Gene,
Good stuff. Thanks for the tip.
ed
- Original Message -
From:
Gene Sais
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:29
PM
Subject: RE: URGENT REPORTS
What I like about VNC, is that all you need for a client
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
Guys,
This is a stupid question but how is directing DISPLAY for reports with xterminal services versus the VNC route?
-Original Message-
From: Jesse, Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
You got to have xvnc server installed somewhere,
then you can direct any X app to it as you would do with normal X. So the app
appears on vnc virtual display and if you want to see it, you have to connect to
this virtual display using vncviewer.
Tanel
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
An X-DISPLAY application (Reports) needs to access
an X-display terminal in order for it to run.You can either give it a real
X-terminal, or you can simulate the functionality (pretend X terminal) with
software, either Xvbf or VNC. Since the application doesn't need
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
Thanks.
-Original Message-From: Binley Lim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003
1:05 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Re: URGENT REPORTS
An X-DISPLAY application (Reports) needs to
access an X-display
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
REP-110: Unable to open file 'alc4.rep'.
REP-1070: Error while opening or saving a document.
REP-0110: Unable to open file 'alc4.rep'.
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
Never mind. Was a bad rep_mdmdmd.conf file.
However, does anyone know if there is a way to run reports services without have a DISPLAY variable set? We don't have a dedicated machine for this one purpose.
-Original Message-
From: Stankus, Paula G
Sent
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
Check
out Xvfb... It the virtual frame buffer... I think it
willaccomplish what you are looking for...
HTH
Tim
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September
24, 2003 3:55 PMTo: Multiple recipients
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
Thanks.
-Original Message-From: Johnston, Tim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003
4:10 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
RE: URGENT REPORTS
Check out Xvfb... It the virtual frame buffer... I think
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS
Setting up vnc server and directing DISPLAY to that
is easier, I think.I have a Apps reports server setup which has run for
few years for now with vnc server.
Tanel.
- Original Message -
From:
Johnston,
Tim
To: Multiple recipients of list
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: URGENT REPORTS
com
If y'all do choose a VNC route, I'd highly recommend the free and GPL'd
TightVNC from http://www.tightvnc.com/
Better compression, better security, and better performance then other
RFB-compliant VNC flavors.
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL
What I like about VNC, is that all you need for a client is a
browser. http://ip.address:5800 gets
you a nice java client connection.
Gene [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/24/03 06:14PM
If y'all do choose a VNC route, I'd highly recommend the free
and GPL'dTightVNC from http://www.tightvnc.com/Better
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS WONT START
It was a problem with 2 things:
1-someone had changed the display on me!
2-conf file was corrupted.
Worked it out but can anyone tell me where I can get more robust descriptions of the conf files and how to edit them and each part of them?
Thanks
Title: RE: URGENT REPORTS WONT START
Getting error:
REP-50125: Caught exception: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
One note I found on web said to comment out some tags. Doesn't seem to help.
Any ideas?
be some / is missed out while closing the
tag?
Can you mail me the conf file highlighting the changes?
GovindanK
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:59 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
RE: URGENT REPORTS WONT START
Getting error:
REP-50125: Caught exception: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
Yeah, well, when all the American IT companies conquered (spelling?) the
world and ran the Danish HW-vendors in the ground, as well as a lot of
small and medium sized SW-shops, I think - but I could be awfully wrong
here :-) - most Americans thought that was because we were too
expensive, too
Well-Spoken Indeed
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Yes, in your experience...and maybe most of the other lister's
experience...majority of the time its true...
That's because you people are the best DBAs I've seen...
Title: RE: RE: URGENT : sql*loader performance problem on partionned tab
here the trace :
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = CHOOSE 2 72 1368
FOR UPDATE
FILTER
PARTITION RANGE SINGLE
TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID FICOM HREL_FUSION 2 72 1368
INDEX RANGE SCAN FICOM
Maria
I just wanted to thank you for posting your views on the DBA situation
from your perspective. I always feel better informed when I have an
opportunity to hear opinions from people whose situation is different from
mine. And I agree with you that this is a valuable forum where people with
Title: RE: RE: URGENT : sql*loader performance problem on partionned table - not sql*loader problem but cursor pb!
