[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.17.1

The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: Release of python-glanceclient version 0.17.1 Please find the details related to the release at: https://launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+milestone/0.17.1 Please report the issues through launchpad: https:/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Open glance-drivers to all glance-cores

Hello all, With all due respect to all the Glance core-reviewers (who are doing an excellent job, by the way), please NO. First reaction that came to my mind after reading the title: What might be the thinking behind this, what is the direction this is driving the project towards, what’s next,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters

: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters On 21/04/15 14:39 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >This is a good idea. We recently removed a unique constraint that may result >into some queries being ver

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters

This is a good idea. We recently removed a unique constraint that may result into some queries being very slow especially those that involve "name" property. I would recommend sketching out a spec that identifies potential full table scans especially for queries that join over image_properties t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Using project-specific channels for official meetings (was: Proposing changes in Rally meetings)

+1 : That's a great insight into efficient cross-project communication. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Boris Pavlovic Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 11:38 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Using project-specific channels for offici

[openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Candidacy

er review speed and start implementing the rotation policy for core reviewers. I have enjoyed working with all the Glance contributors and have learned a lot while serving as PTL for Kilo. I'd appreciate the opportunity to apply what I've learned to the Liberty release. Thanks for your conside

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] zero downtime conf/kilo

Thanks for your (everyone involved) effort on this! Do we have documented bugs for getting these patches merged? We're in a RC window so better to have explicit indication (possibly using bugs) of what's going; this would help the core reviewers to verify and adhere to the freeze guidelines. P

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Applying patch in bug #1414725 while string freeze in place

Please direct this query to documentation and i18n lists [1, 2, 3] and include the response (if any) as a comment on the review so that the core reviewers are aware. Thanks for bringing this up and helping in contributing to the project! [1] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/o

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.17.0

The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: Release of python-glanceclient version 0.17.0 Please find the details related to the release at: https://launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+milestone/v0.17.0 Please report the issues through launchpad: https:/

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] glance_store release 0.4.0

The glance_store release management team is pleased to announce: Release of glance_store version 0.4.0 Please find the details related to the release at: https://launchpad.net/glance-store/+milestone/v0.4.0 Please report the issues through launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gla

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

me. > > +1 for consistent time > > On 14/03/15 10:11, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > Here's what it looks like so far:- > > 1400UTC: 3 votes (all core reviewers) > > 1500UTC: 5 votes (one core reviewer) > > Both: 4 votes (all core reviewers) &g

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Kilo Feature Freeze Exception (FFE) Candidates.

Hi all, Please consider this announcement as an added awareness note for the status of Kilo (k-3) development. [1] shows the lists of features that we intend to land into Kilo-3. The candidates for FFE are: * Artifacts [2] * Catalog Index Service [3] * Policy Enforcer strengtheni

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

p. On 09/03/15 09:07, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > >So, the new proposal is: >Glance meetings [1] to be conducted >weekly on >Thursdays at 1400UTC [2] on >#openstack-meeting-4 __ OpenStack Development Mailing Lis

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Reviews.

Hi all (and specifically Glance cores reviewers), We are approaching a Feature Freeze and there are reviews pending on multiple features [1]. I think as Good Samaritans and members of Glance community, we'd focus our reviews on the code that is expecting our attention in due time. So, let's tr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nitpicking in code reviews

+2A :P (Daniel and Ian) Thanks, -Nikhil From: Ian Cordasco Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:59 AM To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nitpicking in code reviews On 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nitpicking in code reviews

+1 to what John said (overall). However, I think I know where Erno is coming from. We're very close to the FF and people are trying hard to get green on the check as well as ensure thoroughness of the feature; this might lead to bunch of these errors. Pointing them out and expecting to comple

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

I'd prefer to go with 1400 UTC unless there's a majority for 1500UTC. P.S. It's my feeling that ML announcements and conversations are not effective when taking poll from wider audience so we'd discuss this a bit more in the next meeting and merge the votes. Thanks, -Nikhil ___

