Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] domain admin role query

'. I basically had to modify the SQL directly to do it. Any chance we can create a 2nd domain using 'admin_domain_id' via keystone-manage sync_db? -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] horizon PyPi distribution missing

integration. Everything else we do is external to OpenStack. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger ___ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] When is it okay for submitters to say 'I don't want to add tests' ?

option A for nodepool. My patch was accepted, but I didn't know where to start for adding the testsuite for the project. So, that said, if option A keeps coming up, then I think the obvious choice is development needs to refocus to take the option of the table. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Building an application a top

? Or is there another approach you recommend taking? -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger ___ OpenStack-dev mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Building an application a top

dashboard from openstack_dashboard and embed it into my app. Hopefully replacing it when upstream decides to break out identiy into its own dashboard. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter

[openstack-dev] [horizon] User registrations

back in horizon but leveraging keystone this time around. I'm actually curious to hear how people see this working since this is the next thing I need to deal with. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] User registrations

. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Purpose of SetDomainContext / UnsetDomainContext button

the domain_context to be setup on login, hence hiding external domain resources by default. But like I asked, trying to better understand the use case of the current functionality. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Purpose of SetDomainContext / UnsetDomainContext button

file for keystone that also supports a domain admin role. This will look very much like the identity management panel group does today when the domain context is set. -David Lyle -Original Message- From: Paul Belanger [mailto:paul.belan...@polybeacon.com] Sent: Saturday, December 07

Re: [openstack-dev] Help needed to resolve ImportError: No module named urllib

six.moves.urllib import parse ImportError: No module named urllib We are using python package SIX of version 1.8. Please let me know your inputs on this. Did you ever resolve this? I'm also seeing this ImportError too. -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan

Re: [openstack-dev] Help needed to resolve ImportError: No module named urllib

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:58 AM, S M, Praveen Kumar praveen-sm.ku...@hp.com wrote: Please let me know your inputs on this. Did you ever resolve this? I'm also seeing this ImportError too. Thanks to dhellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

already converging and this has zero controversy. Now, the Fedora/RDO/Suse people jumped on the idea to push packaging on the upstream infra. Great. That's socially tempting. But technically, I don't really see the point, apart from some of the infra tooling (super cool if what Paul Belanger does

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 06/09/2015 05:37 AM, Dirk Müller wrote: Hi Derek, 2015-06-09 0:34 GMT+02:00 Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com: This patch would result in 80 packaging repositories being pulled into gerrit. I personally would prefer to start with fewer but common packages between all RPM distros (is there

Re: [openstack-dev] (re)centralizing library release management

On 06/09/2015 01:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Until now we have encouraged project teams to prepare their own library releases as new versions of projects were needed. We've started running into a couple of problems with that, with releases not coming often enough, or at a bad time in the release

[openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects

Greetings, I am wondering the reason for the complementary projects listing[1] in Stackalytics? Specifically, why does stackalytics-processor import docker and cloudfoundry projects into the stats? [1] http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementarymetric=commits

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-library] Using librarian-puppet to manage upstream fuel-library modules

On 06/23/2015 01:51 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: Hello everyone, I took some time this morning to write out a document[0] that outlines one possible ways for us to manage our upstream modules in a more consistent fashion. I know we've had a few emails bouncing around lately around this topic of our

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-root

On 06/11/2015 12:54 PM, James E. Blair wrote: The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure: contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with administrative access). Read all about it here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 06/16/2015 12:41 PM, Allison Randal wrote: On 06/15/2015 01:43 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: While I agree those points are valid, and going to be helpful, moving under OpenStack (even Stackforge) does also offer the chance to get more test integration upstream (not saying this was the original

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 06/15/2015 03:03 PM, Allison Randal wrote: On 06/15/2015 11:48 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 06/15/2015 04:55 PM, James Page wrote: The problem of managing delta and allowing a good level of distribution independence is still going to continue to exist and will be more difficult to manage

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 05/28/2015 04:32 PM, Haïkel wrote: 2015-05-28 21:58 GMT+02:00 Paul Belanger pabelan...@redhat.com: Personally, I'm a fan of mock. Is there plan to add support for it? Also, currently containers are not being used in -infra. Not saying it is a show stopper, but could see some initial

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 05/27/2015 05:26 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 27/05/15 09:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, tl;dr: - - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream gerrit with reviews. - - The intention is to better share the workload,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] The state of collaboration: 5 weeks

On 07/19/2015 09:42 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: I'm currently in holidays but I could not resist to take some time and reply. On 07/18/2015 06:32 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: It has been 5 weeks since Emilien has asked Fuel developers to contribute more actively to Puppet OpenStack project [0].

