pi *rs)
> +@@ -511,24 +582,33 @@ static struct rt2880_spi_ops spi_ops[] =
> + .set_cs = rt2880_spi_set_cs,
> + .baudrate_set = rt2880_spi_baudrate_set,
> + .write_read = rt2880_spi_write_read,
> ++ .num_cs = 1,
> ++ }, {
> ++ .init_hw = rt5350_spi_reset,
> ++ .set_cs = rt2880_spi_set_cs,
> ++ .baudrate_set = rt2880_spi_baudrate_set,
> ++ .write_read = rt2880_spi_write_read,
> ++ .num_cs = 2,
> + }, {
> + .init_hw = mt7621_spi_reset,
> + .set_cs = mt7621_spi_set_cs,
> + .baudrate_set = mt7621_spi_baudrate_set,
> + .write_read = mt7621_spi_write_read,
> ++ .num_cs = 1,
> + },
> + };
> +
> + static const struct of_device_id rt2880_spi_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ralink,rt2880-spi", .data = &spi_ops[0]},
> +- { .compatible = "ralink,mt7621-spi", .data = &spi_ops[1] },
> ++ { .compatible = "ralink,rt5350-spi", .data = &spi_ops[1]},
> ++ { .compatible = "ralink,mt7621-spi", .data = &spi_ops[2] },
> + {},
> + };
> + MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rt2880_spi_match);
> +
> + static int rt2880_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> + {
> +-const struct of_device_id *match;
> ++ const struct of_device_id *match;
> + struct spi_master *master;
> + struct rt2880_spi *rs;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +@@ -536,10 +616,12 @@ static int rt2880_spi_probe(struct platf
> + struct resource *r;
> + int status = 0;
> + struct clk *clk;
> ++ struct rt2880_spi_ops *ops;
> +
> +-match = of_match_device(rt2880_spi_match, &pdev->dev);
> ++ match = of_match_device(rt2880_spi_match, &pdev->dev);
> + if (!match)
> + return -EINVAL;
> ++ ops = (struct rt2880_spi_ops *)match->data;
> +
> + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> +@@ -563,14 +645,13 @@ static int rt2880_spi_probe(struct platf
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> +- /* we support only mode 0, and no options */
> +- master->mode_bits = 0;
> ++ master->mode_bits = RT2880_SPI_MODE_BITS;
> +
> + master->setup = rt2880_spi_setup;
> + master->transfer_one_message = rt2880_spi_transfer_one_message;
> +- master->num_chipselect = RALINK_NUM_CHIPSELECTS;
> + master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_MASK(8);
> + master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> ++ master->num_chipselect = ops->num_cs;
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, master);
> +
> +@@ -579,7 +660,7 @@ static int rt2880_spi_probe(struct platf
> + rs->clk = clk;
> + rs->master = master;
> + rs->sys_freq = clk_get_rate(rs->clk);
> +- rs->ops = (struct rt2880_spi_ops *) match->data;
> ++ rs->ops = ops;
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "sys_freq: %u\n", rs->sys_freq);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags);
> +
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas
wrote:
> El 19/08/2014 21:43, jonsm...@gmail.com escribió:
> > How is the clock speed wrong?
>
> The lowest speed the RT5350 SPI controller can achieve is System Clock /
> 128.
> System Clock = 120MHz
> Lowest
This site has a write up on how SPI mode works.
http://elm-chan.org/docs/mmc/mmc_e.html
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:59 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas > wrote:
>
>> El 19/08/2014 21:43, jonsm...@gmail.com e
How to use SPI bitbang on OpenWRT
http://randomcoderdude.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/spi-over-gpio-in-openwrt/
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:03 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
wrote:
> This site has a write up on how SPI mode works.
> http://elm-chan.org/docs/mmc/mmc_e.html
>
>
>
>
> On T
project.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
be in the Linux kernel.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Tobias Diedrich
wrote:
> jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ralink CPU datasheets mention an iNIC boot mode without describing
>> what it does. For example the RT5350 supports iNIC-USB and iNIC PHY
>> boot modes.
>>
>
ze an empty flash.
Doesn't look like MIPS has the small SRAM region like ARM does. Is
there a write up around somewhere on how to get going with a JTAG on
these chips?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
ope
rt3352,
> so you can just try to use whole DDRAM.
>
> Best regards.
>
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
_
t; Drasko
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 04/09/2013 12:38 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Does the MIPS u-boot in the OpenWRT tree run on the RT5350? If so,
>>
>> U-Boot for Ralink chips is not (yet) part of O
; do you know what would be the best way to augment flash on these? Some
> cheap NAND? SD Card? What would be the best solution?