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] glance_store release 0.3.0

The glance_store release management team is pleased to announce: glance_store version 0.3.0 has been released on Tuesday March 10th around 1755 UTC. For more information, please find the details at: https://launchpad.net/glance-store/+milestone/v0.3.0 Please report the issues through l

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

Thank you all! The nominations and the consolidation has been implemented. Cheers -Nikhil From: Nikhil Komawar Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2015 2:40 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

Hi all, Currently, we've alternating time for Glance meetings. Now, with the Daylight savings being implemented in some parts of the world, we're thinking of moving the meeting time to just one slot i.e. earlier in the day(night). This solves the original conflicting times issue that a subset

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Glance K-3 reviews.

Hi all, This is a gentle reminder on the ML regarding Kilo-3 related reviews. Similar announcements have been made in the past few weeks during the Glance meetings [2]. A small summary of what the current status looks like for k-3 Glance: 1. Feature freeze for Glance is Mar 12th. 2. [1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

_ From: Gary Kotton Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2015 11:45 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. On 3/8/15, 2:34 PM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >On 07/03/15 23:16 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

of new cores. -Hemanth. ________ From: Nikhil Komawar Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 4:04 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. Thank you all for the input outside of the program: Kyle, Ihar, Thierry, Daniel! Mike,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

Thank you all for the input outside of the program: Kyle, Ihar, Thierry, Daniel! Mike, Ian: It's a good idea to have the policy however, we need to craft one that is custom to the Glance program. It will be a bit different to ones out there as we've contributors who are dedicated to only subset

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] glance_store release 0.2.0

The glance_store release management team is pleased to announce: glance_store version 0.2.0 has been released on Friday March 6th around 20:17 UTC. For more information, please find the details at: https://launchpad.net/glance-store/+milestone/v0.2.0 Please report the issues through la

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.16.1

The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: python-glanceclient version 0.16.1 has been released on Thursday, Mar 5th around 04:56 UTC. For more information, please find the details at: https://launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+milestone/v0.16.1

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] glance_store release 0.1.12

The glance_store release management team is pleased to announce: glance_store version 0.1.12 has been released on Tuesday March 3rd around 23.51 UTC. For more information, please find the details at: https://launchpad.net/glance-store/+milestone/v0.1.12 Please report the issues through

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

I think Flavio’s proposal combined with the new members would be the right way to reinforce to momentum we’ve gained in Glance over past few months. I think it’s also the right message to send out for the new cores (including you and myself ;) ) that activity is the key to maintain such status.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [Glance] Nomination for glance-stable-maint

Thank you, Thierry! -Nikhil From: Thierry Carrez Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 10:26 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [Glance] Nomination for glance-stable-maint Nikhil Komawar wrote: > I would like

[openstack-dev] [stable] [Glance] Nomination for glance-stable-maint

Hi all, I would like to propose Zhi Yan Liu for the role of stable maintainer for Glance program. Zhi Yan is currently a Glance core member as well as a go-to person for various features in Glance. He is also handling quite well the additional responsibility of Oslo liaison for Glance. Thus,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

t; >On 24/02/15 04:38 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > >>Hi all, > >> > >>I would like to propose the following members to become part of the Glance > >>core > >>team: > >> > >>Ian Cordasco > >>Louis Taylor > >>Mike F

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Vancouver Summit: Glance Friday Sprint

Hi, For those who are interested and are planning to book travel soon, please do keep in mind that Glance team is planning to have a halfday sprint on Friday of the week of the summit. Besides, we will have fishbowl and work sessions during the week. Please feel free to reach out to me, if you

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.16.0

The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: python-glanceclient version 0.16.0 has been released on Tuesday, Feb 24th around 05:50 UTC. For more information, please find the details at: https://launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+milestone/v0.16.0 Please repor

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] glance_store release 0.1.11

The glance_store release management team is pleased to announce: glance_store version 0.1.11 has been released on Thursday Feb 19th around 23.40 UTC. For more information, please find the details at: https://launchpad.net/glance-store/v0/v0.1.11 Please report the issues through launchp

[openstack-dev] [Glance] New Glance Drivers.

