Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Shouldn't CONFIG_ATH_USER_REGD=y by default?

2011-04-14 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
I think the current situation of enforcing ETSI limits on US machines flies in the face of WIRELESS FREEDOM. In the interest of collaboration Atheros specifically wants OpenWrt to not publish unregulated binaries. One prerequisite for publishing a fully open driver was the ability to enforce

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Shouldn't CONFIG_ATH_USER_REGD=y by default?

2011-04-14 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich x...@subsignal.org wrote: I think the current situation of enforcing ETSI limits on US machines flies in the face of WIRELESS FREEDOM. In the interest of collaboration Atheros specifically wants OpenWrt to not publish unregulated binaries. One

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Shouldn't CONFIG_ATH_USER_REGD=y by default?

2011-04-14 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2011-04-14 5:41 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Jo-Philipp Wichx...@subsignal.org wrote: I think the current situation of enforcing ETSI limits on US machines flies in the face of WIRELESS FREEDOM. In the interest of collaboration Atheros specifically wants

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Shouldn't CONFIG_ATH_USER_REGD=y by default?

2011-04-14 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: On 2011-04-14 5:41 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Jo-Philipp Wichx...@subsignal.org  wrote:  I think the current situation of enforcing ETSI limits on US machines  flies in the face of WIRELESS

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Shouldn't CONFIG_ATH_USER_REGD=y by default?

2011-04-14 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2011-04-14 5:59 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Felix Fietkaun...@openwrt.org wrote: On 2011-04-14 5:41 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Jo-Philipp Wichx...@subsignal.org wrote: I think the current situation of enforcing ETSI