Re: Disabling HTTP "Server" response header

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday 20 July 2016 07:39:28 Silvano Maffeis wrote:
> Hi

Hi Silvano,
 
> Is it possible to configure the org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConfiguration
> "sendServerVersion" property via PAX-WEB?
> I would like to disable the sending of the "Server" HTTP response header.
> 
> Or is there another way to achieve this?

you can unset any header with a Servlet Filter.

Regards,
O.

> Thanks and regards,
> Silvano

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Pax Exam] sharing a simple value between forked framework and driver

[Oliver Lietz]

hi,

I'm trying to optimize some tests which start (and stop) a database daemon and 
searching for a smart way to share the configured port.

Currently the port is allocated and written to a component configuration in a 
method annotated with @Configuration and the daemon is started in this method 
also.

Exam calls this method several times – (Karaf) framework and driver – which 
starts the daemon several times also. This works all fine but should be 
optimized to a single start of the daemon (per test class).

How can the driver access a value of the framework VM which can then be used 
in methods annotated with @BeforeClass and @AfterClass?

Or is there a way to allocate the port in the driver (not Maven) before the 
framework configuration is done?

Thanks,
O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [pax-exam] move to pax-exam 5?

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday 12 July 2017 10:24:23 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> I'd like to clean up the the Container API (see PAXEXAM-822 and linked
> ones), simplyfy and unify the creation of OSGi-Container (like native,
> karaf, forked) as well as adding a new Eclipse-Platform Container that
> allows to work with Eclipse-Apllication and several PDE Artifacts like
> features, target platforms and P2 repros.
> 
> Since this would require some "API-Breaks" I think it would be good to
> create a 5.0.0 version for this, so I'd like to create a new 4.x.x
> branch from the current master and change the master to 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
> 
> Any thoughts?

sounds reasonable. Some features I would like to see support for in Pax Exam 
"Next": @BeforeClass/@AfterClass, multiple containers per test (cluster 
testing) and of course JUnit 5.

Regards,
O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [pax-web] What are OSGI MVC frameworks that can be used with Pax-Web and Pax-CDI?

[Oliver Lietz]

On Tuesday 06 June 2017 06:33:29 Pavel wrote:
> Hi all

Hi Pavel,

> Could anyone suggest MVC framework that work on OSGi and which work
> with pax-web and pax-cdi?

Apache Sling: http://sling.apache.org/

> What I need:
> 1) It must work with pax-web 6 and pax-cdi 1

runs with Felix HTTP Service and Pax Web, doesn't use CDI but DS/SCR (but 
should work with CDI).

> 2) Of course it must be as OSGI bundles

lots of bundles...

> 3) The project must be alive.

and alive since 2007.

Regards,
O.

> Best regards, Pavel

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Pax Exam 4.12 release

[Oliver Lietz]

hi all,

are there any release plans for Pax Exam 4.12?

Thanks,
O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12 release

[Oliver Lietz]

On Tuesday 13 February 2018 13:02:26 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> i'm currently working on docu+tests for the eclipse container, maybe we
> can wait for this to include it?

Hi Christoph,

do you have a time frame for this? I'm somewhat blocked by PAXEXAM-914.

Regards,
O.

> Am 13.02.2018 um 06:09 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
> > No yet, but no objection from my side.
> > 
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > JB
> > 
> > On 02/12/2018 11:57 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> >> hi all,
> >> 
> >> are there any release plans for Pax Exam 4.12?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12 release

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday 14 February 2018 10:19:01 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> I hope to finish docs this week.
> 
> Just wondering: You should always be able to install a higher API
> version of the logging framework inside your test if needed or why is an
> update required?

Sure, but I would have to add Pax Logging API manually to otherwise generated 
tests (options) as workaround (and remove later again) and therefore prefer to 
fix it upstream.

O.

> Am 13.02.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Oliver Lietz:
> > On Tuesday 13 February 2018 13:02:26 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> >> i'm currently working on docu+tests for the eclipse container, maybe we
> >> can wait for this to include it?
> > 
> > Hi Christoph,
> > 
> > do you have a time frame for this? I'm somewhat blocked by PAXEXAM-914.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > O.
> > 
> >> Am 13.02.2018 um 06:09 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
> >>> No yet, but no objection from my side.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Regards
> >>> 
> >>> JB
> >>> 
> >>> On 02/12/2018 11:57 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> >>>> hi all,
> >>>> 
> >>>> are there any release plans for Pax Exam 4.12?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: PAX Exam OSGI Components

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 10:47:05 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> This depends on the DS-Provider you use e.g. the apache felix one has an
> API for this and if I rember right it is also standarized in OSGi-R7
> 
> See
> http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-service-compo
> nent-runtime.html#api-use
> 
> This is nothing special in pax exam so you can simply use
> 
> @Inject
> private ScrService service;

Waiting for components to be present (activated) in tests is a useful feature 
indeed.

