We should also check out http://jbeans.org/ for this stuff... It looks
pretty cool.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:plightbo;cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Drew Davidson
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl status
Followup:
3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation in xwork (Ognl?)
Yup, so we can either report the error or silently ignore it
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: RE
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Opensymphony-Webwork@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:06 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork Security Requirements
I'm hoping that at the beginning of next year we'll be able
apps using J2EE declarative security?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Parker [mailto:maurice.parker;pmic.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork Security Requirements
Jason Carreira wrote
I created a JIRA issue for multiple config files at
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-82
+1 for deprecating views.properties. Multiple configuration methods make
webwork more confusing, not less
-Original Message-
From: James Cook [mailto:jim.cook;dot.state.oh.us]
Yeah, not like the current ever-so-transparent ww:property tag that everyone just
understands without any explanation.
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:hani;formicary.net]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Property tag
of that if need be.
Chris
Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:CD44D03584C7A249A3F86891B24EB8EA03FDCAB9;ehost003.intermedia.net
...
Yeah, not like the current ever-so-transparent ww:property tag that
everyone
just understands without any explanation.
-Original Message-
From: Hani
;dreambean.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Property tag (beating the decomposed horse)
Jason Carreira wrote:
I think this type of break with the past is exactly what Xwork 2.0
SHOULD be for. Leave the property tag
Along this line, I've mentioned before that one of the top requirements
I've got for a framework, and we're hopefully going to be switching to a
new (better) framework in the next few months, is the ability to use
J2EE declarative security to secure paths. This means that the way
actions are
Wow, I'm just reading through the posts in this list (got a little behind) and this is
AWESOME. This definitely should be done.
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 3:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Here are some that I can think of:
* Try to avoid .action URL's
* Allow for multiple read-actions to be on the same page (HMVC)
* Allow for multiple forms to be on the same page, and be developed
independently (the
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Rethink
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Great! So we can expect a finished product by Friday? :)
Friday? *yawn* :-)
Glad
Couldn't the Method objects found the first time through reflection for
parameterizing the Action instances be cached and reused, making the
reflection performance hit negligible? I've never profiled reflection to
see where the biggest performance hit is, but if it's the Class and
Method lookup,
You can put a declarative security line for */deleteUser.action, can't you? Not to say
that this is good, in fact it's horrible, but at least it COULD work.
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL
]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Action invocation
Jason Carreira wrote:
I'm thinking we could use your idea of packages, and map
packages to
certain paths, then you could easily secure by package.
What if you have 10 actions in a package, and 3 are public, 4 are
allowed by one role, and 6
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That is how I have implemented the filter currently: if there's an
action for the JSP, then execute it, otherwise do nothing
(i.e. run JSP
as usual).
/Rickard
I don't like the idea of exposing the view
) to find the package (myPackage) and then find
the action mapping (for myAction).
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Action invocation
Jason Carreira wrote:
I
It would seem some folks are assuming that all requests will
go via the
servlet and therefore if myAction is deemed to be an action then it
will be executed. This obviously has a high overhead factor.
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 08:47 PM, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Jason Carreira wrote
I'm pretty sure I read an article about doing it... Anybody else have any experience
doing this?
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Action invocation
Jason
Did anyone have any thoughts on this skin / package config stuff I sent this morning?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:47 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Re: Action invocation
-Original Message-
From: Rickard
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The argument against .action invocation, then, is only with regard to
declarative security. Would it be ok to declare what roles
may access it
in xwork.xml? (both on action and package level)
That's the argument
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Chris Nokleberg wrote:
Here's another way: define the roles that are allowed to access an
action in xwork.xml, and create an interceptor that checks
it. Then it
can work exactly like how web.xml works, except
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The problem with that is keeping them in sync. I'd prefer
using one file
with namespaces instead.
I'm planning on using Xdoclet, I don't know about you. :-)
Well, I certainly hope you reconsider. Xwork could certainly use your talents. I don't
really think the ideas presented here are that far apart. Perhaps you could list what
you see as the biggest requirements for your portlet app from Xwork, and we can see
where the gaps lie.
