port-potential
To keep track of bugs we want to solve by Ocata-1 milestone, and
eventually backport into stable/newton.
Please let us know any question or feedback,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
No.
> Any feedback would be appreciated.
> Thanks.
Thanks Gabriele to work on this topic, very appreciated!
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ.
So we had a lot of interesting feedback in the spec, I addressed all
comments, let me know if I missed something.
I'm also interested to have feedback from other team members.
Thanks,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> It has been some weeks I have been thin
27;re trying to pin puppetlabs-ntp to a stable branch:
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/3345/
I hope we can fix this bug asap, as it blocks our CI jobs.
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
ints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-third-party-ci-quickstart
The actual link of the spec is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386250/
Thanks, I'm really interested by the discussion we'll have a
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Team,
>
> We'll propose TripleO Newton RC3 on Friday 11am (eastern time).
Schedule changed again, since we still have a bunch of blockers.
Since hard deadline for RC is Tuesday 18th, let's give us 3 more days
and pr
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Please see below:
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Matt Riedemann
> wrote:
>> On 10/13/2016 7:47 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings OpenStack,
>>>
>>> == Backgrou
I can't imagine this being run on all check jobs everywhere.
Right, we don't want to waste Infra resources, that's why I started
this discussion to see if it's really worth it and get the feedback
from our community.
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
___
quot;
If a CI job is breaking because of a patch, deployment tools folks
would look at the CI job and tell to the project why it fails, who
would decide if whether or not it's a blocker (ie: indeed, the patch
is breaking backward compatibility, or no, the patch is good,
installer has to
we did an outstanding job over
the last weeks to respect this schedule. Big kudos to the team here
:-)
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Please read Doug's email:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105266.html
>
> I think it ma
rking on it but obviously
this proposal should be open to Big Tent projects that also deploy
OpenStack.
Please give any feedback, and let's make OpenStack testing stronger!
Thanks for reading so far,
[1] https://github.com/openstack/puppet-openstack-integration
[2] https://review.openstack.org/
il in private to make sure your
session is well prepared: what problem we need to solve, what outcome
do we expect.
Please take some time to finish it as soon as you can before the
Summit: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-tripleo
Any question or feedback is welcome,
Thanks,
--
Emilien M
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> I would like to request for some space dedicated to TripleO project
>> for the first OpenStack PTG.
>>
>> https://www.openstack.org/ptg/
>>
>> The event will happen in Febru
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Emilien Ma
w it prior the Summit, so we can have a productive
"Growing the team" session in Barcelona.
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
Greetings,
I would like to request for some space dedicated to TripleO project
for the first OpenStack PTG.
https://www.openstack.org/ptg/
The event will happen in February 2017 during the next PTG in Atlanta.
Any feedback is welcome,
--
Emilien Macchi
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items
Tomorrow, we'll focus on Newton final release schedule, and OpenStack Summit.
See you tomorrow!
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
eople can still continue to use:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tripleo/rc3+status:open
To make reviews easier.
Let me know if any question or feedback,
Thanks and happy week-end!
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Last reminder before RC3 release that will be proposed o
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Emilien Macchi
__
stions,
> Paul
>
> [1] http://softwarefactory-project.io/
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> h
Last reminder before RC3 release that will be proposed on Friday
morning (eastern time):
- use tripleo/rc3 Gerrit topic
- please backport rc3 bugfixes merged in master into stable/newton
- please let me know any blocker
Thanks,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> We h
.
Thanks for the people who were involved in that process, big kudos here.
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
ne, any feedback is welcome here.
Thanks for your openness, very appreciated here.
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscr
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> On 10/3/2016 10:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm actually proposing to run TripleO multinode job in Nova experimental
>> jobs:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381322/
>> It's no
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> On 10/3/2016 10:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm actually proposing to run TripleO multinode job in Nova experimental
>> jobs:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381322/
>> It's no
the question was directed at me, so
> I'll answer.
( I didn't ask for it but Clay Gerrard did. I also gave my insights,
waiting for others previous PTL, like you, to give thoughts too. )
> ________
> From: Emilien Macchi
> Sent: Monday, Octo
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Make sure it works outside Devstack.
>>>
>>&g
ed of contributing in Puppet OpenStack. Feel free to reach us
if you're interested to work on it.
In any case, we'll probably clean-up deprecations during early Ocata
and update deprecated options during the cycle.
Feedback is welcome,
--
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Make sure it works outside Devstack.
>>
>> There is a huge gap between what is tested by Devstack gate and what
>> operato
I confirm the issue should be solved by the packaging fix, I've seen
OVB jobs passing CI now :-)
I closed the bug, please let me know if you still see some errors in our gate.
Thanks,
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> A bit of investigation drove me to a new de
it tonight if I see that it pass all CI jobs, and give a
status update here before end of day.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't investigated yet (I'll probably look over the week-end), but
> I found out that all OVB jobs running in our s
ight hit a packaging bug or something
backported upstream in stable:newton.
Any help on this one is very welcome,
Thanks!