Here the informations :
table HREL_FUSION :
63 millions rows
3 indexes on columns : nodos_or, nodos_or, numcli --- too much indexes ??
table primedi_enr2_temp_fusion : 133
I could not say it in a better way
/Quamrul
From: Maria Aurora de la Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Urgent INFO needed.
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:19:41 -0800
Its quite unfair for D
Fact of the matter is the majority of the time its true, like it or
not. Those of you who know me, know I DON'T do politically correct, I
call a spade a spade.
Its true at the officer level in a company(and I'm there in the company
I'm in now), its all about dollars and cents, especially
Joe,
It's all about dollars and cents, true. In your view, can a company look
past the next quarter and see that by outsourcing they might be jumping over
dollars to save pennies?
Example, most of the companies in my region aren't Fortune 500, they're
small manufacturing outfits - it's rare to
Did you explain plan? I suspect FTS taking place in case of NOT EXISTS.
It must be using Range scan for the non partitioned table.
Can you confirm / post the explain plan.
GovindanK
Here the informations :
table HREL_FUSION :
63 millions rows
3 indexes on columns : nodos_or,
Yes, in your experience...and maybe most of the other lister's
experience...majority of the time its true...
That's because you people are the best DBAs I've seen...
Your experiences...10...15 years...some of you have a little over 3 years and are
already experts...
Of course a lot of other people
$2.50 is simply because of the $ to Rupee PARITY RATIO respective Cost of Living
here in India.
Labor in India is NOT Cheap . It is Simply this ratio which gives the impression of
being cheap.
Also Outsourcers get to pay LESS because of the Current prevailing Work-to-Earnings
monetary
Title: RE: URGENT : sql*loader performance problem on partionned table
precision : Oracle 8.1.7.3 (64 bits) in Solaris 8
-Message d'origine-
De : NGUYEN Philippe (Cetelem)
Envoyé : 02 September 2003 18:14
À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : URGENT : sql*loader performance problem
Title: RE: URGENT : sql*loader performance problem on partionned table
thank U Dennis,
I use local index,
the script is still running (2hours now! instead of 10-20 min) and here is the statement in question (the script who used non-partionned table is already ended)
SELECT NULL
FROM
Yesterday i posted a reply on this .. but did not reach.
Check if too much logging taking place. Avoid this with loading as
UNRECOVERABLE; Or else Presort the data on the index key to minimise
the use of Temp segment. As of now i am able to think of only these two.
HTH
GovindanK
Hi gurus,
we
Hello
Did you check alert.log for any unusual messages? May be it is using lot of
rollback / archiving.
You can use unrecoverable option to load. You have not mentioned whether
you are using direct load or not.
Check if too many extents are getting allocated at runtime. That is
going to slow
Title: RE: URGENT : sql*loader performance problem on partionned table
thankx for all those
advbices, actually,the problem does not come from the
sql*loader but from this particular statement:
SELECT NULL FROM
hrel_fusion WHERE cod_rel =
:b1 AND dat_rel =
:b2 AND NOT EXISTS
on
seperate partitions. Not sure.
From: NGUYEN Philippe (Cetelem) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/09/03 Wed AM 09:59:27 EDT
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: URGENT : sql*loader performance problem on partionned table
thank U Dennis,
I use local index
All I
know about it is that for every new job in India one more DBA is out of work
here in the United States.
-Original Message-From: Ora DBA
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003
5:30 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Urgent INFO
]On Behalf Of Tony JohnsonSent:
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:05 PMTo: Multiple recipients of
list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Urgent INFO needed.
All
I know about it is that for every new job in India one more DBA is out of work
here in the United States.
-Original Message
Actually, I've seen the reverse be true. I've seen the work offshore be so
poor that more folks are brought in locally to correct the problems, yet the
offshore remain too because of contractual issues. Happened to me on at
least two different occations. You get what you pay for. There are some
i dont think so. There is too much money in this. Odds are they will refine
their processes 'slowly' improve. Over a period of years they will be
better. Will it always be as good as the US? No, but it doesnt need to be.
Its cheap. This doesnt mean every IT job will dissapear, but there is a
Freeman Robert - IL wrote:
Actually, I've seen the reverse be true. I've seen the work offshore be so
poor that more folks are brought in locally to correct the problems, yet the
offshore remain too because of contractual issues. Happened to me on at
least two different occations. You get
part of the problem is that very few people can write decent
specs - because in any creative process, and software
engineering is one, you only converge towards the result
through several iterations
Good point. If folks speaking the same language aren't communicating
well how much more of
Its quite unfair for DBAs to blame their job loss/fear of job loss to DBAs
in India or some other countries with cheaper labor.
And to say that "you get what you pay for" or insinuating that cheaper
labor means less quality...is definitely out of line...
some people are just better than
Philippe
You aren't providing many details on which to base some guesses.
However, your statement brand new disks implies that you are adding
additional partitions to an existing table. Then, your statement should I
drop indexes implies that you have indexes on the partitioned table,
possibly
Title: Re: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
Hi!
I've always wondered why 3 syncs. Is it quaranteed,
that after *exactly 3* syncs everything has been written to disk? Or it more
like that after that number of syncs, most of the changes should be on disk?
(sounds
21, 2003 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down
cleanly/cons
Id suggest throwing a couple ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT commands just
prior to the SHUTDOWN ABORT, to help speed up the subsequent STARTUP (and
just to make me feel better)...
Does anyone remember the UNIX
, August 21, 2003 12:05 PMTo:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: URGENT!!! My 9i
databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
Hi!
I've always wondered why 3 syncs. Is it
quaranteed, that after *exactly 3* syncs everything has been written to disk?
Or it more like
Mb (that right 2 MB!) system drives.
Now
back to Oracle stuff before Jared bears down on us :)
John
-Original
Message-From: Hemant K Chitale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:19 AMTo: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: URGENT!!!
PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:19 AM
*To:* Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
*Subject:* Re: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down
Habit. The sync command is picked up by the scheduler sched
and may not be executed immediately.
With three sync calls, at least
Title: Message
how
about if I send you $1,111,111.11 3 times.
-Original Message-From: Mladen Gogala
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 2:04
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down
Title: Message
Hey
Tom,
You
can send me $111 3 times and I'll be happy! ;o)
-Scott
Stefick
-Original Message-From: Mercadante,
Thomas F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August
21, 2003 1:40 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: URGENT!!! My
I will not object to anything. You can send me $1 and I'll gladly take it
ESC/HRIDD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday,
August 21, 2003 2:49 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting
down cleanly/cons
Hey
Tom,
You
can send me $111 3 times and I'll be happy! ;o)
-Scott Stefick
, August 21,
2003 3:24 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting
down cleanly/cons
Thanks for all the wonderful and interesting responses - esp. Tim
Gorman. I think that is what I needed. Sorry to resurface that old
issue again
: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting
down cleanly/cons
Thanks for all the wonderful and interesting responses - esp. Tim
Gorman. I think that is what I needed. Sorry to resurface that old
issue again. Mladen, you too? Did the nun
Um, yeah.
Mercadante, Thomas F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/21/2003 12:39 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down
cleanly/consUm,
yeah.
"Mercadante, Thomas F"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/21/2003 12:39 PM
Please respond t
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003
4:04 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down
cleanly/cons
Um, yeah. [Shrek]
sync
sync
sync
move
A couple of corrections are in order here. First, some Christians
might object to your characterizing the Holy Trinity, et. al. as
mythology. Second, I thought we became food for worms, not ants.
--- Mladen Gogala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a superstition. Whole christian mithology is
Paul Baumgartel wrote:
A couple of corrections are in order here. First, some Christians
might object to your characterizing the Holy Trinity, et. al. as
mythology.
I don't believe Andrei Rublev to be on this list.
--
Regards,
Stephane Faroult
Oriole Software
--
Please see the official
Oh, we're used to it. It's the predominant mythos of the current
society. Everybody gets their own opinion unitl either death or
judgment.
Allan
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:09 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
cleanly/cons
Paul Baumgartel wrote:
Wow--that one sent me scrambling to Google. Nice riposte!
--- Stephane Faroult [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Baumgartel wrote:
A couple of corrections are in order here. First, some Christians
might object to your characterizing the Holy Trinity, et. al. as
mythology.
I don't
Title: Re: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
I think the reasoning falls somewhere between the utterly rational and the insanely superstitious...
Ive known people who would keep repeating sync until their fingers started tripping over one another, so I tend to see
of syncs, most of the changes should be on disk? (sounds stupid)
Tanel.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Gorman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: URGENT!!! My 9i databases
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
There seems to be a problem with consistent shutdowns in 9i
Oracle 9i 64bit
9.0.1.3.0 - infrastructure database that comes with the application server
9.2.0.1.0
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
BTW,
nothing happening in terms of processes that would hang-up the system.
Also, I have check alert and trace files and there are no obvious errors.
-Original Message
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
We do, Paula... both in 9.0.1.3 and 9.2.0.2 we have trouble getting them
to shutdown elegantly... and they sometimes crash
April Wells Oracle DBA/Oracle Apps DBA Corporate Systems
Paula - Haven't noticed an issue. What command are you using to shut down?
SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE? Are you receiving an error message? Anything in
alert_log? Which Oracle version are you on? Most of my databases are
9.2.0.1.
Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
Which
brings up that thread of - if they are hard to shutdown and possibly going to
crash anyway then . why not just wait some period of time and do the old
shutdown abort
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
No
errors in the alert logs, no traces no ORA- but they don't shutdown cleanly
and so I don't get consistent backups (this is every once in awhile).
-Original Message
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
We have started waiting 90 min then do shutdown abort, startup, shutdown
immediate
April Wells Oracle DBA/Oracle Apps DBA Corporate Systems Amarillo Texas
Few people really enjoy
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i
databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
om
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
...wait...for...it...
-Original Message-From: Josh Collier
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003
12:50 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
Wait...and... wait... and w.a.i.t
In our case, a lot of the problemwas 'supposed' to be a bug fixed
in 9.2 (for a while it was EMN0 waking up... but now that error seems
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i
databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
om
the shutdown
is issued.
--Mladen GogalaOracle DBA
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of April
WellsSent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 2:09 PMTo:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i
databases
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
Any errors ?? what does alert log say?
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot
com All Views
Title: Re: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
Id suggest throwing a couple ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT commands just prior to the SHUTDOWN ABORT, to help speed up the subsequent STARTUP (and just to make me feel better)...
Does anyone remember the UNIX mantra of entering
Title: RE: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/consistently like they used to or starting up
What
exactly "goes wrong"?
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, August 20,
2003 9:25 AMTo: Multiple recipien
Title: Re: URGENT!!! My 9i databases are not shutting down cleanly/cons
sync,
sync sync always reminded me of Benny Goodman.
Henry
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Tim GormanSent:
Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:04 PMTo: Multiple
Luis:
We're patching like crazy, too. So far, none of our systems
has experienced any issues. We're running mostly 8 and 8i,
with a couple 9i machines in there too, on NT4 and Win2k.
Cheers,
Mike
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of
Thanks for your response.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Has anybody applied Windows2000-KB823980-x86-ENU on their boxes hosting the Database?
We are running 9i 9.0.1.1.1 on an Windows 2000 advanced server and our
Hi,
We've applied this on NT4 and W2K servers running 81745 with no Oracle issues.
However, have seen 1 anomaly after this patch:
nbtstat against a remote server no longer shows the logged on user name.
This may have been a security improvement by design.
Note you can still use the freeware
Luis,
Sorry for the delayed reply.
we installed the same patch on all our 8i/9i instances on win2k.
we have not faced any problem so far.
Regards,
Jp.
Has anybody applied Windows2000-KB823980-x86-ENU on their boxes hosting the Database?
We are running 9i 9.0.1.1.1 on an Windows 2000 advanced
lol OR SHOULD i HAVE SAID LOL!
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Thomas Day
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
Madhu,
Can you ping the host?
BTW, please use '!'s sparingly - I couldn't help but noticed that most of your message
carry a few. They should be used for emergencies not just attention grabbers.
Dennis
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of
check listener.ora and the hostname of the box for resoltution problems.
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Have you seen this before
15-AUG-2003 12:10:34 *
Madhu,
If you are sure you are starting all the listeners, not just the default
listener but named listeners as well (if any). I would look into the
HPUX error next. What is file or directory is it looking for? I would
examine the listener.ora closely and verify that the logging/tracing
Several possibilities:
The host you specified in listener.ora does not exist or your machine is
unable
to recognize it. That usually happens when hosts are known under many
nicknames
and, of course, the host recognizes only some of them.
You are trying to resolve the hostname by using a name
i always did like that about the internet, i can telnet to 127.0.0.1 on
ANY server and it knows my userid/passwd, total awesome.
joe
Mladen Gogala wrote:
Several possibilities:
The host you specified in listener.ora does not exist or your machine is
unable
to recognize it. That usually
Yeah, that host is always reachable. As for the telnet, I don't run that
thingy any more. It's ssh localhost, not telnet localhost. Telnet is
politically
incorect.
--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
-Original Message-
Testa
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 3:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of
very true and telnet service is usually disabled but localhost it just
doesn't have the confusion for the newbies as 127.0.0.1 does
joe
Mladen Gogala wrote:
Yeah, that host is always reachable. As for the telnet, I don't run that
thingy any more. It's ssh localhost, not telnet localhost.
-
From: Joe Testa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: URGENT !!! Listener Errors !!! ( HPUX Error: 2: No such
file
i always did like that about the internet, i can telnet to
127.0.0.1 on
ANY server
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: URGENT !!! Listener Errors !!! ( HPUX Error: 2: No such
file
i always did like that about the internet, i can telnet to
127.0.0.1 on
ANY server and it knows my userid/passwd, total
The only time I have seen this is when the server process could not be
started because the database shared segment did not exist or an
executable that was pointed to in the TNS entry actually did not exist.
HP-UX error 2 is file not found so I think you are looking at the later
case. It looks
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: URGENT: Trying to duplicate
database from cold backup - auxi
This
is the type of script I am using:
rman
EOFconnect target rman/[EMAIL PROTECTED]connect catalog
rman/[EMAIL PROTECTED]connect auxiliary sys/[EMAIL PROTECTED]run
{resync catalo
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: URGENT: Trying to duplicate database from cold backup -
auxi
Robert - What I've done over the years is tie the creation of test
databases
to backup verification. The old issue of how can you
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: URGENT: Trying to duplicate database from
cold
backup - auxi
Robert - What I've done over the years is tie the creation of test
databases
to backup
respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: URGENT: Trying to duplicate database from cold backup -
auxi
BTW, I just waited till afterhours brought the database down, copied
the file and cloned the easy way
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04,
2003 11:09 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: URGENT: Trying to duplicate database from cold
backup - auxi
This is the type of script I am using:
rman EOFconnect target
rman/[EMAIL PROTECTED]connect catalog
at approx 100 gigabytes
per hour.
Jared
DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/05/2003 02:59 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: URGENT: Trying to duplicate
Robert - What I've done over the years is tie the creation of test databases
to backup verification. The old issue of how can you trust your backups
unless you've done a recovery. It has seemed that I get a request to build a
test database at about the right interval to periodically verify the
PROTECTED]
08/05/2003 03:29 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: URGENT: Trying to duplicate database from
cold backup - auxi
Jared
Okay, I'll bite. What do you mean about
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
