Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Volunteer to run tomorrow's IRC meeting?

2014-07-08 Thread Kevin Benton
I can lead it, but I'm not sure if there is anything new to discuss since the QoS spec is still under review. Did you have any specific agenda items that you wanted to cover? On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Hi, I am currently at a book

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Volunteer to run tomorrow's IRC meeting?

2014-07-08 Thread Collins, Sean
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:01:52PM PDT, Kevin Benton wrote: I can lead it, but I'm not sure if there is anything new to discuss since the QoS spec is still under review. Did you have any specific agenda items that you wanted to cover? Ah. The QoS IRC meeting will also need to be chaired in my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Volunteer to run tomorrow's IRC meeting?

2014-07-08 Thread Kevin Benton
I think at this point the discussion is mostly contained in the review for the spec[1] so I don't see a particular need to continue the IRC meeting. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88599/ On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: On Mon, Jul

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] request to review bug 1301359

2014-07-08 Thread Harshada Kakad
HI All, Could someone please, review the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1301359 Made Size parameter optional while creating DB Instance. While creating Database Instance size parameter depends on whether trove_volume_support is set. So size paramater is set to mandatory if

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Commit messages and lawyer speak

2014-07-08 Thread Monty Taylor
On 07/07/2014 08:18 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: Hi John, There's a thread started on the legal-discuss list: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/legal-discuss/2014-July/000304.html Probably want to follow along there. Hi! a) I agree with Anne - so I have responded there. b) I agree with Robert

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] request to review bug 1301359

2014-07-08 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 08/07/14 08:29, Harshada Kakad wrote: HI All, Could someone please, review the bug [...] Hello Harshada, please don't send such e-mails or ask in the IRC, submitting the patch is enough to get reviewers to read it, eventually. If we sent such an e-mail for every patch, this mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Building deploy ramdisks with dracut

2014-07-08 Thread 韦远科
I once used update-initramfs under ubuntu, building ramdisk to boot from remote iscsi disk. - 韦远科 3479 中国科学院 计算机网络信息中心 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2014 01:16 PM, Victor Lowther

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Upwards-compatibility for HOT

2014-07-08 Thread Sergey Kraynev
On 8 July 2014 01:25, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: With the Icehouse release we announced that there would be no further backwards-incompatible changes to HOT without a revision bump. However, I notice that we've already made an upward-incompatible change in Juno:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] neutron_url_timeout

2014-07-08 Thread Kevin Benton
This appears to be a bug. I've filed it on launchpad[1] with a fix[2]. 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1338910 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105377/ On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Stefan Apostoaie ioss...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm using openstack icehouse to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [VMware] Can someone help to look at this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1338881

2014-07-08 Thread Radoslav Gerganov
Hi David, - Original Message - From: Jian Hua Geng gen...@cn.ibm.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 8:00:01 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] [VMware] Can someone help to look at this bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Proposal: FairShareScheduler.

2014-07-08 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 08/07/2014 00:35, Joe Gordon a écrit : On Jul 7, 2014 9:50 AM, Lisa lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it mailto:lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it wrote: Hi all, during the last IRC meeting, for better understanding our proposal (i.e the FairShareScheduler), you suggested us to provide (for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

2014-07-08 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
A bit more... I have OpenStack IceHouse with Trusty up and running, *almost* in an IPv6-Only environment, *there is only one place* that I'm still using IPv4, which is: 1- For Metadata Network. This means that, soon as OpenStack enables Metadata over IPv6, I'll kiss goodbye IPv4. For real, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VMware networking

2014-07-08 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Just an update and a progress report: 1. Armando has created an umbrella BP - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-spec s+branch:master+topic:bp/esx-neutron,n,z 2. Whoever is proposing the BP’s can you please fill in the table -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Triaging bugs: milestones vs release series

2014-07-08 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Dmitry, +2 on the approach, thanks for very clear explanation. Let's put this into wiki and accept it into action. On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote: When you

