I think we need to get the project for external integrations going. I
got a note from Rod Johnson about this too, and I think it would be a
great idea to have integrations with Spring and Picocontainer, but these
need to be in a separate project. We're explicitly limiting dependencies
in Xwork /
Yes.. WW just uses the classloader of the Web app, it doesn't do any
funky class loading, so Singletons should work the same as they do in
any web app (i.e. it's a singleton for your web app, but not necessarily
across web apps)
-Original Message-
From: James Pan [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
I'm
not sure about this... this sounds more complicated to me than explicitly
telling it what to look for... you have to read a lot more docs for what the
defaults are, etc. With the stuff I did to make the default stuff pulled out
into a separate file, here's what the
documenting...
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built
I seem to remember a bug in some servlet containers that wouldn't allow you to map a
single taglib to multiple prefix's... I think it was WLS 6.1, but it may be others, too
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:08 PM
To:
Please create a Jira issue and attach your changes, if you want to contribute them
Assign it to Matt Ho or Mike Cannon-Brookes...
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 8/12/2003 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See below
-Original Message-
From: James Pan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Defining views for actions in views.properties
Hello,
Got two questions:
(1)
I have an action that may be invoked
Title: Message
It
should be possible... If it's not pulled out to be called outside the JSP tag,
then create a Jira issue and we'll get it working.
-Original Message-From: Steve Swett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:21
AMTo: [EMAIL
Can we just leave the comments and new issues coming to the main list? They are
essentially the same as meesages to the list, just saved, in my mind...
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 8/12/2003 8:48 AM
To:
I know Matt was working on this, but he's on vacation till Monday... Can
anyone think of a way to make this an ant task, so we can make it part
of the release build? I'd like to automatically pull down the contents
of the Wiki pages for Xwork...
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Hermanns
. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC?
What is the planned intergration with Spring?
Cheers,
matthew
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 08:57 PM, Jason Carreira wrote:
I
Ok... I know why this is happening... I think it needs to cache the list
of included file names to re-check for each call to needsReload(). If
anyone has a good way to unit test this, it would be highly appreciated
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
(and simplest)... I'll code it up!
Cheers,
James
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] webwork.util.Counter example
This sounds like an excellent opportunity
Well, I'm disappointed. Maybe you can try out WW2 on some outside-work
projects.
For those too lazy to look it up, here's the link to the email:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pache.orgmsgNo=20238
You should blog this That or I might have to :-)
I'm interested to hear
start dropping things in and see what forms :-)
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Jason Carreira
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] A Proposal
This sounds like an excellent opportunity for a reusable component to
manage this, if you want to build one :-) We've got one here at work
that does this, but it's tied in with other code we've got, so it
wouldn't be that easy to pull out.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: James Pan
Title: Message
It's
just like any jar file... You jar up your compiled classes with your xwork.xml
file (call it something else so it can be included from a base xwork.xml file
from the classpath) and your velocity .vm files so they can be loaded from the
classpath too. Then just put the
Title: Message
Sounds
like a bug. Please report it.
Did
you see my notes about client-side validation and the include file reloading? Is
the reloading working for you now?
Jason
-Original Message-From: Cameron Braid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003
?
Using Spring, will components automatically be passed to
Actions still?
Is there still going to be a need for *Aware interfaces? Many
questions...
Cheers,
matthew
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
In the same way that we're going to have a Pico
.
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Carreira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:51
PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of
WW2
I'm not sure about this... this sounds more complicated to me than
explicitly telling
Hmm.. Not sure yet, but I will look tomorrow.
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Parameters to/from action
I have problems with sending parameters from jsp/vm to
So the iterator is running, but you're not seeing the form elements? It could be your
templates. Do you have your template JSP files in your war file?
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The UI tags use templates to generate output. These template files must be included in
your .war file to be used by the tags.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 8:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] JSP
Title: Message
Here's the part
of the Hibernate2 build file which does this: target name="fetchwikidoc" description="Fetch current Wiki snapshot if Internet connection exists"
echo message="Fetching Wiki snapshot from bluemars.net"/
mkdir dir="${dist.dir}"/
get
Believe me, I understand. I'm trying to decide if I'm going to have time
to pull down all of the wiki docs and put them into a release or if I
should cut a release without the docs. Xwork / WW2 are pretty much
feature complete, so its mostly bug fixes and tweaks to be done. I think
Conductor will
Any idea what the issue might be with the head of Xwork? Is it a
type-conversion issue?