Hi all, Please join me in welcoming Flavio and Ian to the Glance Drivers team. They have been doing some quality work in Glance; each of them brings in his own skill set to the team. We would be happy to rely on the two main traits of these individuals - they are aware about general workings of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project DevRef Was Re: Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

>From Glance' point of view: We can start off with the modifications needed on >top of the existing one(s). Prepare a Glance specific doc to share in a Cross >Project meeting. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Ian Cordasco [ian.corda...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesda

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Replication on image create

Hi Boden, It would be great to open up a BP/spec on this. As far as the flexibility of adding scripts to tasks is concerned, there are 2 points to be considered: 1. Glance will maintain a _published_ list of acceptable tasks. Meaning, it would be documented somewhere that a task of type "A" wo

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Gentle reminder: Glance mid-cycle meetup for Kilo.

Hi, For those of you, who might have missed my previous announcement [0], please find the venue and tentative schedule for the Glance mid-cycle meetup for Kilo cycle here [1]. It asks for your participation confirmation in the list so, if you are planning to attend please do fill out the needfu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

+1 to Flavio's proposal. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:16 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging On 09/01/15 12:11 -

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Participation count for mid-cycle meetup.

Hi all, For all those of you planning to be at the Glance kilo-mid-cycle meetup and haven't added your name to the list, please do so here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-glance-mid-cycle-meetup . We need the info for scheduling purposes. Thanks, -Nikhil _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

ge questions) > | Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging > | > | > | > | > On Jan 5, 2015, at 08:07, Nikhil Komawar > | wrote: > | > > | > Based on the feedback received, we would like to avoid logging on the > | project channel. My take from the discu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

, January 05, 2015 11:57 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging > On Jan 5, 2015, at 08:07, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > Based on the feedback received, we would like to avoid logging on the project > channel. My t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

Based on the feedback received, we would like to avoid logging on the project channel. My take from the discussion was that it gives many a folks a feeling of informal platform to express their ideas freely in contrast to the meeting channels. However, at the same time I would like to point out

[openstack-dev] [Glance] No meetings for two weeks.

Hi all, In the spirit of the holiday season, the next two meetings for Glance have been cancelled i.e. the ones on Dec 25th and Jan 1st [0]. Let's meet back on the 7th. Of couse, please feel free to ping me on IRC/email if you've any questions, concerns or suggestions. Happy holidays! [0] htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

iling List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use? I was assuming atomic increment/decrement operations, in which case I'm not sure I see the race conditions. Or is atomism assuming too much? On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:59 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

That looks like a decent alternative if it works. However, it would be too racy unless we we implement a test-and-set for such properties or there is a different job which queues up these requests and perform sequentially for each tenant. Thanks, -Nikhil From: C

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

Hi Chris, Apologies for not having heard your use case completely. From the description as well as the information you've provided; it is my recommendation to use a protected property in Glance for the Image entity that is in use. You can then use it in the service of your choice (Nova, Cinder)

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

+1 Thanks, -Nikhil From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 4:33 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use? On 12/16/2014 04:23 PM, Chris St. Pierre wr

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

Don't care either way, let's be consistent with other projects and raise this concern in next weekly cross-project meeting [1] to see what "all" of the projects mutually agree on. If there is no consensus, let's stick to what we have. @Louis: Can you please add that to the agenda of the cross-p

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Proposal for new Glance core reviewers

Hi all, Please consider this email as a nomination for Erno and Alex (CC) for adding them to the list of Glance core reviewers. Over the last cycle, both of them have been doing good work with reviews, participating in the project discussions as well as taking initiatives to creatively improve

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Weekly-meeting time change.