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Building deploy ramdisks with dracut

2014-07-08 Thread Robert Collins
We got to the current place thusly: - The initial ramdisk code in Nova-baremetal needed a home other than a wikipage. - And then there was a need/desire to build ramdisks from a given distro != current host OS. - Various bits of minor polish to make it more or less in-line with the emerging

Re: [openstack-dev] Policy around Requirements Adds (was: New class of requirements for Stackforge projects)

2014-07-08 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:46 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: This thread was unfortunately hidden under a project specific tag (I have thus stripped all the tags). The crux of the argument here is the following: Is a stackforge project project able to propose additions to global-requirements.txt

[openstack-dev] [nova] Instances randomly failing rebuild on ssh-key errors for non-migration resize - new blueprint

2014-07-08 Thread Dafna Ron
Hi, Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1323578 was closed since the design is add the localhost to the list of targets and not to only migrate to localhost. I think that there is an issue with that since the user will still randomly fail resize with ssh-key errors when they configure

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Openstack and SQLAlchemy

2014-07-08 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/07/14 22:28, Jay Pipes wrote: On 07/07/2014 04:17 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 7/7/14, 3:57 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Regarding the eventlet + mysql sadness, I remembered this [1] in the nova.db.api code. I'm not sure if that's

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Openstack and SQLAlchemy

2014-07-08 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/07/14 22:14, Jay Pipes wrote: On 07/02/2014 09:23 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: I've just added a new section to this wiki, MySQLdb + eventlet = sad, summarizing some discussions I've had in the past couple of days about the ongoing issue that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Instances randomly failing rebuild on ssh-key errors for non-migration resize - new blueprint

2014-07-08 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Please note that you will need to draft a nova spec for the BP. Thanks Gary On 7/8/14, 11:38 AM, Dafna Ron d...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Bug https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova /%2Bbug/1323578k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0Ar=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

2014-07-08 Thread Nir Yechiel
- Original Message - A bit more... I have OpenStack IceHouse with Trusty up and running, *almost* in an IPv6-Only environment, *there is only one place* that I'm still using IPv4, which is: 1- For Metadata Network. This means that, soon as OpenStack enables Metadata

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Nova] Launch of VM failed after certain count openstack Havana

2014-07-08 Thread Vikash Kumar
Hi Hrushikesh, On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Gangur, Hrushikesh (R D HP Cloud) hrushikesh.gan...@hp.com wrote: If it is not going to nova-compute, it must be thrown out directly at nova-api due to any of the following reasons: May be, but even doesn't see nova-api error logs. 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] Policy around Requirements Adds

2014-07-08 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/08/2014 04:33 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:46 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: This thread was unfortunately hidden under a project specific tag (I have thus stripped all the tags). The crux of the argument here is the following: Is a stackforge project project able to

Re: [openstack-dev] Policy around Requirements Adds

2014-07-08 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 06:26 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/08/2014 04:33 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:46 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: This thread was unfortunately hidden under a project specific tag (I have thus stripped all the tags). The crux of the argument here

Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and FWaaS integration

2014-07-08 Thread Narasimhan, Vivekanandan
Yi, since am from India, the FwaaS at 11PM Wed is late for me. Is it possible to have a meeting right after the l3 subteam meeting coming Thursday. This evaluates to 10AM PST Thursday. Swami, please let me know your availability as well. -- Thanks, Vivek From: Yi Sun

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Proposal: FairShareScheduler.

2014-07-08 Thread Lisa
Hi Sylvain, On 08/07/2014 09:29, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 08/07/2014 00:35, Joe Gordon a écrit : On Jul 7, 2014 9:50 AM, Lisa lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it mailto:lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it wrote: Hi all, during the last IRC meeting, for better understanding our proposal (i.e the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-07-08 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
I'd like to bring the attention back to this topic: Mark, could you reconsider removing the -2 here? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/ Your reason was: Until the upstream blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/rootwrap-daemon-mode ) merges in Oslo it does not

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Update behavior for CFN compatible resources

2014-07-08 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Hi all, from what I can tell after inspecting the code, these are the only AWS resources in master branch (if I haven't missed something) that have updatable properties that are not supported in AWS: a) AWS::EC2::Volume - must not support any updates [1], size update is in master but not in

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote: Hello Doug, thank you for your help. I guess the problem is that the subdirectory within that tarball includes the version number, as in dbus-python-0.84.0/. How can I tell the extract script that it should

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote: The other tarballs in that hierarchy follow the same schema; perhaps the cached download is broken? I downloaded the tarball and didn't find a setup.py at all. Oh, that is the requirement? I'd have guessed that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] request to tag novaclient 2.18.0

2014-07-08 Thread Russell Bryant
On 07/07/2014 10:34 PM, Mike Lundy wrote: Is it possible to tag a new release containing the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1297796 ? The bug can cause correct code to fail ~50% of the time (every connection reuse fails with a BadStatusLine). Thanks! 3

[openstack-dev] Swift 2.0.0 has been released and includes support for storage policies

2014-07-08 Thread John Dickinson
I'm happy to announce that Swift 2.0.0 has been officially released! You can get the tarball at http://tarballs.openstack.org/swift/swift-2.0.0.tar.gz. This release is a huge milestone in the history of Swift. This release includes storage policies, a set of features I've often said is the most

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Le lundi 7 juillet 2014, 19:14:45 Angus Salkeld a écrit : 4) retraining of OpenStack developers/reviews to understand the new event loop. (eventlet has warts, but a lot of devs know about them). Wait, what? Sorry if it was not clear, but the *whole* point of replacing eventlet with asyncio

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Philipp Marek
The 1.2.0 release from http://dbus.freedesktop.org/releases/dbus-python/ doesn't look like an sdist, either (I see a configure script, so I think they've switched to autoconf). Uploading that version to PyPI isn't going to give you something you can install with pip. Are there system

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Proposal: FairShareScheduler.

2014-07-08 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 08/07/2014 13:18, Lisa a écrit : Hi Sylvain, On 08/07/2014 09:29, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 08/07/2014 00:35, Joe Gordon a écrit : On Jul 7, 2014 9:50 AM, Lisa lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it mailto:lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it wrote: Hi all, during the last IRC meeting, for better

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] topics for Thurday's Weekly LBaaS meeting's agenda

2014-07-08 Thread Susanne Balle
Hi I would like to discuss what talks we plan to do at the Paris' summit and who will be submitting what? The deadline for submitting talks is July 28 so it is approaching. Also how many working sessions do we need? and what prep work do we need to do before the summit. I am personally

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-08 Thread Gordon Sim
On 07/07/2014 07:18 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: I'd expect us to add e.g. @asyncio.coroutine def call_async(self, ctxt, method, **kwargs): ... to RPCClient. Perhaps we'd need to add an AsyncRPCClient in a separate module and only add the method there - I don't have a good sense of

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Openstack and SQLAlchemy

2014-07-08 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/08/2014 04:46 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/07/14 22:14, Jay Pipes wrote: On 07/02/2014 09:23 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: I've just added a new section to this wiki, MySQLdb + eventlet = sad, summarizing some discussions I've had in the past

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-07-08 09:09:35 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] You'll also need to modify cinder's tox.ini to set sitepackages = True so the virtualenvs created for the unit tests can see the global site-packages directory. Nova does the same thing for some of its dependencies. Nova did

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Openstack and SQLAlchemy

2014-07-08 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/14 16:06, Jay Pipes wrote: On 07/08/2014 04:46 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/07/14 22:14, Jay Pipes wrote: On 07/02/2014 09:23 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: I've just added a new section to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS API Version 2 WIP in gerrit

