{not sure where this discussion should be, but the 22 CC's probably don't
need it}
Simon Leinen wrote:
> We are adding continuous and consistent power consumption monitoring
> across our fleet of routers. Most of them expose their overall energy
> consumption (as well as that of
Rob,
One of the challenges we appear to be having is that the working groups that
should potentially care about some of the metrics work for instance are busy. I
find that somewhat unfortunate, but it may be what it is. The IAB program is
not a place for us to standardize protocols or data
Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) writes:
> There are a number of us IETF participants, from a rather long list of
> equipment providers as well as operators, that are working on solving
> very concrete and current issues with respect to energy management in
> network equipment. For example, we have noted
Hi Michael,
On 26/03/2024, 10:02, "Michael Richardson" wrote:
Rob Wilton \(rwilton\)
mailto:40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> 1. For me to request the creation of new open “green-bof” mailing list
> from Mahesh (hopefully should be done over the next few days).
Getting Rid of
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for the comments. I’ve provided some comments (RW) inline …
From: Carlos Pignataro
Date: Monday, 25 March 2024 at 21:09
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: Marisol Palmero Amador (mpalmero) ,
Ops Area WG , E-Impact IETF ,
inventory-y...@ietf.org , Alexander Clemm
, Alberto
Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) wrote:
> 1. For me to request the creation of new open “green-bof” mailing list
> from Mahesh (hopefully should be done over the next few days).
Getting Rid of Energy Eating Networks = GREEN :-)
(I admit that I was slightly inspired by Calvin and Hobbes club)
Carlos, all,
I'm confused by this bullet point:
• next steps? E.g. WG coordination/status, form a WG Design Team,
call for a BOF?
Could you please clarify?
I understood there's no WG (and hence no WG coordination nor status), in favor
of the IAB Program. There cannot be a WG
