to the -dev ml.
9am - 5pm, 8 hours of work (lunch in the middle) for 3 days
Thanks Matt,
Anita.
On 12/18/2013 04:17 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Okay time for a recap.
What: Neutron Tempest code sprint
Where: Montreal, QC, Canada
When: January 15
I can't attend.
I just booked my flight for SaltConf in Salt Lake City, which conflicts.
Would have liked to have been there.
I hope you have a great sprint and FOSDEM.
Thanks,
Anita.
On 12/20/2013 05:26 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
In case you're not familiar with it,
Unfortunately this approach leads to forcing in code that may increase
the bug in question, which will affect all developers.
I suggest you evaluate the Jenkins logs carefully, and link to the
timestamp in the logs were the failure occurred, in a comment on your
patch. This enables reviewers to
...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Anita,
Fawad and Myself will be also attending.
BTW. Fawad will require an invitation letter for visa. He will email you
directly with that request.
Thanks,
Edgar
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
Okay time for a recap.
What: Neutron
On 12/18/2013 04:17 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Okay time for a recap.
What: Neutron Tempest code sprint
Where: Montreal, QC, Canada
When: January 15, 16, 17 2014
Location: I am about to sign the contract for Salle du Parc at 3625 Parc
avenue, a room in a residence of McGill University.
Time
Please.
When your third party testing structure votes on patches and your
testing structure is not stable, it will vote with a -1 on patches.
This results in three consequences:
1. The patch it votes on starts a countdown for abandonment, this is
frustrating for developers.
2. Reviewers who use
On 12/30/2013 09:32 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Please.
When your third party testing structure votes on patches and your
testing structure is not stable, it will vote with a -1 on patches.
This results in three consequences:
1. The patch it votes on starts a countdown for abandonment
On 01/02/2014 05:39 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:24 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
However, there are _a lot_ of third-party test systems coming on-line,
and I'm not sure that expanding the recheck language to support ever
more complexity is a good idea.
On 01/02/2014 05:58 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
I'd love to attend this chat, if possible. A number of the coming
on-line third-party test systems are motivated by neutron plugins. I'd
get a lot from hearing this discussion
Well done Climate electorate, 80% participation is a great rate.
Thank you to both candidates for running.
Congratulations Dina, I look forward to working with you as PTL.
Nicely run election, Sergey.
Good work,
Anita.
On 01/06/2014 02:15 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Hi folks,
thank you all
/icehouse-summit-qa-neutron
[6] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2013/
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 12/18/2013 04:17 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Okay time for a recap.
What: Neutron Tempest code sprint
Where: Montreal, QC
Let me know what you consider a reasonable amount of time to continue
waiting for Tail-F NCS Jenkins before we remove verification permissions
from the account. We were just talking about this a few hours ago at a
Birds of a Feather session. We can get permissions removed from this
account. I'd
On 01/06/2014 10:32 PM, Luke Gorrie wrote:
Hi guys,
On 6 January 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
If the account holder of this account is reading this email, responding
to it would certainly be a good idea.
Apologies for the disturbance!
Please do go ahead
On 01/07/2014 02:31 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote:
On 6 January 2014 18:12, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com
wrote:
How should we handle existing -1's that have been posted?
I suggest removing/ignoring those votes until we see if they are spurious.
I is my belief that Sean is asking
://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/TempestAPITests
[5] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-neutron
[6] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2013/
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 12/18/2013 04:17 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Okay time
If you are in a position where you want or need to provide 3rd party
testing, you do yourself (and the rest of us) a great service if you
take the time to learn the OpenStack development process.
One of the best ways to learn the OpenStack development process is to
submit a patch. Advertising: We
On 01/10/2014 02:53 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 07:46 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
I think we are all agreed that the current state of Gate Resets isn't
good. Unfortunately some basic functionality is really not working
reliably, like being able to boot a guest to a point where
On 01/14/2014 10:04 AM, Collins, Sean wrote:
Can we get the -1 from Tail-F cleared from this review?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56184/17
I thought we had confirmed that all Tail-F -1s prior to now had been
cleared or only remained on abandoned or merged patches, I guess we
missed one.
On 01/14/2014 11:34 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Given the Tempest Sprint in Montreal, I still think we should have this
meeting
on IRC.
Shouldn't this be, given OpenStack is an open project [0], this meeting
will take place on irc, just like all our other meetings.?
Thanks,
Anita.
[0]
]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-11-26-19.02.log.html
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 01/14/2014 11:34 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Given the Tempest Sprint
Thank you, fungi.
You have kept openstack-infra running for that last 2 weeks as the sole
plate-spinner whilst the rest of us were conferencing, working on the
gerrit upgrade or getting our laptop stolen.
You spun up and configured two new Jenkinses (Jenkinsii?) and then deal
with the
On 01/03/2014 12:46 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure
has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with
devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does
it interact with infrastructure systems
On 01/22/2014 04:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
snip
==
Executive Summary
==
To summarize, the effects of these changes will be:
- 1) Decrease the impact of failures resetting the entire gate
On 01/30/2014 08:42 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
If you're going to talk about anything related to OpenStack at PyCON
US/Canada this year, please let me know. We're collecting the list of
talks related to the project.
Cheers,
stef
Would it be possible to start an etherpad for this? I am
On 01/30/2014 09:51 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 01/30/2014 08:42 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
If you're going to talk about anything related to OpenStack at PyCON
US/Canada this year, please let me know. We're collecting
On 02/06/2014 09:52 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote:
Howdy!