Jason
Ah well... personally I don't really care, since I have never used
declarative security and will never use it either.
You might change your tune when you're asked to integrate your CMS
product with an existing security framework... Especially if it's a
large user base and they've gone
As for intercepting transactions, I would say have a key that is set in
the context which tells the after() part of the Tx interceptor what to
do. Kind of like setting rollbackOnly on a UserTransaction. Assume that
the transaction should be committed unless an exception is caught or
rollbackOnly
Well, for a different example, how about setting up a Hibernate Session
and then closing it on the way out? Then Hibernate can manage your
transactions.
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
As I said, I don't think GD is needed anymore. Here's an example
interceptor I wrote:
public class ParameterInterceptor
implements ActionInterceptor
{
// ActionInterceptor implementation --
public String execute(ActionInvocation invocation)
I agree here. I like having the safety of knowing that if we decide to re-architect
the presentation layer of our app (and we're looking at re-doing some of it with
Thinlets), then there could be a framework there to let us do that...
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody
I'm not sure I see the disconnect here. What's so different about Xwork? Views can
still be JSP / Velocity / XSLT which generates HTML. It's still a great framework for
web app development. If the ThreadLocal thing is the only sticking point, then lets
talk about that. I'm personally for the
It's not that it's difficult to keep it Swing compatible and it's not a choice of
loosing features. The new features, the biggest one being Interceptors, IMHO, are in
no way involved in this. This is really a question of cleaning up some (IMO) ugliness
in the original code that was put in to
Can you explain? I'd like to know.
-Original Message-
From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 8:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Reflection
The multiple thread thing is simple/trivial to solve using
AOP. I'm not sure
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why is it difficult? Whenever there's a thread disconnect you
just get
the state, and then re-set it when you want to restart the execution.
What exactly is the difficulty?
I'm not as familiar with the
).
Thoughts?
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from
Funny, we were just talking about this here today. We've got a simple
command pattern implementation for running batch jobs now, and I was
talking about how, if we moved to Webwork, we could make a
MessageDrivenDispatcher (an MDB) that would run jobs asynchronously...
-Original Message-
something to prevent 2 submits, but
I'm not sure what it was...
Thoughts? Would this be something good to add (given that it would be
optional and not break anybodies existing code)?
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL
from clicking 2x but prevents them
from hitting back button and resubmitting. If you want to
prevent clicking button 2x, you have to use javascript.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:04 PM
Subject
you process.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
Hi all,
In our evaluation of Struts vs. Webwork, I was asked about
the ability to do hidden tokens on WW built forms
it.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:48 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
Just thought this out some more. Here's how it could work:
the hidden token is set in the session when the form is
shown
it when i get a chance.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
In WW? Is this already there? Or did you do this in your project?
-Original Message
, that was on the drawing board before the
drawing board collapsed under it.)
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Jason Carreira wrote:
I was thinking we could, like Struts does, make it an
option to have a
ui:form (which we don't have right now) and ww:url tag add
this hidden
token, through a hidden
So we had our Webwork vs. Struts talk today, and I was able to convince
people here that there was sufficiently enough better about WW to make
us use it instead of Struts, even though Struts is the standard, of
sorts! Cool.
Off to catch a plane home...
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect
? Others may find it useful. Perhaps
you've already done that and I accidently deleted the email. If so,
could you resend it to me?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
-Original Message-
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
I think the only reason Struts needs the ui:form is to associate the
form to the form bean.
I'm against
-Original Message-
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
If I quickly hit the the submit button twice what happens?
What guarantee is there that the execution of
-Original Message-
From: matt baldree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
I have the code ;). I can add it if it is what people want
but Rickard has a point in trying to make this more
: [OS-webwork] RC2?
I vote for all features going into RC2. That's kinda the
point of an RC rather than a final release - so people can
test the new features? :)
-mike
On 20/1/03 1:50 PM, Jason Carreira
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
I'd vote for new features (small, well
I propose that we branch the current code base to be the code base for
1.3 and any bugfixes thereto, and allow new development to occur on the
head (with bugfixes merged back, of course). Thoughts?
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax
FieldValidatorSupport, that is. If you want it to do something else,
then implement FieldValidator).
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm
(
http://formproc.sf.net/
) and let me know if their is something missing which would
be necessary
to make it fit WebWork developer needs.
Sincerely,
Anthony Eden
Jason Carreira wrote:
Don't have all of the answers there yet (glad to have
help!), but what
I was thinking
FormProc can do as much or as little as you like. If you
only specify a
validator then the values will only be validated. If you want to use
FormProc to do type conversion then you can specify a type converter.
This goes the same for storing the data (in a bean, hash map, etc),
* Multiple web-based views, including custom JSP taglibs, Velocity
support with pre-built macros, XSLT views, and JasperReports
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm
-Original Message-
From: boxed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
If Ognl is just totally unacceptable, then let's discuss
two options:
When we discussed this in #java it sounded to me like one
could plug in a custom syntax parser into OGNL, thus solving
this issue nicely. Did I
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0
framework/config more rigid and to remove the
ResultInterceptor stuff and specifically hard code the
ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ the servlet
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
It is possible, but it involves basicacally writing at least
_part_ of our own EL
I don't plan on using it, so as long as it doesn't mess up the core +1
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher?
[Small problem +
, the
namespace is checked as the default namespace, which makes it work
like we have now (any path works, you get the action aliased with the
name).
Check out the code in the sandbox in CVS.
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email
Can someone please explain to me how to publish a page on the Wiki? I
can't seem to find a link to create a new page Gaah!
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships
Cool. Got it. It sure wasn't obvious though!
Maybe my wiki paradigm has been messed up because we use Traction at
work.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Beeson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:40 PM
To:
Subject: [OS-webwork] Using the WiKi
To add a
Can a stack reference a stack? It is sometimes nice of actions could
refer to default which in turn could refer to either
defaultStack or
defaultDebug. Actions then refer to default and can be switched
between production and debug simply by editing the debug
interceptor
stack
1.3.1 or somesuch to fix bugs, then we'll need the
1.3 source tree as a base to work from without keeping people from
moving forward.
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade
.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Releasing 1.3 and new development
Nononono you misunderstood. My bad.
I want to branch 1.3 to be able to do bug
Konstantin,
I think the problem here is that you're not using the Model2 paradigm,
which Webwork is based upon. It sounds like you are hitting the JSPs
directly, whereas, in Webwork, we would hit foo.action, which (because
*.action is mapped to the Webwork ServletDispatcher) would be handled by
-Original Message-
From: Chris Nokleberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
When is the next
WebWork release planned for?
-Chris
Good question :-)
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM +
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XWork flux
What areas are likely to change the most? I personally can
see webwork2's functionality being expanded to
How does nanning fit into xwork? (http://nanning.sf.net/)
Nanning is a open source AOP library. IMHO the whole
interceptor stuff in xwork can be modeled using nanning.
-billy.
Hey! We've already GOT interceptors!
AOP is cool and all, but I don't think it's necessary to use AOP for
I'm not asking that you love me or anything but keep it to yourself.
If you feel the temptation to say negative personal things
about me or
anybody else connected with FM, I hope you will have the
sense to bite
your tongue or sit on your hands or whatever is necessary. And we'll
all
-Original Message-
From: Erik Beeson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Partition XWork [Was: Re: XWork flux]
Jason says 7 jars, Hani says 1, Pat says 2. I have two things to say.
Ummm... No. I
I think id is the only thing not looked up, and should be the only thing
not looked up. The reason is that id is a standard attribute to set
something into the page request with a certain name, and it's not
dynamic anywhere else.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Beeson [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: RE: [OS-webwork] how to access bean property?
Andre,
You'll want to do ActionContext.getContext() instead of new ActionContext().
ActionContext.getContext() gets the ThreadLocal instance which is populated by the ServletDispatcher.
You'll probably also want to maintain a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of
Jason Carreira
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] how to access bean property?
Andre,
You'll want to do ActionContext.getContext() instead
Oops, forgot to list the time... I was thinking 2PM Eastern time Monday
2/3...
