[openstack-dev] It's time...

Hi all, Tom here, on a personal note. It's quite fitting that this November our summit is in Australia :) I'm hoping to see you there because after being part of 15 releases, and travelling the equivalent of a couple of round trips to the moon to witness OpenStack grow around the world, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc][ptls][all] Documentation publishing future

On 廿十七年五月廿四日 朝 09:38, Rochelle Grober wrote: From: Ildiko > On 2017. May 23., at 15:43, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:50:50PM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: [snip] Hey

Re: [openstack-dev] project on-board schedule

On 26/04/17 21:12, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Apr 25 2017, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi Tom, It's listed on the main summit schedule, under the Forum :) Here's a direct link to the Forum category: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/#track=146 I've also just realized

[openstack-dev] [all] List of all Boston Forum Session Etherpads

Hi all, With the forum not long away, it's time to start listing your session etherpads. I've gathered all that I knew about on: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017 Please add yours ASAP! Regards, Tom

Re: [openstack-dev] project on-board schedule

On 25/04/17 16:35, joehuang wrote: Hello, Where can I find the project on-board schedule in OpenStack Boston summit? I haven't found it yet, and maybe I missed some mail. Thanks a lot. It's listed on the main summit schedule, under the Forum :) Here's a direct link to the Forum category:

Re: [openstack-dev] Emails for OpenStack R Release Name voting going out - please be patient

Still no email over here :) On 20/04/17 14:43, Kevin Benton wrote: FWIW mine just came through yesterday. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Jay S Bryant > wrote: All, For those of you haven't received an e-mail, check the inbox you

[openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule Online

Hello all, The schedule for our the Forum is online: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/#track=146 ==> Session moderators, please start advertising your sessions & starting pre-discussions, to get the best, most well-informed people there possible! ==> Anyone

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submissio

[openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in Boston. Let us know if you see major issues

[openstack-dev] [all] BOS Forum - User/Dev Feedback session for your project?

Hi all, Forum topic submission closes in 2 days (Sunday 23:59 UTC). One of the types of topics you could consider submitting is a user/dev feedback session for your project. I see Swift, Keystone and Kolla have already done this - thanks! From experience running the ops meetups, the best

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Some information about the Forum at the Summit in Boston

On 廿十七年三月七日 暮 11:26, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/7/2017 6:35 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, I recently got more information about the space dedicated to the "Forum" at the OpenStack Summit in Boston. We'll have three different types of spaces available. 1/ "Forum" proper There will be

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Summit Boston-CFP closes February 6th

Should be good for another 24.5 hours now :) Get those presentations in! On 廿十七年二月六日 暮 01:26, shubham sharma wrote: Hi, I am in IST timezone (UTC+5:30) and I am getting error in submitting proposal with following error. " *Warning!* Call for Presentations is closed!. " Anybody else facing

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Project Navigator Out of Date?

On 17/01/17 00:14, Thierry Carrez wrote: Ian Cordasco wrote: From: Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> On 16/01/17 21:55, Ian Cordasco wrote: Third, "Existence and quality of packages for this project in popular distributions." it seems Fedora [2], Debian [3], Ubuntu [4], and

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Project Navigator Out of Date?

On 16/01/17 21:55, Ian Cordasco wrote: Third, "Existence and quality of packages for this project in popular distributions." it seems Fedora [2], Debian [3], Ubuntu [4], and OpenSUSE [5] all have packages (including in stable versions). I can't speak to the quality of the packages, but knowing

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG? / Was (Consistent Versioned Endpoints)

On 14/01/17 04:07, Joshua Harlow wrote: Sometimes I almost wish we just rented out a football stadium (or equivalent, a soccer field?) and put all the contributors in the 'field' with bean bags and some tables and a bunch of white boards (and a lot of wifi and power cords) and let everyone

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack] The Forum: in more detail

Hi *dev, Post over on the general ML you might be interested in - please send replies there to avoid cross-posting pain ;) Regards, Tom Forwarded Message Subject: [Openstack] The Forum: in more detail Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:42:53 +0800 From: Tom Fifield &l

[openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

Hello all, It's fantastic to see all of the PTG planning that has been going on in recent threads. It's clear there's a bit of confusion too, and as mriedem notes - us "mere mortals" are probably going to take some time to figure it out. Nothing's final of course, and we're going to take a