Hi all, Happy Thanksgiving (in advance)! The meeting on Nov. 27th has been cancelled duly. So, we will be having the next meeting on Thursday, December 4th at 1400UTC. The meeting after will be on Dec 11th at 1500 UTC. (channel: #openstack-meeting-4 ) Please find the new alternating time slots

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Parallels loopback disk format support

It would be good to have a small BP for bookkeeping purposes to the very least. (If you ping me on IRC when this is ready, promise to make this less painful). The idea being a good way to "publish" the image formats supported by Glance. Besides, this calls for Opt and Doc change which shall be r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][stable] Review request

This patch is a bit different as it is not a straightforward cherry-pick from the commit in master (that fixes the bug). So, it seemed like a good idea to start the discussion. Nonetheless, it's my bad turning into a miscommunication where the email just became a review request; while the inten

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Parallels loopback disk format support

Hi Maxim, Thanks for showing interest in this aspect. Like nova-specs, Glance also needs a spec to be create for discussion related to the blueprint. Please try to create one here [1]. Additionally you may join us at the meeting [2] if you feel stuck or need clarifications. [1] https://github

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Poll for change in weekly meeting time.

ek's meeting on Thursday. Please let me know if you've any concerns. Thanks, -Nikhil ________ From: Nikhil Komawar Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 4:41 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Poll for change in weekly meeting time.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [glance] glance_store scheduled release 0.1.10

This is done. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Nikhil Komawar Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:23 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [stable] [glance] glance_store scheduled release 0.1.10 Hi all, Following last week's (ment

[openstack-dev] [stable] [glance] glance_store scheduled release 0.1.10

Hi all, Following last week's (mentioned) corrections to get Glance and the glance_store library come to stable state, we've got a few changes [0, 1, 2] merged. The library is set for the next release in a couple hours or so. Just wanted to give a head's up and see if there were any concerns.

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Policy file not reloaded after changes

Forgot to mention the main part - this patch should enable the auto loading of policies. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Nikhil Komawar [nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:56 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Policy file not reloaded after changes

Hi Ajaya, We'r making some progress on sync-ing the latest Oslo-incubator code in Glance. It's a little more tricky due to the property protection feature so, we've had some impedance. Please give your feedback at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127923/3 Please let me know if you've any conc

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Paris Kilo summit update on contributors' meetup on Friday

Hi, As a result of the team having outstanding questions from the summit sessions as well as discussions prior and during the summit, the contributor's meetup has some planned discussion items. The schedule is posted at the etherpad [0]. Please reach out to Brian (cc-ed) herewith for any questi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Poll for change in weekly meeting time.

] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:08 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Poll for change in weekly meeting time. Thanks for bringing this up, Nikhil. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Here's a poll [0] to f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to add reviewers requirement to the glance-specs.

FYI, this has been made effective as of earlier this week. Please be on the look out for any mysteriously failing tests in your specs... Thanks, -Nikhil From: Nikhil Komawar [nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:31 PM To: openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Poll for change in weekly meeting time.

Hi all, It was noticed in the past few meetings that the participation in the alternating time-slot of Thursday at 20 UTC (or called as "later time slot") was low. With the growing interest in Glance of developers from eastern latitudes and their involvement in meetings, please find this email

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Permissions differences for glance image-create between Icehouse and Juno

2014 4:03 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Permissions differences for glance image-create between Icehouse and Juno On 31/10/14 04:57 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >Hi Jay, > >Wanted to clarify a few things around t

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Permissions differences for glance image-create between Icehouse and Juno

Hi Jay, Wanted to clarify a few things around this: 1. are you using --is_public or --is-public option? 2. are you using stable/juno branch or it is a rc(1/2/3) from ubuntu packages? After trying out: glance image-create --is-public=True --disk-format qcow2 --container-format bare --name foo

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to add reviewers requirement to the glance-specs.

