Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting. Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 I would like to understand the argument why we are creating new names instead of using the standard ones. Edgar From: Ronak Shah

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
mind at least (and having been involved in the work that led up to 3198), the members of the groups being discussed here are not PEPs. As 3198 states, being a PEP implies running COPS and I don't see that as necessary for membership in GBP groups. Ryan Moats Edgar Magana edgar.mag

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
are expressing your intent of doing enforcement at both points you do care then. 18:37:09 rockyg regXboi: Edgar Magana suggested using the IETF phrasing -- enforcement point 18:37:31 mscohen i was thinking “edgar point” would be good. and we won’t have to change our slides from EP. 18:37:44 arosen ivar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
at 2:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Cisco NXOS is not tested anymore

2014-08-11 Thread Edgar Magana
Cisco Folks, I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated? Edgar ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Cisco NXOS is not tested anymore

2014-08-12 Thread Edgar Magana
...@anteaya.info wrote: On 08/11/2014 06:31 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: On 8/11/2014 7:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: Cisco Folks, I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Cisco NXOS is not tested anymore

2014-08-12 Thread Edgar Magana
:04 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-08-12 16:35:18 + (+), Edgar Magana wrote: If this plugin will be deprecated in Juno it means that the code will be there for this release, I will expect to have the CI still running for until the code is completely removed from the Neutron tree

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Rotating the weekly Neutron meeting

2014-08-13 Thread Edgar Magana
Go for it commander! Edgar On 8/13/14, 7:05 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: Per this week's Neutron meeting [1], it was decided that offering a rotating meeting slot for the weekly Neutron meeting would be a good thing. This will allow for a much easier time for people in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-15 Thread Edgar Magana
Team, I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits. I created a report here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin _and_Drivers We will discuss the actions to take

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-15 Thread Edgar Magana
Correction The right links are: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114629/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/ Not this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/ Edgar On 8/15/14, 3:35 PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Team, I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-15 Thread Edgar Magana
if it is a requirement that CIs vote *ALL* the Neutron patches. Some may have missed your call just because of their filters (see [0] section 'what changes to run against'). Cheers, Ivar. [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-18 Thread Edgar Magana
responses. Thanks, Edgar On 8/15/14, 3:35 PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Team, I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits. I created a report here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-18 Thread Edgar Magana
Thank you Akihiro. I will propose a better organization for this section. Stay tune! Edgar On 8/17/14, 10:53 PM, Akihiro Motoki mot...@da.jp.nec.com wrote: On 2014/08/18 0:12, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Team, I did

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-18 Thread Edgar Magana
to nova) - neutron/db/.* - neutron/services/${thepluginsyouruninyourci_eveniftheyrenotyours} - your plugin patch Salvatore PS: Openstack proposal bot submission's checks have been suspended for vmware minesweeper about 2 days ago. They will resume soon. On 16 August 2014 01:02, Edgar Magana

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2014 4:06 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run Importance: High Team, I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
to missing logs? I would like to confirm this is the issue, will resolve this. Thanks, -hemanth On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Thank you Akihiro. I will propose a better organization for this section. Stay tune! Edgar

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
the owner for this CI. The Wiki page for this CI is https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Freescale_CI. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 -Original Message- From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Saturday

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
about on another thread). Thanks, Dane -Original Message- From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
-3). I'm the owner for this CI. The Wiki page for this CI is https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Freescale_CI. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 -Original Message- From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Saturday

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
Haris is the owner. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Karthik -Original Message- From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 3:59 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
run for document changes. I changed filter so that CI run for ALL changes include documents. Thanks, Hirofumi 2014-08-16 7:35 GMT+09:00 Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com: Team, I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins and drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
test. :-) Currently the CI system is backed by about 100 patches to push responses out ~22 hours. This does bring up an old discussion that was never resolved. What is the minimum expected response time for CI systems? On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-19 Thread Edgar Magana
://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/ -Original Message- From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:28 PM To: Dane Leblanc (leblancd); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-21 Thread Edgar Magana
- From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd) Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 3:05 PM To: 'Edgar Magana'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run The APIC CI did run tests against that commit (after some queue