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstac
, we'll proceed to final RC, any question or feedback is
welcome, please let me or shardy know any critical blockers we might
have missed.
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage qu
ewton, we'll have stable/newton based on latest Newton RC.
Any question or feedback is highly welcome,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstac
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Emilien Macchi
ry wrote:
>> +1 from me, David is doing an awesome job in p-o-i =)
>>
>> 2016-09-28 13:08 GMT-03:00 Rich Megginson :
>>>
>>> On 09/28/2016 10:06 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Until now, we had no specific team for dealing with Puppet
ments
- openstack/tripleo-ui
I would ask our group to carefully backport things into stable/newton
if it fix a Critical or High bug reported in Launchpad.
Tomorrow, I'll take care of moving remaining bugs to ocata-1 with
backport-potential tag.
Thanks,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Emil
we would include existing Puppet
OpenStack core groups into it), and also include David into it.
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
RC2 deadline),
we might need to request RC3 next week, if possible.
Reminder: stable/newton will be created when RC2 is out (likely
tomorrow or Friday).
Any feedback is welcome,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development
uld be honored to serve as a TC member.
Thank you for your consideration,
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/066544.html
[2]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/103372.html
--
Emilien Macchi
__
but I've
> tidied that up anyway.
>
> Let me know if I'm missed anything else.
It's all perfect now, thanks a lot!
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for
7;ve removed all of the old branches on the specified repos and created tags
> in their place. Let me know if there are any problems.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> Greatings Infra,
>>
>> This is an
remove all branches before Kilo (Kilo was already removed).
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
, that would be helpful, otherwise we'll have to bisect testing locally
> or derive it from scraping our dstat data from CI run logs.
>
> Steve.
Steve, I dropped a comment in your Heat bug report, that might be
related to our CI problem:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1626675/comm
So this is happening:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374395/
Any feedback in the review is welcome!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today Puppet OpenStack CI is running unit and
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 09/19/2016 10:49 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> (adding puppet tag for cross project session).
>>
>> Let's continue to prepare TripleO sessions.
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Cody Herriges wrote:
>
> On September 21, 2016 at 03:49:58, Giulio Fidente (gfide...@redhat.com)
> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/19/2016 10:49 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> (adding puppet tag for cross project session).
>>
>&g
very important, please take some time when you can to
look at the schedule, so we can have productive sessions in Barcelona.
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Antoine Cabot wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Thierry Carrez
>>> wrote:
>>>> 1. If you have a *hard* conflict that I failed to
were waiting a bit more than
usual to reduce the amount of backports between now and final release:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/371965/
Thanks a lot,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> Quick follow-up on releases.
>>
>> The team should currently focus on:
>>
>> 1) https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tripleo/rc1 - features w
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just a quick update about our plans to release Newton rc1 and final.
> I'm preparing rc1 patches:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:puppet/9.3.0
> Feel free to review.
>
> We'll likely rel
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Quick follow-up on releases.
>
> The team should currently focus on:
>
> 1) https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tripleo/rc1 - features what
> we want before tagging rc1.
> 2) https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone
, good job
>>
>> 2016-09-15 17:44 GMT+03:00 Matt Fischer :
>>>
>>> +1 to all. Thanks for your work guys!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Emilien Macchi
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> While our group keeps moving,
tps://review.openstack.org/#/c/371719/
Consider this release stable if you plan to deploy Ceph Jewel.
Any question, feedback, is highly welcome.
Enjoy the week-end!
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not fo
penStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Emilien Macchi
__
eated, stable/newton branch is also created,
so please take care of backporting your patch merged in master that
you think we need in stable branch.
Thanks everyone, we're almost there! Keep going :-)
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We'r
CI and set the ci & alert tags.
Thanks, and let's keep focusing on Newton release!
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a heads-up before end of day:
>>
>>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a heads-up before end of day:
>
> 1) multinode job is failing 80% of time. James and myself did some
> attempts to revert or fix things but we have been unfortunate until
> now.
> Everything i
is not here yet, please keep doing consistent work, help
in bug triage, maintain stable CI, doing good reviews, improve our
documentation, etc.
As usual, Puppet OpenStack core team is free to -1 / +1 the proposal.
Thanks,
--
ld understanding of the broader TripleO system - as
>discussed above subsystem experts are a good thing, but we also need
>to see some appreciation of the broader Tripleo archticture &
>interfaces (all the folks above have demonstrated solid knowledge of one
>
ou're able to jump in and
make progress on it, this downtime is very critical at this stage of
the cycle.
Any help is highly welcome.
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questio
uld greatly appreciate 2fb and 2-3wr.
> Many thanks in advance!
> Eran
In PuppetOpenStack we have:
1fb 2wr
And I'm really not sure we'll use them all:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-puppet
As you can see, we don't have much topics now, so I'm
nd upgrade work) from
master to stable/newton.
See more details about release schedule:
https://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html#n-finalrc
Any feedback or question is more than welcome,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenSt
t
> week!
