Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Excellent news. Thanks! > On May 27, 2024, at 9:43 AM, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 27.05.24 15:27, Paul D wrote: >> I guess this isn't often discussed unless one is dealing with large >> volume - but does the case include keyhole screw cutouts, those >> specially made holes that accommodate

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 27.05.24 15:27, Paul D wrote: I guess this isn't often discussed unless one is dealing with large volume - but does the case include keyhole screw cutouts, those specially made holes that accommodate screws for non horizontal mounting using a couple of screws? These would make life easier

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi John > I am expecting that the first 15 PCBA samples will be produced shortly > and be shipped by end of march. I'm sure I'm not the only one that is very excited by this project. Are you looking for any (additional) testers? If not, how do we get our hands on one as soon as they become

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

sage -- > From: Bas Mevissen > To: Paul D > Cc: John Crispin , "Rafał Miłecki" , > OpenWrt Development List , > complia...@sfconservancy.org > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:19:30 +0100 > Subject: Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt > On

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2024-02-27 10:16, Bas

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2024-02-26 22:38, Paul D

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 2024-02-26 19:39, John Crispin wrote: Hi Rafał, Is there any update / schedule you could share? I have been meaning to send an update for a few days. Thanks for reminding me. I'm really looking forward to this device. yeah, me too ;) Lots of stuff has been happening. There was a short

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi Rafał, Is there any update / schedule you could share? I have been meaning to send an update for a few days. Thanks for reminding me. I'm really looking forward to this device. yeah, me too ;) Lots of stuff has been happening. There was a short break due to the lunar new year but we

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi John! On 9.01.2024 11:49, John Crispin wrote: In 2024 the OpenWrt project turns 20 years! Let's celebrate this anniversary by launching our own first and fully upstream supported hardware design. If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we would like to start a

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

John Crispin wrote: > tl;dr > In 2024 the OpenWrt project turns 20 years! Let's celebrate this > anniversary by launching our own first and fully upstream supported > hardware design. > If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we > would like to start a vote. > ---

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

śr., 17 sty 2024 o 18:15 Daniel Golle napisał(a): > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 05:47:26PM +0100, John Crispin wrote: > > > > On 17.01.24 17:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > > Do you think I can use m.2 A->M converter here and use wifi mt7916 A+E > > > (6GHz) instead of NVMe? > > >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Ivan Ivanov writes: > blobless ath9k OK, I'll bite. Get yourself a microscope and look closer at that chip. You might find some code in there, even if the driver didn't load any. Please ask Qualcomm for the source and come back when you've got it. Modern systems contain a large number of

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Dear community, This is an excellent idea by Dave Taht to use multiple ath9k chips. Actually, I don't understand: how for a "modern, open, stable" WiFi platform - someone could suggest a blobbed Mediatek or even worse, Broadcom. an OpenWRT official device should be no worse than

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2024-01-17 16:21, John

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

> On Jan 18, 2024, at 12:11 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > OpenWrt One could use a logo... Could we get the designer of the current OpenWrt logo/wordmark to augment it with the word "One"? See:

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 1/18/24 10:37, Chuanhong Guo wrote: MT7981 is such a chip with NAT offload capability, and the flow-offload driver mentioned in other threads is actually a driver for this hardware block. Since it's a cost-down MT7986 I would imagine this particular feature is the same between them: HW NAT −

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:04 PM Gregers Baur-Petersen wrote: > > > > On 18/01/2024 17.50, Dave Taht wrote: > > tee-hee. For the record, I would prefer less (and less buggy) offloads > > than offloads, and to work on scaling software better to multi-cores. I had heard there was a mt76? mt79?

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 18/01/2024 17.50, Dave Taht wrote: tee-hee. For the record, I would prefer less (and less buggy) offloads than offloads, and to work on scaling software better to multi-cores. I also would love to find a chip where fq_codel could be offloaded, but with open source for the offload, since

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

tee-hee. For the record, I would prefer less (and less buggy) offloads than offloads, and to work on scaling software better to multi-cores. I also would love to find a chip where fq_codel could be offloaded, but with open source for the offload, since the nss drivers are slightly broken... I

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi! On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:23 AM Fernando Frediani wrote: > > Hi, interesting. Is it enough to give it the necessary performance boost > when doing NAT ? Is it capable of doing it on the chip or does it do on > the CPU ? Reading about it seems to be a software thing although seems > there