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-21 Thread Edgar Magana
establish a maximum time to vote on the wiki? On Aug 19, 2014 9:39 AM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Kevin, I just verified, Thanks a lot. Edgar From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.commailto:blak...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-22 Thread Edgar Magana
for a patch. On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Maximum time to vote, can you clarify? Edgar From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.commailto:blak...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-22 Thread Edgar Magana
Sorry my bad but I just changed. Edgar On 8/21/14, 2:13 PM, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) lebla...@cisco.com wrote: Edgar: I'm still seeing the comment Results are not accurate. Needs clarification... Dane -Original Message- From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-25 Thread Edgar Magana
. (That is, until we have a solution for the Jenkins limitation). Let me know what you think. Thanks, Dane -Original Message- From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 1:57 PM To: Dane Leblanc (leblancd); OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Author tags

2014-08-27 Thread Edgar Magana
I do agree with Kyle. There is no rush for having this code merged in order to a void multiple rebase work for the other patches. Edgar On 8/27/14, 9:25 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, A few cycles ago the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] collecting recheck command to re-trigger third party CI

2014-09-04 Thread Edgar Magana
PTL) and Edgar Magana (Neutron Core) are proposing a session at Kilo Summit in Paris to cover third party CI systems. I would propose that you please coordinate with them and get your point of view incorporated into this session. I have copied them both on this email so that they can share

Re: [openstack-dev] Documentation on writing a neutron plugin/driver

2014-09-18 Thread Edgar Magana
Daniel, You can start with: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment You can also take a look to one of the latest plugins in being merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96630/ If you are looking into a ML2 driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64944/ Cheers, Edgar From:

[openstack-dev] FW: [Bug 1257788] Re: nova-network doesn't handle large amount of concurrent booting instances well

2013-12-10 Thread Edgar Magana
FYI. Concurrent calls are a problem all around in OpenStack! Edgar On 12/10/13 8:47 AM, Abhishek Chanda abhis...@cloudscaling.com wrote: ** Changed in: nova Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to neutron.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Third party Neutron plugin testingmeeting

2013-12-10 Thread Edgar Magana
Also joining! Looking forward to hearing your ideas folks! Edgar On 12/10/13 10:16 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: +1 ! I'll join. I'm also working on investigating how to use openstack gating system. (This document is still draft version)

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Fix to agents race condition creates another issue

2013-12-11 Thread Edgar Magana
In commit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58814/ There is an assumption that all plugins creates the plumgrid_neutron.agents which is not the case. I just tested big switch and plumgrid and they are failing: INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade havana - e197124d4b9, add unique constraint

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2013-12-19 Thread Edgar Magana
Anita, Fawad and Myself will be also attending. BTW. Fawad will require an invitation letter for visa. He will email you directly with that request. Thanks, Edgar On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Okay time for a recap. What: Neutron Tempest code

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2013-12-26 Thread Edgar Magana
Anita, Did you get my email with my confirmation? Thanks, Edgar On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Anita, Fawad and Myself will be also attending. BTW. Fawad will require an invitation letter for visa. He will email you directly with that request

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2013-12-26 Thread Edgar Magana
we’ll have manpower to onboard new contributors (3 days is a really short time). While I’m happy to welcome more workers there, I do not want to waste his time or PLUMgrid’s resources. mark On Dec 19, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Anita, Fawad and Myself

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party-testing] Sharing information

2014-01-14 Thread Edgar Magana
I like it and I am in favor. Some of us, will be in Montreal attending the sprint tempest session. Hopefully we can all take it from there. Edgar On Jan 14, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@siliconloons.com wrote: Thanks for sending this note Mohammad. I am all in favor of another

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Edgar Magana
Wouldn't be easier just to check if: cidr is 32? I believe it is a good idea to not allow /32 network but this is just my opinion Edgar From: Paul Ward wpw...@us.ibm.com Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:35 PM To: OpenStack List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fwd: Change in openstack/neutron[master]: Kill dnsmasq and ns-meta softly]

2014-01-28 Thread Edgar Magana
No doubt about it!!! Edgar On 1/28/14 8:45 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: This might just be the most creative commit message of the year. -jay ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-28 Thread Edgar Magana
Well say Carl! I am sorry I did not get back to you on this topic before. In general and after thinking about it, it makes sense to leave could admin to adage the /32 cases if any. Edgar On 1/28/14 1:46 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: I think I agree. The new check isn't adding much

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

2014-02-11 Thread Edgar Magana
+1 of course! Edgar Sent from my iPhone On Feb 11, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Mark McClain mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: All- I’d like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. Oleg has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, working on bugs, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

2014-02-20 Thread Edgar Magana
Congratulations Oleg!!! No need for welcoming you to the team, you were already part of ;-) Edgar From: Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:43 AM To: OpenStack List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2]

2014-03-06 Thread Edgar Magana
Nader, I would encourage you to first discuss the possible extension with the ML2 team. Rober and Kyle are leading this effort and they have a IRC meeting every week: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#ML2_Network_sub-team_meeting Bring your concerns on this meeting and get the right

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [neutron] How to tell a compute host the control host is running Neutron

2014-03-06 Thread Edgar Magana
Kyle, Please, point me to the wiki with the documentation for testing the devstack patch! This work seems to be very interesting. Yeah!!! I love to have one more agent less but let's have all agents gone once for all. :-) Edgar On 3/6/14 8:24 AM, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Developer documentation

2014-03-07 Thread Edgar Magana
I agree this is a valid request. As a team we should consider this special request and help is possible. Specially on Documentation!! :-) Edgar On 3/7/14 10:12 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Hi, I know everyone is very busy working on the I-3 release, but I wanted

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?

2014-03-10 Thread Edgar Magana
Team, I found that having a mini-summit with a very short notice means excluding a lot of developers of such an interesting topic for Neutron. The OpenStack summit is the opportunity for all developers to come together and discuss the next steps, there are many developers that CAN NOT afford

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?

2014-03-10 Thread Edgar Magana
for declaration of intents, but not for real discussion of a complex topic at meaningful detail level. What would be your suggestions to make this more inclusive? I think the time and place is the key here - hence Atlanta and few days prior OS summit. Thanks, Eugene. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Edgar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Docs for new plugins

2014-03-12 Thread Edgar Magana
You should be able to add your plugin here: http://docs.openstack.org/havana/config-reference/content/networking-options -plugins.html Thanks, Edgar From: Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com Date: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:40 PM To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: Edgar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Docs for new plugins

2014-03-13 Thread Edgar Magana
@lists.openstack.org Cc: Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com, OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Docs for new plugins Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote on 03/12/2014 10:51:54 PM: From: Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?

2014-03-13 Thread Edgar Magana
That sounds like a good idea Mark! Yes, please do not do it during the World Cup at least the meeting is in Brazil :-) Edgar On 3/13/14 2:11 PM, Mark McClain mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: I personally would not be able to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Docs for new plugins

2014-03-18 Thread Edgar Magana
at 5:10 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com mailto:emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: You should be able to add your plugin here: http://docs.openstack.org/havana/config-reference/content/networking-options-p lugins.html http://docs.openstack.org/havana/config-reference/content/networking-options

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Docs for new plugins

2014-03-19 Thread Edgar Magana
Thanks for the input Anne! Kyle, Please file the proper bugs in the manual projects to be able to track the progress of this topic. Thanks, Edgar From: Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 4:54 AM To: Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com Cc: OpenStack List openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common requirements for services' discussion

2013-10-09 Thread Edgar Magana
Hello all, Is anyone working on NATaaS? I know we have some developer working on Router as a Service and they probably want to include NAT functionality but I have some interest in having NAT as a Service. Please, response is somebody is interested in having some discussions about it. Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common requirements for services' discussion

2013-10-11 Thread Edgar Magana
in a broadening of NAT capability in Neutron using the evolving service framework. Thanks, Bob From: Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: onsdag 9 oktober 2013 21:38 To: OpenStack List openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [GIT] Reset a commit in Gerrit

2013-10-20 Thread Edgar Magana
Floren, Just just need to send a patch to gerrit. From you local repo, do the necessary fixes and be sure everything is just as you want. Then simply run: #git commit -a --amend #git review Thanks, Edgar On 10/20/13 11:26 AM, Floren Llanos florenlla...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm a newbie

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Network topologies

2013-10-27 Thread Edgar Magana
Heat Developers, I am one of the core developers for Neutron who is lately working on the concept of Network Topologies. I want to discuss with you if the following blueprint will make sense to have in heat or neutron code: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/network-topologies-api

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Network topologies

2013-10-28 Thread Edgar Magana
discussion. Thanks, Edgar On 10/28/13 9:47 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2013-10-28 07:47:06 -0700: On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:37:15AM -0700, Edgar Magana wrote: Heat Developers, I am one of the core developers for Neutron who is lately

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Network topologies

2013-10-29 Thread Edgar Magana
at 01:19:13PM -0700, Edgar Magana wrote: Hello Folks, Thank you Zane, Steven and Clint for you input. Our main goal in this BP is to provide networking users such as Heat (we consider it as a neutron user) a better and consolidated network building block in terms of an API that you could use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Network topologies

2013-10-29 Thread Edgar Magana
and generating a template file). Also, I wanted to point out that in a way you will have to do orchestration as you're topology manager will have to call the neutron api in order to create the topology and tear it down. Best, Aaron On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Network topologies

2013-11-02 Thread Edgar Magana
and tear it down. Best, Aaron On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.comwrote: Tim, You statement building an api that manages a network topology more than one that needs to build out the dependencies between resources to help create the network topology

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Design summit etherpads

2013-11-04 Thread Edgar Magana
Steve, Can we meet to talk about the network topologies BP? If you have an open spot I want to chat about it with Heat team Sent from my iPhone On Nov 5, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote: Placeholder etherpads have now been created for Heat's design summit sessions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

2013-11-05 Thread Edgar Magana
Absolutely! +1 Edgar On 11/5/13 3:50 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Hi, Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how there are sub-teams for FwaaS, VPNaas, ML2, etc? -- Sean M. Collins AIM: seanwdp

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Group-based Policy Sub-team Meetings

2013-11-13 Thread Edgar Magana
I do agree with need to sometime to recovery from HK and get the meetings started next week! Edgar On 11/13/13 9:57 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote: On Nov 13, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Kyle, So no meeting this Thursday? I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2013-11-13 Thread Edgar Magana
Anita, Could you prepare the invitation letters for the ones that will require a visa?, which is my case. Thanks, Edgar On 11/13/13 8:10 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Neutron Tempest code sprint In the second week of January in Montreal, Quebec, Canadathere will be a Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2013-11-13 Thread Edgar Magana
do, even if you aren't sure you can attend so I can get the paperwork you need. Edgar, can you email me your address to my personal email anteaya at anteaya dot info so I can work on this for you. Thanks, Anita. On 11/13/2013 01:12 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: Anita, Could you prepare

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port mirroring

2013-11-14 Thread Edgar Magana
Hello Rossella, Kyle has a very good point and I wanted to add the documentation request. Be sure you have a wiki/document (not a technical one) that we can easily transfer into the OpenStack Docs. This is a great feature, any idea of the overhead that it will cause? I assume that this is going

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Blueprint -- Floating IP Auto Association

2013-11-14 Thread Edgar Magana
Thanks Steven for working on this topic! I would prefer the second approach, although there were some discussions during the summit about moving all calls to Neutron instead of having nova involved. Anyway, just providing my two cents Thanks, Edgar From: Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Race condition between DB layer and plugin back-end implementation

2013-11-18 Thread Edgar Magana
Developers, This topic has been discussed before but I do not remember if we have a good solution or not. Basically, if concurrent API calls are sent to Neutron, all of them are sent to the plug-in level where two actions have to be made: 1. DB transaction ­ No just for data persistence but also

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Race condition between DB layer and plugin back-end implementation

2013-11-18 Thread Edgar Magana
for it. Any extra input is welcome! Thanks, Edgar On 11/18/13 12:55 PM, Robert Kukura rkuk...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/18/2013 03:25 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: Developers, This topic has been discussed before but I do not remember if we have a good solution or not. The ML2 plugin addresses

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Race condition between DB layer and plugin back-end implementation