2014-07-08 Thread Susanne Balle
Will take a look :-) Thanks for the huge amount of work put into this. On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Avishay Balderman avish...@radware.com wrote: Hi Brandon I think the patch should be broken into few standalone sub patches. As for now it is huge and review is a challenge :) Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Instances randomly failing rebuild on ssh-key errors for non-migration resize - new blueprint

2014-07-08 Thread Dafna Ron
Thanks Gary, This was a painful task... https://review.openstack.org/105466 Dafna On 07/08/2014 09:57 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Please note that you will need to draft a nova spec for the BP. Thanks Gary On 7/8/14, 11:38 AM, Dafna Ron d...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server groups specified by name

2014-07-08 Thread Day, Phil
Sorry, forgot to put this in my previous message.  I've been advocating the ability to use names instead of UUIDs for server groups pretty much since I saw them last year. I'd like to just enforce that server group names must be unique within a tenant, and then allow names to be used

Re: [openstack-dev] Server groups specified by name

2014-07-08 Thread Chris Friesen
On 07/07/2014 02:29 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Jul 7, 2014 3:47 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 07/07/2014 12:35 PM, Day, Phil wrote: I’m thinking that there may need to be some additional logic here, so that group hints passed by name will fail if there is an existing group with a policy

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Spec Review Day July 9th

2014-07-08 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:30:53PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: Hi Everyone, During the last qa meeting we were discussing ways to try an increase throughput on the qa-specs repo. We decided to have a dedicated review day for the specs repo. Right now specs approval is a relatively

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server groups specified by name

2014-07-08 Thread Chris Friesen
On 07/08/2014 08:30 AM, Day, Phil wrote: Sorry, forgot to put this in my previous message. I've been advocating the ability to use names instead of UUIDs for server groups pretty much since I saw them last year. I'd like to just enforce that server group names must be unique within a tenant,

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-07-08 09:09:35 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] You'll also need to modify cinder's tox.ini to set sitepackages = True so the virtualenvs created for the unit tests can see the global site-packages

Re: [openstack-dev] [compute][tempest] Upgrading libvirt-lxc support status

2014-07-08 Thread Nels Nelson
Greetings list,- just bumping to try to get some attention for this topic. Thank you for your time. -Nels Nelson Software Developer Rackspace Hosting On 7/1/14, 4:32 PM, Nels Nelson nels.nel...@rackspace.com wrote: Greetings list,- Over the next few weeks I will be working on developing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Horizon] Proposed Changed for Unscoped tokens.

2014-07-08 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2014 11:11 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote: On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: Unscoped tokens are really a proxy for the Horizon session, so lets treat them that way. 1. When a user

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Field 'name' is removed from Apps dynamic UI markup, should 'Version' be changed?

2014-07-08 Thread Ekaterina Chernova
Hi guys! I agreed with Stan suggestion. We also need to track somewhere in the documentation for mapping between the Murano version and Dynamic UI version. BTW, what about to keep version values in integer, so the next one would be 3? Regards, Kate. On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Stan Lagun

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova bug scrub web page

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Tracy Jones tjo...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Folks – I have taken a script from the infra folks and jogo, made some tweaks and have put it into a web page. Please see it here http://54.201.139.117/demo.html This is all of the new, confirmed, triaged, and in

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-08 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Victor Stinner's message of 2014-07-08 05:47:36 -0700: Hi Joshua, You asked a lot of questions. I will try to answer. Le lundi 7 juillet 2014, 17:41:34 Joshua Harlow a écrit : * Why focus on a replacement low level execution model integration instead of higher level

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS API Version 2 WIP in gerrit

2014-07-08 Thread Brandon Logan
Avishay, You're probably right about breaking it up but I wanted to get this up in gerrit ASAP. Also, I'd like to get Kyle and Mark's ideas on breaking it up. Thanks, Brandon From: Susanne Balle [sleipnir...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 9:24 AM To:

[openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-08 Thread Zane Bitter
I see that the new client plugins are loaded using stevedore, which is great and IMO absolutely the right tool for that job. Thanks to Angus Steve B for implementing it. Now that we have done that work, I think there are more places we can take advantage of it too - for example, we currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-08 Thread Joshua Harlow
Thanks clint, that was the gist of what I was getting at with the (likely to long) email. -Josh -Original Message- From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Upwards-compatibility for HOT

2014-07-08 Thread Zane Bitter
On 07/07/14 20:02, Steve Baker wrote: On 08/07/14 09:25, Zane Bitter wrote: With the Icehouse release we announced that there would be no further backwards-incompatible changes to HOT without a revision bump. However, I notice that we've already made an upward-incompatible change in Juno:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-08 Thread Joshua Harlow
I think clints response was likely better than what I can write here, but I'll add-on a few things, How do you write such code using taskflow? @asyncio.coroutine def foo(self): result = yield from some_async_op(...) return do_stuff(result) The idea (at a very high level) is

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Update behavior for CFN compatible resources

2014-07-08 Thread Zane Bitter
On 08/07/14 08:06, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, from what I can tell after inspecting the code, these are the only AWS resources in master branch (if I haven't missed something) that have updatable properties that are not supported in AWS: Many thanks for doing this audit Pavlo! :)

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Dev mode implementation

2014-07-08 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi crew, There is no functioning dev mode as of right now in the Fuel ISO build. Authentication feature makes developer's life even more painful. A lot of tests must be rewritten to pass authentication. Manual testing will be slowed down as it will require additional steps. This complicates

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-08 Thread Joshua Harlow
This is the part that I really wonder about. Since asyncio isn't just a drop-in replacement for eventlet (which hid the async part under its *black magic*), I very much wonder how the community will respond to this kind of mindset change (along with its new *black magic*). I disagree with you,

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Rebase pending CRs

2014-07-08 Thread Douglas Mendizabal
All, As part of our ongoing mid-cycle meetup, the Barbican team was able to merge the plugin restructuring CR [1]. This is a pretty big change that will likely cause merge conflicts for most pending CRs. So, if you’re waiting on reviews for Barbican change requests, please take some time to

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Commit messages and lawyer speak

2014-07-08 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On 07/07/2014 11:30 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: Also, CLA's are pointless. Let's be clear: this is your personal opinion, not that of the OpenStack project nor of the OpenStack Foundation. From OpenStack project's perspective, CLAs are not pointless, they're mandated by bylaws and by years of

[openstack-dev] [nova] whatever happened to removing instance.locked in icehouse?

2014-07-08 Thread Matt Riedemann
I came across this [1] today and noticed the note to remove instance.locked in favor of locked_by is still in master, so apparently not being removed in Icehouse. Is anyone aware of intentions to remove instance.locked, or we don't care, or other? If we don't care, maybe we should remove the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Proposal: FairShareScheduler.

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Lisa lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it wrote: Hi Sylvain, On 08/07/2014 09:29, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 08/07/2014 00:35, Joe Gordon a écrit : On Jul 7, 2014 9:50 AM, Lisa lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it wrote: Hi all, during the last IRC meeting, for better

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][devstack-gate] mad rechecks

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-07-04 13:17:12 +0300 (+0300), Sergey Skripnick wrote: [...] Is there any hope that jobs will just work? Such number of failures leads to significant amount of extra work for test nodes. There is indeed hope.

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Healthcheck middleware

2014-07-08 Thread John Dewey
I am looking to add health check middleware [1] into Keystone, and eventually other API endpoints. I understand it makes sense to move this into oslo, so other projects can utilize it in their pate pipelines. My question is where in oslo should this go? Thanks - John [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] olso incubator logging issues

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Every time I crack open a nova logs in detail, at least 2 new olso incubator log issues have been introduced. The current ones is clearly

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Proposal: FairShareScheduler.

