Hi Alistair,
Modules can register their own options and there is no need to call
reload_config_files. The config files are parsed and values stored in case the
option is later declared. The only time you need to reload files is if you add
new config files in the new module. See the example
On Aug 8, 2014, at 6:55 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Ganapathy, Sandhya
sandhya.ganapa...@hp.com wrote:
This is to discuss Bug #1231298 –
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1231298
...
Conclusion reached with this bug is that, we need
On Aug 13, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:55:48PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:56:04AM -0700, Jay Pipes wrote:
By ignoring stable branches,
This may be slightly off-topic but it is worth mentioning that the use of
threading.Lock[1]
which was included to make the locks thread safe seems to be leading to a
deadlock in eventlet[2].
It seems like we have rewritten this too many times in order to fix minor pain
points and are
adding
On Aug 21, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/21/2014 12:34 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
I would prefer that you didn't
On Sep 4, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
Position statement
==
Over the past year I've increasingly come to the conclusion that
Nova is heading for (or probably already at) a major crisis. If
steps are not taken to avert this, the project
On Sep 4, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:36:04PM +, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I do not think that Nova is in a death spiral. I just think that the
current way of working at the moment is strangling the project. I do not
understand
On Sep 5, 2014, at 4:12 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 09/05/2014 06:40 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Just some things to think about with regards to the whole idea, by no
means exhaustive.
So maybe the better question is: what are the top sources of technical
debt in Nova that
Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here.
A couple more:
1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents what the
goal of it is: Infrastructure Services?
2. We need to be be open to having other Layer #1s within the community. We
should allow
On Sep 15, 2014, at 4:34 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com wrote:
So, although I like the fix proposed and I would +1 that idea, I'm
also not very concerned if most of the people don't want that. Because
as you just said we can fix it locally easily. I didn't set it to my
.local
On Sep 19, 2014, at 3:33 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here.
A couple more:
1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents what
the goal
On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:14 AM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:46 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Great writeup. I think
On Sep 23, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
If we are no longer incubating *programs*, which are the teams of people who
we would like to ensure are involved in OpenStack governance, then how do we
make that decision? From a practical standpoint, how do we make a
On Dec 6, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Paul Michali p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
For Neutron, I'm creating a module (one of several eventually) as part of a
new blueprint I'm working on, and the associated unit test module. I'm in
really early development, and just running this UT module as a
This seems like a great choice, assuming that we can verify that it works
properly.
Vish
On Dec 31, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:47 AM, Yaguang Tang yaguang.t...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
Now Neutron has its own quota management API for network related
items(floating ips, security groups .etc) which are also manged by Nova.
when using nova with neutron as network service, the network
On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Stackers,
I was hoping to get some answers on a few questions I had regarding the
Gantt project [1]. Specifically, here are my queries:
1) Why was Nova forked to the http://github.com/openstack/gantt
repository?
outside of nova.
Vish
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Stackers,
I was hoping to get some answers on a few questions I had
On Jan 6, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to propose instance-level snapshots as a feature for
inclusion in Nova. An initial draft of the more official proposal is
here [1], blueprint is here [2].
In a nutshell, this feature will take
The logic makes sense to me here. I’m including Evan Callicoat in this response
in case he has any comments on the points you make below.
Vish
On Jan 7, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
See Sean Collins' review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56381 which
disables
On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
snip
As you’ve defined the feature so far, it seems like most of it could
be implemented client side:
* pause the instance
* snapshot the instance
* snapshot any attached volumes
For the first milestone to offer
On Jan 15, 2014, at 6:40 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Victor Sergeyev vserge...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hello All.
As for lockutils - a few days ago I wondered why we used custom oslo module
instead of lockfile library [1].
This is probably more of a usage question, but I will go ahead and answer it.
If you are writing to the root drive you may need to run the sync command a few
times to make sure that the data has been flushed to disk before you kick off
the migration.
The confirm resize step should be deleting
On Jan 16, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com
wrote:
My thought was to try and get some parallel effort going, do the resync as a
continuing task as suffer a little ongoing pain versus
in syslog.
I have been able to successfully migrate a Qcow2 backed instance.
Dan
On 01/16/2014 03:18 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
This is probably more of a usage question, but I will go ahead and answer it.
If you are writing to the root drive you may need to run the sync command a
few
On Jan 15, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Wangshen (Peter) pete...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi, all
We are interesting in vcpu-memory-hotplug under this link:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vcpu-memory-hotplug
And we have already finished vcpu hotplug and done the basic tests.
But this
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how resource tracking is intended to work for live
migration and evacuation.