2013-11-19 Thread Edgar Magana
Kukura rkuk...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/18/2013 03:25 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: Developers, This topic has been discussed before but I do not remember if we have a good solution or not. The ML2 plugin addresses this by calling each MechanismDriver twice. The create_network_precommit() method

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Race condition between DB layer and plugin back-end implementation

2013-11-20 Thread Edgar Magana
Let me take a look and circle back to you in a bit. This is a very sensitive part of the code, so we need to Handle properly any change. Thanks, Edgar On 11/20/13 5:46 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:59:38AM -0800, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2013-11-20 Thread Edgar Magana
your closest Canadian embassy or consulate outside of Canada to assess if you need one. Hopefully if you are planning on staying less that 1 week, you won't need one. But contact the embassy and be sure. Thanks, Anita. On 11/13/2013 01:25 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: Will do ASAP. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

2014-08-05 Thread Edgar Magana
Jay, I do agree with you on the focus areas. I believe Neutron should focus on the nova-parity (DVR) and DB migrations more than ever, instead of increasing the priority to new API such as the GBP. Actually, yesterday Neutron IRC showed the need of having a more focused work instead of picking in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-06 Thread Edgar Magana
This is the consequence of a proposal that is not following the standardized terminology (IETF - RFC) for any Policy-based System: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 Well, I did bring this point during the Hong Kong Summit but as you can see my comments were totally ignored:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-06 Thread Edgar Magana
That is the beauty of the open source projects, there is always a smartest reviewer catching out the facts that you don¹t. Edgar On 8/6/14, 10:55 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote: Edgar, you seemed to have +2'ed this patch on July 2nd [1]: Edgar Magana Jul 2 8:42 AM Patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-06 Thread Edgar Magana
, yet you +2'ed a patch, by stating that All looks good to me!. On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: That is the beauty of the open source projects, there is always a smartest reviewer catching out the facts that you don¹t. Edgar On 8/6/14, 10:55 AM, Sumit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-06 Thread Edgar Magana
PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Basically, I am admitting that I did not catch in my review the part of the endpoint term that Jay was pointing out. Edgar On 8/6/14, 11:32 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.commailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-06 Thread Edgar Magana
pointless. Meanwhile, imho, blocking the patch feels really unfair. Ivar. On Aug 6, 2014 11:00 PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Ivar, Of course and this is why we are having this conversation, in order to merge our different opinions. Edgar From

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug squashing day

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
I will be around today. I can help on bug triaging.. Catch me on IRC (emagana) Thank for coordinating this Eugene! Edgar On 8/7/14, 9:19 AM, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Eugene for initiating Neutron bug squashing day! I would like to focus on bug triaging and checking bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] Neutron documentation to update about new vendor plugin, but without code in repository?

2014-10-10 Thread Edgar Magana
Hi, IMHO we should have a proper way to reference external vendor specific plugins/drivers mostly because at least in Neutron we are considering to move ALL vendor specific code out-of-tree, again it is just a consideration not a fact. So, having a place holder for that will make sense.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron documentation to update about new vendor plugin, but without code in repository?

2014-10-23 Thread Edgar Magana
I second Anne’s and Kyle comments. Actually, I like very much the wiki part to provide some visibility for out-of-tree plugins/drivers but not into the official documentation. Thanks, Edgar From: Anne Gentle a...@openstack.orgmailto:a...@openstack.org Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron documentation to update about new vendor plugin, but without code in repository?

2014-10-23 Thread Edgar Magana
maintaining that wiki and I would like to keep just for upstreamed vendor-specific plugins/drivers. Edgar From: Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 at 9:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron mid-cycle announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Edgar Magana
I cant attend it if it moves to the week of Dec 15th. I have already booked a trip for that week and even other commitments. Is there any chance to push it back to Dec 8th? Thanks, Edgar On Nov 13, 2014, at 2:18 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:04 AM,

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Error message when Neutron network is running out of IP addresses

2014-11-18 Thread Edgar Magana
Hello Community, When a network subnet runs out of IP addresses a request to create a VM on that network fails with the Error message: No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available. In the nova logs the error message is: NoMoreFixedIps: No fixed IP addresses available for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Error message when Neutron network is running out of IP addresses

