Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:00:15AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:11:23PM +, Frank Jansen wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > > > do you have any insight into the availability of a physical environment for > > the ARM64 cloud? > > > > I’m curious, as there may be a need for

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:11:23PM +, Frank Jansen wrote: > Hi Ian, > > do you have any insight into the availability of a physical environment for > the ARM64 cloud? > > I’m curious, as there may be a need for downstream testing, which I would > assume will want to make use of our

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

Hi Ian, do you have any insight into the availability of a physical environment for the ARM64 cloud? I’m curious, as there may be a need for downstream testing, which I would assume will want to make use of our existing OSP CI framework. Thanks! Frank Frank Jansen Senior Manager |

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 23/02/18 05:35, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 02/02/2018 05:15 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: >> - Once that is done, it should be straight forward to add a >>nodepool-builder in the cloud and have it build images, and zuul >>should be able to launch them just like any other node (famous last >>

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 02/02/2018 05:15 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > - Once that is done, it should be straight forward to add a >nodepool-builder in the cloud and have it build images, and zuul >should be able to launch them just like any other node (famous last >words). This roughly turned out to be

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

Hi, A quick status update on the integration of the Linaro aarch64 cloud - Everything is integrated into the system-config cloud-launcher bits, so all auth tokens are in place, keys are deploying, etc. - I've started with a mirror. So far only a minor change to puppet required for the

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

W dniu 19.01.2018 o 06:08, Ian Wienand pisze: > On 01/13/2018 03:54 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> UEFI expects GPT and DIB is completely not prepared for it. > > I feel like we've made good progress on this part, with sufficient > GPT support in [1] to get started on the EFI part > > ...

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

Hi Lan, On 19 January 2018 at 13:08, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 01/13/2018 03:54 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> >> UEFI expects GPT and DIB is completely not prepared for it. > > > I feel like we've made good progress on this part, with sufficient > GPT support in [1] to get

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 01/13/2018 03:54 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: UEFI expects GPT and DIB is completely not prepared for it. I feel like we've made good progress on this part, with sufficient GPT support in [1] to get started on the EFI part ... which is obviously where the magic is here. This is my first

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 15/01/18 22:51, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 01/16/2018 12:11 AM, Frank Jansen wrote: >> do you have any insight into the availability of a physical >> environment for the ARM64 cloud? > >> I’m curious, as there may be a need for downstream testing, which I >> would assume will want to make use of

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 01/16/2018 12:11 AM, Frank Jansen wrote: do you have any insight into the availability of a physical environment for the ARM64 cloud? I’m curious, as there may be a need for downstream testing, which I would assume will want to make use of our existing OSP CI framework. Sorry, not 100%

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 01/12/2018 07:21 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018, at 3:27 PM, Dan Radez wrote: >> fwiw >> We've been building arm images for tripleo and posting them. >> https://images.rdoproject.org/aarch64/pike/delorean/current-tripleo-rdo/ >> >> >> This uses delorean and overcloud build: >>

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 01/13/2018 01:26 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: In terms of implementation, since you've already looked, I think essentially diskimage_builder/block_device/level1.py create() will need some moderate re-factoring to call a gpt implementation in response to a gpt label, which could translate

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 01/13/2018 05:01 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-01-12 17:54:20 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > [...] >> UEFI expects GPT and DIB is completely not prepared for it. I made >> block-layout-arm64.yaml file and got it used just to see "sorry, >> mbr expected" message. > > I concur.

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018, at 3:27 PM, Dan Radez wrote: > fwiw > We've been building arm images for tripleo and posting them. > https://images.rdoproject.org/aarch64/pike/delorean/current-tripleo-rdo/ > > > This uses delorean and overcloud build: > >    

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

fwiw We've been building arm images for tripleo and posting them. https://images.rdoproject.org/aarch64/pike/delorean/current-tripleo-rdo/ This uses delorean and overcloud build:     DIB_YUM_REPO_CONF+="/etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-deps-${OSVER}.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-${OSVER}.repo

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 2018-01-12 17:54:20 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: [...] > UEFI expects GPT and DIB is completely not prepared for it. I made > block-layout-arm64.yaml file and got it used just to see "sorry, > mbr expected" message. I concur. It looks like the DIB team would welcome work toward GPT