For a while I thought that maybe we were relying on the call to
ComputeManager._instance_update() in
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
* Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
snip
As you’ve defined the feature so far, it seems like most of it could
be implemented client
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:41 PM, Jiang, Yunhong yunhong.ji...@intel.com wrote:
I noticed the BP has been approved, but I really want to understand more on
the reason, can anyone provide me some hints?
In the BP, it states that “For resize, we need to confirm, as we want to give
end user an
On Jan 18, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Wangshen (Peter) pete...@huawei.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:01 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Jinbo (Justin)
Subject: Re
On Jan 19, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-01-19 01:52:56 -0800:
Hi,
I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so replying
quickly) but given the dates the planning phases for Quantum/Neutron LBaaS
Hi Vinod,
Sorry for the top post, but there is a lot that needs to be done across
projects to make the idea of domains and trees actually work. One of the issues
which you mention below is the idea of quotas. I was just having a discussion
with some folks in IRC about this very issue, and
Hi Everyone,
I apologize for the obtuse title, but there isn't a better succinct term to
describe what is needed. OpenStack has no support for multiple owners of
objects. This means that a variety of private cloud use cases are simply not
supported. Specifically, objects in the system can only
Hi!
Nice find, this is a bug. I have reported it along with instructions for fixing
here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1273837
Vish
On Jan 21, 2014, at 6:20 PM, li zheming lizhemin...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all:
I used euca2tool3.1.10 to test ec2 api.but when I do cmd
to use security groups at the time. Note we
also provided the number of cores, but this was for convienience because the
mpi implementation didn’t support discovering number of cores. Code below.
Vish
$ git show 2cf40bb3
commit 2cf40bb3b21d33f4025f80d175a4c2ec7a2f8414
Author: Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jan 27, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm currently working on moving away from the built-in logging to use
On Jan 24, 2014, at 6:33 AM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote:
I agree that I’d like to see a set of use cases for this. This is the second
time in as many days that I’ve heard about a desire to have such a thing but
I still don’t think I understand any use cases adequately.
In the
On Jan 24, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
* Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
* Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Jon Bernard jbern
I would not want to use nova-cert for something like this. It was a minimum
viable option for supporting the ec2 upload bundle use case which requires
certs to work. We also managed to get it working for our hacky vpn solution
long ago, but it is definitely not a best practices case. Perhaps
On Jan 22, 2014, at 7:27 PM, Wangshen (Peter) pete...@huawei.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 2:26 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Jinbo (Justin)
Subject
On Jan 29, 2014, at 3:55 AM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna
vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote:
Dear Vishvananda,
Sorry for very late reply. I was stupid not to follow your reply (i had
messed it some how).
Actually, i am confused after seeing your mail. In the last two weeks, i was
doing
.
Florent Flament
- Original Message -
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:35:15 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] Hierarchicical Multitenancy
by
instance tags. The approach allows this, though I would like to keep
it as simple as possible at first (share with other instances in
project or don't share)
Justin
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 28, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Justin
into the 2100
meeting.
Thanks!
Vish
On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:59 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
I apologize for the confusion. The Wiki time of 2100 UTC is the correct time
(Noon Pacific time). We can move tne next meeting to a different day/time
that is more convienient
On Jan 29, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
I was thinking for the upgrade process that we could leverage the port
attach/detach BP done by Dan Smith a while ago. This has libvirt support
and there are patches pending approval for Xen and Vmware. Not sure about
the
On Jan 30, 2014, at 6:26 AM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote:
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
In testing I have been unable to saturate a 10g link using a single VM. Even
with multiple streams,
the best I have been able to do (using virtio and vhost_net is about 7.8g.
Can you share
Thanks Soren, you are correct! Yay Timezones
Vish
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
2100 UTC is 1 PM Pacific. :-)
Den 29/01/2014 17.01 skrev Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com:
I apologize for the confusion. The Wiki time of 2100 UTC is the correct
Meeting on Friday at 1600 UTC to discuss.
Vish
On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I apologize for the obtuse title, but there isn't a better succinct term to
describe what is needed. OpenStack has no support for multiple owners of
objects
evaluation.
Service (Nova, Swift ) may have define new roles.
Let me know if I am not making sense here or have any questions.
Arvind
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 2:58 PM
To: OpenStack
Flament
- Original Message -
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 10:58:28 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical
of our
goals with the same implementation.
I’d love to be involved with this. I am not sure that I currently have the
time to help with implementation, however.