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] new etherpad to track Puppet OpenStack CI work

in the etherpad. Also, any new topics are really welcome, so do thoughts suggestions. Thanks, Thanks for pointing this out, I plan to help with the AIO module. --- Paul Belanger __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] The state of collaboration: 5 weeks

On 07/20/2015 11:24 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: As a new contributor to any openstack project, this is the first thing I do. Find out when the weekly meetings is, attend and monitor the conversion. Almost always there is an open discussion at the end of the weekly business. Going back through

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:25:27PM +, Gregory Haynes wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the > diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of > contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great

[openstack-dev] [Infra] grafana.openstack.org now online

Greetings, If you are not aware, we now have a Grafana service running[1] under OpenStack Infra. What is Grafana? "The leading graph and dashboard builder for visualizing time series metrics"[2]. The cool thing about our Grafana service, like Jenkins, all of our dashboards are managed via our

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:51:36AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Zaro wrote: > > We want to let everyone know that there is a big UI change in Gerrit > > 2.11. The change screen (CS), which is the main view for a patchset, > > has been completely replaced with a new change screen (CS2). While >

[openstack-dev] [Ansible][Infra] Moving ansible roles into big tent?

Greetings, I wanted to start a discussion about the future of ansible / ansible roles in OpenStack. Over the last week or so I've started down the ansible path, starting my first ansible role; I've started with ansible-role-nodepool[1]. My initial question is simple, now that big tent is upon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ansible][Infra] Moving ansible roles into big tent?

mespace > >for > >'stuff that is not used by OpenStack CI but interesting from CI > >perspective and/or > >used by other downstream groups'. > > > >Regards > > > >2015-09-09 19:22 GMT+02:00 Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com > >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] PTL non-candidacy

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:56:58PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-09-10 13:27:53 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: > [...] > > I do not plan to run for PTL in the next cycle. > [...] > > Thanks for the awesome job you did as PTL these last cycles. I hope > you enjoy a much-deserved

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ansible][Infra] Moving ansible roles into big tent?

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:50:38PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On 09/08/2015 10:57 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I wanted to start a discussion about the future of ansible / ansible roles > > in > > OpenStack. Over the last week o

[openstack-dev] [ansible] tox functional testing rename

Greetings, I've proposed a series of patches[1] to rename tox -eansible-functional to tox -efunctional. While the change is trival, it is meant to workaround an interpreter issue with tox[2]. Additionally, the change brings our tox.ini inline with other OpenStack projects launching functional

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra][bugs] Grafana Dashboard for Bugs

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:20:26PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Background > == > We have "grafana" for data visualization [1] and I'd like to introduce > a dashboard which shows data from our bug tracker Launchpad. Based on > ttx's code [2] for the "bugsquashing day stats" [3] I created

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Revert "Migrate tripleo to centos-7"

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:08:40PM -0400, Dan Prince wrote: > Sending it again to [TripleO]. > > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 20:06 -0400, Dan Prince wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Having a bit of a CI outage today due to (I think) the switch to > > Centos > > Jenkins slaves. I'd like to suggest that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] There is no Jenkins, only Zuul

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:47:24PM +0200, Marek Zawadzki wrote: > Are 3d party CIs affected by this change and if yes how? > What's the recommendation for newly created 3rd party CIs - should they use > new zuul only or it's fine to use existing (and tested) jenkins+zuul > configuration? > 3rd

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Please do *not* use git (and specifically "git log") when generating the docs

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:17:08AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen Reno doing it, then some more. It's time that I raise the > issue globally in this list before the epidemic spreads to the whole of > OpenStack ! :) > > The last occurence I have found is in oslo.config (but

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 6/6

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 06:13:08PM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi all, > > As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of > timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that > folks can catch up before the next one. All of this info should be on > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Switching images for testing