One possible way: we could register proxy services for those components.

Any other ideas?

Regards,
O.

> Am 20.02.2018 um 13:46 schrieb nino martinez wael:
> > Ok.. When using Pax exam I can write @inject MyOwnService service.. Then
> > pax exam will inject the service into the test once karaf are bootet
> > etc... Im wondering if there's a way to do that with components..
> > 
> > Den tirsdag den 20. februar 2018 kl. 12.36.59 UTC+1 skrev Jean-Baptiste
> > 
> > Onofré:
> > Not sure I understand what you mean.
> > 
> > If you use Karaf pax exam container it's as when you are a vanilla
> > Karaf.
> > 
> > Regards
> > JB
> > Le 20 févr. 2018, à 12:00, nino martinez wael
> > 
> >  a écrit:
> > Hi
> > 
> > Are there anyway to get declarative services components? Both
> > the component itself but also the reference where you can start
> > and stop it?

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: PAX Exam OSGI Components

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday 21 February 2018 13:47:46 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> Well it might depend on the concrete case, but there is nothing PaxExam
> can really do, of course if you have such a very special case you can
> always fetch the ScrService and "wait"/check state for the component,
> but in general such things are bad in OSGi and you should better use
> some kind of Whitebord-pattern or notifications.

Which things are bad in OSGi? Better use whiteboard or notifications for what?

We have components which are not published as services and in some tests it is 
useful to "wait" for them. The boilerplate code for that could be provided by 
Pax Exam (similar to @Inject for services).

Neil gave a good explanation for components on SO: 
https://stackoverflow.com/a/8887216

O.

> If you describe your usecase a little bit more one might suggest a way
> how it can be archived...
> 
> Am 21.02.2018 um 13:41 schrieb Oliver Lietz:
> > On Wednesday 21 February 2018 13:07:07 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J 
wrote:
> >> What exaclty do you want to archive?
> >> 
> >> "Waiting" for a component to become active that does not export a
> >> service is mostly useless in a test (since you can't query the
> >> component) and in the other case you can simply wait for the service the
> >> component exports.
> >> 
> >> "component" is just an internal concept of SCR from the outside a
> >> component does not look any different than other services and should be
> >> handeled as those.
> > 
> > Components (and private services of course) can change the behavior of a
> > system and in some cases it makes sense to wait for them before starting
> > tests. As it's not possible to "reference" them, creating proxy services
> > by
> > using DS would be one way.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: PAX Exam OSGI Components

[Oliver Lietz]

On Friday 23 February 2018 14:09:30 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> What should PaxExam Inject if the component does not publish a service?
> What should it check for? All this can better be handled bei a JUnit
> rule as described before.

Please read my previous answers.

O.

> Am 23.02.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Oliver Lietz:
> > On Wednesday 21 February 2018 13:47:46 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J 
wrote:
> >> Well it might depend on the concrete case, but there is nothing PaxExam
> >> can really do, of course if you have such a very special case you can
> >> always fetch the ScrService and "wait"/check state for the component,
> >> but in general such things are bad in OSGi and you should better use
> >> some kind of Whitebord-pattern or notifications.
> > 
> > Which things are bad in OSGi? Better use whiteboard or notifications for
> > what?
> > 
> > We have components which are not published as services and in some tests
> > it is useful to "wait" for them. The boilerplate code for that could be
> > provided by Pax Exam (similar to @Inject for services).
> > 
> > Neil gave a good explanation for components on SO:
> > https://stackoverflow.com/a/8887216


-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Adding full hamcrest to pax exam junitBundles()

[Oliver Lietz]

On Thursday 12 April 2018 08:32:47 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> What about simply adding them to your test as a bundle? :-)
> 
> I think Pax Exam should not include/install ANYTHING by default because
> this always creates problems with the test-setup!

+1 – see https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-723

O.

