: Montag, 10. August 2020 10:36
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: Policy on BUILD_PATENTED
On 09/08/2020 12:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mauro Mozzarelli writes:
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I believe OpenWrt should not even *consider* placing its umbrella
f Of Mauro Mozzarelli
>>> Sent: Montag, 10. August 2020 10:36
>>> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>> Subject: Re: Policy on BUILD_PATENTED
>>>
>>> On 09/08/2020 12:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>>>> Mauro Mozzarelli writes:
>>>>>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 01:30:08AM +0100, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
> Citizens of the European Union are major contributors to OpenWrt and
> other Open Source projects, The European Union, after several years of
> debate. listened to its citizens, not corporations, and has put into
> law that
-Original Message-
> > > > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> > > > > On Behalf Of Mauro Mozzarelli
> > > > > Sent: Montag, 10. August 2020 10:36
> > > > > To: openwrt-devel@lists.o
2020 10:36
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: Policy on BUILD_PATENTED
On 09/08/2020 12:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mauro Mozzarelli writes:
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I believe OpenWrt should not even *consider* placing its umbrella
organization(s) -- which
Subject: Re: Policy on BUILD_PATENTED
On 09/08/2020 12:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mauro Mozzarelli writes:
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I believe OpenWrt should not even *consider* placing its umbrella
organization(s) -- which are based on the U.S. -- in legal risk
without
On 10/08/20 13:58, Sam Kuper wrote:
IIUC, you are suggesting the creation of a new package repository
through which OpenWRT devs who are based in countries (e.g. EU
countries) that don't uphold software patents could distribute
patent-encumbered software.
Users would then be able to decide
On 10/08/2020 10:08, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
On Behalf Of Mauro Mozzarelli
Sent: Montag, 10. August 2020 10:36
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: Policy on BUILD_PATENTED
On 09/08
On 10/08/2020 06:08, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
But still, OpenWrt as a project/organization in embedded in an environment it
has to care about.
And that of course includes caring about the interests of important
stakeholders (or at least ask them about those), and not make our decisions
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:36:08AM +0100, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
> If there is a minority who is unable to use parts of this software,
Worth considering: do we know for sure that it's a minority? And is it
even relevant whether it is a minority or a majority, as long as we know
that some
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 01:21:26PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 6:09 AM Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Mauro Mozzarelli
> Sent: Montag, 10. August 2020 10:36
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: Policy on BUILD_PATENTED
>
> On 09/08/2020
On 09/08/2020 12:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mauro Mozzarelli writes:
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I believe OpenWrt should not even *consider* placing its umbrella
organization(s) -- which are based on the U.S. -- in legal risk
without at least contacting them first and
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 6:09 AM Sam Kuper wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> >> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
> >>> Whenever discussion about patents arise, I usually
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>>> Whenever discussion about patents arise, I usually point to Fedora
>>> whose parent company is Red Hat, which
Mauro Mozzarelli writes:
> On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
>> I believe OpenWrt should not even *consider* placing its umbrella
>> organization(s) -- which are based on the U.S. -- in legal risk
>> without at least contacting them first and getting their approval.
>>
>>
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On 08/08/2020 17:56, Rosen Penev wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:37 PM Mauro Mozzarelli
wrote:
Since OpenWrt is NOT US Based and in fact it appears to be mostly
supported with EU contributions, we should be following the more
liberal
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>> The remerged OpenWrt project is legally represented by the Software
>> in the Public Interest (SPI) - an US 501(c)(3) non-profit
>> organization which is managing our OpenWrt
On 08/08/2020 17:56, Rosen Penev wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:37 PM Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Since OpenWrt is NOT US Based and in fact it appears to be mostly
supported with EU contributions, we should be following the more liberal
EU policies.
Personally I am against software patents and I
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:37 PM Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
>
> Since OpenWrt is NOT US Based and in fact it appears to be mostly
> supported with EU contributions, we should be following the more liberal
> EU policies.
>
> Personally I am against software patents and I campaigned for the
> decision
Since OpenWrt is NOT US Based and in fact it appears to be mostly
supported with EU contributions, we should be following the more liberal
EU policies.
Personally I am against software patents and I campaigned for the
decision that the EU parliament took to ban them despite significant
lobby
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:11 AM Etienne Champetier
wrote:
>
> Hi Rosen,
>
> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
> >
> > Recently there's been a pull request to get patented functionality in
> > the packages feed: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/12992
> >
> > Which pointed
Hi Rosen,
Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>
> Recently there's been a pull request to get patented functionality in
> the packages feed: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/12992
>
> Which pointed me to this lovely description:
> https://www.videolan.org/legal.html
>
>
Recently there's been a pull request to get patented functionality in
the packages feed: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/12992
Which pointed me to this lovely description: https://www.videolan.org/legal.html
Two excerpts:
In the USA, you should check out the US Copyright Office
24 matches
Mail list logo