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:41:43PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > We're migrating already since Friday jobs using the so-called > bare-trusty images to ubuntu-trusty images. > > These images are used for for most of unit and functional tests, for > documentation etc. Devstack is still run on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:32:15PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-10 09:50:03 -0500 (-0500), Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > OpenStack Infra provides an easy way to plug CI systems and some > > CIs (Nova, Neutron, Cinder, etc) already gate on some third party > > systems. I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:50:38PM +, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Belanger wrote: > > >So, I cannot comment on the how useful the bot is but if projects are in fact > >using it I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/17/2016 01:13 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][puppet] Puppet OpenStack 8.0.0 release (mitaka)

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:53:25PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Puppet OpenStack team has the immense pleasure to announce the release > of 24 Puppet modules. > > Some highlights and major features: > > Keystone: > * Federation with Mellon support > * Support for multiple LDAP backends > *

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-quickstart import

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 08:30:22PM -0400, John Trowbridge wrote: > Hola, > > With the approval of the tripleo-quickstart spec[1], it is time to > actually start doing the work. The first work item is moving it to the > openstack git. The spec talks about moving it as is, and this would > still be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Generic solution for bare metal testing

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 06:33:06PM +0300, Igor Belikov wrote: > Hey Stackers, > > In Fuel we use bare metal testing for deployment tests. This is essentially a > core component of Fuel CI and as much as we like having it around we’d rather > spend time and resources integrating with upstream

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: > >> This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking > >> about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:55:56PM +, Chris Dent wrote: > > I built an IRC bot > > https://anticdent.org/purple-irc-bot.html > > that provides (see the blog posting): > > * granular logging > * some in channel commands to get recent history and recent mentions > of your nick > *

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:57:53AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/21/2016 07:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > > On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Ben Nemec wrote: > >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] propose EmilienM for core

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Dan Prince wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add Emilien Macchi to the TripleO core > review team. Emilien has been getting more involved with TripleO during > this last release. In addition to help with various Puppet things he > also has experience in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Contributing to TripleO is challenging

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:23:19AM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > That's not the name of any Summit's talk, it's just an e-mail I wanted > to write for a long time. > > It is an attempt to expose facts or things I've heard a lot; and bring > constructive thoughts about why it's challenging to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Summit: cross-project session for deployment tools projects

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:40:53PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > OpenStack big tent has different projects for deployments: Puppet, > Chef, Ansible, Kolla, TripleO, (...) but we still have some topics in > common. > I propose we use the Cross-project day to meet and talk about our >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:34:40AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > > On 6 May 2016 at 14:18, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:50:15PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 18 May 2016 at 13:34, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > >> On 6 May 2016 at 14:18, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:51:41PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-05-11 10:04:26 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: > [...] > > Before deciding that it's unsurmountable, maybe giving delete > > permissions to a larger set of contributors might be a good idea. > [...] > > I have no objection

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Reason for installing devstack in CI pipeline

Greetings, Over the last few weeks I've been head deep into understanding the TripleO CI pipeline. For the most part, I am happy that we have merged centos-7 DIB support and I'm working to migrate the jobs to it. Something I have been trying to figure out, is why does the pipeline install

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 04:50:19PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:18:03AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Some folks have requested a summary

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 6 May 2016 at 14:18, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Some folks have requested a s

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Reason for installing devstack in CI pipeline

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:23:53AM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 16 May 2016 at 18:16, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Over the last few weeks I've been head deep into understanding the TripleO > > CI > > pipeline. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > Some folks have requested a summary of our summit sessions, as has been > provided for some other projects. > > I'll probably go into more detail on some of these topics either via > subsequent more focussed threads

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Gate precheck job failed due to minimum kernel version on ubuntu 14.04

On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:55:58AM -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 05/08/2016 03:45 AM, Steve Kowalik wrote: > >On 08/05/16 08:11, lương hữu tuấn wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>@Robert: I was successful to update the kernel without change the image. > > > >But that was Robert's point entirely. Installing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:18:03AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Some folks have requested a summary of our summit sessions, as has been > > provided for some other projects. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh2 local mirror server

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 21 July 2016 at 23:04, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I write today to see how I can remove this server from > > tripleo-test-cloud-rh2. I > > hav

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh2 local mirror server

Greetings, I write today to see how I can remove this server from tripleo-test-cloud-rh2. I have an open patch[1] currently to migrate tripleo-ci to use our AFS mirrors for centos and epel. However, I'm still struggling to see what else you are using the local mirror for. >From what I see,

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [TripleO] ntp-wait issue breaks TripleO jobs