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 12:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session
On the table is the ThreadLocal
and can't connect to IRC from
work, contact me and I can help you find ways around it if possible.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:28 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0
Yes, this should be on the wiki... Link it to the example page I just put up about
getting the values from an action...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity as the UI widgets [WW 2.0]
I agree, I had that convern as well. The current jars in lib/core are:
beanutils
it
for 23 hours from now?
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:03 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Velocity as the UI widgets [WW 2.0]
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto
Someone please Wiki this
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lombardi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] UI widgets won't render
Kristian,
Need to copy the templates folder over to your webapp ...
Good question. I don't have an answer, but whoever figures this out,
please Wiki it too. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:50 PM
To: webwork list
Subject: [OS-webwork] Graphical submit buttons and WW 1.2.1
-Original Message-
From: Joel Cordonnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
OK ! but before the action is executed, the servlet sessions
parameters are set, no ?
The Session is there beforehand, and is managed by the Servlet
container.
I don't want to persist them, just retrieve some XML
Can anyone else attach to irc.werken.com? I can't seem to connect.
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm
Now I'm on... Keep trying if you're having problems
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Irc.werken.com
Can anyone else attach to irc.werken.com? I can't seem to connect.
Jason
It's in 13 minutes
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Irc.werken.com
Is the meeting NOW?!
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Jason Carreira wrote:
Can anyone else
().
This is the path I started down when I decided I would open it up to the
floor and schedule the meeting.
Any thoughts?
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm
Did you ever get this resolved?
-Original Message-
From: Sebastiano Pilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Help needed with parametric action
Greetings,
I'm having some troubles when trying to
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have an idea: how about adding an interface Model that has one
method Object getModel(). It would be implemented in
ActionSupport as: public Object getModel() { return this; }
However, for those cases where a
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The context is set by the dispatcher:
* Set context
* Create action
* Invoke action (which may invoke other actions)
I've checked this into the sandbox. It doesn't work exactly like this as I've checked
it in.
At 15.09 07/02/2003, Jason Carreira wrote:
Did you ever get this resolved?
No, unfortunately I haven't... Problem is, I can't seem to be able to
pinpoint the exact problem, not even after a good night's sleep. I'm
reasonably sure it's my fault, but I haven't got a clue.
However
I just don't think anyone ever did it. I think it's a good idea.
-Original Message-
From: Justen Stepka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] file ui tag for jsps
Hey guys...
The time has come that I
If you want to save things in the Session, you need to do it explicitly. The
ValueStack is only valid during one request / response cycle.
-Original Message-
From: Andre Mermegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I have to disagree with Hani here. I think Jelly looks cool. I agree
that the Jakarta projects tend to be overly interconnected, but this
doesn't seem too bad.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 7:06 PM
To:
Good job Pat!
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:57 AM
To: os-ww
Subject: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
Just put in a dinky little new WW 2.0 feature:
ServletRedirectResult now
.
More details on this later, I promise. Check out the sandbox code if
you're too eager to wait, especially the test cases, which demonstrate
this functionality.
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva
This is in the sandbox, not the current Webwork code.
-Original Message-
From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
-1
We'll never get 1.3 final
Title: Message
I
think this should just be
ww:url page="smallImageURL"/
I
think.
Most
all of the attribute values are evaluated, so this will try to get the
smallImageURL property from the ValueStack.
Can
someone verify?
-Original Message-From: Andre Mermegas
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Low,
I don't know about anyone else's dates, but I'm giving a
presentation on WebWork 2 at The
I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if
someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint).
Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 /
WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This
isn't an academic
soon. Maybe you can
work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane?
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
I guess that depends
Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into
the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new /
different
...:-)
Thanks.
Kelvin
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:41:01 -0800, Jason Carreira said:
I started building one. The consensus at the design meeting
last week
was that creating a dependency on another validation framework was a
Bad Thing, so, since it only took a few hours to put in
localized
-markup
Everyone feel free to jump in!
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
---
This SF.NET email
1 - 100 of 1120 matches
Mail list logo
