ment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Edgar, Kyle:
Kevin's suggestion should work for me (still hashing out the implementation).
I've added an item to the 3rd Party IRC agenda anyway t
On 2014-08-27 00:52:35 +0200 (+0200), Salvatore Orlando wrote:
[...]
> In this case you might try to rebase the patch you're going to
> test on master before running devstack, which I think it's also
> what happens in the upstream gate.
More or less. Technically we try to merge the proposed change
to
> discuss this corner case.
>
> Thanks!
> Dane
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 12:44 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-de
hanks,
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd) [mailto:lebla...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 10:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Edgar,
August 25, 2014 12:44 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Dane,
I will second Kyle's idea. Let's discuss this during today IRC meeting if
Kevin's suggestion does
hanks,
>> Dane
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Kevin Benton [mailto:blak...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 5:47 AM
>>
>>
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-pa
: Kevin Benton [mailto:blak...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 5:47 AM
>
>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required
> to be run
>
>
>
> Can you disable po
plugins blocked on a
certain fix).
Thanks,
Dane
From: Kevin Benton [mailto:blak...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 5:47 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Can you disable
(That is,
> until we have a solution for the Jenkins limitation).
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
> Dane
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 1:57 PM
> To: Dane Leblanc (leb
gar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 1:57 PM
To: Dane Leblanc (leblancd); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Sorry my bad but I just changed.
Edgar
On
na [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:58 PM
>To: Dane Leblanc (leblancd); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>
>Dane,
>
>W
1:37 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Edgar,
CI name: One Convergence CI
The logs issue has been fixed and ear
(not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Dane,
Wiki has been updated.
Thanks,
Edgar
On 8/21/14, 7:57 AM, "Dane Leblanc (leblancd)" wrote:
>Edgar:
>
>The status on the wiki page says "Results are n
uestions)"
>>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 at 1:11 PM
>>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What te
g List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
> required to be run
>
> I also added a two more nodes to our cluster to reduce the delay. Can
> we establish a maximum time to vote on the wi
velopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
I also added a two more nodes to our cluster to reduce the delay. Can we
establish a maximum time to vote
-Dane
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
>Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 3:05 PM
>To: 'Edgar Magana'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>questions)
>Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>requ
penStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
The APIC CI did run tests against that commit (after some queue latency):
http://128.107.233.28:8080/job/apic/1860/
http://cisco-neutron-ci.cisco.com/logs
quot;OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
&g
, August 19, 2014 1:33 PM
To: Dane Leblanc (leblancd); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
I was looking to one of the most recent Neutron commits:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c
inal Message-----
>>From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
>>Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:18 PM
>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>>required to be run
>>
>>Also
ing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Dane,
Are you sure about it?
I just went to this commit and I could not find the APIC tests.
Thanks,
Edgar
On 8/17/14, 8:47 PM, "Dane Leblanc (leblancd)" w
velopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
You didn't wait long enough for the Big Switch CI to reach your negative test.
:-)
Currently the CI sy
t: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>Importance: High
>
>Team,
>
>I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Onl
5:33 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Hi, Edgar
MetapluginCI didn't run for document changes.
I changed fi
ot for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>Importance: High
>
>Correction
>
>The right links are:
>
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114629/
>
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>
>
>No
o:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
>Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:06 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>Importance: High
>
>Team,
>
>I did a quick audit
t;To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>
>Edgar:
>
>For the Notes for the Cisco APIC, can you change the comment "results are
>fake" to something like "r
[mailto:trinath.soman...@freescale.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:04 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>> required to be run
>>
>> Hi Edgar,
&g
>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Edgar,
Our CI is running the tests (non voting), but don't see it listed on the review
for any patch. Is this due to missing logs? I would like to confirm this is the
issue, will resolve this.
Th
it Manur
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
>Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2014 4:06 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Importance: High
Team,
I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins and
drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
I created a report
-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 3:47 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [op
com>>,
Deepak Gupta
mailto:deepak.gu...@oneconvergence.com>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Edgar,
Our CI is running the tests (non voting), but don't see it listed on the review
for any patch. Is this due to missing logs? I woul
Edgar,
Our CI is running the tests (non voting), but don't see it listed on the
review for any patch. Is this due to missing logs? I would like to confirm
this is the issue, will resolve this.
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Edgar Magana
wrote:
> Thank you Akihiro.
>
> I wil
Thank you Akihiro.
I will propose a better organization for this section. Stay tune!
Edgar
On 8/17/14, 10:53 PM, "Akihiro Motoki" wrote:
>
>On 2014/08/18 0:12, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Edgar Magana
>> wrote:
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI
Neutron Ci Folks,
I have received answers from almost all the CI contacts and I want to
thank you all.
Every case is different and I will review each one of your answer and
questions.
I do understand that every CI is different and this is why I would suggest
two things:
1) Today's Neutron IRC me
On 2014/08/18 0:12, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Edgar Magana
> wrote:
>> Team,
>>
>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
>> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>> I created a report here:
>> https://wi
; To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
> required to be run
> Importance: High
>
> Team,
>
> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
&
8:18 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Also, you can add me as a contact person for the Cisco VPNaaS driver.
-Original Message-
From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
Sent
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Team,
>
> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
> I created a report here:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Ex
soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:06 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
b
From: daya kamath
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
hi edgar,
the IBM SDNVE system runs a subset of tempest tests currently, but is
stack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Correction
The right links are:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114629/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
Not this one:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
Edgar
On 8/15/14, 3:35 PM, "Edgar Maga
Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 3:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Importance: High
Correction
The right links are:
https
r.mag...@workday.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 3:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Importance: High
Correction
The right links are:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/1
Hi, Edgar
MetapluginCI didn't run for document changes.
I changed filter so that CI run for ALL changes include documents.
Thanks,
Hirofumi
2014-08-16 7:35 GMT+09:00 Edgar Magana :
> Team,
>
> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
> and drivers are running p
her thread).
Thanks,
Dane
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be
Dane
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to
be run
Importance: High
Hi Edgar,
I am running the Nuage CI.
The Nuage CI has run and posted successfully the result for the first
review.
Because of infra issue(internet can be down, etc) we are running manually
the -1
-1 take some time away for developper and before doing a -1, I want to be
sure that it's a valid iss
You didn't wait long enough for the Big Switch CI to reach your negative
test. :-)
Currently the CI system is backed by about 100 patches to push responses
out ~22 hours.
This does bring up an old discussion that was never resolved.
What is the minimum expected response time for CI systems?
On
ugust 15, 2014 at 3:47 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
> required to be run
>
> Hi Edgar,
>
> Nice shot, to
ugust 15, 2014 at 3:47 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
> required to be run
>
> Hi Edgar,
>
> Nice shot, to
ailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 3:47 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]
Correction
The right links are:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114629/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
Not this one:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
Edgar
On 8/15/14, 3:35 PM, "Edgar Magana" wrote:
>Team,
>
>I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only
Hi Edgar,
Nice shot, to be the inquisitor is not necessarily a bad thing :)
I know some CIs are 'stuck' waiting for bugs to be fixed or certain patches
to be merged, but I was wondering if it is a requirement that CIs vote
*ALL* the Neutron patches. Some may have missed your call just because of
Team,
I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
I created a report here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
_and_Drivers
We will discuss the actions to take
Hi-
I'm hitting bugs for (basic/advanced)_server_ops testing.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1232303
Kindly help me with a fix to this.
Thanking you.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest..
58 matches
Mail list logo
