[openstack-dev] Use of capslock on the mailing lists

Hello Gentle Reader: I'm writing to share my thoughts on how I feel when I open my inbox on my account subscribed to OpenStack mailing lists. I've been subscribed to various lists for some time and have accommodated my consumption style to suit the broadcast nature of the specific lists;

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 2018-09-18 08:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...] I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very painful and mostly it is used weChat. [...] I have yet to hear anyone provide first-hand confirmation that access to

Re: [openstack-dev] [election] [tc] thank you

On 2018-09-05 04:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Emilien Macchi wrote: I personally feel like some rotation needs to happen A very honourable sentiment, Emilien. I'm so grateful to have spent time working with your very generous spirit. To more such work in the future, Anita

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Ongoing spam in Freenode IRC channels

On 2018-08-01 09:24 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 08/01/2018 12:45 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: Hello, It seems freenode is currently receiving a lot of unsolicited traffic across all channels.  The freenode team are aware [1] and doing their best. There are not really a lot of options.  We can set

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Winterscale: a proposal regarding the project infrastructure

On 2018-05-30 12:25 PM, James E. Blair wrote: I propose we call the overall effort "winterscale". In the best tradition of code names, it means nothing; look for no hidden meaning here. We won't use it for any actual services we provide. We'll use it to refer to the overall effort of

Re: [openstack-dev] Pros and Cons of face-to-face meetings

On 2018-03-08 02:18 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Fully agree with Doug. At CERN, we use video conferencing for 100s, sometimes >1000 participants for the LHC experiments, the trick we've found is to fully embrace the chat channels (so remote non-native English speakers can provide input) and

Re: [openstack-dev] Pros and Cons of face-to-face meetings

On 2018-03-08 01:24 PM, Jay S Bryant wrote: On 3/8/2018 12:22 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 2018-03-08 09:03 AM, Jens Harbott wrote: With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem to be pretty clear

Re: [openstack-dev] Pros and Cons of face-to-face meetings

On 2018-03-08 09:03 AM, Jens Harbott wrote: With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem to be pretty clear to most, so let me use the occasion to remind everyone of the disadvantages. Every meeting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Election] Process Tweaks

On 2018-02-15 02:09 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello Everyone, Over the last few elections, with changes to the election cycle (i.e. the separation of PTL and TC elections not being back to back), the scripts in place have become somewhat outdated and brittle. A few days ago after fixing a

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Infra] Meltdown Patching

On 2018-01-10 01:11 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: Hello everyone, As a general heads up Ubuntu has published new kernels which enable kernel page table isolation to address the meltdown vulnerability that made the news last week. The infra team is currently working through patching our Ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] It's time...

On 2017-10-04 11:17 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-10-04 22:21:32 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote: [...] the timing is right for me to step down as your Community Manager. [...] Your tireless assistance will be missed. I'm lucky to have been able to count you as a colleague all these

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][zuul] A Sad Farewell

On 2017-10-02 10:42 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: +1,000 to all of what Steve said. It's still tough for me to wrap my head around all the client/library work you shouldered. Your experience, perspective, and insight will certainly be missed. Thanks for being an awesome member of this community and

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 2017-09-22 06:11 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 21:21 Sep 21, Matt Riedemann wrote: I just wanted to highlight to people that there seems to be a series of garbage patches in various projects [1] which are basically doing things like fixing a single typo in a code comment, or very narrowly

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Declaring explicit minimum database versions

On 2017-08-15 11:59 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: stabbing himself in the eyes yesterday I find it interesting that I was just about to read this article: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/08/15/boys-and-men-must-do-the-right-thing-it-will-save-female-lives.html when I noticed Monty

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][barbican][freezer][horizon][karbor][keystone][mistral][nova][pack-deb][refstack][solum][storlets][swift][tacker][telemetry][watcher][zaqar] Last days for PTL candidate announ

On 2017-08-11 10:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-08-11 09:37:08 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/08/17 14:04 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: [...] Also to clarify, the election officials serve the TC, not the other way around. I would like to clarify this sentence, though. I do

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][barbican][freezer][horizon][karbor][keystone][mistral][nova][pack-deb][refstack][solum][storlets][swift][tacker][telemetry][watcher][zaqar] Last days for PTL candidate announ

On 2017-08-07 03:50 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello Everyone :) A quick reminder that we are in the last days for PTL candidate announcements. If you want to stand for PTL, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your candidacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Non-candidacy for Queens cycle Infrastructure PTL

On 2017-07-26 12:55 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-07-26 11:44:17 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: Thank you for all your work Jeremy. The fact that most don't think about and aren't aware of all that infra does is a testament to how well things have been running. To quote Ken Keeler

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects"

On 2017-06-28 10:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: For (1) we could have an "onboarding" project team that would help incoming projects through the initial steps of becoming an openstack project. The team would act as an umbrella team, an experimental area for projects that have some potential to

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

On 2017-05-24 04:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: On 05/23/2017 06:27 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: My mistake I mis-read, $149 USD is equal to $201 CDN (Canadian currency), so it looks like the same price to me. I believe (although I do not know for absolute certain) that the prices

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

On 2017-05-23 07:25 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 2017-04-05 06:05 PM, Erin Disney wrote: We are excited to announce the September Project Teams Gathering in Denver, CO at the Denver Renaissance Stapleton Hotel this September 11th-15th. As mentioned at the Atlanta PTG feedback session in February

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

On 2017-04-05 06:05 PM, Erin Disney wrote: We are excited to announce the September Project Teams Gathering in Denver, CO at the Denver Renaissance Stapleton Hotel this September 11th-15th. As mentioned at the Atlanta PTG feedback session in February, we had narrowed down our PTG location

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Do we need a #openstack-tc IRC channel

On 2017-05-16 11:46 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/16/2017 11:17 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:38:34AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, See $TITLE :) Thanks, Dims My preference would be to have an #openstack-tc channel. One thing I like about the dedicated meeting

Re: [openstack-dev] Supporting our global community

On 2017-01-29 01:34 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: OpenStack is a global open source community. The OpenStack Foundation serves members in 180 countries focused on advancing the capabilities and accessibility of open infrastructure everywhere. We fundamentally believe diversity and collaboration

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

On 2017-01-17 02:08 AM, Isaac Beckman wrote: I think that it would also be a good idea to have the option to let the CI maintainers add some useful information on the current status. It is very helpful to know that the CI system is under maintenance which is the reason why it hasn't been

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

On 2017-01-16 01:19 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: On 01/13/2017 10:29 PM, Mike Perez wrote: The way validation works is completely up to the project team. In my research as shown in the Summit etherpad [5] there's

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] not planning to serve as release PTL for Pike

On 2017-01-13 03:19 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: +++ Thanks for making it 100x easier to release new libraries, it's now something I look forward to. On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Many thanks for all the automation and all other initiatives Doug!

Re: [openstack-dev] Retire the radar project?

On 2016-12-21 07:02 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi, radar was an antique effort to import some outside-OpenStack code that did CI reliability dashboarding. It was never really a thing, and has been abandoned over time. The last commit that wasn't part of a project wide change series was in

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

On 2016-12-21 11:11 AM, Matt Kassawara wrote: Howdy! After several years of contributing to OpenStack documentation, a significant change in my career path warrants resigning from my role as a core reviewer. Working with the OpenStack community was a great experience and I hope it continues to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stepping down from core

On 2016-12-01 05:51 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: I've already communicated this in the neutron meeting and in some neutron policy patches, but yesterday the PTL actually updated the gerrit ACLs so I thought I'd drop a note here too. My work situation has changed and leaves me little time to keep up

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers

On 2016-11-29 11:27 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: I think we also need to look harder at the reasons for driver-only developer teams seeking official status. If it's because they want to be part of the community and help collaborate with the rest of us, then as long as they can do that consistent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Stepping back

On 2016-11-22 11:39 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: I should have sent this weeks ago but I'm a bad person who forgets common courtesy. My employment situation has changed in a way that does not afford me the necessary time to remain a regular contributor to Nova, or the broader OpenStack community. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stepping down from core

On 2016-11-17 01:42 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: Neutron (and Openstack), It is with regret that I report that my work situation has changed such that I'm not able to keep up with my duties as a Neutron core reviewer, L3 lieutenant, and drivers team member. My participation has dropped off

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] pausing releases until 1 Nov

On 2016-10-20 05:13 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: It's late in the week and the release and infra teams need to see to our travel preparations. I am declaring the releases repository frozen until the Tuesday after summit,

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 02:07 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: On 2016-10-11 01:40 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: There really needs to be a period when a) we

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 02:35 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: On 10/11/2016 01:21 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 2016-10-11 12:57 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: On 10/11/2016 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Just in case folks care, now is th

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 01:43 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Instead of two week process, make it three: Again as I replied to Ed's post, I think we can find options that fit in the current timeframe. Why do we need a week to nominate

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 01:42 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Anita Kuno wrote: * Getting rid of self nomination. Nominations come from the electorate at large. They can be refused of course. What is the current problem with self nomination? (I almost missed this since it was after your

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 01:40 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: There really needs to be a period when a) we know who all the candidates are, and b) voting has not yet begun. Why? The voting period is open for a period of several days,

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:55 PM, Ruby Loo wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Chris Dent wrote: Based on the turnout numbers and a bit of unscientific number crunching on the voting results it seems that the electorate was rather more engaged this time around. That's

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:08 PM, Chris Dent wrote: Based on the turnout numbers and a bit of unscientific number crunching on the voting results it seems that the electorate was rather more engaged this time around. That's _great_. As others have said I imagine some significant part of that was because

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:57 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: On 10/11/2016 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Just in case folks care, now is the best time to discuss our election process and suggest options or changes for the next

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Just in case folks care, now is the best time to discuss our election process and suggest options or changes for the next round of elections. I'm not adverse to discussing it

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-04 04:53 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 16-10-04 12:54 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: John Davidge wrote: Thierry, I'm surprised by your open hostility towards candidates. Accusing people of 'pretending' to care about things that they've taken the time

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] OpenStack Newton is officially released!

On 16-10-06 10:04 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Hello OpenStack community, I'm overjoyed to announce the final releases for the components of OpenStack Newton, which conclude the 6-month Newton development cycle. You will find a complete list of the deliverables for the 31 services and ~130 other

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 16-10-04 12:54 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: John Davidge wrote: Thierry, I'm surprised by your open hostility towards candidates. Accusing people of 'pretending' to care about things that they've taken the time to This is an excellent example of needing to know the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On 16-10-03 11:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: hi, as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the candidates for those who haven't voted

[openstack-dev] [elections] TC candidacy

OpenStack ensures people have a choice. We give developers choices, which gives deployers choices, which ensures consumers have choices. We make choices, evaluate results, revisit and choose again. OpenStack creates space; personal space, public space. The choice is available. By virtue of

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

On 16-09-29 08:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: 2016-09-26 16:05 GMT+02:00 Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info>: On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: Hi, following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Retiring stale stadium projects

On 16-09-27 09:18 PM, Armando M. wrote: Hi Neutrinos, I wanted to double check with you the state of these following projects: - networking-ofagent - python-neutron-pd-driver It's my understanding that they are ready for retirement or thereabouts. Please confirm, and I'll kick off the

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: Hi, following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting: - MOS CI - SUSE CI After promotion, all patchsets submitted will have to validate these gates in order to

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

On 16-09-21 01:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2016-09-21 08:56:24 -0700: Excerpts from Filip Pytloun's message of 2016-09-21 14:58:52 +0200: Hello, it's definately our bad that we missed elections in OpenStackSalt project. Reason is similar to Rob's - we

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

On 16-09-22 11:32 AM, Filip Pytloun wrote: If there's more we can do, we are available at Freenode/#openstack-salt. I think this right here is your issue. Believing it is the responsibility of the tc or other leaders to find you. It isn't. Be available on #openstack-dev at the very least.

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

On 16-09-21 05:08 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Jakub, Please see below. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Jakub Pavlik wrote: Hello all, it took us 2 years of hard working to get these official. OpenStack-Salt is now used by around 40 production deployments and it is

Re: [openstack-dev] Too many mails on announce list again :)

On 16-09-20 05:38 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-09-20 10:19:04 +0200: Steve Martinelli wrote: I think bundling the puppet, ansible and oslo releases together would cut

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] ops meetup feedback

On 16-09-20 09:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote: This is a bit delayed due to the release rush, finally getting back to writing up my experiences at the Ops Meetup. Nova Feedback Session = We had a double session for Feedback for Nova from Operators, raw etherpad here -

Re: [openstack-dev] Election Season, PTL and TC September/October 2016

On 16-09-13 10:23 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 16-09-13 09:52 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:48:06AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:14:56PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:10:53PM +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Lastly, election

Re: [openstack-dev] Election Season, PTL and TC September/October 2016

On 16-09-13 09:52 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:48:06AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:14:56PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:10:53PM +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Lastly, election officials are also reachable through the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 02:19 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: -Original Message- From: Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> Reply: Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> Date: September 7, 2016 at 13:08:44 To: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com>, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 01:59 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: -Original Message- From: Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: September 7, 2016 at 12:03:25 To: openstack-dev@lists.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 12:43 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: -Original Message- From: Monty Taylor Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 12:20 PM, Barrett, Carol L wrote: -Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 9:05 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards" On

Re: [openstack-dev] P and Q naming: all hail Pike and Queens

On 16-08-18 10:59 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey everybody, As you all know, voting is only one step in the selection process. We also have to have vetting done on the choices to identify risk associated with the selected names. This time around, the top choice by vote for both P and Q was too

[openstack-dev] PyCon Canada Call for Proposals

I spoke at this conference last year and it is a nice small friendly little conf. It was in Toronto last year and will be again this year. It is being held in November, most of the audience is university students. CFP is open for two more weeks:

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Jenkinsfile support (or repo/s for them?)

On 16-08-15 01:19 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi folks, I've been experimenting/investigating/playing around with the 'new' jenkins pipeline support (see https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/ for those who don't know what this is) and it got me thinking that there are probably X other

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

On 16-08-12 09:21 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: I 100% understand the cinder policy of kicking drivers out without CI. And I think there is a lot of value in ensuring what's in tree is tested. However, from a user perspective basically it means that if you deploy Newton cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder][stable] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

On 16-08-11 09:36 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2016-08-11 13:59:54 +0100: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2016-08-11 12:26:59 +0100: Hi all, As follow up on the mailing

[openstack-dev] [requirements][elections] Requirements PTL Results

We'd like to thank all those folks who came out to participate in this election on very brief notice. Thank you. The participation rate is impressive. Thank you to all candidates who put themselves forward, showing their enthusiasm for the role. It is plain to see this new team has a lot of

Re: [openstack-dev] Why do we need a Requirements Team and PTL

On 16-08-06 10:34 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, Question asked by Julien here: https://twitter.com/juldanjou/status/761897228596350976 Answer: There's a boat load of work that goes on in global requirements process. Here's the list of things that we dropped on the new team being formed:

[openstack-dev] [requirements][elections] requirements PTL election now open

The OpenStack Requirements PTL election is now open. The poll will close after 13:00 utc August 11, 2016. The electorate has been sent ballots to the gerrit Preferred Email. If you have patches returned when you issue this gerrit query, you are part of the Requirements electorate:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 16-07-27 09:41 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug Hellmann). We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote next week.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

a question of a personal nature, please don't hesitate to email both election officials: Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> and Anita Kuno as soon as you can so we can ensure you have the answers you need. Thank you to Jeremy Stanley for his assistance and support as well as his

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 07/27/2016 05:44 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-07-27 17:38:49 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote: > [...] >> /me assumes Jeremy's follow up suggestion/offer is to help compose the >> rolls, for which Anita is grateful > > Good guess, and yes I'm happy to if

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 07/27/2016 05:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-07-27 08:41:17 -0500 (-0500), Matthew Thode wrote: >> We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the >> requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug >> Hellmann). >> >> We are gathering the self

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][nova][infra] Voting gates

-steve Thank you Steve, Anita. > > On 7/14/16, 7:37 AM, "Anita Kuno" <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: > >> On 07/14/2016 10:21 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> At the midcycle, we had a session on gating. >>> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][nova][infra] Voting gates

On 07/14/2016 10:21 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey folks, > > At the midcycle, we had a session on gating. > > Out of that session came the decision to make the build gates voting Jobs, you have voting jobs, gates do not vote. We have an overload of technical terms as it is. Newcomers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][CI] Rule of recheck keywords has been updated

On 07/13/2016 05:36 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Thanks for sending this out! > > It would be appreciated if all CI maintainers get this updated to follow > the recommendations soon. It would really help us have consistency > across systems. > > Sean Clarifying this is a Cinder decision, so all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] what do you work on upstream of OpenStack?

On 06/23/2016 08:37 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2016-06-13 15:11:17 -0400: >> I'm trying to pull together some information about contributions >> that OpenStack community members have made *upstream* of OpenStack, >> via code, docs, bug reports, or anything

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

ta. > -Original Message- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info] > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 7:18 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash > > On 06/16/2016 07:03 PM, Matt Riedemann

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

On 06/16/2016 07:03 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 6/14/2016 9:03 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> >> I'll reply in private first because I am a core reviewer on the >> project-config repo, which was not mentioned in your list but you might >> consider useful to you at the bug s

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

On 06/13/2016 04:06 AM, Wang, Shane wrote: > Hi, OpenStackers, > > As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug > Smash at Hangzhou, China. > The 1st China Bug Smash was at Shanghai, the 2nd was at Xi'an, and the 3rd > was at Chengdu. > > We are constructing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] The Magnum Midcycle

On 06/09/2016 02:27 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > If we can confirm the dates and location, there is a reasonable chance we > could also offer remote conferencing using Vidyo at CERN. While it is not the > same as an F2F experience, it would provide the possibility for remote > participation for those

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Require a level playing field for OpenStack projects

On 06/14/2016 10:44 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > On 14/06/2016 15:00, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I just proposed a new requirement for OpenStack "official" projects, >> which I think is worth discussing beyond the governance review: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329448/ >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] what do you work on upstream of OpenStack?