Hi, I would like to propose the requirement of 2 reviewers (at least one of them being Glance core), for a spec in order to be approved. This proposal is a step to better plan the development work and help the team prioritize on the reviews and features. The anticipation is that it will help c

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Virtual Mini-Summit

We've planned a online + IRC mini-summit for discussing Glance topics prior to the Paris summit. Please find the agenda as well as the topics which are currently included for the same in this [0] etherpad. If you've a topic in mind just for this virtual summit, please feel free to add so in the

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Summit Topics

The summit planning etherpad [0] is up and available for discussing topics specifically for Glance during the design sessions. The agenda for the contributors' meetup will be kept open. If you've more suggestions or need input on a topic which you would like to include as a part of the sessions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Granularity of policies

Eddie, +1 on glance-spec We might want to define the scope. How far are we diverging from Openstack policy structure? Are there any other use cases which need policy changes? - some questions which come to my mind. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Eddie Sheffield [eddie.s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstacl] [Glance] Container format

Adam, container-format is an essential property within Glance. Specifying 'bare' is not mandatory however, whatever applicable container-format for your deployment is necessary. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Adam Lawson [alaw...@aqorn.com] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Let's deprecate the GridFS store (Fwd: [Openstack] [Glance] GridFS Store: Anyone using it?)

Thanks for bringing this up Flavio! Let's wait another week to get some feedback. Also, we can discuss the fate of this driver in our weekly meeting to be on safe side. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, October 03, 20

[openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL candidacy

ly meeting times to accommodate the convenience of people from various time zones. Thanks for reading and I hope you will support my candidacy! [1] https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/programs.yaml#L26 -Nikhil Komawar ___ OpenSt

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]code review needed for 'changing HTTP response code on errors'

Hey Kent, Appreciate your effort and being pro-active for your patches. For future review requests please join us at the #openstack-glance channel on Freenode. Thanks, -Nikhil From: Wang, Kent [kent.w...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:20 PM To: openstac

[openstack-dev] [Glance] async workers interface design.

Hi all, There seem to be varying ideas about the worker interface design for our blueprint [https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=async-glance-workers] async-glance-workers. Fei and Zhi already have posted detailed comments on [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46117/21] htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] tasks/async workers sync up.

me kind of scrubber which deletes tasks after current_time > expires_at Please let me know if you've any questions. Thanks, -Nikhil -Original Message----- From: "Nikhil Komawar" Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 2:22pm To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" S

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Zhi Yan Liu for glance-core

+1 -Nikhil -Original Message- From: "Iccha Sethi" Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:25am To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" Subject: [openstack-dev] Nominating Zhi Yan Liu for glance-core Hey, I would like to nominate Zhi Yan Liu(lzydev) for glance core. I think Zhi has b

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Fei Long Wang for glance core

+1 -Nikhil -Original Message- From: "Iccha Sethi" Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:28am To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" Subject: [openstack-dev] Nominating Fei Long Wang for glance core Hey, I would like to nominate Fei Long Wang(flwang) for glance core. I think Fei ha

[openstack-dev] [Glance] tasks/async workers sync up.

Hi folks, I was hoping to see if you all were free sometime tomorrow (Friday) Oct 4th at 14:00 UTC to do a sync up on the patch we've had going on for async workers (full PS here:- [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46117/] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46117/ ). Venkatesh and I are worki

[openstack-dev] [Glance][Swift] Glance using swiftclient without multithreading

Hi all, It seems that glance uses swiftclient and misses out a multithreading option. [https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/store/swift.py#L574] https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/store/swift.py#L574 [https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] import task meeting 15:00 UTC Monday 26 August

It works for me and I'll have some research done on the bullet points until then. thanks, -Nikhil -Original Message- From: "Brian Rosmaita" Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 9:33am To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] import task meeting 15:00 UTC

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance Image List

you could always try using the user as an admin or an admin user itself! thanks, -Nikhil -Original Message- From: "Jacob Godin" Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 5:22pm To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" Subject: [openstack-dev] Glance Image List Hey all, Does anyone know if there

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Reviews needed: Normalize datetimes to account for tz

Hi, There is a patch in review which resolves bug [https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+bug/1195924] 1195924 - link [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35403/] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35403/. To ensure appropriate timezone offsets are considered while checking the token

<    1   2   3   4