We believe The miniPCI version has enough on the connector to attach a
SD Card using SPI.
>
> BR,
> Drasko
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:21 AM, jon
, as it seem to be better described.
> This company haowever have not been so responsive in my case, still
> waiting on some contacts.
>
> I can see that they go up to 64MB RAM, but I do not trust these
> Alibaba adds too much...
>
> BR,
> Drasko
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:28 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
> wrote:
>> Yes,
>> I have seen these boards and contacted suppliers. they seem really
>> responsive.
>>
>> I am missing some more flash though. 8MB
s not a miniPCI card. They just used the miniPCI connector. It is
in no-way compatible with miniPCI.
They bring out the Ethernet, USB, I2C, SPI from the rt5350 to the
miniPCI connector pins.
>
> How do you plan to fix this card?
>
> BR,
> Drasko
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:09 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
> wrote:
>> Great, thanks a lot John.
>>
>> I has just a little trouble with their miniPCI card, as it has only
>> one hole in the middle, and will not
cause it is more expensive.
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
op
do you know what would be the best way to augment flash on these? Some
> cheap NAND? SD Card? What would be the best solution?
>
> BR,
> Drasko
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:21 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> It will be a while for the boards to arrive from China. Bu
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Michel Stempin
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Le 09/04/2013 21:13, jonsm...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> Does any one actually have one of the TopLink minPCIe boards? Their
>> datasheet doesn't clearly identify the pins. They have pins called
>> L
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Michel Stempin
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Le 09/04/2013 21:13, jonsm...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> Does any one actually have one of the TopLink minPCIe boards? Their
>> datasheet doesn't clearly identify the pins. They have pins called
>> L
shots/trunk/ramips/openwrt-ramips-rt305x-wr512-3ng-8M-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I believe the answer is to select the Default target and then all of
these rt30xx variations get built in
build_dir/target-mipsel_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-ramips_rt305x/*
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:19 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm trying to get a build going for an old WS-WN512N
tuff in AP mode.
AP mode needs to keep stuff like wifi setup.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:42 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I put two and two together and figured out that those are the names
> from the Ralink reference design, not the datasheet. So based on that
> observation
>
Toplink has confirmed this to be the correct pin out.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC <
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:42 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:42 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
come from China.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
this building I was planning to try and figure out the
diffs to standard uboot.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I had STAGING_DIR set wrong.
This works:
STAGING_DIR=/home/apps/openwrt/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2
This fails:
STAGING_DIR=/home/apps/openwrt/staging_dir
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:24 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Has anyone gotten that source to build us
elects */
&gpio_ebi_i2stx_0 3 0>;
s25sl032a@0 {
compatible = "code,s25sl032a";
reg = <0>;
spi-max-frequency = <100>;
};
};
then use something like:
gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(pdev->dev.of_no
This patch is in openwrt tree:
ramips/patches-3.8/0209-owrt-GPIO-add-gpio_export_with_name.patch
Looks like it supports naming them.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Michel Stempin
wrote:
>
>
> Le 02/05/2013 16:06, jonsm...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:49 AM,
'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/apps/openwrt/package/toolchain'
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> On 05.05.2013 18:46, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> > How do I compile a target object when there is a toolchain object of the
> > same name?
> >
> > For example sed. I want it to make the target version, not
H \
(REAL_VALUE_TYPE_SIZE/HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT \
+ (REAL_VALUE_TYPE_SIZE%HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT ? 1 : 0)) /* round up */
/* Verify the guess. */
extern char test_real_width
[sizeof(REAL_VALUE_TYPE) <= REAL_WIDTH*sizeof(HOST_WIDE_INT) ? 1 : -1];
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
_
I attached my current makefiles for mpc, mpfr, gmp and gcc.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:40 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Suppose I am crazy and I want to directly compile something on my RT3050
> chip. Has anyone tried this? Will the compiler work in 32MB? I can load it
> via a USB
up in target_mipsel/gcc-1.0
What is the right way to achieve a rename like this?
I need the source in the avr-gcc tree so that I can apply avr specific
patches to it.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwr
vr-binutils'
make[1]: *** [package/feeds/packages/avr-binutils/compile] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jonsmirl/openwrt'
make: *** [package/avr-binutils/compile] Error 2
jonsmirl@jonsmirl-VirtualBox:~/openwrt$
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Mirko Vogt wrote:
> On 05/17/201
gt; On 05/17/2013 09:25 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> PKG_NAME:=avr-binutils
>> PKG_VERSION:=2.20.1a
>> PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION)
>> PKG_SOURCE:=binutils-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.bz2
>> PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/
>
> This means
/user-manual/install_tools.html
DEPENDS:=+zlib
endef
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> 2013/5/18 jonsm...@gmail.com :
>> So PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR is not the feature I am looking for. I'm trying
>> to figure out how to make my package name end up different tha
My packages are getting built with the architecture ramips_24kec. A
normal downloaded package is simply built for ramips.
What controls this? How to I switch to the ramips architecture.
My target CPU is a rt5350 but nothing in the package should be
specific to that CPU.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm
fig.
>
>
> 2013/5/18 jonsm...@gmail.com
>>
>> My packages are getting built with the architecture ramips_24kec. A
>> normal downloaded package is simply built for ramips.
>>
>> What controls this? How to I switch to the ramips architecture.
>>
>> My targe
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:48 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:21 AM, xakep wrote:
>> Try set ARCH_PACKAGES:=ramips (in linux/ramips/rt305x/target.mk)
>
> So how do the snapshots get built with ARCH_PACKAGES:=ramips instead
> of ARCH_PACKAGES:=rami
I just discovered the 'make runhttpd' feature of Luci.
Is there a way to aim it at the standard OpenWRT web pages so that
they can be edited/debugged on the host?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
ope
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:29 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I just discovered the 'make runhttpd' feature of Luci.
>
> Is there a way to aim it at the standard OpenWRT web pages so that
> they can be edited/debugged on the host?
I see that I can switch the theme over to
0x19c/0x3f4
[ 36.44] [<8006f564>] __do_fault+0xd0/0x4f4
[ 36.45] [<80072cec>] handle_pte_fault+0x450/0x944
[ 36.46] [<80073280>] handle_mm_fault+0xa0/0xe0
[ 36.47] [<80013c00>] do_page_fault+0x154/0x398
[ 36.48] [<80004820>] ret_from_exception+
_____
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
c/4.7.2
\
-Map u-boot.map -o u-boot
/bin/sh: line 0: [: : integer expression expected
cpu/ralink_soc/start.o: In function `reset':
(.text+0x6b8): undefined reference to `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_'
make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
__
Answer to this is to add -fpic in mips_config.mk
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:02 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm compiling the 8device uboot located here:
> https://github.com/8devices/u-boot.git
> Using the OpenWRT cross compiler.
>
> When I get to the end I can't
b' connection from
Warn : acknowledgment received, but no packet pending
Info : dropped 'gdb' connection
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Seeing as it looks like the gdb is built by openwrt, can you check if it has
> xml support built in?
>
> Cheers,
> Karl P
>
>
>
> On 06/09/2013 02:06 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Any idea what I am doing wrong? Why are the registers too long?
>>
>&g
/apps/openwrt/staging_dir/target-mipsel_dsp_uClibc-0.9.33.2/pkginfo
ERROR: module
'/home/apps/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_dsp_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-ramips_rt305x/compat-wireless-2013-06-13/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00pci.ko'
is missing.
--
Jon Smirl
jon
I got it working, I needed to run 'make menuconfig' and tell it to
write out a new config file.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm still failing in the build.
>
> if [ -f
> /home/apps/openwrt/staging_dir/target-mipsel_dsp_uClib
wrt.org/openwrt/trunk@36977
3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 04:09 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> That last commit didn't fix everything. rt2x00pci.ko is still in the
>> package list.
>>
age set for AsiaRF AWM002
endef
$(eval $(call Profile,AWM002))
.targetinfo-ramips--
Target-Profile: AWM002
Target-Profile-Name: AsiaRF AWM002
Target-Profile-Packages: kmod-usb-core kmod-usb-ohci kmod-usb2
kmod-ledtrig-usbdev kmod-i2c-core kmod-i2c-gpio
Target-Profile-Config:
@@
Target-Profile-Description:
Package set for AsiaRF AWM002
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I have this working by explicitly enabling the modules I need. I
played with this for a while and I don't understand what the purpose
of the DEFAULT_kmod-??? variables is. They don't seem to have any
effect.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:35 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I made a p
partition@3 {
> label = "u-boot-env";
> reg = <0x3 0x8000>;
> read-only;
> };
>
> factory: partition@4 {
> label = "factory";
> reg = <0x4 0x1>;
> read-only;
> };
>
> partition@5 {
> lab
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2013/6/24 jonsm...@gmail.com :
>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Flávio Silveira wrote:
>>> Good evening,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to create a dts file for my router which is not supported y
Is there a driver for Ralink I2S already in OpenWRT? I can't identify one.
If not, can someone with the Ralink SDK tell me if there is one in there?
I'd like to get Ralink I2S going if it can be done without a huge
amount of work.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...
I checked in the Ralink 3.3 SDK and don't see an I2S driver. Maybe no
one has written one?
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a driver for Ralink I2S already in OpenWRT? I can't identify one.
> If not, can someone with the Ralink SDK tell me if
uot;Mic Jack";
nvidia,i2s-controller = <&tegra_i2s1>;
nvidia,audio-codec = <&wm8903>;
nvidia,spkr-en-gpios = <&wm8903 2 0>;
nvidia,hp-det-gpios = <&gpio 178 0>; /* gpio PW2 */
nvidia,int-mic-en-gpios = <&gpio 184 0>; /*gpio PX0 */
nvidia,ext
on a Ralink router would be implemented. A
codec on I2S would make sense, but I don't see any code for doing
that.
Anyway, I wasn't planning to use audio in my project. I was just going
to make it a compile option for other people using the RT5350 module.
--
Jon Smirl
jon
that...
>>
>> But I found a userland utility called "i2scmd" into the
>> "RT288x_SDK/source/user/rt2880_app" directory... So there should be
>> something?
>>
>> -- Michel
>>
>> Le 24/06/2013 22:04, jonsm...@gmail.com a écrit :
&
n if someone is interested. I
did the MPC5200 ALSA driver that is in the kernel.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Read some more about it, but I think this board should hook up to the
I2S pins on your AWM002-EVAL carrier board.
$30 I2S amp kit that you solder yourself. Dual inputs - I2S and USB.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/WEI-DAC1-PCM2706-I2S-CS4398-USB-DIY-KIT-/171018440417?pt=US_Home_Audio_Amplifiers_Preamps
option isolate '1'
config wifi-iface
option device 'radio0'
option ifname 'adhoc0'
option network 'mesh'
option mode 'adhoc'
option ssid 'mesh'
option bssid '02:CA:FE:CA:CA:40'
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 00:20 -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Can this be made to work on Ralink? When I have the adhoc0 interface
>> up bringing up ap0 says interface busy.
>>
>
> Ralink is not good f
, P2P-GO }
<= 8, #{ IBSS } <= 1,
total <= 2048, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must match
* #{ AP } <= 1,
total <= 1, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must match, radar detect
widths: { 20 MHz (no HT), 20 MHz }
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
_
, P2P-GO }
<= 8, #{ IBSS } <= 1,
total <= 2048, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must match
* #{ AP } <= 1,
total <= 1, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must match, radar detect
widths: { 20 MHz (no HT), 20 MHz }
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
__
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 00:20 -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Can this be made to work on Ralink? When I have the adhoc0 interface
>> up bringing up ap0 says interface busy.
>>
>
> Ralink is not good f
://www.asiarf.com/Smallest-Tiny-Ralink-802-11n-Wireless-AP-Router-Module-Board-AWM002-product-view-375.html
With 32MB/8MB the modules are around $8.50 Q1000. AsiaRF will sell Q1
for $15 and a dev carrier board for $30. Dev board exposes JTAG, both
UARTS, two Ethernet and USB.
>
> BR,
> D
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:35 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Jon,
>>> both RT3050 and RT5350 have MIPS 24Kc
lest-Tiny-Ralink-802-11n-Wireless-AP-Router-Module-Board-AWM002-product-view-375.html
I have both of the Toplink modules too.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mai
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:57 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 32MB memory, 8MB flash. If you need 32MB flash they will pass along
>> for whatever the difference is in chip price.
>
> Which then becomes more expen
to it?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:43 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I tried the kernel patch procedure described here:
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/devel/patches
> but that kernel tree doesn't seem be getting built
>
> There is some interaction with the compat-wireless tree.
I sho
Dual radios?
>
> Jon Bagg
> NAD Electronics
> __**_
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.**org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/**mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel<https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/ope
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
and use Ethernet to route between them.
> Thank you again.
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: jonsm...@gmail.com [mailto:jonsm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 8:04 AM
> To: OpenWrt Development List
> Cc: Paul Lai
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Basic suppor
t
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
x27;d also lose the module include file aspect this way.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:31 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> It is a reusable module plugged into a baseboard.
>
> There are three pieces which can be used in two combinations...
> 4MB module plugged into baseboard
> 8MB
Here's a photo - you can see how it is a module mounted on a baseboard.
http://www.ayyari.com/pic/AYYAR.jpg
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:36 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Alternatively I could ignore the module aspect and just make two
> combined dts file...
>
> AWM002-EVB-4M
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 22/07/13 21:37, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Here's a photo - you can see how it is a module mounted on a baseboard.
>> http://www.ayyari.com/pic/AYYAR.jpg
>
>
> these 2 file have essentially the sam
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:38 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>> On 22/07/13 21:37, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's a photo - you can see how it is a module mounted on a baseboard.
>>> http://www.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:01 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 23/07/13 02:10, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I'm happy with whatever we pick, it isn't hard to edit them.
>>
>> How about this...
>> AWM002.dtsi -- the module (with m25p80 flash specified)
&g
ub.com/ayyaris/ayyar
>
>
> Ayyari
>
> Il giorno 23/lug/2013, alle ore 06:01, John Crispin ha
> scritto:
>
> On 23/07/13 02:10, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm happy with whatever we pick, it isn't hard to edit them.
>
>
> How about this...
>
> AWM002.
Are there any other 802.11ac miniPCIe modules for sale other than the
Intel ones? The Buffalo routers have some large 3 way ones, but I
can't find them for sale anywhere.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-
fter I had it all working. I must have forgotten
to recompile them.
I have been using OpenWRT on these board for about a month without problem.
>
> --> https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/37561
>
>
>
>
>
> On 24/07/13 03:43, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> So ha
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:29 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 26/07/13 17:34, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>> *cough*
>>>
>>> shame on me for not compile testing it properly and shame o
T3X5X}" ]; then
+ swconfig dev rt305x set reset 1
+ fi
ifname=eth0
}
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:37 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:29 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> On 26/07/13 17:34, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:23 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Has this generic RT5350 problem been fixed somehow? The AWM002 support
> depended on this fix.
>
I see this has been committed
> diff --git
> a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/preinit/07_set_preinit_iface_ramips
&
AWM002 dts files and then let the kernel fix them up. But that kind of
defeats the point in having DTS files that describe the hardware.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt
Something seems to be wrong in the Makefile when parsing target profiles
with hyphens in them.
For example: TARGET_ramips_rt305x_RT-N13U
$(PROFILE) ends up blank instead of RT-N13U
I searched around and can't figure out where this parsing is happening.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmai
od-i2c-core kmod-i2c-gpio
endef
-define Profile/AWM002-EVB/Description
+define Profile/AWM002EVB/Description
Package set for AsiaRF AWM002 Evaluation Board
endef
-$(eval $(call Profile,AWM002-EVB))
+$(eval $(call Profile,AWM002EVB))
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:04 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
getting parsed.
CONFIG_TARGET_ramips_rt305x_AWM002EVB=y parses ok
CONFIG_TARGET_ramips_rt305x_AWM002-EVB=y fails with a blank $PROFILE
I don't understand the Makefiles well enough to find where this parsing happens.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:11 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Any ideas on what is up with hyphen pro
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
syn.pcap
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 5 September 2013 09:04, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>> Hi, Jon.
>>
>> On 5 September 2013 04:02, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I'm using OpenWRT git on AsiaRF. AsiaRF may not be completely debugged yet.
>
'@wan'
option proto 'dhcpv6'
config switch
option name 'rt305x'
option reset '1'
option enable_vlan '1'
config switch_vlan
option device 'rt305x'
option vlan '1'
option ports '1 2 3 4 6t'
config switch_vlan
option
ian
>> ___
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
>
>
> ___
>
This is what an AtherOS chip says...
> valid interface combinations:
> * #{ managed, WDS, P2P-client } <= 2048, #{ IBSS, AP, mesh
> point, P2P-GO } <= 8,
>total <= 2048, #channels <= 1
>
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:36 AM
t; this feature?
>
>
> Regards.
>
> JiapengLi
>
>
>
>
> 2013/9/7 jonsm...@gmail.com
>
>> This is what an AtherOS chip says...
>>
>> > valid interface combinations:
>> > * #{ managed, WDS, P2P-client } <= 2048, #{
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Jiapeng Li wrote:
> Thanks jonsmirl,
> I'll test it to see what happens, and give you a feed back.
I believe you need to apply that patch in the 80211mac project because
of the way git openwrt builds.
>
>
> 2013/9/8 jonsm...@gmail.com
>
;>> #endif /* IEEE8021X_EAPOL */
>>> sme_sched_obss_scan(wpa_s, 0);
>>> +#ifdef MULTICALL
>>> + } else if (state == WPA_INACTIVE && wpa_s->hostapd) {
>>> + if (wpa_s->current_bss)
>>> + hostapd_reload(wpa_s, wpa_s->current_bss);
+
+config interface 'wan6'
+ option ifname '@wan'
+ option proto 'dhcpv6'
+
+config switch
+ option name 'rt305x'
+ option reset '1'
+ option enable_vlan '1'
+
+config switch_vlan
+ option device 'rt305x'
+ option vlan &
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