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote: Le 08/07/2014 13:18, Lisa a écrit : Hi Sylvain, On 08/07/2014 09:29, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 08/07/2014 00:35, Joe Gordon a écrit : On Jul 7, 2014 9:50 AM, Lisa lisa.zangra...@pd.infn.it wrote: Hi all,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Scheduler]

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Abbass MAROUNI abbass.maro...@virtualscale.fr wrote: Hello Joe, Thanks for your quick reply, here's what we're trying to do : In the scheduling process of a virtual machine we need to be able to choose the best Host (which is a cinder-volume and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] topics for Thurday's Weekly LBaaS meeting's agenda

2014-07-08 Thread Mark McClain
On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I would like to discuss what talks we plan to do at the Paris' summit and who will be submitting what? The deadline for submitting talks is July 28 so it is approaching. Also how many working sessions do we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-08 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/07/14 09:14, Zane Bitter wrote: I see that the new client plugins are loaded using stevedore, which is great and IMO absolutely the right tool for that job. Thanks to Angus Steve B for implementing it. Now that we have done that work, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-08 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:08:32PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: I see that the new client plugins are loaded using stevedore, which is great and IMO absolutely the right tool for that job. Thanks to Angus Steve B for implementing it. Now that we have done that work, I think there are more

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Building deploy ramdisks with dracut

2014-07-08 Thread Ben Nemec
On 07/08/2014 03:28 AM, Robert Collins wrote: We got to the current place thusly: - The initial ramdisk code in Nova-baremetal needed a home other than a wikipage. - And then there was a need/desire to build ramdisks from a given distro != current host OS. - Various bits of minor polish

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Discussion of capabilities feature

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 3, 2014 6:38 PM, Doug Shelley d...@tesora.com wrote: Iccha, Thanks for the feedback. I guess I should have been more specific – my intent here was to layout use cases and requirements and not talk about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-08 Thread Steve Baker
On 09/07/14 07:08, Zane Bitter wrote: I see that the new client plugins are loaded using stevedore, which is great and IMO absolutely the right tool for that job. Thanks to Angus Steve B for implementing it. Now that we have done that work, I think there are more places we can take

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:00:32AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: While the Trusty transition was mostly uneventful, it has exposed a particular issue in libvirt, which is generating ~ 25% failure rate now on most

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

2014-07-08 Thread Michael Still
The associated bug says this is probably a qemu bug, so I think we should rephrase that to we need to start thinking about how to make sure upstream changes don't break nova. Michael On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Daniel

[openstack-dev] [all] oslo.messaging 1.4.0.0a3 released

2014-07-08 Thread Mark McLoughlin
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of oslo.messaging 1.4.0.0a3, another pre-release in the 1.4.0 series for oslo.messaging during the Juno cycle: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.messaging/1.4.0.0a3 oslo.messaging provides an API which supports RPC and notifications over a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

2014-07-08 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Joe, What about running benchmarks (with small load), for all major functions (like snaphshoting, booting/deleting, ..) on every patch in nova. It can catch a lot of related stuff. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: The

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: The associated bug says this is probably a qemu bug, so I think we should rephrase that to we need to start thinking about how to make sure upstream changes don't break nova. Good point. Would running devstack-tempest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS API Version 2 WIP in gerrit

2014-07-08 Thread Brandon Logan
Alright I broke it up into smaller chunks. One problem I ran into was that the tests basically require the extension, plugin, db, and noop driver to exist so that is why the tests are dependents of those reviews. Even though you can navigate in order through gerrit using the depdencies

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

2014-07-08 Thread Michael Still
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: This is also why I find it unlikely to be a qemu bug, because that's not shared state between guests. If qemu just randomly wedges itself, that would be detectable much easier outside of the gate. And there have been attempts by

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] 3rd party ci names for use by official cinder mandated tests

2014-07-08 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this at the cinder meeting and there wasn't much consensus on this approach [1]. I think the main issue is that some vendors' drivers are maintained by separate teams, so they would need a separate account per driver anyway. Unfortunately,

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][neutron] whether vm's port in use could be deleted?