Re: [openstack-dev] Community Contributor Awards

Time is running out to nominate for an award!! https://openstackfoundation.formstack.com/forms/community_contributor_award_nomination_form On 21/09/16 02:43, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello all, I’m pleased to announce the next round of community contributor awards! Similar to the Austin Summit,

[openstack-dev] Too many mails on announce list again :)

Hi all, Last November, we discussed the OpenStack-announce list, defined its purpose more finely and moved some internal library announcements to -dev[1]. For reference, we describe the list as: """ Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the OpenStack Release Team

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

On 10/09/16 06:12, Tom Fifield wrote: On 廿十六年九月九日 暮 02:01, Shamail wrote: Hi Tom, I'll help with that. :) Thanks Shamail - standby - I will write up instructions and send them through. I added a section "Helping Real Users avoid the CAPTCHA (admin rights needed)" on the wiki

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

On 廿十六年九月九日 暮 02:01, Shamail wrote: Hi Tom, I'll help with that. :) Thanks Shamail - standby - I will write up instructions and send them through. Thanks, Shamail On Sep 9, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: On 廿十六年九月九日 朝 11:45, Hayes, Graham wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

On 廿十六年九月九日 朝 11:45, Hayes, Graham wrote: On 09/09/2016 08:44, Tom Fifield wrote: On 廿十六年九月八日 暮 08:36, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-09-09 01:10:15 + (+), Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: Is it just me who likes to hit the save button often? It gets tedious proving often that you

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368114/ On 廿十六年九月九日 朝 10:51, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org <mailto:t...@openstack.org>> wrote: On 廿十六年九月九日 朝 10:41, Tom Fifield wrote: On 廿十六年九月八日 暮 08:36, Jeremy S

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

On 廿十六年九月九日 朝 10:41, Tom Fifield wrote: On 廿十六年九月八日 暮 08:36, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-09-09 01:10:15 + (+), Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: Is it just me who likes to hit the save button often? It gets tedious proving often that you are not a robot. Wiki reCAPTCHA likes proof even

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

On 廿十六年九月八日 暮 08:36, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-09-09 01:10:15 + (+), Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: Is it just me who likes to hit the save button often? It gets tedious proving often that you are not a robot. Wiki reCAPTCHA likes proof even if saves are spaced less than a minute

Re: [openstack-dev] (no subject)

On 17/08/16 15:19, UnitedStack 张德通 wrote: i want to join openstack mailing list You're on it ^_^ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] How to change openstack ID email

Hi, Did you try logging in with your @gmail.com address ? :) Regards, Tom On 02/08/16 19:04, zhuna wrote: Dear, I had an openstack ID with my company email address(na...@cn.ibm.com), I change my company recently, so I add an company affiliation with my new company name. Now the question

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting and ask.openstack.org

On 01/07/16 13:01, Adam Young wrote: On 06/28/2016 11:13 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: Quick answers in-line On 29/06/16 05:44, Adam Young wrote: It seems to me that keystone Core should be able to moderate Keystone questions on the site. That means that they should be able to remove old dead ones

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting and ask.openstack.org

Quick answers in-line On 29/06/16 05:44, Adam Young wrote: It seems to me that keystone Core should be able to moderate Keystone questions on the site. That means that they should be able to remove old dead ones, remove things tagged as Keystone that do not apply and so on. I would assume the

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

Hi, Are there plans to follow the OpenStack events policy this time? eg Commercial participants should have equal opportunity to sponsor and support the activity. When the number of sponsorships is limited, a best practice is to publish a sponsorship prospectus online on a date known in

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 11/05/16 09:04, Dan Smith wrote: Here it is :) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages Great, I see at least one I can nuke on the first page. Note that I don't seem to have delete powers on the wiki. That's surely a first step in letting people maintain the relevance of

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 11/05/16 02:48, Dan Smith wrote: Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the value of being google indexed). Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world. I'm definitely

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 04/05/16 01:58, John Dickinson wrote: TC, In reference to http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/093680.html and Thierry's reply, I'm currently drafting a TC resolution to update http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20150901-programming-languages.html to

