[openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it?

Hi, I recently reviewed a patch [1] that is trying to address an issue with ironic (master) talking to a ramdisk that has a mitaka IPA lurking around. It made me think that IPA may no longer be a teenager (yay, boo). IPA now has a stable branch. I think it is time it grows up and acts

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] looking for documentation liaison

Hi, Thank you Vlad and Jay for volunteering! Neither of you love documentation, but Jay is “very willing”, so Jay wins :D --ruby On 2016-05-31, 1:23 PM, "Loo, Ruby" <ruby@intel.com> wrote: >Hi, > >We¹re looking for a documentation liaison [1]. If you love (Œl

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are stoked to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 23 May 2016) - Ironic: 204 bugs (+12) + 178 wishlist items. 8 new (+8), 138 in progress, 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it?

ge questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it? 2 июня 2016 г. 10:19 PM пользователь "Loo, Ruby" <ruby@intel.com> написал: > > Hi, > > I recently reviewed a patch [1] th

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] process for making decisions?

Hi Jim, Thanks for responding. >If we do think we need a formal process for making decisions as you >define above, I think it should be something like: > >* bring it up on the mailing list >* someone /must/ propose a solution along the way, in gerrit, perhaps > the person that started the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly sub team status report

Hi, We are thrilled to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 6 June 2016) - Ironic: 213 bugs (+9) + 182 wishlist items (+4). 15 new (+7), 147 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] simple patches requiring only one +2/+A

Hi, There was a short discussion on IRC a few minutes ago [1] about when it would be acceptable for a patch to be approved with one +2 (as opposed to two +2s). The few of us that commented (I think all are cores in one or several ironic projects) agreed that it would be good to do that, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][ironic][nova] When Nova should mark instance as successfully deleted?

Hi, >But the issue here is just capacity. Whether or not we keep an instance >in a deleting state, or when we release quota, doesn't change the >Tempest failures from what I can tell. The suggestions below address >that. > > >> >> > > > >> > > > I think we should go with #1, but instead of

[openstack-dev] [ironic] looking for documentation liaison

Hi, We¹re looking for a documentation liaison [1]. If you love (Œlike¹ is also acceptable) documentation, care that ironic has great documentation, and would love to volunteer, please let us know. The position would require you to: - attend the weekly doc team meetings [2] (or biweekly,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing two new cores

Jim, Thanks for the proposal. +2 +A. Err, +2 :) --ruby On 2016-06-16, 11:12 AM, "Jim Rollenhagen" > wrote: Both Sam and Jay are to the point where I consider their +1 or -1 as highly as any other core, so I think it's past time to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic Newton midcycle sprint summary

Thanks Mathieu, that is a great summary! It is much easier than trying to figure that out from the etherpad [1] notes. --ruby [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-midcycle On 2016-06-23, 3:08 PM, "Mathieu Mitchell" > wrote:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] next week's meeting is cancelled

Hi, Quite a few people will be away next Monday (July 4), due to a US holiday (and other reasons), so we decided to cancel the ironic meeting. The next meeting [1] will be on Monday, July 11. --ruby [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Next_Meeting

[openstack-dev] [ironic] mid cycle feedback

Hi, Now that we've all had a chance to recover from the mid-cycle last week and while it is still fresh in your minds (or am I too late?), I was wondering whether you had any feedback about the mid-cycle. What worked for you, what didn't. I am especially interested in knowing what can be

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are upbeat to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 13 June 2016) - Ironic: 207 bugs (-6) + 191 wishlist items (+9). 12 new (-3), 140 in progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] usage of ironic-lib

Ooo, thanks for that data point Pavlo! Thanks Lucas, Sam, Shivanand and Pavlo for commenting. From the replies, it seems like the original intent of ironic-lib was to solely be used by ironic and ironic-python-agent projects. But that doesn’t seem to have been communicated properly (because I

[openstack-dev] [ironic] process for making decisions?