2014-07-08 Thread Yangxurong
Hi, folks, My usecase follows: 1. create two vms A and B by using the ports that have been created. 2. vm A can ping vm B 3. Delete one port of A or B 4. vm A can still ping vm B IMO, ping should not be ok when vm's port have been deleted. Two alternative solution: 1. do more

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][neutron] dhcp scheduler should stop the redundant agents

2014-07-08 Thread Yangxurong
Hi, folks, we initiate the counter of dhcp agents between active host and cfg.CONF.dhcp_agents_per_network, suppose that we start dhcp agents correctly, then some dhcp agents are down(host down or kill the dhcp-agent), during this period, we will reschedule and recover the normal dhcp agents.

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][neutron] can't notify the broadcast fdb entries

2014-07-08 Thread Yangxurong
Hi, folks, Now , in order to improve broadcast fdb entries traffic, we do some restriction: if agent_active_ports == 1 or ( self.get_agent_uptime(agent) cfg.CONF.l2pop.agent_boot_time): # First port activated on current agent in this network, # we have to

[openstack-dev] [nova] nova bug scrub web page (updated)

2014-07-08 Thread Tracy Jones
I've updated the page with some of the ideas jogo floated by me today http://54.201.139.117/demo.html Once I have the code in decent shape I will post to git so other projects can make use of it if they would like (aka Neutron) ;-) Please let me know if you have questions or comments. BTW -

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [VMware] Can someone help to look at this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1338881

2014-07-08 Thread Jian Hua Geng
Radoslav, Thanks for your response, I found the minimum permissions requirement in http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/config-reference/content/vmware.html . And create a new doc bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1339440 regarding the missed privilege we needed when using the

[openstack-dev] What projects need help?

2014-07-08 Thread Brian Jarrett
Developers, I'm looking to become a contributor. I've already signed the CLA, etc. and I'm looking through tons of documentation, but I'm thinking it might be good to have a project I could focus on. Are there any projects that could use more developers? I would imagine there are some that are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] oslo.messaging 1.4.0.0a3 released

2014-07-08 Thread Paul Michali (pcm)
Mark, What is the status of adding the newer oslo.messaging releases to global requirements? I had tried to get 1.4.0.0a2 added to requirements (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103536/), but it was failing Jenkins. Wondering how we get that version (or newer) into global requirements (some

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] pypi-mirror is now unsupported - what do we do now?

2014-07-08 Thread James Polley
It may not have been clear from the below email, but clarkb clarifies on https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1294381 that the infra team is no longer maintaining pypi-mirror This has been a very useful tool for tripleo. It's much simpler for new developers to set up and use than a full

[openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Policy and Audit

2014-07-08 Thread Adam Young
Summary of the discussion in #openstack-keystone. Policy in OpenStack is the mechanism by which Role-Based-Access-Control is implemented. Policy is distributed in rules files which are processed at the time of a user request. Audit has come to mean the automated emission and collection of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] pypi-mirror is now unsupported - what do we do now?

2014-07-08 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, James Polley j...@jamezpolley.com wrote: It may not have been clear from the below email, but clarkb clarifies on https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1294381 that the infra team is no longer maintaining pypi-mirror This has been a very useful tool for

Re: [openstack-dev] What projects need help?

2014-07-08 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Brian Jarrett celttec...@gmail.com writes: Developers, I'm looking to become a contributor. I've already signed the CLA, etc. and I'm looking through tons of documentation, but I'm thinking it might be good to have a project I could focus on. Are there any projects that could use more

Re: [openstack-dev] Swift 2.0.0 has been released and includes support for storage policies

2014-07-08 Thread Hua ZZ Zhang
Cheers! This is the most exciting moment for Swift users and developers. Proud of you and the community! :-) -Edward Zhang John Dickinson