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Core Party after Austin

Hi all, On 22/04/16 16:40, Clint Byrum wrote: But in the mean time, maybe we can just send this message to party planners: Provide us with interesting spaces to converse and bond in, and we will be happier. Spoke with the party planners and got the inside gossip :) The good news: for the

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas Goirand wrote: I still don't have any idea what's wrong with the Debian guide. The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits as per the other distros. I can't remember

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Contributor Awards

Reminder :) We'll probably stop taking entries at the end of next week. On 16/02/16 18:43, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi all, I'd like to introduce a new round of community awards handed out by the Foundation, to be presented at the feedback session of the summit. Nothing flashy or starchy

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance Mitaka: Passing the torch

A beautiful post, sir. Thank you for everything! On 09/03/16 22:15, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, I'm not going to run for Glance's PTL position for the Newton timeframe. There are many motivations behind this choice. Some of them I'm willing to discuss in private if people are interested

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Changing the Neutron default security group rules

On 03/03/16 23:12, Jonathan Proulx wrote: To go a little further down my wish list I'd really like to do be able to offer a standard selection of security groups for my site no tjust 'default', but that may be a bit off this topic. Briefly my motivation is that 'internal' here includes a

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Contributor Awards

ugh Blemings ---2016/02/21 09:54:59 PM---Hiya, On 16/02/2016 21:43, Tom Fifield wrote:Hugh Blemings ---2016/02/21 09:54:59 PM---Hiya, On 16/02/2016 21:43, Tom Fifield wrote: From: Hugh Blemings <h...@blemings.org <mailto:h...@blemings.org>> To: "OpenS

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

On 26/02/16 22:02, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/23/2016 12:33 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: OpenStack Conference <-- The main event. OpenStack:How <-- The developer planning event. :) -jay Probably I'm dumb, but I still don't understand what's wrong with the name "design summit" for the developer

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

Hi ops (cc: devs), I'm writing to you to let you know why I think Thierry's proposal is a good one that probably works better for us than the current situation. The design summit for us at the moment isn't as good as it could be. You turn up, ready to contribute and help out developers with

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Contributor Awards

Hi all, I'd like to introduce a new round of community awards handed out by the Foundation, to be presented at the feedback session of the summit. Nothing flashy or starchy - the idea is that these are to be a little informal, quirky ... but still recognising the extremely valuable work

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Announce List

ingee" as Thierry suggested? Regards, Tom On 14/12/15 17:12, Tom Fifield wrote: ... and back to this thread after a few weeks :) The conclusions I saw were: * Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev" * Service project releases announcements are good * Cl

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Announce List

On 14/01/16 15:22, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2016-01-14 08:13, Tom Fifield wrote: So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this thread :) There appears to be broad consensus that those shouldn't be going to the announce list ... what do we need to do to get that to change

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno

On 11/01/16 20:08, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/10/2016 11:31 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: Wow. That'll make the release notes process painful this round ... o.O Hmmm. In my mind it will make it a lot easier. In the past we end up getting to the release and sit around and go "hmmm, what did we change

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno

On 08/01/16 21:15, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/07/2016 06:21 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: On 7 Jan 2016, at 2:09 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/06/2016 09:02 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-01-06 07:52:48 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: [...] I think auto openning against a

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Announce List

al library (particularly oslo) release announcements don't fit Open Questions: * Where do Internal library release announcements go? [-dev or new -release list or batched inside the weekly newsletter] * Do SDK releases fit on -announce? Regards, Tom On 20/11/15 12:00, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi all, I'd l

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Announce List

On 14/12/15 19:33, Thierry Carrez wrote: Tom Fifield wrote: ... and back to this thread after a few weeks :) The conclusions I saw were: * Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev" * Service project releases announcements are good * Client library release announce

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] Move from active distrusting model to trusting model

On 24/11/15 19:20, Dolph Mathews wrote: Scenarios I've been personally involved with where the "distrustful" model either did help or would have helped: - Employee is reprimanded by management for not positively reviewing & approving a coworkers patch. - A team of employees is pressured to

[openstack-dev] OpenStack-Announce List

Hi all, I'd like to get your thoughts about the OpenStack-Announce list. We describe the list as: """ Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the OpenStack Release Team and OpenStack Security Team. This is a low-traffic, read-only list. """ Up until July 2015, it was