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 04:12:32PM +0300, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi infra and TripleO cores, > > I'd like to ask you for review+merge of bugfix which limits ntp-wait tries > to 100 instead of current 1000. These long tries cause timeout of 100 > minutes and breaks TripleO jobs. > > More details

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] NOT_REGISTERED to be or not to be

On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 03:53:12PM +, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in some cases[1] CI sets a comment on the patch set as > NOT_REGISTERED. > > Those comments are very hard to monitor for CI operators and have noisy value > for the developers. > > Maybe a better solution is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] additional git repo(s) for tripleo-quickstart

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:26:18PM -0400, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings, > > In an effort to make TripleO CI composable and managed and governed by the > TripleO project we have found the need to create additional git repos in > openstack under the TripleO project. This could also be done

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Stability and reliability of gate jobs

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:20:06PM +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > David, > > The gates are unreliable for a variety of reasons - some we can fix - some > we can't directly. > > RDO rabbitmq introduced IPv6 support to erlang, which caused our gate > reliably to drop dramatically. Prior to

[openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

Greetings, 5 months ago fungi posted: [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)[1] About having the discussion whether the existing TripleO CI should itself follow our third-party integration model instead of the current implementation relying on our main community

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > I've proposed: > https://review.openstack.org/353019 > > which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and > gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs. > > I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][nodepool] Can the nodes created by nodepool be reused by jenkins jobs?

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:49:41AM +0800, 王华 wrote: > Hi all, > > In OpenStack infra system after a job in Jenkins has finalized, Jenkins > send a message called onFinalized to nodepool to delete the node. I have a > question. Between the time the job is done and > the node is deleted by

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Moving mirror server images to tarballs.o.o (Was: [rdo-list] RDO-CI Scrum Weekly Scrum Recap)

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 08:50:10AM -0500, John Trowbridge wrote: > Moving this thread from rdo-list, but leaving in copy as it is relevant > there too. However it is more of a TripleO topic. > > On 02/07/2017 03:56 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 03:34:0

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [gate] [all] openstack services footprint lead to oom-kill in the gate

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 06:14:01PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-02-03 11:12:04 +0100 (+0100), Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > [...] > > So, would it be realistic to bump the flavors RAM to favor our stability in > > the short term? (considering that the less amount of workload our

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 5)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:37:56PM +0100, Attila Darazs wrote: > In the spirit of "better late than never", here's a summary of our CI Squad > meeting. > > Time: Thursdays, 15:30-16:30 UTC > Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ > > > Configuration management in TripleO CI >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 5)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:07:42PM +0100, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > On 30 Jan, Paul Belanger wrote: > > > Before you go out an implement some sort of in-repo configuration for > > testing, I > > strongly encourage you to read up on our Zuulv3 spec[3], as we are providin

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Pike PTG Etherpad

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:44:46PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Just a heads-up I've been meaning to send for a while... as > discussed in the last month of Infra meetings we've got a pad here > for people to pitch ideas of things they want to collaborate on in > the Infra team space at the PTG

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 7)

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:39:44PM +0100, Attila Darazs wrote: > As always, if these topics interest you and you want to contribute to the > discussion, feel free to join the next meeting: > > Time: Thursdays, 15:30-16:30 UTC > Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ > > Full minutes:

Re: [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:43:46PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there, > > It's been a while since I planed on writing this message. I couldn't > write it because the situation makes me really sad. At this point, it > starts to be urgent to post it. > > As for many other folks, Mirantis

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging-deb] - status of packaging directly within the OpenStack infra ?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello, > > I just subscribed this list, usually I am on the operators list. > > I have been reading the archives of this list: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-June/097947.html > > I am more than happy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Need more undercloud resources

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:11:32PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > The latest recurring problem that is failing a lot of the nonha ssl > jobs in tripleo-ci is: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1616144 > tripleo-ci: nonha jobs failing with Unable to establish connection to >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh1 and bastion host

Greetings, I would like to start the discussions around the removal of the bastion host that sits in front of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1. It is my understanding, all traffic from tripleo-test-cloud-rh1 flows through this linux box. Obviously this is problematic for a public cloud. I currently do

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Puppet OpenStack PTL non-candidacy

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:05:36PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a little blog post about the last cycle in PuppetOpenStack: > http://my1.fr/blog/puppet-openstack-achievements-during-newton-cycle/ > > I can't describe how much I liked to be PTL during the last 18 months > and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] what's up in upgrades?

