explanation.
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:hani;formicary.net]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
Excellent! A great way of ensuring nobody is able to use webwork without
first going through lots
the current ever-so-transparent ww:property tag that
everyone
just understands without any explanation.
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:hani;formicary.net]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Property tag (beating the decomposed horse
Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
It's a different approach I suppose.
I didn't know of the TWO uses of the propertytag, let alone the 3 uses.
I'm not
angry
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
Excellent! A great way of ensuring nobody is able to use webwork without
first going through lots of docs.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
, but this
this stubbornness is pretty sickening.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
It's a different approach I suppose
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
It's a different approach I suppose.
I didn't know of the TWO uses of the propertytag, let alone the 3 uses.
I'm not
angry or irritated at anyone because of it, in fact, I was rather
delighted when
I
Well, I'm not sure if my vote counts, but I'm certainly +1.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
Oh, and everyone correct
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
It's a different approach I suppose.
I didn't know of the TWO uses of the propertytag, let alone the 3 uses.
I'm not
angry or irritated at anyone
anything, then how will Xwork ever improve?
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Parker [mailto:maurice.parker;pmic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed
horse)
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
You might
1) Changing the behavior of the PropertyTag hurts our userbase.
No examples given. Thus an unfounded opinion with no base in logic.
2) Adding addional tags makes the PropertyTag (and the taglibs as a
whole) more confusing, not less.
Adding tags that are simple and straight forwards makes
Jason Carreira wrote:
I think this type of break with the past is exactly what Xwork 2.0
SHOULD be for. Leave the property tag in there, but mark it as
deprecated with links to the new, much more intuitive tags (although I
don't think we need separate push and pop tags, just the ww:context).
If
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed
horse)
It's a different approach I suppose.
I didn't know of the TWO uses of the propertytag, let alone the 3
uses.
I'm not
angry or irritated at anyone because of it, in fact, I was rather
delighted when
what everyone else asks of
them.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
Alright, following your ranting
boxed wrote:
1) Changing the behavior of the PropertyTag hurts our userbase.
No examples given. Thus an unfounded opinion with no base in logic.
I am a WebWork user. I use the PropertyTag. Changing the behaviour of
the PropertyTag hurts me.
Better?
2) Adding addional tags makes the
So the argument that a tag named property is less intuitive than two tags
named push and print is a bad one?
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating
;dreambean.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
Jason Carreira wrote:
I think this type of break with the past is exactly what Xwork 2.0
SHOULD be for. Leave the property tag
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
So the argument that a tag named property is less intuitive than two
tags
named push and print is a bad one?
I wasn't talking about this specific instance, but more in general, in
reply to Jason's comment if we can't ever change anything, then how
will Xwork ever
I am a WebWork user. I use the PropertyTag. Changing the behaviour of
the PropertyTag hurts me.
Better?
Likewise for me (except the opposite) :)
2) Adding addional tags makes the PropertyTag (and the taglibs as a
whole) more confusing, not less.
Adding tags that are simple and
boxed wrote:
1) Changing the behavior of the PropertyTag hurts our userbase.
No examples given. Thus an unfounded opinion with no base in logic.
I am a WebWork user. I use the PropertyTag. Changing the behaviour of
the PropertyTag hurts me.
...and he fell into the trap. We do NOT advocate
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
Oh, and everyone correct me if I'm wrong here, but I believe this how the
votes stack up (and of course, most of the +1 crew doesn't really have
real
voting power, but I think
20 matches
Mail list logo