Hi, I think it would be good if we came up with some general guidelines wrt the processes by which decisions are made. By ³decisions², I mean decisions that we, as a community, will try to abide by ? I have noticed in the past, that discussions in the mailing list (ML) sometimes peter out

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] usage of ironic-lib

ananda van der Veen wrote: >> On 05/16/2016 07:14 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: >> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> A patch to ironic-lib made me wonder about what is our supported u

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly sub team status report

Hi, We are rambunctious to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 16 May 2016) - Ironic: 192 bugs (+2) + 178 wishlist items (+1). 0 new, 138 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] deprecations

Hi ironic’ers, I thought we had decided that we would follow the standard deprecation process [1], but I see that ironic isn’t tagged with that [2]. Although we have documented guidelines wrt deprecations [3]. But I am not sure we’ve been good about sending out email about deprecations. Does

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [OpenstackClient] deprecations

for the duplicate email. ‹ruby On 2016-05-11, 11:46 AM, "Jim Rollenhagen" <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: >On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:35:12PM +, Loo, Ruby wrote: >> Hi ironic¹ers, >> >> I thought we had decided that we would follow the standard

[openstack-dev] [ironic][openstackclient] deprecation process

Hi OpenStackClient folks, Ironic is following the standard deprecation process [1]. We added an OSC plugin and realized that we didn’t get the commands quite right. This patch [2] adds the right commands and deprecates the wrong ones. My question is what the deprecation process might be. Since

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][openstackclient] deprecation process

tackclient/blob/b4c3adbd308e65679489c4c64680cbe0324f4bc7/openstackclient/volume/v1/volume.py#L53-L63 On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com<mailto:ruby@intel.com>> wrote: Hi OpenStackClient folks, Ironic is following the standard deprecation process [1].

[openstack-dev] [ironic] usage of ironic-lib

Hi, A patch to ironic-lib made me wonder about what is our supported usage of ironic-lib. Or even the intent/scope of it. This patch changes a method, ‘bootable’ parameter is removed and ‘boot_flag’ parameter is added [1]. If this library/method is used by some out-of-tree thing (or even some

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly sub team status report

Hi, We are quick to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 9 May 2016): - Ironic: 190 bugs (0) + 177 wishlist items (+4). 0 new (-17), 134 in progress (+1),

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle: virtual or physical?

The poll closes Sunday night/Monday morning. Ie, whenever Jim gets around to looking at the numbers Monday (May 16) morning, before our weekly ironic meeting :) ‹ruby On 2016-05-09, 6:24 PM, "Jim Rollenhagen" wrote: >Hey all, > >In this morning's meetings we

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are xenodochial to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 11 July 2016) - dtantsur on PTO, no stats from me this week Network isolation

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are wriggly to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 11 July 2016) - Ironic: 201 bugs (+4) + 201 wishlist items (+4). 13 new (+3), 145 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are veracious to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 27 June 2016) - Ironic: 197 bugs (-10) + 197 wishlist items (+6). 10 new (-2), 142 in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] why do we need setting network driver per node?

Thanks Devananda and Dmitry and Sam! From my point of view, I wanted to make sure that: 1. we agreed on whether the 'network_interface' was, or was not, an interface that was similar to the existing power, deploy, ... interfaces so that it fit into the driver composition work 2. we agreed on

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are zealous to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - no update - dtantsur is out sick today Network isolation (Neutron/Ironic work) (jroll, TheJulia, devananda)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] How should ironic and related project names be written?

Honestly, I don't think it matters what we use in our specifications, since specifications are not public documents. Personally, in specifications, I am fine with any of the proposed because they are all understandable! IF we have to decide on something or if we want some preferred ways, then

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Driver composition defaults call

Hi Julia, Thanks for discussing with Sam and sending out this email. I like the 5 steps described below! --ruby On 2016-08-11, 1:37 PM, "Julia Kreger" > wrote: Yesterday as a group (jroll, rloo, dtantsur, matt128, devananda,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 1 Aug 2016 and 15 Aug 2016) - Ironic: 232 bugs (+16) + 199 wishlist items (-5). 36 new (+15), 160 in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi, I don't like the new one. I think Lucas captured it nicely. I prefer our PixieBoots. Jim, do you remember what our choices are? Could we use PixieBoots? --ruby From: Lucas Alvares Gomes Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are freewheeling to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. Continue

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jittery to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. nova patch for

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jovial to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. Continue

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] End-of-Ocata core team updates

Vasyl + Mario: definitely +2. Just like the rest of us, they aren't experts in everything, but we trust them and us to review and +2 based on our degree of confidence etc! Looking forward to them relieving the load :) Devananda. Unfortunately, +2 but I'd rather do a -2. This makes me so sad. I