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:29:46AM +0200, mathieu bultel wrote: > On 09/09/2016 12:42 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:18 PM, David Moreau Simard wrote: > >> How long does the upgrade job take ? > > undercloud upgrade is a matter of 10 min max. > > overcloud

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh1 and bastion host

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:53:41PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 9 September 2016 at 16:38, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I would like to start the discussions around the removal of the bastion host > > that sits i

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Setting up to 3rd party CI OVB jobs

Greetings, I wanted to propose a work item, that I am happy to spearhead, about setting up a 3rd party CI system for tripleo project. The work I am proposing, wouldn't actually affect anything today about tripleo-ci but provider a working example of how 3rd party CI will work and potential

Re: [openstack-dev] A daily life of a dev in ${name_your_fav_project}

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:48:26AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 09:03 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > Hi folks (dev and more!), > > > > I was having a conversation with some folks at godaddy around our future > > plans for a developer lab (where we can have various setups

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Barcelona Design Summit space needs

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Thierry sent an email to all PTLs about space needs for next Summit. > > Here's what we can have: > > * Fishbowl sessions (from Wednesday 4pm to Friday noon) > Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] important changes to pep8 python jobs

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:29:09PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > We (openstack-infra) are proposing a change to the current pep8[1] job for > python jobs, and would like to bring your attention to it. > > We'll be removing the extra-index-url field from pip

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] important changes to pep8 python jobs

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:58:38PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:29:09PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > We (openstack-infra) are proposing a change to the current pep8[1] job for > > python jobs, and would l

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:06:43PM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 12/10/16 11:01 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2016-10-12 14:50:03 +0200: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > One of the common complains about the existing project organization in > > > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [Infra] Kolla-ansible is available

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 06:28:19PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-11-15 12:20:35 -0600 (-0600), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > > I think we could use git submodule in kolla-ansible to download kolla. > > That would help us deal with gates in kolla-ansible short term. > > Thoughts? > > The

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] important changes to pep8 python jobs

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:29:09PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > We (openstack-infra) are proposing a change to the current pep8[1] job for > python jobs, and would like to bring your attention to it. > > We'll be removing the extra-index-url field from pip

[openstack-dev] [all] important changes to pep8 python jobs

or use #openstack-infra on freenode. --- Paul Belanger [1] https://review.openstack.org/391875 [2] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/bindep/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Setting up to 3rd party CI OVB jobs

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 05:37:54PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 7 October 2016 at 14:03, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I wanted to propose a work item, that I am happy to spearhead, about > > setting up > > a

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Virtual midcycle/sprint - Jan 11/12

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 07:45:28AM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > We're going to be running a small midcycle/sprint on January 11-12, > > 2017 in #puppet-openstack on freenode. We will be reviewing

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][diskimage-builder] containers, Containers, CONTAINERS!

On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 02:45:28PM -0600, Gregory Haynes wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:57 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:48:31AM +0100, Andre Florath wrote: > > > Hello Paul, > > > > > > thank you very much for your c

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][diskimage-builder] containers, Containers, CONTAINERS!

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:04:10PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 02:45:28PM -0600, Gregory Haynes wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 09:57 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:48:31AM +0100, Andre Florath wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] not planning to serve as release PTL for Pike

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:00:17PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I announced this at the release team meeting on 6 Jan, but thought > I should also post to the list as well: I do not plan to serve as > the Release Management team PTL for the Pike release cycle. > > It has been my pleasure to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Problem in Ubuntu check when building Kolla base image

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:02:32PM -, Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) wrote: > Here at Bloomberg, we're evaluating Kolla to replace our in-house OpenStack > deployment system, and one of our requirements is that we be able to do our > builds without touching the Internet - everything

[openstack-dev] [infra][diskimage-builder][glean] nodepool dsvm (non-voting) check jobs

Greetings, I'd like to mention we recently expanded our nodepool devstack jobs to include glean and diskimage-builder. Specifically, we now attempt to build, upload and SSH into DIBs produced by the jobs. You'll notice 2 jobs now: gate-dsvm-nodepool-debian-src-nv - ubuntu-precise -

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Greetings, With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the future of diskimage-builder as it relates to the tripleo project. Reading the recently approved spec for containers, container (image) builds are no longer under the control of tripleo; by kolla. Where does

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:11:42PM -0500, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > >> Greetings, > >> >

  1   2   3   >