[OPSAWG] new draft on dynamic network probes for interactive query

2017-06-27 Thread Haoyu song
Dear all, We have submitted a draft describing the use case and requirements for dynamic network probes. Please kindly provide any comments and suggestions to help us improve the work. Thank you very much! https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-dnp4iq/ Abstract: This document

[OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-song-ntf-02.txt

2018-07-02 Thread Haoyu song
; Giuseppe Fioccola ; Lizhenbin ; Haoyu song ; Laurent Ciavaglia ; Tianran Zhou ; Aijun Wang ; Pedro Martinez-Julia Subject: New Version Notification for draft-song-ntf-02.txt A new version of I-D, draft-song-ntf-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Haoyu Song and posted to the IETF

Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt

2018-07-09 Thread Haoyu song
Hi Randy, Thank you for comments on draft-song-ntf. I'm not sure I understand your second point. Could you please clarify it? Please note we didn't enforce any specific model on the telemetry yet. This doc only concerns the aspect on how to acquire data from networks. It does support the

[OPSAWG] request a presentation slot

2018-07-03 Thread Haoyu song
Dear OPSAWG chairs, I'm writing to request a slot to present the updates of the following document. Thank you very much! https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-ntf-02 Best regards, Haoyu ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org

Re: [OPSAWG] network telemetry framework

2018-04-02 Thread Haoyu song
-Original Message- From: Joe Clarke [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 11:52 AM To: Haoyu song <haoyu.s...@huawei.com>; opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] network telemetry framework On 3/21/18 04:01, Haoyu song wrote: > Dear all, >

[OPSAWG] network telemetry framework

2018-03-21 Thread Haoyu song
Dear all, The WG presentation triggered a lot warm discussions on this topic. While we agree that at present it's too aggressive to try to unify the telemetry protocols, we feel it is needed to formalize the terminologies and clarify the technique classifications from multiple dimensions so to

[OPSAWG] Asking for a slot

2018-03-02 Thread Haoyu song
Dear OPSAWG Chairs, I’m writing to ask for a presentation slot for the draft of “Toward a Network Telemetry Framework” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-ntf/) Thank you very much for the consideration! Best regards, Haoyu Song ___ OPSAWG

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

2018-10-17 Thread Haoyu song
Hi Uri, Thanks for the comments. I'd like to clarify there's no black and white separation between conventional OAM and telemetry. Conventional OAM is also indispensable in many cases and some tools is also evolving to bear more characteristics of a typical telemetry system. I'll make the

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

2018-10-18 Thread Haoyu song
I don't think we are trying anything "re-inventing the wheel". First, we didn't invent anything in this draft. Rather, we are providing an overview and summary of existing stuff. Second, even SNMP notification can do data push, it is still insufficient. Google has deprecated SNMP for a reason.

[OPSAWG] New version of Network Telemetry Framework

2018-10-22 Thread Haoyu song
Dear all, We have uploaded a new version of the Network Telemetry Framework draft which reflects the modifications based on comments and suggestions from Adrian Farrel, Daniel King, Randy Presuhn, Uri Blumenthal and others. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ntf/ We add new

[OPSAWG] Request for presentation slots in IETF103

2018-10-22 Thread Haoyu song
Dear OPSAWG chairs, I'm writing to request two presentation slots to cover the following two drafts: 1. Newly submitted: In-situ Flow Information Telemetry Framework https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/ Abstract: In-situ Flow Information Telemetry (iFIT) is

Re: [OPSAWG] Request for presentation slots in IETF103

2018-10-22 Thread Haoyu song
we can provide something useful to IETF, so we are open to hear any comments and opinions. Thanks! Haoyu -Original Message- From: Joe Clarke [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 2:20 PM To: Haoyu song ; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Re: Request

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

2018-10-17 Thread Haoyu song
Hi Adrian, Thank you very much for the comments. I'll try to address all your comments in the new revisions. Given the time and bandwidth, I may leave some parts (e.g., security concern) to future revisions. Yes, gRPC is a recursive acronym and "g" doesn't mean google although we all know

Re: [OPSAWG] EARLY CALL: Agenda topics for IETF 103

2018-10-17 Thread Haoyu song
Hi Joe, I'd like to apply a presentation slot for the draft song-opsawg-ntf-01. In the talk, I'll presents the updates of the draft and address the issues raised during the email discussion. Thanks! Best, Haoyu -Original Message- From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

2018-10-29 Thread Haoyu song
Hi Joe, Here I also try to response an earlier question you raised in anther email: “Others commented that a detailed comparison and evaluation is required in order to determine what the right approach/recommendation should be.” I think the nature of the doc is more like a survey than an

[OPSAWG] presentation on ifit framework draft

2018-10-30 Thread Haoyu song
Dear all, As Joe suggested, I would like to request you to take a look at the following draft before the meeting so we can have some good discussion during the meeting. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/ Basically we want to address the challenges of data plane