Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][euphrates] Milestone 5 / August 11

All, Following up on this thread while David is out... Another reminder that the new MS5 date is in a few days (Friday/August 11th). I also reached out to PTLs who had filed an exception request for the original MS5 date a few weeks ago and heard back from 3 project teams that they're on track f

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Bottlenecks] Minutes of Bottlenecks Discussion on Aug. 10th, 2017

Minutes of Bottlenecks Discussion on Aug. 10th, 2017 * Date and Time * Thursday at 0100-0200 UTC, Aug. 10th, 2017 * Thursday at 0900-1000 Beijing, Aug. 10th, 2017 * Wednesday at 1800-1900 PDT, Aug.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Copper, Opera (and Multisite, Netready) status for Euphrates (Functest integration)

Hello, Morgan, It'll be good to remove multisite from Functest in Euphrates, I am afraid that there is no maintainer continue working on it. Thanks a lot. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: morgan.richo...@orange.com [morgan.richo...@orange.com]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

Hi Bryan and All, To avoid confusion please check the schedule for OpenDev: http://www.opendevconf.com/schedule/ You can see at the bottom of the page that __none__ of the discussion topics / content categories is exclusive to OpenStack. The purpose of the event is to identify and understand b

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fds-dev] [APEX] [Euphrates] Euphrates testing - database issues

Great Juraj. We merged a fix: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38987/ Will make a note to look into it upstream. Thanks, Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team - Original Message - From: "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" To: "Tim Rozet" Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

Understood – I was invited to it early. But it seemed to me that all these discussions are in the context of OpenStack nonetheless – unless they are open to discussion of solutions that do not include Nova, Neutron, … but anyway I’m sure it will be a good discussion forum so I wish those who are

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

Hey Bryan, It is organized by the foundation, but it is not intended to focus exclusively on OpenStack. Topics such as SDN, Containers, Hardware and security are, among other things, part of the conference streams. Cheers, Chris Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 9, 2017, at 19:47, SULLIVAN, B

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

Well that event is solely focused on OpenStack. We will have representation there, but I think we need to set our sights wider. So I’ll be at the http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/open-source-summit-north-america with focus on the docker/moby-based options for edge clouds with NFV use cas

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

Hey Bryan, Related to this there's an event in California next month addressing the edge. http://www.opendevconf.com/ I think this would be an excellent forum to help develop content and architecture for anyone interested in this area. / Chris Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 9, 2017, at 17:18,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

Hi all, As those who expressed interest in the Edge project proposal https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Multi-Access+Edge I'd like to get us together with anyone else with interest in the project, to start planning OPNFV F release participation (with TSC approval of the project first of course

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [StorPerf] Committer nomination

Hello, I would like to nominate Taseer Ahmed to StorPerf committer. As Jose is currently on leave until September, I will be leaving the nomination open until then. Please vote, or +2 here: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/38979 Regards, Mark Mark Beierl SW System Sr Principal Engineer Dell

[opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC weekly MoMs 9th August 2017

http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc. 2017-08-09-14.01.html ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Copper, Opera (and Multisite, Netready) status for Euphrates (Functest integration)

Georg sent an email on Friday June 2nd that NetReady withdrew from E Release: https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-June/016536.html. Thanks Bin -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [StorPerf] Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Eastern Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02000

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] ODL target Release for Euphrates

Hello Franck, The basic test suite is hardcoded for keystone v2 (and other limitations) what becomes an issue. We must sync with ODL test community regarding that point if it makes sense to continue on updating this suite. Yes our config file already allows defining multiple ODL testcases accor

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fds-dev] [APEX] [Euphrates] Euphrates testing - database issues

Hi Tim, There were indeed many more processes than 12 per each openstack service. I'm running functest with the configuration and seems to run smoothly. Could you find out why it hasn't been fixed upstream? I also looked at ci results. After Danube we made a number of refactoring patches and

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OpenStack Wiki page updates

Hi All, I wanted to give you a heads up that I started to update the OpenStack Wiki page on the OPNFV Wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/COM/OpenStack For now I moved some of the outdated information to an ‘Archives’ (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/COM/Archives) page and updated some of the b

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Copper, Opera (and Multisite, Netready) status for Euphrates (Functest integration)

Hi, as Functest is currently integrating the feature projects - see several pending patches including a better control of the requirements, I had questions on the status of some feature projects that used to be integrated in Functest in previous versions according to https://wiki.opnfv.org/

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Bottlenecks] Bottlenecks weekly meeting August 10th 2017

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAY