Re: [openstack-dev] Winterscale: a proposal regarding the project infrastructure

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:23 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Joshua Hesketh writes: > > > So the "winterscale infrastructure council"'s purview is quite limited in > > scope to just govern the services provided? > > > > If so, would you foresee a need

Re: [openstack-dev] Winterscale: a proposal regarding the project infrastructure

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:25 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > With recent changes implemented by the OpenStack Foundation to include > projects other than "OpenStack" under its umbrella, it has become clear > that the "Project Infrastructure Team" needs to change. > > The infrastructure that

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

> > I think in actuality, both operations would end up as intersections: > > === === > Matcher Template Project Result > === === > files ABBC B > irrelevant-files ABBC B >

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:58 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > If you've had difficulty overriding jobs in project-templates, please > read and provide feedback on this proposed change. > > We tried to make the Zuul v3 configuration language as intuitive as > possible, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] New Zuul Depends-On syntax

Perhaps we need to consider a backport of the syntax to the 2.5 series? It could help with the transition for those who need to upgrade. However, on the other hand it might make deployers more complacent to do so. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Marking <= mitaka EOL

Hi All, I've processed the list that Tony sent through this morning, removing the branches and tagging their positions as described. The only exception being that openstack/zaqar doesn't have stable/liberty or stable/liberty2 branches to EOL. Let me know if I've missed anything. Cheers, Josh

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

Hi all, Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at the correct position. Similarly please let me know if there were any projects that should have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects"

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-06-29 18:58:09 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > So I apologise if this has already been suggested/discussed (the > > long threads are difficult to keep up with), but has it been >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects"

Howdy, So I apologise if this has already been suggested/discussed (the long threads are difficult to keep up with), but has it been considered to go back to using a stackforge namespace? It seems to me that the role of stackforge to provide a proving ground or place for aligned projects/repos

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > [...] > > I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've > > used for the last few retirements is here: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

An [official] OpenStack project is also a hosted project by OpenStack [infra]. I agree that "OpenStack-Hosted projects" is not very distinct from "OpenStack projects". Furthermore the "hosted" part is not unique to either category. I don't have an immediate suggestion for an alternative, but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Questions for Candidates

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello Candidates! > > You all have proven yourselves to be crucial parts of the community and I > just wanted to say good luck to each one of you in the upcoming election! > > Also though, I thought it might be good

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][infra][pbr] Nominating Stephen Finucane for pbr-core

+1, yay! :-) On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-04-12 08:14:31 -0500: > > Hey all, > > > > As I'm sure you all know, pbr is both our most pervasively used > > dependency and our least well understood.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Howdy, To answer the original question, if elected, I should be able to commit at least a few hours per day to the TC (if not more). I can also be quite elastic in this being able to spend more time some weeks than others as the role dictates. My timezone is UTC+10 which makes the meetings at

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] Nominating for Technical Committee

Howdy, My name is Joshua Hesketh and I would like to self nominate for the Technical Committee. I work for Rackspace Australia and have been involved in the OpenStack community since the Havana release circa 2013. I have been primarily working on the Infrastructure (infra) project where I am

Re: [openstack-dev] Zuul v3 - What's Coming: What to expect with the Zuul v3 Rollout

Thanks for the great write-up Monty :-). Last week was great fun and zuulv3 is making excellent process. I'm excited for the switch-over. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hi everybody! > > This content can also be found at >

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see > > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way > > of some

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Please add a initial core member to meteos-ui-core.

All done :-) On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Hiroyuki Eguchi wrote: > Hello Infra Team. > > > > I've created new projects named meteos-ui > > which UI interface for Machine Learning as a Service. > > > > Could you please add me (Hiroyuki Eguchi )

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > > > > On Dec 19, 2016, at 14:31, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:18:20AM -0800, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > > > >> The Chef OpenStack cookbooks team is way late to the party.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Hey Tony, > > > > Could we also EOL tripleo-incubator and tripleo-image-elements > > stable/icehouse please? > > Yup, No problem. > I have retired

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Any way to disable zuul status page auto-refresh?

You could try saving the status page and modifying the refresh time, or similarly you could checkout zuul and run the webapp locally[0]. You'd have to point it at [1] and modify the refresh times here [2]. (The status page in the zuul tree is different to the one on status.o.o). Cheers, Josh [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

Hi Sumit, That's fine. That repo wasn't marked for removal. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sumit Naiksatam <sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh > <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The repos listed[0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Tony and all, > > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root bea

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

Hey Tony and all, I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to it I'll look at it then. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue,

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Ocata Summit Infra Sessions Recap

Thank you for the write up. Having missed being there in person it is much appreciated :-) On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > I'm Cc'ing this to the openstack-infra ML but setting MFT to direct > subsequent discussion to the openstack-dev ML so we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Having said that, I think Dan Smith came across a fairly large > > production DB dataset recently which he was using for testing some > > archive changes, maybe Dan will become our new Johannes, but grumpier of > > course.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Dean Troyer <dtro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The question now is whether or not to continue running. Is there still >> value in running t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 10/3/2016 11:29 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Quick bit of background. Turbo-hipster is a 3rd party CI system that >> runs nova's database migrations ag

[openstack-dev] [nova] Future of turbo-hipster CI

Howdy, Quick bit of background. Turbo-hipster is a 3rd party CI system that runs nova's database migrations against real datasets to try and catch real-world problems. When it was initially written the state of migrations in nova would cause a lot of pain for deployers (such as very long

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] Request for old branches removal

t rid of them? > > Thanks again, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Joshua Hesketh > <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Emilien, > > > > I've removed all of the old branches on the specified repos and created > tags > > in their place. Let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] Request for old branches removal

Hi Emilien, I've removed all of the old branches on the specified repos and created tags in their place. Let me know if there are any problems. Cheers, Josh On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greatings Infra, > > This is an official request to remove

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][all] Status update of the InfraCloud

This is awesome stuff. Thanks to all involved and to HPE for the hardware :-) On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz < ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there > > We would like to write an update about the status of the InfraCloud ( if > you never heard of it, it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Naming polls - and some issues

Hello Ian, My understanding of it is that you need to receive a new link. Monty is slowly sending those out in batches and he hasn't finished. I expect he'll email the list once he has finished to confirm so I'd suggest holding off until then to check. Cheers, Josh On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:58

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hey Jesse, Sorry for the delay. I've gone ahead and removed icehouse, juno and kilo branches creating tags in their places. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag implemented > we’ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to have our > kilo-eol tag implemented and the ‘kilo’

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [vitrage] branch marking policy

Hey Elisha, Have you looked at http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html ? Cheers, Josh On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Rosensweig, Elisha (Nokia - IL) < elisha.rosensw...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We've prepared a (local) branch with Vitrage that is *Liberty-compatible*, > and

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > Removing the pbr branch should be fine - it was an exceptional thing > to have that branch in the first place - pbr is consumed by releases > only, and due to its place in the dependency graph is very very very

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

deletion > please be reversed? > > Thanks, > ~Sumit. > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 06/24/2016 02:09 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have completed removi

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

, > ~Sumit. > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 06/24/2016 02:09 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have completed removing stable/kilo branches from the projects listed > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi all, I have completed removing stable/kilo branches from the projects listed [0]*. There are now 'kilo-eol' tags in place at the sha's where the branches were. *There are a couple of exceptions. oslo-incubator was listed but is an unmaintained project so no further action was required. Tony

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Upcoming changes now that Jenkins has retired

Hey Steve, Yes. The user "jenkins" in gerrit has actually been controlled by zuul for some years now. This rename is basically to reflect that and includes an 1st party CI comments (so check and gate). Cheers, Josh On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Upcoming changes now that Jenkins has retired

We can update those without any trouble. We just need to also update the tests that check the usernames. You should be able to make all of the changes (as per your first patchset) and then find where the tests also need changing. Happy to help you on the review if you need more guidance. To

Re: [openstack-dev] StackViz is now enabled for all devstack-gate jobs

Awesome work to all involved. This is really neat! :-) On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Buckley, Tim Jason < timothy.jas.buck...@hpe.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to announce that StackViz will now be running at the end all > tempest-dsvm jobs and saving visualization output to the log

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Jobs failing : "No matching distribution found for "

Thanks for your digging and help with this Ian and Andreas. I've added an apache rule to redirect -'s to .'s as a quick workaround to un-wedge the gate https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314898/ (and a few edge cases https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314956) If you have a build that has failed due

Re: [openstack-dev] Acknowledging Jim Blair's work on the TC

Absolutely, +1! Thanks very much for all you do Jim. On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > Jim is an incumbent on the TC this election and he didn't run. I'm > posting this to express my thanks to Jim for his work and dedication on > the TC. > > Jim, I think

[openstack-dev] Devstack jobs failing

Hi all, Just a heads up that devstack jobs are failing in the gate. I'm currently investigating but unfortunately haven't found anything yet and don't have much time this evening. Hopefully somebody smarter than I will look at it shortly. Cheers, Josh

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Why WADL when you can Swagger

Hey Anne, Thanks for all your work. This sounds really exciting. The explanation in this email was largely what I was missing during my earlier reviews of the spec. I'll take another look at the spec shortly but it might be helpful to have some of this rationale added. Cheers, Josh On Sat, Feb

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno

Hey all, So I just caught up on this thread and the corresponding scrollback in IRC. First of all, sorry if this came as a surprise to anybody. As Andreas pointed out this was highlighted in a number of docs email to this list, but I understand why they might have been overlooked. The resource

Re: [openstack-dev] Mitaka Infra Sprint

n...@spencerkrum.com > > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, at 09:17 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > Hi all, > As discussed during the infra-meeting on Tuesday[0], the infra team will > be holding a mid-cycle sprint to focus on infra-cloud[1]. > The sprint is an opportunity to get in a room an

[openstack-dev] Mitaka Infra Sprint

Hi all, As discussed during the infra-meeting on Tuesday[0], the infra team will be holding a mid-cycle sprint to focus on infra-cloud[1]. The sprint is an opportunity to get in a room and really work through as much code and reviews as we can related to infra-cloud while having each other near by

[openstack-dev] Open Cloud Symposium Call for Proposals – LCA2016

We are pleased to announce that the call for proposals to the Open Cloud Symposium for linux.conf.au 2016 is now open! The symposium – a one day mini-conference dedicated to all things cloud – will be held on Monday 01 February 2016 in Geelong, Victoria as part of linux.conf.au 2016. Presentation

[openstack-dev] IRC Bot issues

Hi all, Freenode are currently experiencing a severe DDoS attack that are having an effect on our bots. As such the meetbot, irc logging and gerrit watcher are interminably available. We expect the bots to resume their normal function once Freenode has recovered. For now, meetings may have to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] PTL non-candidacy

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-09-10 13:27:53 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: > [...] > > I do not plan to run for PTL in the next cycle. > [...] > > Thanks for the awesome job you did as PTL these last cycles. I hope > you enjoy a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] PTL/TC candidate workflow proposal for next elections

I'm struggling to think of a way this might help enable discussions between nominees and voters about their platforms. Since the tooling will send out the nomination announcements the only real noise that is reduced is the nomination confirmed type emails. While I think this sounds really neat,

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit under high load

Hi all, Gerrit (review.openstack.org) has been restarted and the systems are back up and functioning. We have an idea of the cause of the problem and will investigate more permanent fixes. Cheers, Josh On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Joshua Hesketh joshua.hesk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all

[openstack-dev] Gerrit under high load

Hi all, Gerrit is currently under very high load and may be unresponsive. We are looking into the issue and will keep you updated here. Cheers, Josh __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] How to use the log server in CI ?

Hi Tang, For OpenStack's set up, os-loganalyze sits at /htmlify/ and is used to add markup and filter log lines when viewing in a browser. For your own set up you don't need to use this and could simply serve anything straight off your disk. It should be safe to remove the apache matching rules

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][infra] CI System is broken

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-07-31 14:49:52 +0800 (+0800), Gareth wrote: Could this issue be fixed today? I believe it is, now that we've restarted with https://review.openstack.org/207675 applied. Btw, is it possible to design a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] CI Infrastructure down

Hi all, The gate is slowly recovering and working through the backlog of changes. It should now be safe to do 'recheck's on jobs that received NOT_REGISTERED errors. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: This morning we hit some problems with our

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] turbo-hipster seems to be out to lunch

Everything is up and running again FYI. Let me know if you spot any further problems. Cheers, Josh On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 7/12/2015 1:50 AM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: Hey, Yes, sorry, I only discovered this yesterday. I should

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] turbo-hipster seems to be out to lunch

Hey, Yes, sorry, I only discovered this yesterday. I should have updated the wiki page sooner but I've placed some details there now: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/kilo+topic:fix-th,n,z Basically the removal of migrate-flavor-data from master

[openstack-dev] OpenStack miniconf at PyCon AU Ticket giveaway

Hi all, The OpenStack miniconf at PyCon Australia is rapidly approaching (31st July) but it's not too late to register! You can find all of the details on http://2015.pycon-au.org/, including the OpenStack miniconf programme http://2015.pycon-au.org/programme/schedule/friday. We're also

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-root

Thanks all. I promise to not break things too much! Cheers, Josh On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:54 AM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure: contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability on infra

Re: [openstack-dev] PyCon-AU Openstack miniconf CFP open

to submit or not, please ping me or Joshua Hesketh - we're organising the miniconf together and can provide guidance. Cheers, Rob __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Required data migrations in Kilo, need Turbo Hipster tests updated

On 4/23/15 11:41 PM, Dan Smith wrote: That change works on the dataset. However I was referring to the db/object api (which I have no real knowledge of) that it should be able to get_by_uuid unmigrated instances and in my case I got the traceback given in that paste. It's possible I'm just

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Required data migrations in Kilo, need Turbo Hipster tests updated

On 4/22/15 1:20 AM, Dan Smith wrote: The migrate_flavor_data command didn't actually work on the CLI (unless I'm missing something or did something odd). See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175890/ where I fix the requirement of max_number. This likely means that operators have not bothered to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Required data migrations in Kilo, need Turbo Hipster tests updated

On 4/23/15 1:31 AM, Dan Smith wrote: Sure, but for people doing continuous deployment, they clearly haven't ran the migrate_flavor_data (or if they have, they haven't filed any bugs about it not working[0]). Hence the usefulness of T-H here, right? The point of the migration check is to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Required data migrations in Kilo, need Turbo Hipster tests updated

On 4/23/15 1:16 PM, Dan Smith wrote: If I selected all the instance_type_id's from the system-metadata table and used those uuid's to load the object with something like: instance = objects.Instance.get_by_uuid( context, instance_uuid,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dropping DB Downgrades, need Turbo Hipster tests updated

Hey, turbo-hipster is no longer testing downgrades as per the TC decision. The CI bot now passes on that change. Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 4/20/15 10:16 PM, Sean Dague wrote: Awesome, thanks Josh. On 04/20/2015 07:14 AM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: Hi Sean, Thanks for your work

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Required data migrations in Kilo, need Turbo Hipster tests updated

Hey, So I can add support to turbo-hipster to apply migrate_flavor_data when it hits your migration (in fact I started to do this). This means the tests will pass on your change and continue to once it merges. I'll update the datasets after the next release but it'll probably be to a version

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dropping DB Downgrades, need Turbo Hipster tests updated

Hi Sean, Thanks for your work on this. I'll take a closer look tomorrow and remove the downgrade testing from turbo-hipster in line with the TC decision. Cheers, Josh From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net Sent: Monday, 20 April 2015 8:38 PM To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party

Hey, 0700 - 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: anteaya, UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC 7:00 AM to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Turbo hipster problems

Hi Gary, Sorry we had a mis-hap over the weekend. The Database CI should be back up and running now. Let me know if you see any more problems. Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 10/18/14 1:55 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Anyone aware why Turbo his peter is failing with:

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Anita Kuno for project-config-core

Absolutely. +1. Rackspace Australia On 9/27/14 1:34 AM, James E. Blair wrote: I'm pleased to nominate Anito Kuno to the project-config core team. The project-config repo is a constituent of the Infrastructure Program and has a core team structured to be a superset of infra-core with

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Andreas Jaeger for project-config-core

Agreed :-). +1 Rackspace Australia On 9/27/14 1:35 AM, James E. Blair wrote: I'm pleased to nominate Andreas Jaeger to the project-config core team. The project-config repo is a constituent of the Infrastructure Program and has a core team structured to be a superset of infra-core with

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Sean Dague for project-config-core

Awesome. +1. Rackspace Australia On 9/27/14 1:35 AM, James E. Blair wrote: I'm pleased to nominate Sean Dague to the project-config core team. The project-config repo is a constituent of the Infrastructure Program and has a core team structured to be a superset of infra-core with additional

Re: [openstack-dev] Oslo final releases ready

Howdy, I did some digging and it appears because the proposal bot failed and skipped out updating keystone-specs: http://logs.openstack.org/c2/c2372ca3ef6c3ced31934429aecf830daafe583a/post/propose-requirements-updates/e9bbc05/console.html#_2014-09-18_22_56_42_181 (the exit comes from here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [feature freeze exception] Move to oslo.db

Hey, Yep, I became aware of these this afternoon. The negative votes are due to a bad nodepool image. I've rebuilt them and am working on clearing the backlog. Sorry for the issues. Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 9/4/14 4:30 PM, Michael Still wrote: I'm good with this one too, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Review metrics - what do we want to measure?

On 9/3/14 10:43 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-09-03 11:51:13 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: I thought there was now a thung where zuul can use a different account per pipeline? That was the most likely solution we discussed at the summit, but I don't believe we've implemented it yet

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Neutron] How to verify link to logs for disabled third-party CI

On 9/3/14 12:11 PM, Gary Duan wrote: Hi, Our CI system is disabled due to a running bug and wrong log link. I have manually verified the system with sandbox and two Neutron testing patches. However, with CI disabled, I am not able to see its review comment on any patch. Is there a way that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Review metrics - what do we want to measure?

I've moved it back up the review chain for you :-) Rackspace Australia On 9/3/14 6:34 PM, Robert Collins wrote: We would benefit a great deal from having this sooner. On 3 September 2014 20:11, Joshua Hesketh joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com wrote: On 9/3/14 10:43 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] Retrigger turbo-hipster

Hi John, Sorry for the slow reply*. We ran into some trouble with our CI system after an upgrade to nova's requirements broke our system. Everything is back up and running now and we've caught up on missed jobs (including your recheck). My apologies for the hassle. Let me know if you have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] turbo-hipster seems very unhappy

Hey Matt, You're absolutely right. We've been having trouble since a change to nova requirements was merged. We release we're a long way behind and are working on getting things back to normal as soon as possible. My apologies for the inconvenience. Cheers, Josh

[openstack-dev] PyCon AU OpenStack Miniconf – Schedule now available!