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 17.01.24 20:31, David Bauer wrote: Hi John, On 1/9/24 11:49, John Crispin wrote: FAQ * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to recover - NAND will hold the main loader (U-Boot) and the Linux image and will be the

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi John, On 1/9/24 11:49, John Crispin wrote: FAQ * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to recover - NAND will hold the main loader (U-Boot) and the Linux image and will be the default boot device - NOR will be

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 17.01.24 20:28, Daniel Santos wrote: On 1/16/24 00:36, John Crispin wrote: And in the interest of running *my* own mouth, I'm stoked as hell -- LOVE that it will have mikroBUS! Thanks to John and everyone working on this! My only request is that any unused gpios that don't make it to

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 1/16/24 00:36, John Crispin wrote: And in the interest of running *my* own mouth, I'm stoked as hell -- LOVE that it will have mikroBUS! Thanks to John and everyone working on this! My only request is that any unused gpios that don't make it to mikroBUS find their way to a (possibly

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 05:47:26PM +0100, John Crispin wrote: > > On 17.01.24 17:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > Do you think I can use m.2 A->M converter here and use wifi mt7916 A+E > > (6GHz) instead of NVMe? > >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 17.01.24 17:19, Fernando Frediani wrote: Hi, again, does this SoC have any type of NAT offload capability ? Now a days with common Internet Broadband plans that is becoming a must. Also is there any possibility to consider more than just 2 Ethernet ports (at least 4)? Would that increase

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

śr., 17 sty 2024 o 16:27 John Crispin napisał(a): > > Additional FAQ for OpenWrt One > > This is a summary of some further questions regarding the OpenWrt One > project gathered so far. After OpenWrt voted to move forward, it will be > converted into a page within the OpenWrt wiki as a place for

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 17.01.24 17:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: Do you think I can use m.2 A->M converter here and use wifi mt7916 A+E (6GHz) instead of NVMe? Eg.https://kamami.pl/akcesoria-do-raspberry-pi/587051-m2-m-key-to-m2-a-key-adapter-m2-m-key-do-m2-a-key.html Will that work? so the theory but we wont know

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Additional FAQ for OpenWrt One This is a summary of some further questions regarding the OpenWrt One project gathered so far. After OpenWrt voted to move forward, it will be converted into a page within the OpenWrt wiki as a place for collecting the latest information. Q: Will the various

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

> Interesting idea. We've been making and maintaining OpenWrt based > routers (yes with our little additions on top) for over a decade. Seems > like you have everything figured out already, but wanted to state the > obvious anyway - if you are interested, we are here and we would be > happy

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi, Interesting idea. We've been

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

And in the interest of running *my* own mouth, I'm stoked as hell -- LOVE that it will have mikroBUS! Thanks to John and everyone working on this! My only request is that any unused gpios that don't make it to mikroBUS find their way to a (possibly unpopulated) header some where for the

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 1/15/24 06:56, Paul D wrote: A kickstarter is a good way to forecast demand. You've captured the imagination of the geek community. Not aware of peripheral issues or complexities in doing a kickstarter, though I agree with forecasting demand. "Geeks" are good at commenting on stuff,

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 1/10/24 08:18, Forest Crossman wrote: On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:52 AM John Crispin wrote: ---SNIP--- * Why is there no USB 3.x host port on the device? - the USB 3.x and PCIe buses are shared in the selected SoC silicon, hence only a single High-Speed USB port is available Perhaps you've

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

A kickstarter is a good way to forecast demand. You've captured the imagination of the geek community. Not aware of peripheral issues or complexities in doing a kickstarter, though I agree with forecasting demand. "Geeks" are good at commenting on stuff, and intellectualizing a new

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:55 AM John Crispin wrote: > > when did crowdfunding come into play here ? there is no intention of > starting a crowdfunder. A kickstarter is a good way to forecast demand. You've captured the imagination of the geek community.

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

when did crowdfunding come into play here ? there is no intention of starting a crowdfunder.     John On 15.01.24 01:51, Kathy Giori wrote: Or CrowdSupply (founder Joshua Lifton). Or I could introduce you to BeagleBoard.org -- combo of

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Or CrowdSupply [1] (founder Joshua Lifton). Or I could introduce you to BeagleBoard.org [2] -- combo of the founder and the exec dir is quite an experienced pair, well-aligned with OpenWrt principles, experienced with getting high-volume hardware manufactured and sold (manufactured in Asia). If

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Can I recommend you do a kickstarter? ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 12.01.24 16:16, Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel wrote: Hardwarespecifications: * SOC: MediaTek MT7981B * Wi-Fi: MediaTek MT7976C (2x2 2.4 GHz + 3x3/2x2 + zero-wait DFS 5Ghz) Was the MT7986AV, MT7976DA combo considered? Has 4x4 for office applications (MU-MIMO), so might be useful for

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 09/01/2024 11:49, John

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Bjørn Mork wrote: > antennas. I realize that such a case will be relatively expensive. But > without it all you have is yet another midrange dev board. This is > your chance to make a device which shouts "OpenWrt!!!" whenever someone > sees it. Just like the original WRT did.

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Dave Taht wrote: > So I at least do not feel a huge urge to get on the 6ghz bandwagon at > this time. I would actually, be happy cutting even more multiplexing > latency out of the ath9k chips, and there is much fat left to be cut > from the mt79 also, and the benefits of many

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi Forest, On 10.01.2024 15:18, Forest Crossman wrote: On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:52 AM John Crispin wrote: ---SNIP--- * Why is there no USB 3.x host port on the device? - the USB 3.x and PCIe buses are shared in the selected SoC silicon, hence only a single High-Speed USB port is available

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

John hello. I like this project quite a lot. I'm very excited to see it happen and would love to be involved! The company I work with, Xeront, has some PCB designs of their own. I can happily connect you with folks for any discussions about the electronic engineering and manufacturing aspects of

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:52 AM John Crispin wrote: > ---SNIP--- > > * Why is there no USB 3.x host port on the device? > - the USB 3.x and PCIe buses are shared in the selected SoC silicon, > hence only a single High-Speed USB port is available Perhaps you've already considered this, but it may

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi Daniel, Bjørn, On 10.01.2024 12:14, Daniel Golle wrote: Hi! On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:08AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: John Crispin writes: > At the beginning we focused on the most powerful (and > expensive) configurations possible but finally ended up with something > rather simple

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi Chuanhong, On 9.01.2024 14:51, Chuanhong Guo wrote: Hi! On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:52 PM John Crispin wrote: [...] FAQ * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to recover What about a built-in JTAG probe instead of

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi Janusz, On 9.01.2024 19:14, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:59 Daniel Golle napisał(a): On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:49:04PM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:02 Robert Marko napisał(a): > > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > > >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi Enrico, On 9.01.2024 13:55, Enrico Mioso wrote: Hello!! First of all, let me thank You all for this great project. I wll do my best to buy some units - even tough I am not contributing by any mean to OpenWrt in terms of code, or very little, I am very passionate about this project and the

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 10.01.24 12:17, Robert Marko wrote: Along with a well designed minimalistic case with sufficient passive cooling and optional integrated antennas. Thinking something along the Flirc RPi4 cases, using the case itself as a cooler. With half the case radio transparent and a choice between

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

> > > > Along with a well designed minimalistic case with sufficient passive > > cooling and optional integrated antennas. Thinking something along the > > Flirc RPi4 cases, using the case itself as a cooler. With half the case > > radio transparent and a choice between antenna pigtails and

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi! On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:08AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > John Crispin writes: > > > At the beginning we focused on the most powerful (and > > expensive) configurations possible but finally ended up with something > > rather simple and above all,feasible. > > That's a very wise choice.

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

John Crispin writes: > At the beginning we focused on the most powerful (and > expensive) configurations possible but finally ended up with something > rather simple and above all,feasible. That's a very wise choice. And most of the compromises make sense to me. Except the > * Storage: M.2

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024, Paul D wrote: 6GHz seems a starting point nowadays, although I get by with 5GHz. only if all your clients support 6GHz as well, most don't * Packages with cases+PSU are a must for broader acceptance, which explains why the Raspberry Pi bare board is such a failure,

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

This looks like a great project. I'm sure I would end up buying several units. Looking at the spec: > Ethernet: 2x RJ45 (2.5 GbE + 1 GbE) 2.5Gb FTTP is becoming more widely available. It would be better to be able to match egress and ingress surely as it is a router after all? 1GbE x 2 or

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

I have often tried to point out that what matters most in wifi is low interference, better multiplexing across devices, and good bandwidth *at range*. Up until very recently the 6ghz stuff mostly had terrible bandwidth, jitter and latency at range, and everyone shipping it bleeding into all the

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:59 Daniel Golle napisał(a): > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:49:04PM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:02 Robert Marko napisał(a): > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote: > > >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:49:04PM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:02 Robert Marko napisał(a): > > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > > > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote: > > > > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote: > > > >> ---SNIP--- > >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:02 Robert Marko napisał(a): > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote: > > >> ---SNIP--- > > >> > > >>> Why not 6GHz? > > >> 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:52:57PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote: > > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote: > > > ---SNIP--- > > > > > > > Why not 6GHz? > > > 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the > > > target price. > > > > >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote: > > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote: > >> ---SNIP--- > >> > >>> Why not 6GHz? > >> 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the > >> target price. > >> > >> Regards, > >>

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote: On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote: ---SNIP--- Why not 6GHz? 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the target price. Regards, Robert correct. as mentioned in the email, we wanted to start out small. also upstream

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi! On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:34 PM John Crispin wrote: > > > On 09.01.24 14:51, Chuanhong Guo wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:52 PM John Crispin wrote: > >> [...] > >> FAQ > >> > >> * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? > >> - the idea is to make the device (almost!)

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

6GHz seems a starting point nowadays, although I get by with 5GHz. If the BPi can be extended with add-on cards for exactly this area, that's a great starting point also. Ideally sub $100 for any product. * Packages with cases+PSU are a must for broader acceptance, and to prevent fatigue

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Chuanhong Guo wrote: >> * What is the purpose of the console USB-C port? >> - Holtek UART to USB bridge with CDC-ACM support on USB-C makes the >> device ultra easy to communicate with. No extra hardware or drivers will >> be required. Android for example has CDC-ACM support

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 09.01.24 14:51, Chuanhong Guo wrote: Hi! On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:52 PM John Crispin wrote: [...] FAQ * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to recover What about a built-in JTAG probe instead of

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Battery power capability? Parts of the world still have their power flicker regularly. Others can be solar powered. What is the projected power consumption of this device? ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hi! On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:52 PM John Crispin wrote: > [...] > FAQ > > * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? > - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to > recover What about a built-in JTAG probe instead of SPI-NOR+USB-UART? It'll be actually unbrickable

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

Hello!! First of all, let me thank You all for this great project. I wll do my best to buy some units - even tough I am not contributing by any mean to OpenWrt in terms of code, or very little, I am very passionate about this project and the overall router freedom. As most of you know by now,

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 13:38, Dave Taht wrote: > > You should talk about this project at FOSSDEM! > > Two potential funders off the top of my head: > > https://nlnet.nl/funding.html > https://www.ardc.net/apply/ > Ardc funded the latest round of the librerouter project in argentina, > which is

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

You should talk about this project at FOSSDEM! Two potential funders off the top of my head: https://nlnet.nl/funding.html https://www.ardc.net/apply/ Ardc funded the latest round of the librerouter project in argentina, which is also openwrt based, but intended for outdoor. a 10 year design

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote: ---SNIP--- Why not 6GHz? 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the target price. Regards, Robert correct. as mentioned in the email, we wanted to start out small. also upstream mac80211 is still missing a bunch of 11be

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

wt., 9 sty 2024 o 13:21 Daniel Golle napisał(a): > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 12:56:55PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote: > > ---SNIP--- > > > > > Why not 6GHz? > > > > 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the > > target price. > > Afaik we could use MT7976A as DBDC front-end

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 09.01.24 12:58, Rafał Miłecki wrote: So are you looking for just a generic interest feedback? Or some technical comments? What are next steps for this project and do you could use some community help? just general feedback. it felt a bit weird to jump straight into voting.     John

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 12:56:55PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote: > ---SNIP--- > > > Why not 6GHz? > > 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the > target price. Afaik we could use MT7976A as DBDC front-end supporting 2.4 GHz + 5/6 GHz instead of MT7976C which only supports

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

On 9.01.2024 11:49, John Crispin wrote: If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we would like to start a vote. I'm afraid it's a bit unclear what do you expect here ;) People at IRC started wondering too. I love idea of this project and I'll surely be interested in

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

---SNIP--- > Why not 6GHz? 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the target price. Regards, Robert > > BR > > > Janusz > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

wt., 9 sty 2024 o 11:54 John Crispin napisał(a): > > tl;dr > > In 2024 the OpenWrt project turns 20 years! Let's celebrate this > anniversary by launching our own first and fully upstream supported > hardware design. > > If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we >

OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

tl;dr In 2024 the OpenWrt project turns 20 years! Let's celebrate this anniversary by launching our own first and fully upstream supported hardware design. If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we would like to start a vote. --- The idea It is not new. We