[openstack-dev] User Survey Results - October 2015

Hi everyone, Working with the user committee, we run a survey of users every six months. We are pleased to share the results of the latest survey, conducted in September. Each survey is meant to provide a sample representation of OpenStack users and deployment profiles, with the goals to

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][Fuel] Using Native Ruby Client for Openstack Providers

On 13/10/15 21:13, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: Puppetmaster and Fuelers, Last week I mentioned that I would like to bring the theme of using native ruby OpenStack client and use it within the providers. Emilien told me that I had already been late and the decision was made that puppet-openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Liberty RC1 availability in Debian

On 30/09/15 19:58, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi everyone! 1/ Announcement === I'm pleased to announce, in advance of the final Liberty release, that Liberty RC1 not only has been fully uploaded to Debian Experimental, but also that the Tempest CI (which I maintain and is a package only

Re: [openstack-dev] Mitaka travel tips ?

On 24/09/15 16:43, Thierry Carrez wrote: David Moreau Simard wrote: There was a travel tips document for the Kilo summit in Paris [1]. Lots of great helpful information in there not covered on the Openstack Summit page [2] like where to get SIM cards and stuff. Is there one for Mitaka yet ? I

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Anyone using containers?

On 02/09/15 17:36, Thierry Carrez wrote: Lowery, Mathew wrote: Just curious if anyone is using containers in their deployments. If so, in what capacity? What are the advantages, gotchas, and pain points? This might trigger more responses on the openstack-operators mailing-list. +1 :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup

On 19/08/15 11:52, Edgar Magana wrote: Folks, I just want to share with you the feedback collected today during the networking session on Ops Meet-up: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-network-model Special thanks to Ryan and Doug for helping on some questions. Line 28 on

Re: [openstack-dev] App Catalog IRC meeting minutes - 7/2/2015

On 07/07/15 04:25, Christopher Aedo wrote: * Stale URL checker (gosha) (docaedo, 17:27:48) The docs-tools repository has a tool that does this that can probably be re-purposed. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help! Zuul can not connect to port 29418 of review.openstack.org

On 12/06/15 17:04, liuxinguo wrote: Hi, Recentlyour CI can not connect to port 29418 of review.openstack.org.app:ds:recently Following are the failuer message, is there anyone know the reasion why our CI can not cennect to 29418 of review.openstack.org? That port on review.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack Foundation] Openstack Diversity Working Group

If anyone needs help with the timezone conversion, I recommend http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html Just put in Portland and your nearest city into the boxes and you'll get an hour-by-hour breakdown :) On 10/06/15 23:39, Barrett, Carol L wrote: The Doodle time zone doesn’t seem

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack Foundation] Openstack Diversity Working Group

? That would be a good example of improving diversity by being inclusive. Cheers Tristan On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:50 AM -0700, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org mailto:t...@openstack.org wrote: If anyone needs help with the timezone conversion, I recommend http

Re: [openstack-dev] Can not connect to host review.openstack.org port 29418

On 11/06/15 11:33, 苌智 wrote: I met problem when run git review. It says that ssh: connect to host review.openstack.org port 29418: No route to host . There is no response when I run telnet review.openstack.org 29418. And my screen only displays Trying 104.130.159.134 Does anyone meets the

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

Many thanks to Thomas and the other packagers for a great discussion at the summit and this fast follow-up, explained well. Looking forward to seeing what can be achieved! On 27/05/15 16:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi all, tl;dr: - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge as the default in DevStack [was: Status of the nova-network to Neutron migration work]

, Kevin From: Tom Fifield [t...@openstack.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 7:09 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge as the default in DevStack [was: Status of the nova-network to Neutron migration

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge as the default in DevStack [was: Status of the nova-network to Neutron migration work]

On 14/04/15 23:36, Dean Troyer wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mangel...@redhat.com mailto:mangel...@redhat.com wrote: Why would operators install from devstack? that’s not going to be the case. If they do they need more help than we can give... So,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge as the default in DevStack [was: Status of the nova-network to Neutron migration work]

replacement, you'd be OK with this change? Kevin * * *From:* Tom Fifield *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2015 5:58:43 PM *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Question on documentation reviews

On 08/04/15 03:36, Ben Swartzlander wrote: On 04/07/2015 12:58 PM, Luis Pabon wrote: Hi guys, I have been reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171166/, but I am concerned that I provided more of a hindrance than assistance. Instead I would like to propose the method used by Swift for

