On Oct 12, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Li Ma skywalker.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014/9/17 22:34, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The documentation in the oslo.messaging repository [2] would be a good place
to start for that. If we decide deployers/operators need the information we
can either refer to it
On 2014/9/17 22:34, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The documentation in the oslo.messaging repository [2] would be a good place to
start for that. If we decide deployers/operators need the information we can
either refer to it from the guides managed by the documentation team or we can
move/copy the
Hi all, I almost lost this new thread for discussing with ZeroMQ issue.
On 2014/9/19 5:29, Eric Windisch wrote:
I believe it makes good sense for all drivers, in the long term.
However, the most immediate benefits would be in offloading any
drivers that need substantial work or improvements,
On 09/19/2014 08:38 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:29:27 Eric Windisch wrote:
That?s great feedback, Eric, thank you. I know some of the other projects
+1 - yes, excellent feedback - having just worked on the AMQP 1.0
driver, I think you've nicely described some of my own
Hi,
For me, the lack of tests is why reviews are not done, even some of them
are critical.
An other issue, less problematic, of this driver is it relies on
eventlet directly,
but all the eventlet code should be only localized into
oslo.messaging._executor.impl_eventlet.
Otherwise, I have
On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon Sep 8 15:18:35 UTC 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sep 8, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Antonio Messina antonio.s.messina at
gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We tested briefly ZeroMQ with Havana last year, but we couldn't find
any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/09/14 15:34, Doug Hellmann wrote:
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the
conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of
discussions.
[...]
I'd also like to document the current design of the
On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the
conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of
discussions.
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-September/009253.html
I saw this
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the
conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of
discussions.
[1]
On 09/18/2014 04:16 PM, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the
conversation to the
Kapil,
I see just 2 relevant reviews for zmq in the oslo.messaging queue:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.messaging+status:open+file:%255E.*zmq.*,n,z
Are there others i am missing? (fix critical items, tests from your email)
thanks,
dims
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:16
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Kapil Thangavelu kapil.thangav...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the
conversation
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Hi Davanum
The two primary fixes to oslo.messaging outstanding to get things running
are
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84938/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120745/
cheers,
Kapil
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kapil,
I see just 2 relevant
On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Eric Windisch e...@windisch.us wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco
That’s great feedback, Eric, thank you. I know some of the other projects
are moving drivers out of the main core tree, and we could certainly
consider doing that here as well, if we have teams willing to sign up for
the work it means doing.
In addition to the zmq driver, we have a fairly
16 matches
Mail list logo