Come to the meeting on friday! 1600 UTC
Vish
- Chris
On Feb 3, 2014, at 1:58 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
On Feb 5, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Florent Flament florent.flament-...@cloudwatt.com
wrote:
Vish:
I agree that having roles associated with projects may complicate
policy rules (although we may find ways to simplify the syntax?). It
may be a sound choice to stick to a single scope for a given
On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:38 AM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose one idea that autogenerates API sample files from API
schema for Nova v3 API.
We are working on API validation for v3 API, the works require API schema
which is defined with JSONSchema
On Feb 7, 2014, at 8:21 AM, Jesse Noller jesse.nol...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Feb 7, 2014, at 1:51 AM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1
To give an example as to why eventlet implicit monkey patch
On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, Vish!
I hope you can provide some historical data.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
To be clear, since many people weren’t around in ye olde days, nova started
This looks like a bug to me. It would be great if you could report it on
launchpad.
Vish
On Feb 11, 2014, at 7:49 PM, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I met some problems when testing an ec2_api:'modify_image_attribute()' in
Nova.
I found the params send to Nova, are not
Hi Vinod!
I think you can simplify the roles in the hierarchical model by only passing
the roles for the authenticated project and above. All roles are then inherited
down. This means it isn’t necessary to pass a scope along with each role. The
scope is just passed once with the token and the
to find the full list of roles.
Vish
Regards,
Vinod Kumar Boppanna
Message: 21
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:13:59 -0800
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev
Hi Everyone,
I will be on a plane during the Multitenancy Meeting on Friday. You are welcome
to have the meeting without me. Otherwise, we can just continue the excellent
discussion we have been having on the Mailing list.
Thanks,
Vish
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy
proposal that Vish made a while back.
However, the focus so far is on roles and quota but could not find any
discussion related to resource
Hi Henrique
I disagree with the idea that the other services should use domains. They need
a concept of hierarchical ownership which we have been discussiong. Domains is
one way of representing such an ownership hierarchy but i think it is too
limited.
The POC code I created for hierarchical
On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
sets) and discussing the changes with some former coworkers (MySQL
experts) I am inclined to believe
This seems like a reasonable and well thought out approach but It feels
like we are removing our ability to innovate. I know we are worried about
maintaining multiple APIs, but I’m still leaning towards putting the v3
API out and just keeping v2 around for a long time. Yes, its a maintenance
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:10 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Thank you all for your participation on this topic. It has been quite
controversial, but the API we expose to our users is a really big deal.
I'm feeling more and more confident that we're coming through this with
a much
On Mar 3, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 11:09 -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Having done some work with MySQL
On Mar 5, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
Recently, I found a serious issue about network-nodes startup time,
neutron-rootwrap eats a lot of cpu cycles, much more than the processes it's
wrapping itself.
On a database with 1 public
+1
I can help review these.
Vish
On Mar 6, 2014, at 12:20 AM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
RBD image support chain
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
are still
On Mar 17, 2014, at 4:34 AM, Yuzhou (C) vitas.yuz...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Duncan Thomas,
Maybe the statement about approval process is not very exact. In fact
in my mail, I mean:
In the enterprise private cloud, if beyond the quota, you want to create a
new VM ,that needs to wait
On Mar 20, 2014, at 5:52 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 08:36 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:07 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain
This all makes sense to me. I would suggest a blueprint and a pull request as
soon as Juno opens.
Vish
On Mar 25, 2014, at 8:07 AM, Shlomi Sasson shlo...@mellanox.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to share with the community the following challenge:
Currently, Vendors who have their iSCSI driver,
Personally I view this as a bug. There is no reason why we shouldn’t support
arbitrary grouping of zones. I know there is at least one problem with zones
that overlap regarding displaying them properly:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1277230
There is probably a related issue that is
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Here is some preliminary views (it currently ignores the ceilometer
logs, I haven't had a chance to dive in there yet).
It actually looks like a huge
On Mar 26, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 09:47 -0700, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Personally I view this as a bug. There is no reason why we shouldn’t
support arbitrary grouping of zones. I know there is at least one
problem with zones
Note that there has been a lot of discussion and a potential path forward for
hierarchical project support in openstack. I personally think this makes a lot
more sense than having a bunch of domain specific calls. Please take a look at
the information in the wiki here:
On Mar 27, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
On 03/27/2014 04:47 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Interestingly, unit test
nova.tests.api.openstack.compute.contrib.test_server_groups.ServerGroupTest.test_display_members
passes just fine, and it seems to be running
I dealt with this myself the other day and it was a huge pain. That said,
changing all the packages seems like a nuclear option. Is there any way
we could change python that would make it smarter about searching multiple
locations for namespace packages?