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are feverish to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. Clean up

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi Heidi, I'm happy with the proposed logo. As far as the "kiss" style face painting goes, I don't like it. But that is because I am not a fan of KISS or their music. Having said that, I can understand why people would like it and why it fits with ironic, so I am fine if it is used :) Thank

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jubilant to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. nova code for

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 15 Aug 2016 and 22 Aug 2016) - Ironic: 223 bugs (-9) + 211 wishlist items (+12). 26 new (-10), 164 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ideas for Ocata summit sessions

Hi, Start getting those ironic juices flowing! We've got an etherpad [1] ready to capture your ideas for the Ocata summit sessions. As discussed in today's meeting [2], in next Monday's ironic meeting [3] we will decide on the number of fishbowl and workroom sessions, and the ideas submitted

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are fascinated to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. PTG summary

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 22 Aug 2016 and 29 Aug 2016) - Ironic: 234 bugs (+11) + 214 wishlist items (+3). 33 new (+7), 170 in progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][OpenStackClient] two openstack commands for the same operation?

f.cc<mailto:j...@jvf.cc>> wrote: On Aug 29, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Dean Troyer <dtro...@gmail.com<mailto:dtro...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com<mailto:ruby@intel.com>> wrote: I did this because 'passthrough'

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] should we provide 'ironic node-list --chassis' and 'ironic port-list --node' commands?

, so maybe having both of them is fine. Vlad On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com<mailto:ruby@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, While working on the openstackclient plugin commands for ironic, I was thinking about the equivalents for 'ironic chassis-node-list'

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 29 Aug 2016 and 12 Sep 2016) - Ironic: 255 bugs (+21) + 213 wishlist items (-1). 41 new (+8), 181 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 16 Sep 2016 and 26 Sep 2016) - Ironic: 195 bugs (+9) + 216 wishlist items (+1). 0 new (-1), 159 in progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] install guide has moved

Hi Andreas, Because you asked so nicely, tada: http://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/baremetal/newton/ Also, thanks for clarifying about ../draft/.. ! --ruby From: Andreas Jaeger Organization: SUSE Linux GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 12 Sep 2016 and 16 Sep 2016) - Ironic: 186 bugs (-69) + 215 wishlist items (+2). 1 new (-40), 145 in

[openstack-dev] [ironic][OpenStackClient] two openstack commands for the same operation?

Hi, In ironic, we have these ironic CLI commands: - ironic node-vendor-passthru (calls the specified passthru method) - ironic node-get-vendor-passthru-methods (lists the available passthru methods) For their corresponding openstackclient plugin commands, we (I, I guess) have proposed [1]: -

[openstack-dev] [ironic] should we provide 'ironic node-list --chassis' and 'ironic port-list --node' commands?

Hi, While working on the openstackclient plugin commands for ironic, I was thinking about the equivalents for 'ironic chassis-node-list' (nodes that are part of specified chassis) and 'ironic-node-port-list' (ports that are part of specified node). It didn't make sense to me to have an

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Driver removal policies - should we make it softer?

Hi, I admit, I didn't read the entire thread [0], but did read the summary [1]. I like this, except that I'm not sure about #3. What's the rationale of adding a new config option 'enable_unsupported_drivers' that defaults to False. Versus not having it, and "just" logging a warning if they are

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Summit session planning

Also, as part of this reminder. If you add a proposal to the etherpad, please put your name/NIC next to it so we know who added it/is going to lead it. Bruno, I added your name to #12 & 13 :) Thanks, --ruby From: Jim Rollenhagen Reply-To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] base node payload for notification

Hi Yuriy, Thanks for bringing this up. I'm good with your list, with the exception of driver_info and instance_info. I'm on the fence with these two. If we assume that any secrets will be bleep'd out (configdrives won't be there), is there other information there that might be useful? I'm not

[openstack-dev] [ironic] install guide has moved

Hi, Thanks to the huge efforts put in by Mathieu Mitchell (mat128) and Jay Faulkner (JayF), we've moved ironic's install guide from the developer documentation to the official openstack site [1]. Isn't it a beauty? :D Please update your bookmarks to point to the new location, and help us

