Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

revor.coo...@intel.com> Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29 To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11 Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for accuracy and highl

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11 Hi Dovetailers, Proposed agenda for this week's call on Friday: 1) C

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Dovetailers, Proposed agenda for this week's call on Friday: 1) Current tool+test status: (10 min) a. dovetail version 0.5 b. Testing pod resources 2) Docs, including the test case requirement patch https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1 -(10 min) 3)

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]New dovetail.cvp.0.4.0 draft release notes

Hi all: Continue to update the dovetail dovetail.cvp test suite。 As you may have noticed, we have started to prepare weekly TAGs for the draft dovetail.cvp test suite, and the latest this week is 0.4.0. The "User Guide" document draft has also been updated to reflect the changes.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

> > Srikanth > > > > *From:* Zenghui Shi [mailto:z...@redhat.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, July 30, 2017 7:31 PM > > > *To:* Srikanth Vavilapalli <srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com> > *Cc:* Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Tianhongbo < > hongbo.tianhon

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call Hi Srikanth & Tim, Thanks for sharing the findings on test gaps in weekly dovetail meeting! Is it possible the slides can be shared so that anyone who's interested in

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

Hi Srikanth & Tim, Thanks for sharing the findings on test gaps in weekly dovetail meeting! Is it possible the slides can be shared so that anyone who's interested in can get to understand and follow-up on some of the test items? Regards, zenghui On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Srikanth

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call Thanks Srikanth. And sorry for being slow in sending out the agenda. Here it is for this Friday: (1) Review of gap analysis findings by Srikanth and Tim. (2) Preliminary review of the workfl

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

Thanks Srikanth. And sorry for being slow in sending out the agenda. Here it is for this Friday: (1) Review of gap analysis findings by Srikanth and Tim. (2) Preliminary review of the workflow - I will submit the patch before the call. (3) Needs more hands on the remaining docs. Review the list.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Request for a slot in tomorrow's weekly call

Hi In tomorrow's weekly call, Tim and myself (from Ericsson) wanted to share our findings on test gaps in basic cloud capability, security and High availability areas. Can you plz add to the agenda if we can get some time for this? Thanks Srikanth

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]New dovetail.cvp.0.3.0 draft release notes

Hi all: Continue to update the dovetail dovetail.cvp test suite。 As you may have noticed, we have started to prepare weekly TAGs for the draft dovetail.cvp test suite, and the latest this week is 0.3.0. The "User Guide" document draft has also been updated to reflect the changes.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda 7/21

Looks good Wenjing /Trevor > On Jul 19, 2017, at 10:11 PM, Wenjing Chu wrote: > > > Hi Dovetailers > > I am proposing we continue on the same topics for this week, > > 1) Update on the most recent Dovetail release 0.3 > 2) Another round of review on the addendum

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda 7/21

Hi Dovetailers I am proposing we continue on the same topics for this week, 1) Update on the most recent Dovetail release 0.3 2) Another round of review on the addendum document 3) Continue to look through the open task list, including docs that still remain in drafts Anything else to add?

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail][CI]How to create a dovetail CI weekly job?

.0.2.0” there. > > > > > > Best regards > > /MatthewLi > > > > *发件人:* 吴之惠 [mailto:zhihui.wu2006+...@gmail.com] > *发送时间:* 2017年7月11日 16:55 > *收件人:* Lijun (Matthew); Motamary, Shabrinath via opnfv-tech-discuss; > Tianhongbo > *抄送:* serena.feng.711 >

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda 7/14

Hi Dovetailers, Here is the proposed agenda for this Friday, 0) Determine if everyone is OK to extend an hour to the meeting time... just this once 1) A few minutes to update status and the most recent 0.2 release 2) Review addendum document for test scope 3) If we have

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release

v-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release Hi Wenjing Yes its new thread. Re. EUAG I am aware of the Pain Points Wiki page however it's not clear to me how this is feeding initial scope of CVP. The CVP page https://wiki.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release

-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Cooper, Trevor [trevor.coo...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:00 PM To: Wenjing Chu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release Hi Wenjing Yes its new thread. Re. EUAG I am

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release

l.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release Hi Trevor I'm not sure if your email is a follow-up of a previous message or not. I couldn't find another email so I'm assuming this is a new thread. Let me know if I'm

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release

n...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:50 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release My notes on the "use-case approach" w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail][CI]How to create a dovetail CI weekly job?