2014-11-19 Thread Edgar Magana
not been reported so a bug would be great. It looks like it might be as easy as adding the NoMoreFixedIps exception to the list where FixedIpLimitExceeded is caught in nova/network/manager.py Vish On Nov 18, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Error message when Neutron network is running out of IP addresses

2014-11-19 Thread Edgar Magana
is running out of IP addresses It looks like this has not been reported so a bug would be great. It looks like it might be as easy as adding the NoMoreFixedIps exception to the list where FixedIpLimitExceeded is caught in nova/network/manager.py Vish On Nov 18, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Edgar Magana

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug day

2014-11-24 Thread Edgar Magana
Great progress! Thanks for this huge effort. Edgar From: Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 1:52 AM To:

[openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs

2013-06-20 Thread Edgar Magana
Developers, So far in Networking (formerly Quantum) IPs are pre-allocated when a new port is created by the following def: _allocate_ips_for_port(self, context, network, port): If we are using a real DHCP (not the dnsmasq process) that does not accept static IP allocation because it only

Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs

2013-06-20 Thread Edgar Magana
an allocator for a subnet. mark On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Developers, So far in Networking (formerly Quantum) IPs are pre-allocated when a new port is created by the following def: _allocate_ips_for_port(self, context, network, port): If we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs

2013-06-28 Thread Edgar Magana
achieve that. Why doesn't that work? Thanks, Aaron On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Could it be possible to add a flag to disable the allocation for the IP? If the no allocation flag is enabled, all ports will have an empty value for IPs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs

2013-06-28 Thread Edgar Magana
the blueprintŠ https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/configurable-ip-allocation On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Mark, Can you point me to the BP for this feature? I want to keep an eye on it. Thanks, Edgar From: Mark McClain mark.mccl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking] Allocation of IPs

2013-06-28 Thread Edgar Magana
your use case may be beneficial to other plugins, so in my view having a plugin-specific override is not the best fit. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Got it!!! I knew it could be possible.. Thanks, Edgar From: Aaron Rosen aro...@nicira.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] does delete_network call delete_subnet automatically?

2013-07-02 Thread Edgar Magana
PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Folks, When I create a network and a subnet associated to that network, I am able to delete the network without deleting the subnet first from both CLI and Horizon. The difference is that in Horizon, both APIs are called: delete_subnet

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] does delete_network call delete_subnet automatically?

2013-07-02 Thread Edgar Magana
it directly from the database. Aaron On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: If the plugin performs operations when the subnet is created, how is possible to roll-back those operation if the plugin implementation of delete_subnet() is never called? I don¹t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] does delete_network call delete_subnet automatically?

2013-07-02 Thread Edgar Magana
delete that then too. I don't see any reason to complicate things by forcing the user to delete the subnets first. Aaron On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Before filing a bug, do we really want this kind of functionality? Is it correct to delete a network

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] does delete_network call delete_subnet automatically?

2013-07-02 Thread Edgar Magana
. Since you cannot have a subnet without a network we should delete that then too. I don't see any reason to complicate things by forcing the user to delete the subnets first. Aaron On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Before filing a bug, do we really want

Re: [openstack-dev] Bug #1194026

2013-07-15 Thread Edgar Magana
This is ready to be merged, already has two core reviews but Salvatore ask for some changes in the commit message. Thanks, Edgar On 7/15/13 1:47 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Nachi Ueno wrote: Since this is critical bug which stops gating, I hope this is merged soon. I'll

Re: [openstack-dev] lambda() Errors in Quantum/Neutron Grizzly (2013.1.2)

2013-07-15 Thread Edgar Magana
Craig, It will help if you can add more information about your set-up: release version? devstack configuration (if you are using it) configuration files recently, if you are using master branch this error is really weird because we renamed all quantum references to neutron. Thanks, Edgar On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposal to add new neutron-core members

2013-07-23 Thread Edgar Magana
+1 Absolutely for both! BTW. I also would like to propose to Eugene Nikanorov Thanks, Edgar On 7/23/13 12:15 PM, Mark McClain mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com wrote: All- I'd like to propose that Kyle Mestery and Armando Migliaccio be added to the Neutron core team. Both have been very active

  1   2   3   >