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

W dniu 12.01.2018 o 16:54, Jeremy Stanley pisze: > On 2018-01-12 16:06:03 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Or someone will try to target q35/uefi emulation instead of i440fx >> one on x86 alone. > > I'm curious why we'd need emulation there... Developers around x86 virtualisation

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 2018-01-12 16:06:03 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Or someone will try to target q35/uefi emulation instead of i440fx > one on x86 alone. I'm curious why we'd need emulation there... the expectation is that DIB is running on a native 64-bit ARM system (under a hypervisor, but still

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 12/01/18 00:28, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018, at 1:41 AM, Gema Gomez wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Linaro would like to add a new cloud to infra so that we can run tests >> on ARM64 going forward. This discussion has been ongoing for the good >> part of a year, apologies that it took

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 12/01/18 15:49, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:17:33AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Wu dniu 12.01.2018 o 01:09, Ian Wienand pisze: >>> On 01/10/2018 08:41 PM, Gema Gomez wrote: 1. Control-plane project that will host a nodepool builder with 8 vCPUs, 8 GB

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

W dniu 12.01.2018 o 15:49, Paul Belanger pisze: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:17:33AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Wu dniu 12.01.2018 o 01:09, Ian Wienand pisze: >>> On 01/10/2018 08:41 PM, Gema Gomez wrote: 1. Control-plane project that will host a nodepool builder with 8 vCPUs, 8

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 2018-01-12 11:17:33 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: [...] > I am aware that you like to build disk images on your own but have > you considered using virt-install with generated preseed/kickstart > files? It would move several arch related things (like bootloader) > to be handled by

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:17:33AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Wu dniu 12.01.2018 o 01:09, Ian Wienand pisze: > > On 01/10/2018 08:41 PM, Gema Gomez wrote: > >> 1. Control-plane project that will host a nodepool builder with 8 vCPUs, > >> 8 GB RAM, 1TB storage on a Cinder volume for the

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

Wu dniu 12.01.2018 o 01:09, Ian Wienand pisze: > On 01/10/2018 08:41 PM, Gema Gomez wrote: >> 1. Control-plane project that will host a nodepool builder with 8 vCPUs, >> 8 GB RAM, 1TB storage on a Cinder volume for the image building scratch >> space. > Does this mean you're planning on using

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 2018-01-12 11:09:10 +1100 (+1100), Ian Wienand wrote: [...] > I've seen occasional ARM things come by, but of course > diskimage-builder doesn't have CI for it (yet :) so it's status is > probably "unknown". A problem which will solve itself! ;) -- Jeremy Stanley signature.asc Description:

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 01/10/2018 08:41 PM, Gema Gomez wrote: 1. Control-plane project that will host a nodepool builder with 8 vCPUs, 8 GB RAM, 1TB storage on a Cinder volume for the image building scratch space. Does this mean you're planning on using diskimage-builder to produce the images to run tests on?

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018, at 1:41 AM, Gema Gomez wrote: > Hi all, > > Linaro would like to add a new cloud to infra so that we can run tests > on ARM64 going forward. This discussion has been ongoing for the good > part of a year, apologies that it took us so long to get to a point > where we feel

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 2018-01-10 19:34:07 +0100 (+0100), Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 10.01.2018 o 18:28, Jeremy Stanley pisze: > > On 2018-01-10 09:06:43 -0800 (-0800), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > >> So it's my understanding (which is limited at best) that zuul > >> currently doesn't support something like

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

W dniu 10.01.2018 o 18:28, Jeremy Stanley pisze: > On 2018-01-10 09:06:43 -0800 (-0800), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: >> So it's my understanding (which is limited at best) that zuul >> currently doesn't support something like "this job has to run on >> nodepool X", which would be necessary. We might

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On 2018-01-10 09:06:43 -0800 (-0800), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > So it's my understanding (which is limited at best) that zuul > currently doesn't support something like "this job has to run on > nodepool X", which would be necessary. We might need to add some sort > of metadata for nodepools and

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

Thanks Gema! So it's my understanding (which is limited at best) that zuul currently doesn't support something like "this job has to run on nodepool X", which would be necessary. We might need to add some sort of metadata for nodepools and be able to specify in zuul job that "this job has to land

[OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

Hi all, Linaro would like to add a new cloud to infra so that we can run tests on ARM64 going forward. This discussion has been ongoing for the good part of a year, apologies that it took us so long to get to a point where we feel comfortable going ahead in terms of stability of infrastructure