On 06/13/2016 03:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I'm trying to pull together some information about contributions > that OpenStack community members have made *upstream* of OpenStack, > via code, docs, bug reports, or anything else to dependencies that > we have. > > If you've made a contribution

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][vpnaas]Question about MPLS VPN

On 05/26/2016 02:50 AM, zhangyali (D) wrote: > Hi all, > > I am interested in the VPNaaS project in Neutron. Now I notice that only > IPsec tunnel has completed, but other types of VPN, such as, MPLS/BGP, have > not completed. I'd like to know how's going about MPLS/BGP vpn? What's the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] newton 1 milestone closed

On 06/03/2016 05:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > The Newton 1 milestone deadline is past, and the release team has > processed all but a few of the tag requests. We had some technical > issues with a few requests that we expect to have resolved early > next week. > > A few projects missed the

Re: [openstack-dev] Collecting our wiki use cases

On 06/02/2016 10:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thanks to everyone who helped collecting wiki use cases on that etherpad. > > I tried to categorize the various use cases and I think they fit in 4 > categories: > > 1/ Things that are already in the process of being moved to reference > websites

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Leadership training - ideas to include those not in the room?

On 05/26/2016 06:03 PM, Colette Alexander wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: >> On 05/26/2016 05:01 PM, Colette Alexander wrote: >>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Leadership training - ideas to include those not in the room?

On 05/26/2016 05:01 PM, Colette Alexander wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: > >> I personally think that for any environment to be able to foster >> personal growth the environment has to first and foremost protect the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Leadership training - ideas to include those not in the room?

On 05/26/2016 03:10 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 05/26/2016 02:40 PM, Colette Alexander wrote: >> Hello Stackers! >> >> I just wanted to check in as we approach the leadership training >> session that some of the TC and community will be attending in Ann >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Leadership training - ideas to include those not in the room?

On 05/26/2016 02:40 PM, Colette Alexander wrote: > Hello Stackers! > > I just wanted to check in as we approach the leadership training > session that some of the TC and community will be attending in Ann > Arbor, Michigan together [0]. > > > First thing: fostering as much inclusion as

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] when are your mid-cycle meetups?

On 05/23/2016 05:36 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > FYI, > > Glance one was cancelled (so can't put on the wiki), as we are > preferring the virtual one for more participation. > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/095591.html Did you add it to the wiki page for virtual

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] VMT addition

On 05/21/2016 11:16 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > It's my pleasure to announce that Morgan Fainberg > (0D1A 8C84 23CF 3C86 BF42 0F7B B9A8 3CEF A07C 6D8A) has formally > joined the ranks of the OpenStack Vulnerability Management Team. His > years of expertise handling security issues in Keystone, and

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 05/11/2016 02:06 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:51:41PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-05-11 10:04:26 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: >> [...] >>> Before deciding that it's unsurmountable, maybe giving delete >>> permissions to a larger set of contributors might

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party] Are you getting value from the 8:00 utc Tuesday meeting?

On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 14:30 May 10, Anita Kuno wrote: >> I've been chairing this meeting for about 3 releases now and in this >> last release it has mostly been myself and lennyb, who also attends the >> Monday 15:00 utc third-party meeting that I

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 05/11/2016 05:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:59:41PM -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>>>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less >>>>> ephemeral items ou

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Are you getting value from the 8:00 utc Tuesday meeting?

I've been chairing this meeting for about 3 releases now and in this last release it has mostly been myself and lennyb, who also attends the Monday 15:00 utc third-party meeting that I chair. Are you getting value from the Tuesday 8:00 utc third-party meeting? If yes, please make yourself known.

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less >>> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the >>> value of being google indexed). > > Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world.

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On 05/09/2016 07:33 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10 May 2016 at 10:55, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: >> On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki >>> more would be a good

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki > more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? > > -Rob Well we are actually moving away from the wiki. Currently new accounts are closed due to spammers using new

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 05/04/2016 08:25 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 04/05/16 01:58, John Dickinson wrote: >> TC, >> >> In reference to >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/093680.html and >> Thierry's reply, I'm currently drafting a TC resolution to update >>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >