On Jan 22, 2015, at 12:21 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
mailto:mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to
+1
On 1/22/15, 2:18 AM, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for Doug
2015-01-20 13:59 GMT+09:00 Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com:
+1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net
wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
Congratulations Doug!
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 11:21 -0600, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December
[1]. In looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core
team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so we
+1 for Doug
2015-01-20 13:59 GMT+09:00 Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com:
+1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December
+1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to
+1
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in
+1 for Doug, he does a great job!
Thanks,
Oleg
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
I agree with the proposed changes.
I would also like to take a chance to thank Sumit for the effort he has
put in this project over several years - he has been in the
Dear all,
+1 for Doug.
Thank you,
Tina
On Jan 16, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Oleg Bondarev
obonda...@mirantis.commailto:obonda...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1 for Doug, he does a great job!
Thanks,
Oleg
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Salvatore Orlando
sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core
team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so
On 01/16/2015 11:31 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core
team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so we
need to ensure cores are
+1, without Doug's help fixing everything, the services split probably
wouldn't have happened.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some
+1 to Doug’s addition. He’s been a workhorse in moving lbaas and the services
split forward and his being able to finally merge code in the main repo should
be a boon to our merge velocity.
Many thanks to Sumit for his long-serving dedication as a core reviewer. I
hope to see him return to
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core
team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so we
need to ensure cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 90 day period [2]
@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
As part of the change, I'd like to propose Doug Wiegley as a new Neutron core
reviewer. Doug has been actively reviewing code across not only all the
Neutron projects, but also other projects such as infra. His help and work in
the
I agree with the proposed changes.
I would also like to take a chance to thank Sumit for the effort he has put
in this project over several years - he has been in the core team since the
project's inception and has been a witness of all its developments - both
the good and the bad ones!
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Now that we're in the thick of working hard on Kilo deliverables, I'd
like to make some changes to the neutron core team. Reviews are the
most important part of being a core reviewer, so we need to ensure
cores are doing
Way to go Kevin and Henry!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
] [neutron] Changes to the core team
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery
mest...@mestery.commailto:mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Now that we're in the thick of working hard on Kilo deliverables, I'd
like to make some changes to the neutron core team. Reviews are the
most important part of being
Congrats Kevin and Henry ☺.
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 11:32 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery
mest
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Sumit Naiksatam
sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2014 06:24 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been pleasure working with
you guys.
If I may
On 12/04/2014 05:21 AM, Mathieu Rohon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Sumit Naiksatam
sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2014 06:24 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been
On 12/04/2014 09:24 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
I think we move into very dangerous territory if we are equating a core
review Gerrit permission (it is just a Gerrit permission, if it is
perceived as anything other than that that is a perception we have
created ourselves) with value as an OpenStack
On 12/04/2014 01:44 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 12/04/2014 09:24 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
I think we move into very dangerous territory if we are equating a core
review Gerrit permission (it is just a Gerrit permission, if it is
perceived as anything other than that that is a perception we have
On 2014-12-03 23:24:41 + (+), Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
[...]
If I may express my opinion, Bob's contribution to ML2 has been
quite substantial. The kind of stability ML2 has achieved makes a
statement of his dedication to this work. I have worked very
closely with Bob on several issues and
Congratulations to Henry and Kevin, very well deserved!,
keep up the good work! :)
Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Wednesday, 3 de December de 2014 at 09:44, Oleg Bondarev wrote:
+1! Congrats, Henry and Kevin!
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
Hi all,
It seems that a process with a survey for neutron core
election/removal was about to take place [1]. Has it been applied for
this proposal?
This proposal has been hardly discussed during neutron meetings
[2][3]. Many cores agree that the number of reviews shouldn't be the
only metrics.
Mathieu:
The peer review proposal was NOT about removing core reviewers, that
is very clear in the proposal. The peer review proposal was about
deciding as a team what it means to be a core reviewer, and ensuring
core reviewers are doing that. I still plan to do try out the peer
review process in
+1 for Kevin and Henry. Thanks for your continuous efforts so far and
it would be great additions to our community.
I also would like to say great thanks to Bob and Nachi.
It would be really nice if we see their activities in reviews soon.
We already understand your contributions and skills, so
I
I give +2 to Henry and Kevin. So, Congratulations Folks!
I have been working with both of them and great quality reviews are always
coming out from them.
Many thanks to Nachi and Bob for their hard work!
Edgar
On 12/2/14, 7:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Now that we're in the
Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been pleasure working with
you guys.
If I may express my opinion, Bob's contribution to ML2 has been quite
substantial. The kind of stability ML2 has achieved makes a statement of
his dedication to this work. I have worked very closely with Bob
On 12/03/2014 06:24 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been pleasure working
with you guys.
If I may express my opinion, Bob's contribution to ML2 has been quite
substantial. The kind of stability ML2 has achieved makes a statement
of his dedication
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2014 06:24 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been pleasure working with
you guys.
If I may express my opinion, Bob's contribution to ML2 has been quite
substantial. The
Now that we're in the thick of working hard on Kilo deliverables, I'd
like to make some changes to the neutron core team. Reviews are the
most important part of being a core reviewer, so we need to ensure
cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 180 day period [1] indicate
some changes are
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
First of all, I'm proposing we remove Bob Kukura and Nachi Ueno from
neutron-core. Bob and Nachi have been core members for a while now.
They have contributed to Neutron over the years in reviews, code and
leading
I am happy with the proposed change in the core team.
Many thanks to the outgoing members and a warm welcome to hell (err core
team) to Henry and Kevin!
Salvatore
Il 02/dic/2014 17:20 Mark McClain m...@mcclain.xyz ha scritto:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
Congrats to Henry and Kevin, +1!
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Assuming I still have a vote, I vote +1 for adding Henry and Kevin, both
of whom I am confident will do a great job as core reviewer.
I'd ask people to consider voting against dropping me from core (and I
vote -1 on that if I get a vote). During Juno, my plan was to balance my
time between
Hi folks
Congrats! Henry and Kevin.
I'll keep contributing the community, but Thank you for working with
me as core team :)
Best
Nachi
2014-12-03 2:05 GMT+09:00 Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net:
+1 from me for all the changes. I appreciate the work from all four
of these excellent
+1 for Kevin and Henry!
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Nati Ueno nati.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks
Congrats! Henry and Kevin.
I'll keep contributing the community, but Thank you for working with
me as core team :)
Best
Nachi
2014-12-03 2:05 GMT+09:00 Carl Baldwin
@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team
+1 for Kevin and Henry!
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Nati Ueno
nati.u...@gmail.commailto:nati.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks
Congrats! Henry and Kevin.
I'll keep contributing the community
43 matches
Mail list logo