Vish
On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Doug
On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Joshua Hesketh joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Rackspace Australia
On 10/12/13 12:35 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:15 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
Hi there,
I've been reviewing this change which is currently proposed for master
and I think
, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This
is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend
our circle of trust.
When nova started
Interesting Background Information:
Why do we have modelines?
Termie put them in all the files of the first version of nova
Why did he put in modelines instead of configuring his editor?
Termie does a lot of python coding and he prefers a tabstop of 2 on all his
personal projects[1]
I really
On Oct 31, 2013, at 6:56 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2013-10-31 06:30:32 -0700:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a bit of a social norms thread
I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for
On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 11/13/2013 08:08 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 14 November 2013 13:59, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
This is an area where we actually have consensus in our docs (have had
for a while), the reviewer was being
On Nov 15, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
We've talked a lot about requirements for new compute drivers [1]. I
think the same sort of standards shold be applied for a new third-party
API, such as the GCE API [2].
Before we can consider taking on a
Hi Everyone,
I tend to follow merges and look for valuable havana backports. A few bug
fixes have merged recently where the associated bug is untriaged (i.e. the
severity is listed as 'Unknown'). I assume that reviewers of a bugfix
patch are viewing the associated bugs. It makes sense for
On Nov 26, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 13:06 -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I tend to follow merges and look for valuable havana backports. A few bug
fixes have merged recently where the associated bug is untriaged (i.e
On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
On 11/29/2013 06:37 PM, David Koo wrote:
On Nov 29, 02:22:17 PM (Friday), Chris Friesen wrote:
We're currently running Grizzly (going to Havana soon) and we're
running into an issue where if the active controller
On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/02/2013 10:59 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
I think that this is certainly different. It is something that we we want
and need a user facing API.
Examples:
- aggregates
- per host scheduling
- instance groups
Etc.
On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
On 02 Dec 2013, at 20:54 , Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool stuff!
Seeing your special glance properties for iso and floppy connections made me
think
of something
On Dec 2, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/02/2013 03:31 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 12/02/2013 10:59 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
I think that this is certainly different
Hi Ian,
The rendered network template was a legacy item that got stuck onto the config
drive so we could remove file injection. It is not intended that this is the
correct way to do net config. We have intended in the past to put a generic
form of network info into the metadata service and
On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Plunk andrew.pl...@rackspace.com wrote:
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum clint at fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800:
Why not
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I am really inspired by this thread. Frankly saying, Glance for Murano was a
kind of sacred entity, as it is a service with a long history in OpenStack.
We even did not think in the direction of
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:38 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-05 21:32:54 -0800:
On 12/05/2013 04:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49 -0800:
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05
On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Jan van Eldik jan.van.el...@cern.ch wrote:
Just
On 06/17/2014 08:18 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
We have some projects which are dynamically creating VMs up to their
quota. Under some circumstances, as cloud administrators, we would like
these projects to shrink and
You need to remove the old .pyc files in the migrate_repo/versions directory. I
have an alias in my .gitconfig to allow me to checkout a branch and delete pycs
in one command:
[alias]
cc = !TOP=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel); find $TOP -name '*.pyc'
-delete; git-checkout”
so i can do:
This isn’t an officially supported method, but i tend to use:
python -m nova.openstack.common.lockutils nosetests test
for example:
python -m nova.openstack.common.lockutils nosetests
nova.tests.integrated.test_api_samples:CloudPipeSampleJsonTest.test_cloud_pipe_create
I think this is a
I believe this will affect nova-network as well. We probably should use
something like the linux cutter utility to kill any ongoing connections after
we remove the nat rule.
Vish
On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:18 PM, Xurong Yang ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
After we create an SSH connection
it's qg- interface it can do a
similar operation.
-Brian
On 06/26/2014 03:36 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
I believe this will affect nova-network as well. We probably should use
something like the linux cutter utility to kill any ongoing connections
after we remove the nat rule
On Jun 26, 2014, at 5:07 AM, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I tested the 'backup' API recently and got two questions about it:
1. Why 'daily' 'weekly' appear in code comments novaclient about
'backup_type' parameter?
The 'backup_type' parameter is only a tag for this
Thanks WingWJ. It would also be great to track this in a bug.
Vish
On Jun 26, 2014, at 5:30 AM, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phil,
Ok, I'll submit a patch to add a new task_state(like 'STARTING_BUILD') in
these two days.
And related modifications will be definitely added in the
I have seen something like this before with nova-network and it was due to the
number of requests the rpc call timeout gets hit for allocate_network. You
might need to set your rpc_response_timeout to something greater. I think it
defaults to 60 seconds.
Vish
On Jun 25, 2014, at 6:57 AM,
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