>
> 2016-09-05 15:39 GMT-03:00 Iury Gregory :
>>
>> Hi Puppeteers,
>>
>> If you have any topic to add for this week, please use the etherpad:
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20160906
>>
>> See you
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> Hopefully Heïkel was also online :-)
>>
>> Here's the short term workaround: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/2186/
>> For long term, we need to b
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hopefully Heïkel was also online :-)
>
> Here's the short term workaround: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/2186/
> For long term, we need to backport what we want from master to
> tripleoclient, specially all the re
/2016-August/102205.html
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/ma
been merged
since August 30th, please backport it to stable/newton.
Thanks,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> So I found the reason, python-tripleoclient looks like downgraded in
> RDO since yesterday. See the bug report for more context.
>
> I investigated all
27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> I'm not sure how yet but it looks like
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/315679/ broke CI (even if it passed
> jobs).
> I'm seeing a high number of failures all related to this error:
>
> 6:19:49.979948 | Deploying templates in the directo
tinue tomorrow. Please use this
bug report if you have any thoughts.
Thanks,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:uns
10, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> Emilien,
>
> Great work over the past 18 months, it was a pleasure to work with you.
> Thanks for all you've done!
>
> -amrith
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Emilien Macchi [mailto:emil...@redhat.co
-2/var/log/aodh/evaluator.txt.gz#_2016-09-09_13_05_23_261
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.open
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Cody Herriges wrote:
> On September 9, 2016 at 9:08:56 AM, Emilien Macchi (emil...@redhat.com)
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a little blog post about the last cycle in PuppetOpenStack:
> http://my1.fr/blog/puppet-openstack-achievements-durin
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:15 PM, gordon chung wrote:
> mec, great work trying to make the stuff we build work and telling us to
> make it less broken.
>
> so we play ping pong now?
not really: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367386/
> On 09/09/16 12:05 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
L this time.
Sorry, but I'll keep bother you for long time :-P
> 2016-09-09 19:05 GMT+03:00 Emilien Macchi :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wrote a little blog post about the last cycle in PuppetOpenStack:
>> http://my1.fr/blog/puppet-openstack-achievements-during-newton-cy
CI is broken ;-)
Again, a big thank you for those who work with me,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> I'm writing this email because it's end of day for me and I want our
> community know the status of our CI.
>
> I spent my day trying to bring our CI back and we found new blockers
> almost at every hour:
>
s. Any
help from Puppetlabs is welcome.
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-
r | Openstack RDO
>
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> What's up in upgrades?
>>
>> 1) Undercloud: Mitaka to Newton
>>
>> We just approved a patch in openstack-infra/tripleo-ci that test
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> What's up in upgrades?
>
> 1) Undercloud: Mitaka to Newton
>
> We just approved a patch in openstack-infra/tripleo-ci that test
> undercloud upgrades.
> I don't think we should make it vote as for now it
can easily iterate later.
3) Overcloud: Newton to Newton
I'm working on a simple patch that would test updates from Newton to
Newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351330/ like we had with OVB
jobs but this time using multinode.
Any feedback, help, is
; Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage q
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 05:48 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>>>>
>>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>>> > However, the current
quot;, but just some feedback I would like to share here.
My 2 cents,
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
was the only project in the
> openstack-infra namespace belonging to an official team other than
> Infra.
>
> In that case, as an interested (transitive) core reviewer on that
> repo, I heartily agree. ;)
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> ______
to help you to
get a Puppet module in OpenStack.
> --
> Regards,
> Qasim Sarfraz
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?su
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Emilien Macchi
___
help on this thing would be awesome, Thanks
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
jectif-libre.com
> Infrastructure et Formations Linux
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.ope
iption
- For now, we're using pingtest to test that services actually work. I
guess it's good for now, but we also might want to consider Tempest
sometimes. I know Tempest already runs on periodic jobs, but should we
also consider it in those multinode jobs? The feedback would be
valuable
fix, I don't think adding more bits in the stack will help.
As a retrospective for next time, I suggest to start the work at the
beginning of the cycle so we stop pushing-all-we-can at the end of
cycles.
My 2 cents again.
--
Emilien Macchi
__
pdate launchpad for you.
On behalf of TripleO bugs supervisors : merci :-)
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> This e-mail is addressed to TripleO developers interested by helping
> in bug triage.
> If you already subscribed to TripleO bugs notifications
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Emilien Macchi
No topic this week, meeting cancelled!
See you next week :)
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you have any topic to add for this week, please use the etherpad:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20160830
>
>
ions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Cody Herriges wrote:
>
> On August 18, 2016 at 05:12:56, Emilien Macchi (emil...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Note:
>> - Ops summit on Tuesday morning until 4pm
>> - Cross-project workshops from Tuesday 4pm to Wednesday 4pm
o do this
>> can be identified then it would be good investigate.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> __________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@l
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:17:16AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> This is a quick release update:
>>
>> - We're currently R-6, "Final release for non-client libraries".
>> - Next week will be R-5
701 - 800 of 1369 matches
Mail list logo