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 26 Sep 2016 and 03 Oct 2016) - Ironic: 205 bugs (+10) + 212 wishlist items (-4). 6 new (+6), 169 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, We are nonchalant to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 31 Oct 2016 and 07 Nov 2016) - Ironic: 233 bugs + 218 wishlist items (+7). 33 new, 180 in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Core team updates

Chris and Haomeng, thanks for your past reviews and I look forward to your return to the core team. For the folks that are clearly reviewing far more than others, what do you think about asking them not to review so much? I'd vote for that :) --ruby From: Jim Rollenhagen

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Summit schedule is set

Hello ironic'ers, For the design sessions to be as productive as possible, please prepare beforehand so that the sessions are spent discussing and coming up with solutions/consensus, instead of describing and getting folks up-to-speed on the issues. Feel free to add your comments directly in

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 10 Oct 2016 and 17 Oct 2016) - Ironic: 224 (+8) bugs + 209 wishlist items (-3). 23 new (+8), 171 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] next meeting is a spooky one

Hi, Since the Barcelona summit is next week, the Monday (Oct 24) ironic meeting is cancelled. We'll have a spooky meeting the week after (Oct 31). Feel free to come in costumes :) --ruby __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are nonpareil in presenting this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1.

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are nonplussed to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. portgroup:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ending the API meetings

Hi, We are ending the ironic API meetings that we started in July [0]. There were few AND mighty meetings. I thank Devananda for an awesome job of addressing some major API pain points in his epic "Evolving our REST API" series of specifications [1]! Now we need to follow his lead and get

[openstack-dev] feedback Re: [ironic] ocata summit summary

Hi, Thanks for the great summary Jim! As an aside (or in addition to this?), we (or maybe I should speak for myself only) am always interested in constructive feedback and suggestions on how we (as a community) can improve. If you have ideas on how we can improve the design sessions at the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are nerdy to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. NEW! Starting today, we will also include the week's priorities (also available from the whiteboard[0]). The priorities are decided at Monday's

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weakly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 17 Oct 2016 and 31 Oct 2016) - Ironic: 233 bugs (+9) + 211 wishlist items (+2). 33 new (+10), 175 in

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, Here is this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff between 03 Oct 2016 and 10 Oct 2016) - Ironic: 216 bugs (+11) + 212 wishlist items. 15 new (+9), 173 in progress (+4),

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are dazzled to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. attach/detach:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down as PTL after this cycle

Jim, (Now that the shock has worn off). Thanks for being such a great PTL. I very much appreciated what you did/do as PTL! And welcome back to the land of coding, etc. :) --ruby From: Jim Rollenhagen Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] cancelled Re: [ironic] Ironic-qa meeting canceled this week (Nov 23rd)

Hi, In Monday's ironic meeting [1], we decided to cancel the QA meetings. --ruby [1] from 17:49:21, http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2016/ironic.2016-11-28-17.00.log.html From: Jim Rollenhagen Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are dumbfounded to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. portgroup:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jazzy to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. attach/detach:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] python-ironicclient weird behaviour

From: Maxime Belanger Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 9:32 AM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" Subject:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are delighted to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Retiring ironic-webclient

Thanks Julia. --ruby From: Julia Kreger Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Monday, December 19, 2016 at 2:34 PM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org"

[openstack-dev] [ironic] volunteers for cross project liaisons

Hi, The ironic community is looking for volunteers to be cross-project liaisons [1] for these projects: - oslo - logging working group - i18n The expectations are documented in [1] on a per-project basis. The amount of commitment varies depending on the project (and I don't know what that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] volunteers for cross project liaisons

ve me an opportunity to become more active within the Ironic community. I have worked with multiple OpenStack projects in prior jobs and have a few connections within the Oslo community. This would give me valuable experience learning more about the Oslo project and I believe I have the time commitmen

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] volunteers for cross project liaisons

Hi Jay, That makes a lot of sense and thank YOU for being the i18n liaison! :D --ruby On 2017-03-15, 11:18 AM, "Jay Faulkner" <j...@jvf.cc> wrote: > On Mar 15, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] volunteers for cross project liaisons

e me valuable experience learning more about the Oslo project and I believe I have the time commitment to take this on. Thanks, Rushil On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com<mailto:ruby@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, The ironic community is look