> I'm currently working on a way where the test-probe is the only thing
> that gets installed so there are no problems with custom logging or
> test-libs anymore.
> 
> Am 11.04.2018 um 15:56 schrieb Christian Schneider:
> > Currently the junitBundles option only installs hamcrest core which
> > misses the nice matchers.
> > How about changing the junitBundles option to install the servicemix
> > hamcrest instead.
> > 
> > Christian

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Release Pax Exam 4.13/5.0

[Oliver Lietz]

Hi *,

is anyone planning a release of Pax Exam for the near future?

Thanks,
O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Release Pax Exam 4.13/5.0

[Oliver Lietz]

On Tuesday 09 October 2018 13:16:57 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Oli,

Hi JB,

> Yes, as I'm working on JUnit 5 update (Pax Exampl 5.0) and Java 11
> support/improvements (ASM, XBean, ... for both Pax Exam 4.x and 5.x).

good to hear. Do you have a rough timline?

Thanks,
O.

> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 09/10/2018 13:08, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> > Hi *,
> > 
> > is anyone planning a release of Pax Exam for the near future?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > O.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PAX EXAM] 5 – status?

[Oliver Lietz]

Hi *,

What is the status of Pax Exam 5?
Anyone still working on it?

Thanks,
O.




-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1752490.BzjIWqZvl2%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: [PAX EXAM] 5 – status?

[Oliver Lietz]

On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 9:04:20 PM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Yes. After discussed with Romain we identified several improvements.
> We plan to work on this starting from next week.

Great news, JB!

Is there already a roadmap?

O.

> I would like to release pax exam 5 in couple of weeks.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 19:53, Oliver Lietz  a écrit :
> > Hi *,
> > 
> > What is the status of Pax Exam 5?
> > Anyone still working on it?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > O.
[...]



-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1894859.DYr1CQ9XjO%40madness.front.ruhr.

[PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

[Oliver Lietz]

Hi *,

I need a new release of Pax Exam: 4.13.2
Who can manage versions in JIRA?

Thanks,
O.




-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/7682379.qZPg9MAYzA%40madness.front.ruhr.

Using GitHub Issues and Pages

[Oliver Lietz]

Hi *,

How about dropping JIRA and Confluence and fully leveraging GitHub for OPS4J's 
projects?

Regards,
O.




-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/2208945.GiKWtrRqj9%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: Maven Aether configuration

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 10:52:49 PM CET Jared Whiklo wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi Jared,

> I'm relatively new to Pax-Exam stuff, but have been using it to test
> deployment of some resources in a Karaf container. This was working until
> such time as the recent switch to required SSL for maven central. So I need
> to switch out any default repositories urls from
> "http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/; to "https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/;.
> 
> Currently we are getting the error
> 
> -
> Gradle Test Run :islandora-karaf:test > Gradle Test Executor 31 >
> ca.islandora.alpaca.karaf.KarafIT > classMethod FAILED
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Problem starting container
> 
> Caused by:
> java.io.IOException: Error resolving artifact
> org.apache.karaf:apache-karaf:jar:zip:4.0.6: Could not transfer artifact
> org.apache.karaf:apache-karaf:jar:zip:4.0.6 from/to central
> (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/): Failed to transfer file:
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/4.0.6/apache-kar
> af-4.0.6-zip.jar. Return code is: 501 , ReasonPhrase:HTTPS Required.
> 
> Gradle Test Run :islandora-karaf:test > Gradle Test Executor 31 >
> ca.islandora.alpaca.karaf.KarafIT > executionError FAILED
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Container never came up
> 
> 
> I'm trying to set either the "org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories" or
> "org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.settings" property. I have tried using the
> CoreOptions.systemProperty and
> CoreOptions.frameworkProperty but neither is used by the
> AetherBasedResolver class and instead it seems to fallback to...my maven
> settings?
> 
> The only thing that has worked was to add a  to my local
> ~/.m2/settings.xml for central. But this seems very user specific.
> 
> The test class can be found here
> https://github.com/Islandora/Alpaca/blob/dev/karaf/src/test/java/ca/islandor
> a/alpaca/karaf/KarafIT.java
> 
> I feel like there something obvious I am missing here, any help is
> appreciated.

No, I fixed it just yesterday for 4.x by upgrading Pax URL.
New release is outstanding.

Regards,
O.

> cheers,
> jared



-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/2396003.SP4rjLJWGJ%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 11:40:53 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Sure. I will.

Done. PAXEXAM-934 and dependency updates (fixing HTTP issue with Maven 
Central).

Please go ahead, JB.

Thanks,
O.

> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 11:23, Oliver Lietz  a écrit :
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 7:07:24 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > I will.
> > 
> > Let me add some dependency updates and improvements before cutting the
> > release. Can you add version 4.13.2 to JIRA?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > O.
> > 
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > > 
> > > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 00:35, Oliver Lietz  a
> > 
> > écrit :
> > > > Hi *,
> > > > 
> > > > I need a new release of Pax Exam: 4.13.2
> > > > Who can manage versions in JIRA?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > O.
[...]



-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/6567372.OaYqkxrSbj%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: ops4j domain names

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 3:25:31 PM CET 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J 
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I fully agree on Toni ...
> actually for PaxWeb it had always been an issue of not beeing an apache
> project.
> Therefore I'd go with option 4, the how-to would be needed to be worked
> out.

Really? But we already have a HTTP and Log service at Felix (and another one 
at Sling) and I guess it means a lot of paper work related to IP and 
donations.

O. 

> regards, Achim
> 
> 
> Am Mi., 19. Feb. 2020 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek <
> 
> gr.grzy...@gmail.com>:
> > Hello
> > 
> > While being happy contributor of pax-logging, pax-web,
> > pax-jdbc/jms/transx, pax-url, pax-cdi, I never wonder about how it works.
> > I've never seen working https://ops4j.org site (it's now "it works!"
> > page) and I assumed Atlassian is providing us (how?) JIRA + Confluence.
> > 
> > I don't know what to suggest, except that I'll welcome any improvement ;)
> > 
> > regards
> > Grzegorz Grzybek
> > 
> > śr., 19 lut 2020 o 13:15 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > 
> > jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> >> Hi Toni
> >> 
> >> Thanks for bringing this discussion forward.
> >> 
> >> I agree with your statements. Let me get back with comments and
> >> proposals.
> >> 
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >> 
> >> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 13:01, Toni Menzel  a
> >> 
> >> écrit :
> >>> *TL/TR:*
> >>> I'd be also happy to pay for ops4j.org (the one that is actively used
> >>> atm).
> >>> 
> >>> *Long version:*
> >>> Since this is coming up now, there is a general question were to go with
> >>> OPS4J in general.
> >>> 
> >>> It predated github and probably was back then the easiest way to get
> >>> hands dirty in a non-trivial java based OSS community where trust was
> >>> default. Think about it, back then everyone could get write access to
> >>> the
> >>> subversion repo and start hacking on new or existing projects. Including
> >>> admin access to jira and whatever else was existing back then. Pax URL,
> >>> Pax
> >>> Runner, Pax Exam, Pax Construct etc. all got initiated by individuals
> >>> without asking for permission. I mean.. thats Names like Pax Tinybundles
> >>> got to life.. but oh well.
> >>> 
> >>> Now, why am I writing this: there is - at least for pax url, web and
> >>> exam - a huge user base that seems to be quite healthy. Even if there is
> >>> just that "ops4j" name of the github organization now, no website etc.
> >>> 
> >>> So, question: what are the options? Let me just drop them here that come
> >>> 
> >>> to my mind (ordered from easy-as-py to more complicated options):
> >>>- keep things as is, find individual sponsors like I do with the
> >>>Build Server (who uses that still by the way??), and JB or me (this
> >>>means
> >>>I'd be also fine to pay for the org domain that is in active use,too
> >>>btw).
> >>>It would be good to have two different companies or legal entities
> >>>backing
> >>>this anyway.
> >>>- Modernize OPS4J a bit. Get it a landing page at least and a clear
> >>>who is behind all this, who pays etc. Maybe look at Github Sponsoring
> >>>to
> >>>spread costs across user base - avoid single entity control.
> >>>- Maybe look into making it a proper foundation or at least an
> >>>entity that makes the work here eligible for future donations. I am
> >>>not
> >>>sure of this is worth it. But i feel Open Source != Open Governance.
> >>>- Retire non active projects and donate active projects to apache.
> >>>Probably difficult because of Intellectual Property)
> >>> 
> >>> wdyt?
> >>> Toni
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> *Toni Menzel | rebaze.com  | growing developer
> >>> culture*
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> >>> 
> >>> jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Hi Niclas
>  
>  First of all, thanks a lot for all what you did (and still doing ).
>  
>  I’m ready to take the hand for the domain and finance them.
>  
>  Thoughts ?
>  
>  Regards
>  JB
>  
>  Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 12:13, Niclas Hedhman  a
>  
>  écrit :
> > Everyone,
> > In a few months time (June), the OPS4J domain names are up for
> > renewal. And I have been paying for those for 15 years now, and since
> > I no
> > longer participate in OPS4J I would like to transfer the domain names.
> > But
> > where to??
> > 
> > Ideally a foundation that would be Ok to take it over, otherwise to a
> > trusted community member.
> > 
> > Ideas are welcome, and should be discussed. I have no opinion and will
> > simply follow what you all can agree on.
> > 
> > ops4j.org
> > ops4j.net
> > ops4j.com
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Niclas
[...]



-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to 

Re: Using GitHub Issues and Pages

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:16:01 AM CET Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I ... have never think about it. Maybe it is a good idea? Confluence is
> quite good, but the content there is quite dated. JIRA is great software,
> but it's of course subjective and lots of projects do their
>  at GH.

Sure, I like using JIRA (and Confluence) in other projects but the experience 
for (new) users at OPS4J is quite bad.

We should at least set up a basic site at ops4j.org again and update content 
in Confluence or GitHub (Pages: http://ops4j.github.io/).

There are several commits without JIRA issues therefore I thought about 
switching to GitHub Issues and PRs. I guess it makes managing release 
information easier.

See also 
https://spring.io/blog/2019/01/15/spring-framework-s-migration-from-jira-to-github-issues

Regards,
O.

> I don't know (I wasn't here at that time) what are the terms on which
> Atlassian runs Ops4J space (jira, confluence). Would be great to read
> feedback from others.
> 
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
> 
> śr., 19 lut 2020 o 00:43 Oliver Lietz  napisał(a):
> > Hi *,
> > 
> > How about dropping JIRA and Confluence and fully leveraging GitHub for
> > OPS4J's
> > projects?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > O.
[...]



-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/2921450.MABC123e95%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

[Oliver Lietz]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 7:07:24 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I will.

Let me add some dependency updates and improvements before cutting the 
release. Can you add version 4.13.2 to JIRA?

Thanks,
O.

> Regards
> JB
> 
> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 00:35, Oliver Lietz  a écrit :
> > Hi *,
> > 
> > I need a new release of Pax Exam: 4.13.2
> > Who can manage versions in JIRA?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > O.
[...]



-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1913191.HhQKl5TqLv%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: Change Pax Probe location and sorroundings: an explorative adventure

[Oliver Lietz]

On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 6:39:17 PM CEST Massimo Bono wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi Massimo,

> I'm exploring the pax-exam project because* I want to change the location
> of the pax-exam probe generated* (location in the file system and possibly
> its name): I'm using a karaf container to actually test and in that project
> in order to configure the probe itself I need to specify a method annotated
> with "@ProbeBuilder". By looking where the annotation "@ProbeBuilder" was
> actually used I discovered the methods `overwriteWithUserDefinition` and
> `createProbeBuilder` in `TestProbeBuilder` which , apparently, creates a
> probe implementation from a template (i.e., system.createProbe()). Looking
> at the method interface it seems that I just need to change the tem dir via
> the method `setTempDir`.
> 
> However, there is a problem: the associated method `getTempDir`,
> technically used to retrieve such a temp directory, is not used in the
> project at all (or at least, a search in my IDE gave no usage result).
> 
> Since I couldn't find usages of `getTempDir` method, I turn my attention on
> `system.createProbe()`. The only implementation I found was in
> `ReactorManager.createProbeBuilder`.
> Here I noticed that the `tempDir` field of the pax-probe is populated by a
> temporary folder via the line `cache = createTemp(new
> File(work.getWorkingDirectory()));` whereas the `store` variable may
> represents an abstract storage location. Inspecting further the standard
> implementation of `TestProbeBuilderImpl.build()` seems to reveal that such
> a variable is responsible to decide where the probe is actually stored.
> 
> In particular, it seems that  the only implementation of `Store`,
> `TemporaryStore`, actually creates the probe in temp file via
> `createTempFile` and only then transfer it in a given location
> `TemporaryStore.getLocation()`. So changing the return value of such a
> method should do the trick.
> 
> 
> My questions are:
>  - what is the real purpose of `getTempDir` method in `TestProbeBuilder`?
> Is is really useless or it has an implicit need?
>  - I've noticed that both the filename of such a probe and its symbolic
> name are hardcoded? Do you know any location in pax-exam (or karaf) where
> such hardcoded names are used? I ask this because if I can, I would like to
> change them :)
>  - Is it indeed safe to change the instance of `Store` with another that
> allows me to change the actual probe-location?
>  - If I want to add some javadoc documentation in some classes (like the
> totally undocumented `TestProbeBuilder`), what are the contribution rules?
> Can you give me a link to them so I can read them? On pax-exam site I
> couldn't find them, but maybe I'm just stupid :D
> 
> Thanks for any kind reply

Why do you want to access the probe as file?
You can change the symbolic name via TestProbeBuilder.

Regards,
O.




-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/2869386.BpcU5DQJyk%40madness.front.ruhr.

[PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.3

[Oliver Lietz]

Hi *,

Can someone please look into PAXEXAM-920 and cut a release?

Thanks,
O.




-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1724991.J3SbQkRBBU%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: ops4j domain names

[Oliver Lietz]

ed community member.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Ideas are welcome, and should be discussed. I have no opinion and
> >>>>>>>>> will simply follow what you all can agree on.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> ops4j.org
> >>>>>>>>> ops4j.net
> >>>>>>>>> ops4j.com
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>> Niclas
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >>>>>>>>> send an email to op...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKf7a0rzdkro7v-rxBV
> >>>>>>>>> 1p1-KkSMTE_BQT2HhUZyOUM9jyA%40mail.gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKf7a0rzdkro7v-rx
> >>>>>>>>> BV1p1-KkSMTE_BQT2HhUZyOUM9jyA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email
> >>>>>>>>> m_source=footer> .
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >>>>>>>> send an email to op...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3QGMMWvzzCck96CxemuYg
> >>>>>>>> SiYWNcs%2BOGPXmtaKTthoJvrw%40mail.gmail.com
> >>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3QGMMWvzzCck96Cxemu
> >>>>>>>> YgSiYWNcs%2BOGPXmtaKTthoJvrw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_
> >>>>>>>> source=footer> .
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >>>>>>> send an email to op...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAEjgzHT%2BYNAL3CA1dsqGpevhp
> >>>>>>> oYsU9OYVUBi%3Df%2BMT9_u5ta3fw%40mail.gmail.com
> >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAEjgzHT%2BYNAL3CA1dsqGpev
> >>>>>>> hpoYsU9OYVUBi%3Df%2BMT9_u5ta3fw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email
> >>>>>>> m_source=footer> .
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> >>>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/14adf9b2-1de0-4af5-835e-832c3c
> >>>>> 1e1185%40googlegroups.com
> >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/14adf9b2-1de0-4af5-835e-832c
> >>>>> 3c1e1185%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer> .
> >>>> 
> >>>> --
> >>>> --
> >>>> --
> >>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> ---
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> >>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3RyG8sxL49uTn4pT2nssc5YtG
> >>>> y5G6w%3DvweJBXmMZ_4XZw%40mail.gmail.com
> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3RyG8sxL49uTn4pT2nssc5Y
> >>>> tGy5G6w%3DvweJBXmMZ_4XZw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=f
> >>>> ooter> .
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> --
> >>> --
> >>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
> >>> 
> >>> ---
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> >>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKduMCvFn0VSbS6%3DE9pFPyN
> >>> 5j11PssGS%2BhYTcpWE3OS-CA%40mail.gmail.com
> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKduMCvFn0VSbS6%3DE9pFP
> >>> yN5j11PssGS%2BhYTcpWE3OS-CA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source
> >>> =footer> .
> >> 
> >> --
> >> --
> >> --
> >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "OPS4J" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> >> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3T36M9%2BpwMpV25E%2BPzfbe6o
> >> OpSPKTKioXw_fYUgmLx%3DBg%40mail.gmail.com
> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3T36M9%2BpwMpV25E%2BPzfbe
> >> 6oOpSPKTKioXw_fYUgmLx%3DBg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=f
> >> ooter> .
> > 
> > --
> > --
> > --
> > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
> > 
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "OPS4J" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKeLPNsZnKtREUfLnA7En9Mgukq
> > BhMECMbgz2W7McD5HCA%40mail.gmail.com
> > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKeLPNsZnKtREUfLnA7En9Mgu
> > kqBhMECMbgz2W7McD5HCA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> > .


-- 

Oliver Lietz | Wintgensweg 29 | 45481 Mülheim an der Ruhr
fon: +49 208 41191263 | fax: +49 208 41191264
email: i...@oliverlietz.de | web: oliverlietz.de


-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/21724874.iNe2Eb8pWA%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: Jira or github?

[Oliver Lietz]

On Monday, April 27, 2020 9:15:16 AM CEST 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> in the past we needed to do a "lock-down" on self-registration for the Jira
> Instance due to tremendous amount of spam in Jira Issues and on the
> confluence pages.
> This increases the burden for people to file new Issues :(
> 
> How about changing to github completely for issues and documentation?

+1, see also https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ops4j/5nN7tjV4P_Y

O.

> regards, Achim




-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/3291512.OYLYMOc9CJ%40madness.front.ruhr.

Re: [pax exam] Running code outside the OSGi container

[Oliver Lietz]

On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 18:51:36 CEST Thomas Dalton wrote:
> Christian,

Hi Tom,

> Were you able to figure out a solution to starting/stopping docker
> containers while using the PaxExam runner? I want to be able to use
> TestContainers (https://www.testcontainers.org/) to spin up an external DB
> and verify services can talk to the DB,

There are modules in Apache Sling which start a Docker container during 
testing with Pax Exam:

ClamAV:

https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-commons-clam/blob/master/src/
test/java/org/apache/sling/commons/clam/it/tests/ClamTestSupport.java

MongoDB:

https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-karaf-integration-tests/blob/
master/src/test/java/org/apache/sling/karaf/tests/bootstrap/
SlingQuickstartOakMongoIT.java

HTH,
O.


> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> On Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 2:04:43 AM UTC-6 cschne...@gmail.com wrote:
> > One case is to start and stop docker containers.
> > Another case is to start additional OSGi containers using  PaxExamRuntime.
> > createContainer.
> > 
> > I have to use forked mode. So it makes some difference.
> > If there is no predefined way then I will create my own class extending
> > PaxExam that calls my hooks.
> > 
> > Christian
> > 
> > 2018-05-04 19:42 GMT+02:00 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J <
> > 
> > op...@googlegroups.com>:
> >> What exactly do you want to archive?
> >> 
> >> e.g. the configure method is run "outside" the container, or you can
> >> simply have an static insitilizer and check there if an active OSGi env
> >> is
> >> avaiable (OSGi Phase) or not (configuration phase)...
> >> 
> >> Beside that, if you are not using the forked mode all code already runns
> >> in the same jvm process...
> > 
> >> Am 04.05.2018 um 17:22 schrieb Christian Schneider:
> > I would like to have code executed outside of the OSGi container in the
> > 
> >>> process where junit runs.
> >>> 
> >>> This used to work with @BeforeClass in older versions of pax exam. Now
> >>> these methods are also run in OSGi.
> >>> 
> >>> Is there some way to run my code outside in a generic way?
> >>> 
> >>> What I did until now is to extend pax exam an override the run method.
> >>> Is there maybe a built in way that avoids this?
> >>> 
> >>> Christian
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Computer Scientist
> >>> http://www.adobe.com
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> ---
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> >> 
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> >> 
> >>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com  >>> ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >> 
> >> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > 
> >> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > 
> > Computer Scientist
> > http://www.adobe.com


-- 

Oliver Lietz | Wintgensweg 29 | 45481 Mülheim an der Ruhr
fon: +49 208 41191263 | fax: +49 208 41191264
email: i...@oliverlietz.de | web: oliverlietz.de


-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/2325381.RSjJl314KY%40madness.front.ruhr.

OPS4J on Zulip

[Oliver Lietz]

Hi *,

OPS4J is now on Zulip: https://ops4j.zulipchat.com

Regards,
O.




-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/2909605.e9J7NaK4W3%40madness.front.ruhr.

Moving documentation to Git

[Oliver Lietz]

Hi *,

We discussed in 2020 to switch over from Confluence and Jira to GitHub Pages 
and Issues.
Migration of issues to GitHub was done by Grzegorz a while back.
I will now start working on documentation with Antora in Pax TinyBundles and 
Pax Exam to have something up-to-date on https://ops4j.github.io/

Regards,
O.



-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/2305118.ElGaqSPkdT%40madness.front.ruhr.