My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to
support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly
for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with
Icehouse. In particular, our attempt
On 02/10/2014 12:48 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the
infra-core team.
He is among the top reviewers of projects in openstack-infra, and is
very familiar with how jenkins-job-builder and zuul are used and
configured. He has done
On 02/11/2014 04:57 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
Hi Mark and Anita,
could we declare stable/havana neutron gate jobs good enough at this point?
There are still random failures as this no-op change shows
https://review.openstack.org/72576
but I don't think they're stable/havana specific.
Do we
who supported that attendance. And to Mark
McClain and Salvatore Orlando, thank you both so much.
Thank you,
Anita.
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 18:00
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack
On 02/14/2014 02:15 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
As many of you surely noticed, we had some significant significant
gate issues in the last day. It's fixed now, and I've got the
details below.
The root cause of the issue was a lack of proper testing in
python- swiftclient. We've made some
On 02/17/2014 03:33 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
Per commitment during last week's Neutron IRC meeting, I have classified
below all the api Tempest tests in review for Neutron. This is to assist
core developers in reviewing this code
- Core api
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66921
On 03/02/2014 07:10 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/01/2014 06:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
Hey,
I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up
recently. Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this
most; don't participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least
like to
/TC_Elections_April_2014
Anita Kuno (anteaya)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
that the emailed ballots are
mailed to the correct email address.
Happy running,
Anita Kuno (anteaya)
[0]
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 03/27/2014 08:12 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Hello folks,
we've been hearing a lot about the incredible growth of the OpenStack
community but we don't hear much about the incredible amount of pressure
that comes with such growth. One huge problem that growth brings with is
that new
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 11:19 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
I would like to announce my candidacy for the Infrastructure PTL.
I have developed and operated the project infrastructure for several
years and have been honored to serve as the PTL for the Icehouse cycle.
I was instrumental
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 10:07 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute (Nova) PTL position.
Qualifications
-
I have been working almost exclusively on Nova since mid-2012, and have
been on the nova-core team since late 2012. I am also a
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 01:29 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I would like to run for the QA Program PTL position.
I'm currently a core reviewer on the Tempest and elastic-recheck projects and
a
member of the stable maint team. I have been working on Tempest and on
improving
overall
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 02:29 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program
Technical Lead (PTL).
I have been working on OpenStack upstream documentation since September
2010, and am currently serving in this role. I recently summarized
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 03:21 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute PTL position as well.
I have been an active nova developer since late 2011, and have been a
core reviewer for quite a while. I am currently serving on the
Technical Committee, where I
confirmed
On 03/29/2014 09:06 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Folks,
I would like to throw my hat into the ring for the upcoming ceilometer
PTL election.
Over the past three release cycles, I've become increasingly focused
on Telemetry in OpenStack, and feel at this stage that I'm in a
confirmed
On 03/31/2014 12:18 PM, Jarret Raim wrote:
I'd like to throw my name in for PTL for the Key Management Program which
includes the Barbican, python-barbicanclient and Kite projects.
I've been working on Barbican since the first line of code was committed
and was responsible for
On 03/31/2014 12:18 PM, Jarret Raim wrote:
I'd like to throw my name in for PTL for the Key Management Program which
includes the Barbican, python-barbicanclient and Kite projects.
Also please note for the purposes of elections the only repositories
eligible for consideration are the
confirmed
On 03/31/2014 01:04 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have decided to run for the OpenStack Networking (Neutron) PTL position.
Why I Want To Be Neutron PTL
-
I want to be Neutron PTL because I wish to continue pushing Neutron forward
and help it evolve, and have the
confirmed
On 03/31/2014 02:52 PM, Lyle, David wrote:
I would like to announce my candidacy for Horizon PTL.
I've been working on and contributing to Horizon for the last three releases
and had the pleasure to serve as the PTL for the Icehouse cycle.
In the Icehouse cycle, we started a
confirmed
On 03/31/2014 04:15 PM, Mark McClain wrote:
All-
I writing to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Networking (Neutron) PTL.
I am the current Neutron PTL and would like to continue leading our team
during the Juno cycle. As PTL, I have worked to promote a vibrant open
On 03/31/2014 06:02 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
What is the criteria for this? The OpenDaylight Jenkins has been
reliably voting for a few weeks now, I'm wondering how and when we can
get it's voting rights approved.
Thanks!
Kyle
___
OpenStack-dev
confirmed
On 04/01/2014 02:19 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
I am running for another term as DevStack PTL. I have been the
acting/elected PTL since DevStack became a program and have been working on
DevStack since its first public demo in a lightning talk at the Essex
Design Summit. In addition I
confirmed
On 04/01/2014 03:02 PM, John Griffith wrote:
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Block Storage (Cinder) PTL
position.
I've been involved with OpenStack for about two and a half years now,
starting out by trying to help with some things in Nova-Volumes and then
with the help
confirmed
On 04/01/2014 03:52 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Hey folks,
I'd like to announce my intention to continue being PTL of the Data
Processing program (Sahara) PTL.
I'm working on Sahara (ex. Savanna) project from scratch, from the
initial idea, proof of concept implementation and
confirmed
On 04/01/2014 05:30 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all!
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Bare Metal Provisioning (Ironic)
PTL position.
I've been involved with bare metal provisioning for the last two years,
before it was even in Nova. I led the work on
This is a reminder that 4 programs still need at least one candidate to
nominate themselves for PTL.
Glance, Keystone, TripleO and Marconi all need to let me know who will
lead you in Juno.
Talk amongst yourselves and communicate something to the -dev mailing
list by the end of the nomiation
1 - 100 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