[openstack-dev] cancelled Re: [ironic] Ironic review party invitation

Hi, Effective immediately and indefinitely (or err in 10 minutes :)), the Ironic review parties have been cancelled. It was the best kept secret but frowned upon when discovered. Too much partying and drinking you know. [I am just kidding!] If someone wants to resume this or do something

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Pike PTG report

Thanks Dmitry for the great report! If you want your comment(s) to be available to the ironic community, please respond here, not in Dmitry's blog. (Or, to rephrase it a different way, if you have comments that you don't want me to know about, please respond in Dmitry's blog :)) Many thanks to

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ironickers and mascot at Pike PTG (or "where's Waldo?")

Dmitry, our fearless PTL, looks like the tallest person in the group. Is that what happens when you become PTL, or is it a requirement to be PTL? :) Many thanks to that organized and took this picture at the Pike PTG:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are meditative to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1.

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are magnanimous to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. PTG

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] OpenStack client default ironic API version

On 2017-03-06, 3:46 PM, "Mario Villaplana" wrote: Hi ironic, At the PTG, an issue regarding the default version of the ironic API used in our python-openstackclient plugin was discussed. [0] In short, the issue is that we default to a very old API

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Volume meeting?

Hi Julia, Thanks for asking! I'm agnostic about whether the BFV meeting should use the same day/time as the ironic-neutron meeting was. As long as people who are/will be attending this meeting are fine with the date/time, I'm fine too :) I would actually prefer that the date/times are chosen

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic]HP proliant create logical drive not according to the target_raid_config

Hi, I suggest either providing more information so someone may be able to help you here, or go onto irc, #openstack-ironic, and ask for help there. --ruby From: 王俊 Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] another ironic-stable-maint update proposal

Definitely, +1 to add Julia. That's unanimous from the team! How do we get you to have ACL (or do PTLs not get ACL?) Jim Roll..., who's that guy? :-( --ruby From: Dmitry Tantsur Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [ironic] gate status for 3rd party CI

Hi, In yesterday's meetup, we discussed how we could help 3rd party CI become all green (ie, not fail). One of the suggestions was to have the gate status available. Among other things, this would help developers know whether they should (or shouldn't) ignore gate failures for 3rd party CI.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Resigning as a core reviewer

Hi Jay, I'm so SAD to see you go, especially in these circumstances :-( The first time I met you was when you three Js waltzed (err, walked) into the ironic mid-cycle with your IPA proposal. It is the end of an era. We've had some great times; I'll miss your opinions, especially wrt specs :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Thank you Heidi! > Long live Pixie Boots! May (s)he reign forever :D --ruby From: Heidi Joy Tretheway Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, April 21, 2017 at 6:02 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers core cleanup and additions

I agree whether I have a vote or not ;) Thanks Dmitry! --ruby From: Dmitry Tantsur Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 5:24 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Stepping down from core

Hi Lucas, This is a big loss for our community (but lucky OVS/OVN projects!) It has been awesome to work with you over the years. I'll always treasure the friendship we have! I know you're still around but it won't be the same; I'll miss you :-( So long core, and thanks for the fish, although

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSC][ironic][mogan][nova] mogan and nova co-existing

Hi Zhenguo (and others), is there a description/email thread/documentation about how mogan and nova co-exists in the same cloud? In particular, will it be possible for mogan and nova (with ironic driver) to run? Is this something that we will recommend or not recommend or not mention? Because

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSC][ironic][mogan] Can we share the same keyword 'baremetal'?

Hi Zhenguo, Thanks for bringing this up. Naming is hard :-( Maybe this is a dumb question but your phrase "We copied nova's server resource concept here, so users may easily to accept the 'baremetal server'" made me wonder. I'm not a user of Mogan so I don't know if this would work, but OSC

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Goodbye^W See you later

I was hoping that if I ignored this, it wouldn't be true. Who am I kidding... sigh... sob... Good bye Jim, last of the Js (Josh, Jay) from Rackspace, thank you for IPA, for sacrificing yourself and being PTL, for sacrificing yourself and talking to the nova folks :-), and for everything else

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] ironic-stable-maint update proposal

+1 to all and more sighs. I wish I didn't have to be added. Can't we make people stay? :) --ruby From: Julia Kreger Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 5:57

  1   2   >