Hi,
Just by watching the issue about jasper (former WW-222) I just
recognized, that the same issue id was used to create a new one.
Bug or feature?
If the former issue was deleted, then Jira should not reuse the same key
for something different or all watchers should be notified about the
Hi WebWork Guys,
Seems
com.opensymphony.webwork.dispatcher.ServletDispatcher
class is caching the value of
webwork.multipart.saveDir property (at init() of
servlet) and it causes problems when I want to change
this prop's value after initialization (at runtime).
Attached is the changes I've made
Scott,
thanks for your quick reply.
Shall I resubmit the issue or wait until you could track down the problem?
cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woperstr. 34 tel: +49 (0)170 - 3432 912
D-52134 Herzogenrath
Maybe with some kind of scheduler. Because I'm using an EJB container
I'll try JMS.
Thanks again !
Lars
Well, for us we queue a JMS message. I'm not sure of another way to
start an asynch process in the J2EE spec
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL
I never use JavaScript because my application has to work the same
way even if JavaScript is turned off.
I haven't actually done this yet (but am planning to) -- however, can't
you take care of this behavior with dhtml?? It seems like you could
call a javascript function on submit that pulled
The in progress page is shown when the process is finished (the
action has completed). As Jason said you have to start thew process
asynchronous.
Don't forget our cool new HTTP 204 trick that we just learned.
Display the in progress page, and then have a refresh ping the server
periodically.
I see your point, Mike. I was thinking in terms of medium length tasks,
not truly long running. You mentioned that the javascript approach is
very error prone. Are you referring to differences between browsers, or
is there something else?
In terms of very long tasks, I actually did something
Lars, just out of curiosity, what is driving the requirement for not
supporting the complete browser model (no javascript)?
These are some of the reasons:
- some IT departments do not allow JavaScript (Active Scripting) for
security reasons
- my applications should work with the most common
IMO, if you want to create a web application that acts like a desktop
application, JavaScript is your best buddy. If you want to create a web
application that acts like a web site (click, wait, click, wait) then don't
use it.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL
Wow, are you the famous man who's name turned into a verb ?
Well the two are completely unrelated. J2EE has no user interface
guidelines, it is not specific to browsers (it does define servlets
which deal with http though, but that's as 'browsery' as it gets). So
the question of how well
Hi,
Anybody got this problem.
Iam gettig velocity exception HashMap class cast exception if i try to
access TreeMap like this simpleMap.get($key).
Iam not getting error if use the HashMap.
Is it something like webwork supporst only accessing HashMaps.
Thanks,
Ajmal
Nor should you, to be honest. You're trying to jam a square peg into a
round hole. Yes, you can get pretty far, but in the end, a user will
get an email with a link, and will click on it and boom, their browser
window with all your lovely javascript is now replaced. Or maybe the
user gets
Hey Armond,
I recommend that you open a JIRA issue for this and attach the patch. We'll
get to it real soon.
- Original Message -
From: Armond Avanes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:33 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Multipart SaveDir
Hi WebWork
Absolutely. We agree!! :) If you need truly rich functionality, you
should be writing a client app. However, if you are required to be web
and can do javascript, then use it. I'm just suggesting that something
as simple as bringing a div to the front is very easy to make cross
platform and may
Watch out folks, Maurice has been infected! :)
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:12 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Application
-- Virus Warning Message (on the network)
Found virus WORM_SOBIG.E in
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [OS-webwork] Re: Application
Scanning Time = 06/26/2003 18:27:17
Engine/Pattern =
Incident Information:-
Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[OS-webwork] Re: Application
The file your_details.zip (details.pif) you received was infected with the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted.
17 matches
Mail list logo