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

On 03/03/15 05:35, Clay Gerrard wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Why do you say auto-abandon is the wrong tool? I've no problem with the 1 week warning if somebody wants to implement it - I can see

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

On 28/02/15 09:02, John Griffith wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org mailto:stef...@openstack.org wrote: I'm not expressing myself cleary enough. I don't advocate for the removal of anything because I like pretty charts. I'm changing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] translations gone wild

On 26/02/15 21:18, Sean Dague wrote: This morning in the nova channel we were trying to get to the bottom of the unit tests failing lxsi and gillard in en_GB on some string comparisons. Something is breaking down in our i18n null fixture for the tests. However, in trying to track down the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

On 24/02/15 19:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] First, Daniel, thank you for the well-written and thought-through post. I have some comments on translation specifically which I hope can shed some light

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Ubuntu, qemu, NUMA support

On 17/02/15 23:32, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi all, Just thought I'd highlight here that Ubuntu 14.10 is using qemu 2.1, but they're not currently enabling NUMA support. I've reported it as a bug and it's been fixed for 15.04, but there is some pushback about fixing it in 14.10 on the

Re: [openstack-dev] Vancouver Design Summit format changes

On 10/01/15 03:26, Michael Dorman wrote: (X-posted to -operators.) Any thoughts on how the ops track spaces would be requested, since there is not a real ‘operators project’, PTL, etc.? Based on our past events and summit survey feedback from Paris, I've mentioned to Thierry that we

Re: [openstack-dev] The state of nova-network to neutron migration

On 09/01/15 08:06, Maru Newby wrote: On Jan 8, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/08/2015 06:41 PM, Maru Newby wrote: As per a recent exchange on #openstack-neutron, I’ve been asked to present my views on this effort. What follows is in no way intended to detract

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] fix latency on requirements breakage

On 18/11/14 18:51, Thierry Carrez wrote: Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: waiting extra long for valid test results. People don't realize their code can't pass and just keep pushing patches up consuming

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Permissions differences for glance image-create between Icehouse and Juno

This was covered in the release notes for glance, under Upgrade notes: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Juno#Upgrade_Notes_3 * The ability to upload a public image is now admin-only by default. To continue to use the previous behaviour, edit the publicize_image flag in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Permissions differences for glance image-create between Icehouse and Juno

curious what exactly I'm supposed to do :) -jay On 10/27/2014 09:04 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: This was covered in the release notes for glance, under Upgrade notes: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Juno#Upgrade_Notes_3 * The ability to upload a public image is now admin-only

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Cells conversation starter

On 22/10/14 03:07, Andrew Laski wrote: On 10/21/2014 04:31 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 10/20/2014 08:00 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: One of the big goals for the Kilo cycle by users and developers of the cells functionality within Nova is to get it to a point where it can be considered a first

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [I18N] compiling translation message catalogs

On 08/10/14 20:51, James Page wrote: On 07/10/14 18:00, Julie Pichon wrote: I'm adding a couple of people on cc: with an interest in Ubuntu and SUSE packaging: the Horizon team would love to have your opinion on this (it came up during our weekly meeting). The current consensus is leaning

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Contributing to docs without Docbook -- YES you can!

On 04/10/14 04:03, Nick Chase wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org mailto:stef...@openstack.org wrote: 1. Pick an existing topic or create a new topic. For new topics, we're primarily interested in deployment scenarios. 2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Contributing to docs without Docbook -- YES you can!

On 06/10/14 11:38, Nick Chase wrote: On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org mailto:t...@openstack.org wrote: On 04/10/14 04:03, Nick Chase wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org mailto:stef...@openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [I18N] compiling translation message catalogs

On 02/10/14 14:32, Łukasz Jernaś wrote: On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Hi Akihiro! To display localized strings, we need to compile translated message catalogs (PO files) into compiled one (MO files). I would like to discuss and get a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

Hi Joe, On 01/10/14 09:10, joehuang wrote: OpenStack cascading: to integrate multi-site / multi-vendor OpenStack instances into one cloud with OpenStack API exposed. Cells: a single OpenStack instance scale up methodology Just to let you know - there are actually some users out there that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Get rid of the sample config file