Hello all, The miniconf organisers are pleased to announce their first draft of a schedule for the PyCon Australia OpenStack miniconf: http://sites.rcbops.com/openstack_miniconf/2014/07/openstack-miniconf-programme-for-pycon-au/ The OpenStack miniconf is a one day conference held on Friday the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Turbo hipster

Hi Gary, Thanks for the notification. Our nodepool had built a corrupt image which was returning false positives. I have fixed this up and rerun tests on changes that had negative votes where Jenkins passed. If you notice any changes that seem like a false negative please issue a recheck

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

On 6/28/14 10:40 AM, James E. Blair wrote: An alternate approach would be to have third-party CI systems register jobs with OpenStack's Zuul rather than using their own account. This would mean only a single report of all jobs (upstream and 3rd-party) per-patchset. It significantly reduces

Re: [openstack-dev] PyCon AU OpenStack Miniconf – Call for proposals now open!

Hello everybody, Just a quick reminder that the call for proposals closes at the end of Friday for the openstack miniconf in Brisbane, Australia http://openstack.pycon-au.org Cheers, Josh On 5/27/14 5:33 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: The OpenStack miniconf organisers for PyCon AU are pleased

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] Do all turbo-hipster jobs fail in stable/havana?

On 6/18/14 12:52 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/16/2014 11:58 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: Hi there, Very sorry for the mishap. I manually enqueued our zuul to run tests on changes that turbo-hipster had recently missed and did not pay attention to the branch they were for. Turbo-Hipster

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] Do all turbo-hipster jobs fail in stable/havana?

Hi there, Very sorry for the mishap. I manually enqueued our zuul to run tests on changes that turbo-hipster had recently missed and did not pay attention to the branch they were for. Turbo-Hipster doesn't run tests on stable or non-master branches so it should have never attempted to.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Ironic] [Infra] Making Ironic vote as a third-party Nova driver

Howdy, Here is my first pass at allowing different voters for different pipelines. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97391/2 Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 5/30/14 3:30 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Joshua Hesketh joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Ironic] [Infra] Making Ironic vote as a third-party Nova driver

On 5/29/14 8:52 AM, James E. Blair wrote: Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com writes: Hi all! This is a follow-up to several summit discussions on how-do-we-deprecate-baremetal, a summary of the plan forward, a call to raise awareness of the project's status, and hopefully gain

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-core

] [infra] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-core jebl...@openstack.org (James E. Blair) writes: The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure: contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people

[openstack-dev] PyCon AU OpenStack Miniconf – Call for proposals now open!

The OpenStack miniconf organisers for PyCon AU are pleased to announce their call for proposals is now open! The OpenStack miniconf is a one day conference held on Friday the 1st of August 2014 in Brisbane before PyCon Australia. The day is dedicated to talks related to the OpenStack project and

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Sergey Lukjanov for infra-root

+1 :-) From: James E. Blair [jebl...@openstack.org] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 7:42 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Sergey Lukjanov for infra-root The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier

[openstack-dev] [nova] Turbo-Hipster bad votes

Hi all, Unfortunately turbo-hipster has been leaving bad votes on nova db migrations. I've disabled voting and we're looking into the problem. Sorry for the inconvenience. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. Regards, Josh ___

[openstack-dev] PyCon Australia Call For Proposals

Hi There, Just a friendly note that PyCon Australia's call for proposals closes tomorrow. PyCon Australia 2014 will be held in Brisbane 1st-5th of August. OpenStack content is welcome in the main programme. For full details and to submit, see http://2014.pycon-au.org/cfp Cheers, Josh --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] How to solve the cgit repository browser line number misalignment in Chrome

Hey, I suspect you're looking for this : http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/git/openstack.css Hope that helps! Cheers, Josh From: Doug Hellmann [doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Thursday, April

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] who builds other part of test environment

Hi Gareth, Tempest shouldn't touch the test that you are looking at. The Jenkins job should execute using the tox.ini in the rally repository so that part should be the same as your local environment. This is the relevant part loaded onto the Jenkin's slaves:

  1   2   >