> *收件人：*Motamary, Shabrinath via opnfv-tech-discuss,田红波 > *抄送：*serena.feng@gmail.com > *时间：*2017-07-11 16:22:08 > *主题:*[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail][CI]How to create a dovetail CI > weekly job? > > Hi dovetail team, > > I would like to create a dovetail C

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail][CI]How to create a dovetail CI weekly job?

Hi dovetail team, I would like to create a dovetail CI weekly job on ZTE pod1. The scenario is os-odl_l2-nofeature-ha and the installer is fuel. I read jjb template files about dovetail in releng. It is hard to find out which jjb template file I should modify. Would you kindly please give me some

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Use-cases for Dovetail Danube Release

My notes on the "use-case approach" with VOLTE and vCPE ... capture that EUAG supports the approach and will get back with some suggestions. Are we still waiting on the EUAG to get back? If yes what are our expectations for receiving guidance? Can we try to define the "use-case approach" better

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

, 2017 7:59 PM To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda Hi Dovetailers I propose we cover the most urgent topics this week: - Review the feedbacks from tsc members - Examine remaining work

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] New dovetail.cvp.0.2.0 draft release notes

Thanks Xudan for preparing these notes below and made a lot of the contributions including supporting early users. As you may have noticed, we have started to prepare weekly TAGs for the draft dovetail.cvp test suite since a week ago, and the latest this week is 0.2.0. The "User Guide" document

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Dovetail documents for review

I have reworked the "Documents for Review" page to give an overall view of all the planned documents, highlighting which are being reviewed (with gerrit links + merge status). I hope this will make it easier for people reviewing the documents and to keep track of progress. Committers please

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

: Thursday, July 06, 2017 11:55 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli <srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Srikanth, 1. About the pod.yaml file 1. Think it’s

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

count': 8} Regards, Dan Xu 发件人: Srikanth Vavilapalli [mailto:srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2017年7月7日 2:48 收件人: Srikanth Vavilapalli; xudan (N); opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Just cont

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting cancelled

Hi all: Due to the vocation of most people, this dovetail weekly meeting has been cancelled. Best regards hongbo ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

a.tc002.out", "runner_id": 55}, "tc": "opnfv_yardstick_tc045", "options": {"attackers": [{"fault_type": "kill-process", "host": "node1", "process_name": "neutron-server"}], "monitor

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Srikanth： Thanks for the interest in the testing. The dovetail team has created the wiki page for the record of running history: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+history+for+

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

iscuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Srikanth, The Functest WARNING logs you have mentioned can all be ignored, because they don’t have any matter with t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

Lausuch 抄送: xudan (N); opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Jose I have already tried setting these environment variables while launching dovetail docker container (as shown below), even then I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

Vavilapalli <srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com> Cc: xudan (N) <xuda...@huawei.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Srikanth, You should set INSTALLER_TYPE=apex and also set

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

. If you think otherwise, please speak up now. Best regards Georg From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:38 PM To: Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

om: xudan (N) [mailto:xuda...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 9:17 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli <srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com<mailto:srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

are: Thanks for your help… Thanks Srikanth From: xudan (N) [mailto:xuda...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 9:17 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli <srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with doveta

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

you for your feedback. Thanks Dan Xu 发件人: Srikanth Vavilapalli [mailto:srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2017年7月1日 1:58 收件人: xudan (N); opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi Dan Xu Here

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

the dovetail container. Thanks Srikanth From: xudan (N) [mailto:xuda...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:29 PM To: Srikanth Vavilapalli <srikanth.vavilapa...@ericsson.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:59 PM To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda Hi Dovetailers I propose we cover the most urgent topics this week: - Review the feedbacks from tsc members - E

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

+1 From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Georg Kunz Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 7:54 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases Hi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

Hi Dovetailers, Thank you for the votes so far. As an intermediate result, we have 5 +1 votes, which is a majority. Nevertheless, this is a kind reminder for the Dovetail committers who have not voted yet to cast their vote. Thanks a lot. Cheers Georg From: Georg Kunz Sent: Monday, June 26,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

:03 收件人: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 主题: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error Hi When I run the `sdnvpn’ dovetail test cases, I see the below error for each run. I have ensured that the ubuntu cloudimg is present under $(DOVETAIL_HOME

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

Hi Dovetailers I propose we cover the most urgent topics this week: -Review the feedbacks from tsc members -Examine remaining work items required for first release and decide how to close them -Quick new status updates For the first two topics, can everyone do homework

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

+1 On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Zenghui Shi wrote: > +1 > > zenghui > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Georg Kunz > wrote: > >> Hi Dovetailers, >> >> >> >> You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case >> scope and

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

+1 zenghui On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Georg Kunz wrote: > Hi Dovetailers, > > > > You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case > scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the > committers. We have discussed how to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

+1 Leo Wang On Jun 26, 2017, at 16:34, Georg Kunz > wrote: Hi Dovetailers, You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the committers. We have

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

Thanks Georg. +1 Wenjing On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Georg Kunz wrote: > Hi Dovetailers, > > > > You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case > scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the > committers. We have

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test cases

Hi Dovetailers, You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the committers. We have discussed how to handle this already a few times, but we have not yet reached an officially documented conclusion. Since

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail PTL election process

Hi all: As we discussed in lat meeting, there will be an PTL election. Before the PTL election, let us prepare the election process guide. Here is the process example from the yardstick. Link: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/yardstick/Yardstick+PTL+Election Dovetail election guide may start with

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]stable try for the dovetail tool

Hi all: The dovetail has been tagged by the cvp.0.1.0 for the stable try. If you are interested in, please do not hesitate to try. Here is the user guide: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/dovetail/review/34285/testing_user_userguide/index.html if you have any feedbacks, please add those to the wiki:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]IPv6 and HA test specification review planning

Hi dovetail committers: The specification of HA and IPv6 are in the gerrit. They got a lot of comments and feedbacks. IPv6: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/34577/11 HA: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/34441/ After several updates of patches, they had no additional comments more than ten

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

Awesome, thanks! Cheers Georg From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 2:53 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

As discussed in the last call before the Summit, the main agenda for this week's call is to give sufficient time for the Openstack Interop WG guests to share their experiences. There are two other business to cover: 1) A 5 min quick #agree on moving

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] agenda for Friday's Dovetail call

Hi Wenjing, Hongbo, Dovetailers I was wondering how much time you are planning to dedicate to Egle from the OpenStack Interop WG on Friday's call? Regarding the content, I was thinking about Egle sharing some information about the processes in the interop WG (test case selection and voting,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] dovetail weekly meeting is cancelled for this week

Hi all: Due to the summit, this dovetail call has been cancelled. Best regards hongbo ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting has been cancelled this week

Hi all: Due to the OPNFV summit, most of the people are travelling, this dovetail call has been cancelled. See you in Beijing OPNFV summit. Best regards hongbo ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session

sts.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Cc: Egle Sigler <egle.sig...@rackspace.com<mailto:egle.sig...@rackspace.com>>, Mark Voelker <mvoel...@vmware.com<mailto:mvoel...@vmware.com>>, Catherine Cuong Diep <cd...@us.ibm.com<mailto:cd...

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] TSC and DoveTail meeting to discuss scope and needs for CVP testing

Hi Tapio/HongBo, On this weeks TSC call I understood there was an identified need for some form of working session between the TSC and the DoveTail team to describe the wanted/needed scope of CVP testing that DoveTail should develop for the CVP in any given release. As a number of us we will

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session

v-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session Hi Wenjing, Yes, I recall that the 9th was considered not to be ideal because of people traveling to the summit. Will there be a meeting at all this

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session

g.k...@ericsson.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session Thanks Georg. There was a quick mention during the last call of not having the June 9's meeting as some people may already be tra

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session

-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session Hi Dovetailers, This is a kind reminder to add your vote to this doodle poll for finding a timeslot for a joint Dovetail - OpenStack Interop WG meeting: https

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session

@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss][dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session Hi all, As proposed on today's meeting call, here is the Doodle poll for finding a meeting for the joint Dovetail - OpenStack Interop WG info sharing session: https://doodle.com/poll

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] TSC feedback and analysis of the Dovetail test coverage

Hi Dovetailers, This week we got some feedback from the TSC on the scope of the current Dovetail test suite. Some of the feedback was around how does this suite address the intent of the CVP program and can we articulate that. To take from our holistic CVP “mission statement” this is an

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Doodle poll for Dovetail - OpenStack Interop info sharing session

Hi all, As proposed on today's meeting call, here is the Doodle poll for finding a meeting for the joint Dovetail - OpenStack Interop WG info sharing session: https://doodle.com/poll/sgn7iwuv9em2spu5 Please respond by mid of next week. Thank you Georg

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:58 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda Sorry I'm a little behind. Here is

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda Sorry I'm a little behind. Here is the agenda proposal for this Friday. Please add your comments. 1) The questions raised during the TSC discussion (w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

presumably take quite some more time). Thank you. Georg From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:58 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:21 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda Hi Dovetailers, Please chime i

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:21 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda Hi Dovetailers, Please chime in if the following agenda

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Hi Dovetailers, Please chime in if the following agenda looks good. It's packed as always, so suggestions of order also welcome. Thanks. -Preparation for TSC review on 5/30 -Review the Danube addendum -QA dovetail o Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] About the HA test suites

Hi Bryan I’d like to continue the discussion about this info during the dovetail weekly meeting ”#info my main comments are let's don't do extra effort. let's reference the tests that will specifically be used (by hyperlink)

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] CVP Guidelines - Scope and Test Criteria

The CVP Guidelines document form the C committee describes "The scope of the criteria and requirements for each CVP release" in an addendum. A draft of the addendum has been put onto the Dovetail Wiki here https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/CVP+document. Please provide comments and input

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack RefStack and Interop people

+1 From: Georg Kunz Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:37 PM To: Dave Neary; Cooper, Trevor; Wenjing Chu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Tianhongbo; z...@redhat.com; Fu Qiao; Leo Wang; 'Lincoln Lavoie'; Jose Lausuch Subject:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack RefStack and Interop people

Hi Georg Great suggestion and thanks for having this discussion during Openstack Boston. Since we are kind of in a jam for our weekly calls, do you think it's better to have 2 half an hour sessions and sooner, rather than waiting for when we can dedicate whole hour to it? I'm also in touch

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack RefStack and Interop people

I am all in favour. It may also make sense to connect with the ETSI TST group - perhaps in a separate meeting - to get their point of view too. Thanks, Dave. On 05/18/2017 07:04 PM, Cooper, Trevor wrote: > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com] >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack RefStack and Interop people

+1 -Original Message- From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:38 PM To: Dave Neary ; Cooper, Trevor ; Wenjing Chu ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Tianhongbo

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack RefStack and Interop people

Hi all, We are trying very hard to establish processes, guidelines and best practices for running the OPNFV certification program - on our own and with guidance from C I believe we can much better leverage existing knowledge and experience from related communities. In this context, I'd like to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19

Hi, My suspicion is that the entire meeting will be taken up with agenda items 2 and 3 from Wenjing. We need alignment around the test areas, and test case review. We also need to clarify what, if anything, we need to get in terms of guidance from C I suggest inverting these agenda items,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19

I would like to propose some topics ... a few minutes for each should be fine to decide if we can defer or need a decision - H/w resources for Dovetail - Dovetail artifact versions and release schemes - Test catalog domains relevant to compliance -

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19

Hi wenjing I was working on the "Tagging / releases, offline support" for the last few weeks, i think i can make some progress on that BR Leo Wang From: Wenjing Chu Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 11:14 PM To:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19

Please comment if the following agenda makes sense: 1. Welcome new committers and where we need immediate new contribution and attention 2. Preparation for tsc review on 5/30 3. Ask - what we need to ask from c and board? How should we take on the administrative side of

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] This week's agenda (May 12)

Dovetailers, I think we should focus mostly on the task of getting test scope and test specs out for community review by May 16. -Discuss/review any outstanding issues on the gerrit merges for test scope and test specs. -And if additional time is available : functest Danube

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail planning for the design summit

Hi all: There will be a chance for the dovetail face to face meeting in the OPNFV design summit. Here is my two cents: * Topics proposals: * 1:cooperation with other projects, such as features projects, test projects and infra projects * 2:a tutorial session *

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]vendors group for the dovetail testing try for more feedbacks

Hi all: We have done a lot of work in the plugfest trying to run the dovetail tool on different environments. We tried dovetail tool in the environments including three hardware, three installers, two cloudOS(D release and WindRiver Titanjum) for two area test cases( defcore and IPV6).

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly meeting agenda

Hi Hongbo and all, Here is what I can think of to propose for this week. 1) Summary of the OPNFV plugfest 2) Sdnvpn test case sample format 3) Refstack test cases 4) Next steps for the test case review 5) Document status And of course any sharing of views on the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]help to add the test cases into dovetail test scope

Hi PTLs: Here is the test scope for the dovetail. This will provide the foundation list of test scope for moving forward with dovetail selection. Please help to add the test cases from the SDNVPN, HA and IPV6. Here is the previous patch: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/33885/ Best regards

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

v.org; Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail Chris's explanation makes complete sense to me (I have been involved in many of the recent CVP and Dovetail d

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

gt;; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail Hi Paul, Thanks for reaching out, and happy to try and answer your questions. In re

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

>, Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "Tallgren, Tapio" <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>, TSC OPNFV <opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

ehalf Of Christopher Price > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 08:12 > To: HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com>; Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; > Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; > Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

un...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto: > opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 6:39 PM > To: Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; > Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg...@nokia.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi Dave, I don't think the issue is with having multiple committers from a single vendor. Committers should be committing or not be committers. My interpretation of Chris' email is that he doesn't seem to feel his voice is heard amongst the project governance. So I see that as a distinctly

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

com>; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail Hi Bin, Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’d like to further understand the power struggle you clearly see here, I would b

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

:12 To: HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com>; Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dove

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

.pr...@ericsson.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 3:12:18 PM To: HU, BIN; Cooper, Trevor; Dave Neary; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo); opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail Hi Bin,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

to:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 6:39 PM To: Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

revor Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 6:39 PM To: Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail Dovetail is a unique pro

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

I agree that getting TSC guidance in the way forward is the right next step. Tapio, Ray, Can we add in the agenda tomorrow on TSC for this topic? The committers have been discussing how to restructure the dovetail project to broaden talent pool and represent diverse community interests, but do

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi, In light of Chris's resignation and request, I would like to propose that we bring our plans to evolve the project to the TSC sooner, rather than later, and get TSC guidance on a number of key questions related to Dovetail, which is not like other projects because of its relationship to the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Standing down as a committer on DoveTail

Hi Hongbo, I will be standing down as a committer on the Dovetail project. When I established the project it was intended to reflect as fairly as possible a common set of voices from all member companies that had a stake in our project. I feel that the balance in the project is not ideal

<    1   2   3   4   5   >