Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Security PTL

Luke, I would like to thank you for your work as security project lead. I've tried to follow your lead in a similar role for the Acumos project, and I think the project (and other LF projects) are better for the focus you put on project objectives, tools, and CI/CD support for security/quality

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] Anteater maintenance

AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] Anteater maintenance Thanks Bryan, Any recommendations on who I could contact at LF to see if they want to use the tool. You're of course welcome to do anything you please with anteater in acumos

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] Anteater maintenance

Hi Luke, Thanks for continuing to develop this on github. Did you know that the LF recently launched a new compliance toolset project? https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press-release/2018/12/the-linux-foundation-to-launch-new-tooling-project-to-improve-open-source-compliance/ Your work might be

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] VOLUNTEERS NEEDED for booth duty at KubeCon! #volunteer #kubecon #booth

Hi David, Just got a pass to the event and planned my schedule. I signed up for the booth whenever I could. Happy to bring anyone up to speed on the LFDL and Acumos during the time also. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [announce][election] Opening nominations for OPNFV Technical Steering Committee (TSC)

Yes From: David McBride [dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 10:24 AM To: HU, BIN; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Cc: TSC OPNFV; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; tim.irn...@ericsson.com; Heather Kirksey Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [announce

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Following-up on groups.io discussion

Ray, I think the issue on attachments was limited to meeting invites, which didn't work reliably for some reason. Just a heads up for people to ensure they are getting invites via the lists. From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Models and VES pull out of Fraser

Hi all, Just FYI although there was very substantial progress this time around for Models and VES, the Acumos project has consumed my time and thus I was not able to jump thru the final hoops to get the updates released. So these two projects will not participate further in the Fraser release.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][security][infra] Anteater Improvements

...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 1:52 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: Aric Gardner <agard...@linuxfoundation.org>; Fatih Degirmenci <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][security][infra] Anteater Improvements

Aric, To clarify my intent - it was that the blocking of wget/curl/etc tool use except as allowed by regex rules, is the onerous part since there are many different uses and it will be difficult to create/maintain the regexp rules. I actually would *prefer* use of an external service such as

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][security][infra] Anteater Improvements

...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 7:01 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Luke Hinds <lhi...@redhat.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][security][infra] Anteater Impr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][security][infra] Anteater Improvements

I do recommend that we rely upon tools that can focus on the trust of specific sources, and not the use of platform capabilities such as curl, wget, etc. These (curl, wget, etc) are tools that can be used for many purposes inside an application like an OPNFV platform, or its deployment/testing

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] VNFs and ONAP setup for Kubernetes and Arm pod at UNH

Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Sofia Enriquez [mailto:lsofia.enriq...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 3:09 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: gerard.d...@wipro.com; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] VNFs

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] VNFs and ONAP setup for Kubernetes and Arm pod at UNH

Not specific to ARM, but I have implemented clearwater-docker as part of the Models kubernetes demo deploy, which includes a full-stack k8s cluster deployment, ending with clearwater-docker deployment and test. See https://github.com/opnfv/models/tree/master/tools/kubernetes for an overview of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] For the TSC composition discussion on Tuesday

To: opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tsc] [opnfv-tech-discuss] For the TSC composition discussion on Tuesday A

[opnfv-tech-discuss] {releng-anteater] project_scan.py check for top-level license needs enhancements

I'm not sure how/where to raise this as a bug, so I created a JIRA issue: https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/RELENG-346 Anteater needs to verify that the project top-level license file is correctly formatted ("Licence string present"), and accept any variation of file name "LICENSE*" (e.g.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] For the TSC composition discussion on Tuesday

I echo Dave's recommendation to be inclusive. The main reason not to be exclusive AIUI is to prevent gaming of the voting process. There are two ways to address that, while remaining inclusive: 1) set a reasonably low bar for participation IMO anyone that is a regular attendee in OPNFV TSC or

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Anteater status and link issue

Comments etc inline Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Luke Hinds [mailto:lhi...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 9:04 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; degirmenci, fatih <fatih.degirme...@eri

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Infra] Latest docs for connecting to Jenkins

Is the document http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/submodules/octopus/docs/octopus_docs/opnfv-jenkins-slave-connection.html still valid? I see very little info in the docs e.g. http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/infrastructure/ci.html, and need to know what is the current process for connecting to

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: [OPNFV Helpdesk #52339] AutoReply: Wiki appears somewhat broken

, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Subject: [OPNFV Helpdesk #52339] AutoReply: Wiki appears somewhat broken Greetings, Your support ticket regarding: "Wiki appears somewhat broken", has been entered in our ticket tracker. A summary of your ticket appear

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Issues with Anteater pretest process

to loosely integrated code e.g. through APIs, or running as separate processes and providing some system service. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Julien [mailto:julien...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 10:20 PM To: Fatih Degirmenci <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com> Cc: SULLIVAN, B

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Issues with Anteater pretest process

ression if I should continue down this path. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 6:43 AM To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Issues with Anteater pretest process Hi all, I'm start

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Issues with Anteater pretest process

Hi all, I'm starting to look at the pretest process for Anteater patches as described under "How can I test my entire project or pretest a patch?" at https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=11700198. The first instruction is not working: if you would like to perform a full

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Test Results Dashboard

Hi all, I see that the design of http://testresults.opnfv.org has evolved. Quick suggestions/questions. * Is it possible to reduce the size of the tiles in the UI? I don't see how the tiles so large add a lot of value. * The info for past releases seems to be missing/broken * For

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Manuel, Apart from the basic issue you are facing being dependency on test frameworks (which can be a convenient tool, until they change out from under you without notice), the basic problem OPNFV faces here is that it needs to, and easily can, provide such notice automatically. For example,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Seeking demo ideas for LFN booth at ONS

Brandon, I’ll be there and can provide a demo from the Models/VES projects of closed-loop lifecycle management for VNFs on cloud-native stacks. I’ll be using Clearwater-docker as the VNF, with the stack (Kubernetes, Cloudify (as VNFM), VES, and if possible ONAP etc) as described at

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Issues building clearwater-live-test

of the other services do show up in kube dns... just this one doesn't). Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 6:20 AM To: Valentin Boucher <valentin.bouc...@kontron.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: Issues bu

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Issues building clearwater-live-test

ere? Sorry to ask for all this help and if you're too busy I understand. I'll keep looking and put whatever I find that works on the wiki. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Valentin Boucher [mailto:valentin.bouc...@kontron.com] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 5:41 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) &l

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Issues building clearwater-live-test

Valentin, Thanks for the advice. Some more notes and questions: Your repo does not include a Dockerfile. So I created one with the instructions in the readme. I had to make the following updates to your instructions: * Using a xenial base, start with "apt-get update" (otherwise

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Article on Containers with GPL and non-GPL Code

In case anyone was wondering about this, see this article which addresses questions about incorporation of non-copyleft (e.g. Apache 2.0) code into copyleft-license based images in containers: https://opensource.com/article/18/1/containers-gpl-and-copyleft Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Looking for a scriptable IMS client that will run in docker

Hi all, Looking for any guidance on the following. I need an IMS test client that can be dockerized, to drive the clearwater-docker deployment that I am putting into the Models project (I have clearwater-docker now running and will commit the build/run scripts soon, but need a test client to

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] "Auto Test Framework"

I added some notes to the page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/AUTO/Auto+Test+Framework. Hope this helps. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Tina Tsou (OPNFV Confluence) [mailto:conflue...@opnfv.org] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 6:51 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.su

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New Adventures

Dan, Thanks for all your help and patience with us in OPNFV. You guys really set the bar for collaborative support, and I wish you the best in your new project. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Auto Project Meeting 01/15/2018 - Auto - OPNFV Wiki

No, I was not able to find the info to start the meeting. Sorry. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Tina Tsou [mailto:tina.t...@arm.com] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 8:06 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subje

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Auto Project Meeting 01/15/2018 - Auto - OPNFV Wiki

If someone has the credentials for the GTM bridge, please start the meeting and I will chair it. I can't find the current credentials. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Collecting questions for the Biterg Dashboard Training //RE: Issues/Needs/requirements for Biterg dashboard

If it results in some gaps being better socialized and prioritized, it's a good idea to meet. E.g. I sent a request back in Nov and got no response... it was: I’d like the ability to view/download the full set of data for a particular query, e.g. as you have from stackalytics (setting for “Show

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models][Auto] vHello_Tacker updated for Euphrates

ould indicate that for Fuel, there needs to be some additional file installed on the Tacker client... I have not encountered such an error on Apex or JOID. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: pramod.sud...@wipro.com [mailto:pramod.sud...@wipro.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 9:05 PM To:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated invitation: OPNFV C Committee Call @ Every 2 weeks from 11pm to 12am on Monday (SGT) (christopher.don...@huawei.com)

organizational issues. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT -Original Message- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 7:12 PM To: 'Christopher Donley (Chris)' <christopher.don...@huawei.com>; Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>; Christopher Price <christopher.pr.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models][Auto] vHello_Tacker updated for Euphrates

to pull it as a local container image. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: pramod.sud...@wipro.com [mailto:pramod.sud...@wipro.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 3:09 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com>; eric.dm...@wipro.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models][Auto] vHello_Tacker updated for Euphrates

"/ nova / { print \$4 }" | head -1) Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 2:13 PM To: 'pramod.sud...@wipro.com' <pramod.sud...@wipro.com>; Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com>; eric.dm...@wipro.com; UKASICK, AIMEE L (AIMEE L) &l

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models][Auto] vHello_Tacker updated for Euphrates

van | AT From: pramod.sud...@wipro.com [mailto:pramod.sud...@wipro.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 12:43 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com>; eric.dm...@wipro.com; UKASICK, AIMEE L (AIMEE L) <aim...@research.att.co

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models][Auto] vHello_Tacker updated for Euphrates

Pramod, Bringing this offline discussion to the list... The Models vHello_Tacker test is now updated/merged and working for Euphrates (verified for Apex virtual install). There were a variety of API/CLI and other changes in OpenStack Ocata, and I took the opportunity to refactor the test. It

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Licenses for OPNFV docker images

ance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Raymond Paik [mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 8:55 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Licenses for OPNFV docker images

Hi all, Should we be adding license descriptions to the https://hub.docker.com/u/opnfv images? I have seen a recommendation that the license be included in the repo description field. Just wondering, since otherwise per the docker hub TOS (https://www.docker.com/docker-terms-service): 6.4 The

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Demo of VES-Barometer deployment and takeaways

Hi all, As noted on the Barometer call here is a quick overview of the status of VES-Barometer integration, and some takeaways, in advance of a 30-min demo on some upcoming Barometer call. For reference, see the current VES deployment approach for OPFNV testing and ONAP integration at the VES

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] weekly meeting

. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Aaron Smith [mailto:aasm...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 5:28 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] weekly meeting Bryan,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Service VM

control plane as needed, so we only need access to the nodes/VMs. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: SINGARAJU, GOKUL [mailto:gs2...@att.com] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 8:34 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; GUPTA

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] weekly meeting

as suggested. But I recommend first we get the Barometer team to describe how that lineage is intended to work – and we can then verify it. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 6:19 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.su

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] weekly meeting

FYI, I updated the VES tools to build a container for the VES Agent (ves_app.py in the Barometer repo). Using it now with the latest tests for the Models kubernetes stack. Also built the VES Collector as a container. Using my personal docker hub

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] ves_app.py exception when collecting from multiple collectd clients

| AT From: Mytnyk, VolodymyrX [mailto:volodymyrx.myt...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 7:22 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Tahhan, Maryam <maryam.tah...@intel.com> Cc: Mcmahon, Tony B <tony.b.mcma...@intel.com>; Power, Dam

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] VES Heartbeats

/dummy VNF that issues heartbeats via the ONAP Agent libraries (Gokul is welcome to help there as well...). Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: GUPTA, ALOK Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 6:19 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opn

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] ves_app.py exception when collecting from multiple collectd clients

n | AT From: Mytnyk, VolodymyrX [mailto:volodymyrx.myt...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 9:05 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Tahhan, Maryam <maryam.tah...@intel.com> Cc: Mcmahon, Tony B <tony.b.mcma...@intel.com>; Power, Damien <d

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] ves_app.py exception when collecting from multiple collectd clients

in the repo. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 5:36 AM To: 'Mytnyk, VolodymyrX' <volodymyrx.myt...@intel.com>; Tahhan, Maryam <maryam.tah...@intel.com> Cc: Mcmahon, Tony B <tony.b.mcma...@intel.com>; Power, Damien <d

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] Test entry into the database via swagger

All, As we discussed today if you need access or help to enter tests into the swagger UI for the test database reach out to me. We can setup an adhoc call to help you get started. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] VES Heartbeats

Alok, Thinking about the shared Agent (ves_app.py from Barometer) design, in which we don't need an agent running on each node, but can use a single agent running on the local cloud which aggregates VES events from the Kafka bus, it brings up the question of how heartbeats are supposed to work

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] ves_app.py exception when collecting from multiple collectd clients

Hi Barometer team, The exception below came up when the ves_app began getting events from multiple collectd clients (one on each compute node). This occurs when there is a shared kafka server and a single ves_app instance which is getting the events from the multiple collectd clients. The

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Agenda Items for Technical Discussion This Week Nov 16

Maybe we can have PTLs discuss some Fraser release goals, e.g. as I noted in the email [opnfv-tech-discuss] Euphrates retrospective input ? I would welcome for example the opportunity to get feedback on the points

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Euphrates retrospective input

On the release call today I mentioned several takeaways from the OPNFV Euphrates release that might be good to capture as part of the retrospective. Thanks to the release call participants to allow me to take the final 10 minutes for these thoughts! This release allowed us a pause on project

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Issues in VES Guide

Sure, that works too. If there’s anyone available to talk today over IRC, I’m bryan_att and will be working on this today. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Aaron Smith [mailto:aasm...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 6:34 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.su

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Issues in VES Guide

, you can refer to it in the guide as an example of how to automate the process. This will be much less painful than following the manual step-by-step process (which anyway will be documented in the script), and will be used in CI for VES. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Issues in VES Guide

esting it that works in a script. * At "Install development tools:" the guide only references how to do this for Centos. It should also clarify for Ubuntu (there is no "group" operation in apt-get). Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Friday, No

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Issues in VES Guide

Hi Barometer team, Any help below is appreciated. I am scripting the setup for the new version of the VES plugin per http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/submodules/barometer/docs/release/userguide/collectd.ves.userguide.html I have found a couple of issues as below. Here are the steps I am using

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Anyone working with Clearwater-docker ?

Hi all, This goes out to anyone who is experimenting with Metaswitch clearwater-docker, or who might have an idea what's going on with an error I am having when trying to build it. I'm doing this as part of the Models project development of cloud-native stacks

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Hybrid Cloud goals for VES, Models, Auto in Fraser

Hi all, I edited the Auto wiki use case page to capture what I mentioned on today’s call. See below. I can provide a walk-thru of progress toward the cloud-native stack described below next week, and the roadmap for integrating ONAP

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Request for AOB Item in next TSC Call: OPNFV Should Take a Lead Role in Open Source NFV Platform Security Scanning

Already done. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Raymond Paik [mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 5:56 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnf

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Request for AOB Item in next TSC Call: OPNFV Should Take a Lead Role in Open Source NFV Platform Security Scanning

Hi all, You may follow the security space and already be aware of the open source vulnerability that led to the recent Equifax breach. I want the TSC to seriously consider seeking budget to incorporate detailed security scanning for any open source software included in OPNFV platform builds.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Infra] Infra WG Weekly Meeting Minutes - Oct. 9th

I submitted a commit for the securedlab project with an alternate proposal for the IDF as I mentioned today. At the least I recommend that we discuss/define the schema for these proposals in more detail, as I have included in the commit: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/44603/ Here is the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] {Auto] Auto Project Meeting 10/09/2017

, 2017 7:15 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Subject: [OPNFV confluence] Michael O'Brien mentioned you on "Auto Project Meeting 10/09/2017" [cid:image002.jpg@01D340D2.A9F0D980]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [announce] F-release name poll (part II)

FYI – the translation of Feio is “ugly, bad, nasty”. We should check these things before proposing them. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2017

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Discussion Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion this Thursday 09/28

The one-size nature of the Pharos specs has always been one of the key weaknesses of the OPNFV program IMO. It does not reflect the likely diversity of hardware infra that will be used in different deployment environments, e.g. datacenter, edge, customer premises (enterprise, consumer),

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Stepping down as barometer PTL post E release.

And thanks to you, Maryam, for your excellent work as PTL. I'm sure over the last couple of releases the team picked up some great pointers from you on how to do this job right, so we should be in good hands. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Commiters-at-Large TSC election

I think someone else also reported this issue... but I received two notices for the BOD election and none for the TSC election. On Sep 13, 2017, at 7:32 AM, Raymond Paik > wrote: All, Thanks to everyone who voted so far... If you

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OpenContrail support in OPNFV

Hi all, Whoever is working on any OCL scenarios for Danube or Euphrates, please let me know the status of that work, e.g. which scenarios are deployable, and what is the latest build that is deployable. We had not been actively testing with OCL but it is a key part of our AIC (AT Integrated

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [announce] Opening nominations for Committers-at-Large TSC & Committer Board elections

I would like to nominate Tina Tsou (Arm) as a member of Committers-at-Large TSC. Tina serves as an Enterprise Architect with ARM, a technical leadership position on the Enterprise Open Source Enablement team. In this highly visible role, Tina analyzes, designs, and implements dynamic

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] Telemetry in Auto-UC-01

Here are some examples: - the ability to make workload placement decisions (e.g. knowing that a VNF can be deployed in an edge cloud) requires a running view of key metrics for the NFVI e.g. compute, network, storage, and control plane capacity (if there's some limitation based on that). This

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Updates to VES Plugin install guide

Alan, Per https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/39603/, what is the new/changed process for installing the VES plugin? I checked out that patch and edited the new conf file, and removed the earlier collectd plugin conf (implied by "All collectd modules removed"). What do I need to change in the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added the table for beta participants. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM To: Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] Proposal for LaaS Hardware

I usually mean “ports” (distinct ethernet connections) when I say “NIC” so by I expect production-grade servers to typically come with 4 onboard ports, often configured as 2 10GB and 2 1GB. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta program of course! Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT -Original Message- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; Christopher

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for the beta program. Here’s what I suggested: • We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta • We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are applicable the chance to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

are attending a great time. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Christopher Price [mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 11:29 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: Pasi Vaananen <pvaan...@redhat.com>; Stephen Wong

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

cases. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Christopher Price [mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 10:23 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> Cc: Pasi Vaananen <pvaan...@redhat.com>; Stephen Wong <stephen.wo...@hu

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Edge] Call to discuss next steps for Edge project proposal

Hi all, As those who expressed interest in the Edge project proposal https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Multi-Access+Edge I'd like to get us together with anyone else with interest in the project, to start planning OPNFV F release participation (with TSC approval of the project first of

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] Seeking input to the Auto project creation review

FYI I added a summary of the points below to the Auto project proposal at https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=12387216 The Auto project supporters would like to get started ASAP on the project’s goals. While in principle I think the consensus is that a combined project

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] Seeking input to the Auto project creation review

FYI I added a summary of the points below to the Auto project proposal at https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=12387216 The Auto project supporters would like to get started ASAP on the project’s goals. While in principle I think the consensus is that a combined project