-Original Message-
From: Dag Liodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Parameters to/from action
This looks like
Please send them to me (as 2 separate messages)... We'll see if our
exchange server can handle the load :-)
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 4:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Performance diff bw
Is your action ModelDriven, or no?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework
I have just started to use the validation framework, and am
coming
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2003 2:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Conductor Project Created
I've created the Conductor project
that can go wrong. Smart defaults are a
developers friend.
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Carreira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003
7:51 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork]
Simplicity
Title: Message
Doesn't look like it
-Original Message-From: Cameron Braid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 9:02
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [OS-webwork] WW2/Xwork Docs
Does
SnipSnap support metadata for pages, allowing you to tag any
This should be fixed in beta
-Original Message-
From: Dag Liodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Parameters to/from action
This looks like an issue in the current HEAD of xwork. Have
your tried
Title: Message
This
is fixed in CVS
-Original Message-From: Thompson, Kris
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003
11:39 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] IoC
example in WW2 broken?
I created the webwork-example.war that comes with
WW2
Check the xwork.dev.java.net and webwork.dev.java.net sites for
downloads.
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm
.
Cheers,
Dag
Jason Carreira wrote:
Ok. I found the problem... Some of the type conversion stuff Patrick
checked in at the last minute before rushing out is f***ed up
Dammit.
-Original Message-
From: Dag Liodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15
The Wiki front page is messed up... I posted a blog entry for the
releases, but it's not showing up. Mike, et al, any ideas?
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm
. This
wouldn't work with
short names.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
Jason Carreira
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of WW2
Create a jira for default
Most of them, at least :-) They're mostly small things and a lot of them
have attached patches which just need to be applied and tested.
Right now the people with commit access are: me, Patrick, Matt, Mike CB,
Matthias, Cameron, Rainer. If possible, lets get together (those in this
list) Monday
I created an issue for this and assigned it to myself:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XW-75
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:11 AM
To: Mike Cannon-Brookes
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
opensymphony-developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Re: [OS-webwork] Re:
-Original Message-
From: boxed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 7:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of WW2 - Practical ideas
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
You can already test actions to setup xwork.xml - just
instantiate
So who's building full J2EE apps without a web front end (at least for the
adminsitration)? Even someone doing big batch processes needs to see how they're
progressing sometimes...
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 8:38 PM
The include tag still needs to be added to WW2. I'll leave the others to
the Velocity experts
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Sturm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 7:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] using ww:url from velocity, ww:include
Well, it will probably need to be Tuesday morning or afternoon for
you... If you're the same as Sydney, then it's 14 hours ahead of eastern
time US. Let's see when Patrick and Matt can do it when they get back
tomorrow.
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Braid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Along the lines of making it easier for new users, we need something like this:
http://www.springframework.org/docs/MVC-step-by-step/Spring-MVC-step-by-step.html
If someone else wants to do it, great... If not, I'll eventually try to get to it.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Drew
There is a facility for adding global i18n message files...
com.opensymphony.xwork.util.LocalizedTextUtil:
public static void addDefaultResourceBundle(String resourceBundleName)
It has a static initializer to load the default:
static {
Keep in mind we already have the ability to add more config files for
action configs in the include element in xwork.xml. There's only about
5 or 5 properties used by WW2 from the webwork.properties, so I'm not
sure how useful it is to split this up across multiple files...
-Original
Do the current tags try to use getText() all the time? This should be
changed to not do this by default, if possible. To get localized text,
you should do text('myKey'). This could be part of the problem with
render speed.
-Original Message-
From: Dag Liodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, who remembers the servlet spec details? Does it need the /? This
is my fault, anyway... The reason for 1.3 vs. 1.4 is the switch to
java.net CVS.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL
are a developers friend.
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Carreira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003
7:51 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork]
Simplicity
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ww2 bug in servlet redirect result
I tried this in tomcat 4.x and getContextPath() was not returning the
ending slash, I havent bothered testing on other servers
Jason Carreira wrote:
Ok, who remembers the servlet spec details? Does it need
and displays that result
for all subsequent form submissions). WebWork2 also provides the
standard web application framework features such as servlet redirect and
request dispatcher results and multipart file uploading support.
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone
Here's some updated text:
The OpenSymphony team is proud to announce the first beta releases of
XWork 1.0 and WebWork 2.0.
This is the first release of a complete rewrite of WebWork, a
hierarchical pull-MVC framework. While WebWork 1 provided a good
separation of the general command framework
: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 09:56 PM, Jason Carreira wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman
The problem is that HTML forms pass an empty string when you leave a
field blank. They don't leave the field out, so there's always a value.
If you have a string property, you should use the required string
validator.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
));
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
}
}
As you can see, the default webwork configuration is not overwritten,
but it is possible to add custom properties.
Unit Tests are adjusted as well.
Any thoughts/comments?
--Rainer
Jason Carreira wrote:
Keep in mind we
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought the writing was pretty good. I on the other hand
question the
need for boasting about a beta. It'd be weird to do a press
release now,
and then a similar one in a week or two when the final release
This is awesome... You should send this over to the SnipSnap guys,
too... Did you get the docs down for WW2? I see them in the Xwork CVS
tree, but not WW2.
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Hermanns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of a changes.txt file? Why not
just point to JIRA changelog? I'd much rather do that as it
also promotes putting _all_ bug fixes and feature
requests/changes in to JIRA.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19
Ok, ok... We'll save it for the final release.
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review
I thought the writing was pretty good.
I've updated the text to reflect that you are just adding support for
Xwork actions to Jpublish.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Eden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for
Sounds like a great idea. Joe Ottinger monitors this list, and he's the J2EE editor
for JDJ, so he's the man to talk to :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork]
I'm willing to support any and all efforts to document XW and WW2... I'm
trying to find the time to finish up my little example app (which shows
all of the configurations for a ww2 app), but I'll happily answer any
questions.
I think the problem we have is that while the features are relatively
Check out the FilterDispatcher in WW2... It does a reverse lookup by
view to the action it is mapped from.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 2:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] default action for
+1 to that... Once it's all done we should put it into the build for a
dist and have it pull down the wiki docs... While we're talking about
the build, should we change it to tag builds with a date?
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August
Hey, just out of interest,what are you using Xwork for standalone?
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of WW2
Agreed. I like things being simple but
a framework that would have
impressed me. I hate having to configure things with xml
that should be default. One more step that can go
wrong. Smart defaults are a developers friend.
- Original Message
What you can do is create a parent class for your actions which extends from
ActionSupport and tie the resource bundle to that class. You can create multiple of
these parent classes to have different groupings of resources, etc...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota
that the
ActionProxyFactory hard codes the DefaultActionProxyFactory as the
implementation.
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Carreira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:45
PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of
WW2
-1
Oops... Just realized I only sent this to opensymphony-developers
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 1:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Webwork IRC meetup
Well, better late than never, I talked to Pat and figured out an ok
time:
10 AM Eastern
There has been disussion of having the interceptor use the ValueStack
for setting properties. Anyone have any thoughts on this, pro or con?
-Original Message-
From: Marko Lahma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 6:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I'm sure I fixed this, but looking at the code, the bug is still
there...
Ok, I think I deleted this file locally, but didn't remove it from CVS.
I've deleted it in CVS now. Anyone have any idea how to remove it from
the tag for beta1?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Francisco
I've spent some time profiling these in Tomcat with OptimizeIt and it
definitely looks like it's something in VelocityResult and how it uses
Velocity. In Tomcat, the ww2 version is talking 600+ ms, the ww1 version
is 30-40ms. Under Resin, it's about 10ms for the ww1 version and 100ms
for the ww2
Please add this as a Jira issue. Sorry, this was my fault. I made field
errors hold a List of errors instead of just one.
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 6:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] bug in
Or, like I was saying, if you have this parent class, you can define the
resource bundle at this level for default messages.
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
: [OS-webwork] Re: Performance diff bw ww1 and ww2?
Just quickly - are we caching the velocity templates? AFAIK
(and that
ain't much regarding velocity), the speed increase in velocity is
achieved by caching the parsed templates.
Cheers,
Scott
Jason Carreira wrote:
I've spent
There's one for Xwork and one for WebWork2 on dev.java.net under the
mailing lists under the respective projects. They always set up a few
mailing lists for each project - dev, announce, users, cvs.
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
If you make sure your xwork.xml file is in the classpath, you can create
an ActionProxy using the ActionProxyFactory and execute it. This will do
all of the Interceptors, etc. You should tell it not to execute your
result, though, since dispatching to a JSP / VM is likely to fail in a
unit test
Title: Message
We
need a project for integrations with WW2 anyway for Spring / Picocontainer /
Bebop... Is it possible on java.net to make another module in CVS under WebWork
or XWork?
-Original Message-From: Cameron Braid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25,
Has anyone looked at projects for creating a DOM from an object graph?
Domify seems to not be maintained, and one of the later messages is from
the main developer saying he'd been contacted by someone with another
project that seemed further along and he wanted to merge the two
projects
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Tuesday, 26 August 2003 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] When will XSLT support be in
WebWork2? (Slightly OT)
Has anyone looked at projects for creating a DOM
So we just don't ship the jar file? That would work
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker Views
I see no reason why this couldn't be included in webwork
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Braid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Freemarker Views
Shall I add it to the CVS repository at java.net then ?
Yes
If so should I put, source in
Wouldn't it be better to have this properties file driven, like it is
now? Just add the ability to have converters both from AND to String?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Therefore if the above app is deployed into /myApp the url would be
SaveDepot :
/myApp/supplier/depot/ReadDepot.action?id=XX
SaveDepot2 :
/myApp/Done.action
when using contextRelative=false
Title: Message
I
fixed a JDK 1.4 dependency (Everyone please be careful to make sure it runs in
JDK 1.3, which means none of the nice nested exception constructors), and now it
builds and tests for me. Let me know if it's working for
you.
-Original Message-From: Cameron Braid
out to the user without declaring it in
vs.findValue() and all the
others. What'd you end up doing?
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Testing Xwork
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 06:50:41 -0700
I fixed a JDK 1.4
You mean which is more valuable? Depends on where you're working and
what you were working on. In general, I'd say work experience, but then
I have a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Photography and no technical degrees
whatsoever, so I'm biased :-)
-Original Message-
From: James Pan
Sorry, I'll work on putting an example of its use into the example app.
In the meantime, what this means is that it's going to add errors to the errors list
and the lists of errors in the map of fieldErrors. It WILL NOT stop execution just
because you have an error. You can apply the
Title: Message
WebWork actually uses commons-logging, so you should look at how to
configure commons-logging for use with log4J...
-Original Message-From: Rajat Sharma
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003
4:38 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
going from photography to computer programming?
Jason Carreira wrote:
You mean which is more valuable? Depends on where you're
working and
what you were working on. In general, I'd say work experience, but
then I have a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Photography and no technical
degrees
I created this:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Webwork+-+Why+would+I+use+Action+Chai
ning%3F
One common use of Action chaining is to provide lookup lists (like for a
dropdown list of states, etc). Since these Actions get put on the
ValueStack, these properties will be available in the view.
I may be wrong, but these look like common errors that you will get when
dealing with Sockets that close before finishing, etc... On WebLogic,
I've always seen lots of Connection reset by peer errors (or something
like that).
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL
Hmm... Are your validations down in the actions package of your Action? You said
only that it was in br.com.company.app. It needs to find the validations for your
Action to apply them.
The other problem is the stuff Mike CB checked in a long time ago :-)
He implemented what
See below... Let me know if this helps.
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Persisting error messages across a redirect?
Is there any kind of functionality in
.
-Robert Douglass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Jason Carreira
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Offtopic: need advice
I got a job doing web site design while I
+1 to that!
I know that right now bugs are coming in faster than they're being
fixed, but hopefully we can turn that around soon. I'm very encouraged
to see new names submitting bugs, because it means more people are using
the code and findng bugs by doing things the rest of us weren't doing
What lifecycle? It's already there. All it does is this:
Action action = invocation.getAction();
if (action instanceof ValidationAware) {
ValidationAware validationAwareAction = (ValidationAware)
action;
if (validationAwareAction.hasErrors()) {
See below
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Hi Jason, guys,
Now the interceptor is working ... or should be working. The
Ok... Someone create a Jira for this and I'll create the Interface
(Validateable?) and add it to the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
401 - 500 of 1120 matches
Mail list logo