On 26/09/14 03:35, Morgan Fainberg wrote: -Original Message- From: John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: September 25, 2014 at 12:27:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

: This thread is about the Design Summit, the Operators Track is a different thing. In Atlanta the Operators Track was organized by Tom Fifield and I have every confidence he is working hard to ensure the operators have a voice in Paris and that those interested can participate. Last summit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] webnumbr bug graphs appear dead for bug triage

On 10/09/14 22:51, Sean Dague wrote: All the various bug triage graphs point out to webnumbr urls from our wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage All of webnumbr appears to be dead and not returning any data. Why this service was used predates me. Does anyone know why? Anyone

Re: [openstack-dev] Criteria for giving a -1 in a review

On 22/08/14 00:40, Adam Young wrote: On 08/21/2014 12:21 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote: I would prefer that you didn't merge this. i.e. The project is better off without it. A bit off topic, but I've never liked this message that

Re: [openstack-dev] Contact information required for ICLA -- getting a server error

On 18/08/14 19:01, Udi Kalifon wrote: Hi. I am trying to update my contact information in order to submit my first gerrit review. I go to review.openstack.org and log in, then go to my account settings and click on Contact Information. I provide my address and click Save Changes and get:

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

On 13/08/14 19:55, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Matt, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:06:11PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: On 11/08/14 16:21, Matthew Treinish wrote: I'm sorry, but the fact that the docs in the rally tree has a section for user testimonials [4] I feel speaks a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

On 09/08/14 05:09, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/06/2014 01:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/06/2014 01:40 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote: On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote: On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote: What happened

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

On 06/08/14 03:54, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote: However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs the benefit in the face of other things on our plate. Perhaps those large operators that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

On 06/08/14 12:40, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/05/2014 11:25 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: On 06/08/14 03:54, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote: However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

On 06/08/14 13:18, Robert Collins wrote: On 6 August 2014 16:57, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote: Note, however, that nobody is suggesting not having a migration path. I'm just suggesting relaxing the requirement that the migration from nova-network to neutron be without any downtime

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote: On 6 August 2014 17:22, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote: On 06/08/14 13:18, Robert Collins wrote: On 6 August 2014 16:57, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote: Note, however, that nobody is suggesting not having a migration path. I'm just

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote: On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote: On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote: What happened to your DB migrations then? :) Sorry if I misunderstood, I thought we were talking about running VM downtime here? While DB

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Why people don't close bugs?

On 04/08/14 17:46, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: Hello! I looked through launchpad bugs and it seems there are a lot of bugs, which are fixed already, but still open, here are 3 ones: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/909096 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1206762

Re: [openstack-dev] Networking Docs Swarm - Brisbane 9 August

How about writing up something in a bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+filebug or a mailing list post about what you'd like to see? Regards, Tom On 05/08/14 12:22, Stuart Fox wrote: Cant make it to Brisbane but this doc is so needed. Any chamce you could put round a

Re: [openstack-dev] debug logs and defaults was (Thoughts on the patch test failure rate and moving forward)

On 25/07/14 06:05, Robert Collins wrote: On 25 July 2014 08:01, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I'd like us to think about whether they is anything we can do to make life easier in these kind of hard debugging scenarios where the regular logs are not sufficient. Agreed. Honestly, though we

Re: [openstack-dev] debug logs and defaults was (Thoughts on the patch test failure rate and moving forward)

On 28/07/14 09:18, Robert Collins wrote: On 28 July 2014 13:11, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote: If a starting point is needed, the last discussion we had around 'reasonable' defaults is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-ops-reasonabledefaults Thanks Tom! I note

[openstack-dev] Call for Speakers Open, OpenStack Summit in Paris

Hi Everyone, *The Call for Speakers is OPEN for the November OpenStack Summit in Paris! Submit your talks here: https://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-paris-summit-2014/call-for-speakers/.* There are a few new speaking tracks in the Summit lineup this year so please review the below

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Announcing Keystone Middleware Project

On 25/06/14 07:24, Morgan Fainberg wrote: The Keystone team would like to announce the official split of python-keystoneclient and the Keystone middleware code. Over time the middleware (auth_token, s3_token, ec2_token) has developed into a fairly expansive code base and includes dependencies

  1   2   >