Hi,
I think you're describing a real security hole. But I'm not sure how it's
exploited exactly. Let's say John Doe sets up his database on his desktop,
which is part of the production database network. He sees the hash value of
SYSTEM's password on production and sets the hash value for his own
You could use protocol.ora to specify which machines are
allowed to make a connection to the database.
In some environments this would be fairly painless.
SAP for example. The users do not connect to the database,
they connect to the app server. The number of machines
that legitimately require
I believe the point is not that you can create links to SYS or
SYSTEM accounts, but instead to application accounts, e.g. if I
created a link from my private database to the company's HR
database using a duplicated HR_MANAGER schema, I may be able to
access data that I otherwise should not
There's no reason I can see that he couldn't create the dblink first, and then reset
the password using the encrypted value. Alternately, the dblink could be created
using the DBMS_SYS_SQL package... no knowledge of the current password required.
create database link foo
-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: OEM permissions
Raj - Thanks for your reply. Were this a consultant, my reply would mirror
yours, and maybe not so diplomatically.
But basically I manage these databases on behalf of this manager, so
when
he asks for read-only
Hi, Raj,
9i doesn't allow a user with select any table privilege to view any object
owned by SYS. So the sys.link$ risk is gone. But select any dictionary, a new
privilege in 9i, allows that. In practice, I always grant select_catalog_role
to any developer, but refrain from granting select any
A possibly related question:
I'm curious if everyone allows your developers to see
V$SQL... views? If not, then ... whatever ... no
comment.
I'm disappointed with some perspectives in these
threads regarding developers. Rather than close doors,
why not use 'development' instances, and role based
recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: OEM permissions
A possibly related question:
I'm curious if everyone allows your developers to see
V$SQL... views? If not, then ... whatever ... no
comment.
I'm disappointed with some perspectives in these
threads regarding developers. Rather
Sure it does, just not by default. Check out the
07_DICTIONARY_ACCESSIBILITY parameter.
Enjoy!
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003
That's why we have scripts which give us a report every few days on users that have
db_links, any of the *_ANY_* privs (like alter any table), dba privs etc, also a list
of some sensitive schemas too.
Our application support needed to work with users to grant/revoke roles and private
synonyms.
Dennis,
select any table has to be a big no no ... anyone can select from sys.link$. But I
am still trying how OEM can be used for _development_?? what am I missing? As for
One of our groups hired a new consultant and he (claimed to have DBA background)
immediately shot off an email saying he
Wouldn't this allow viewing DBA_USERS?
I haven't tried this myself, but it seems that I could set up another oracle
instance, create a user identified by values, then create database link.
-Original Message-
We have a new manager that wants his group to use OEM for development
Raj - Thanks for your reply. Were this a consultant, my reply would mirror
yours, and maybe not so diplomatically.
But basically I manage these databases on behalf of this manager, so when
he asks for read-only access, I can't really refuse. And I think he is
pretty competent as a DBA. He says
Dennis,
I think you are probably ok with this. But the best way to do this is to
create an Oracle account, grant what he asks, and start OEM using that
account. Try and change things and see what happens. Then you will know
for sure what the impact is.
Good Luck!
Tom Mercadante
Oracle
I would say OEM for dbas only. To difficult to manage for developers.
Dangerous. Too much low level stuff for managers and developers to poke
around with.
OEM is not really a development tool.
2 cents
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Multiple
Raj, Thomas, Brad, Bill, anyone I forgot - I feel better about the situation
now. Thanks for letting me run this issue past you.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Ryan,
If your goal is to drop the user, then the following
should work:
SQL drop user OEM_RYAN-2LE36OFJCE_OEMREP cascade;
Alternatively, if you still want to connect to this
user, the following should work too:
SQL connect OEM_RYAN-2LE36OFJCE_OEMREP
Then when prompted for the password, type
S. Don't say that in front of
any of the Oracle boffins...
It's like a religion.
Cheers
Nuno Souto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:29 AM
Piece of junk. I'll stick with the scripts.
We use OEM 9.2.01 with 8.16.
Some of the features does not work but everything that
should work is working.
BTW - Anybody knows if the SQL tuner in OEM know about the
CASE already?
Yechiel AdarMehish
- Original Message -
From:
AK
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Last night I decided to give OEM another try.
Launched the configuration manager, installed the repository, so
far, so good.
Tried to discover a couple of nodes.
First tried rsysdevdb, a linux box with 8.1.7 and 9.2.0 on it.
Since there is no agent running there, I had the opportunity to
I am able to use OEM 9.2.0.1 against 8.0.4-8.0.6 and 8.1.6-8.1.7
databases.
Hemant
At 08:59 AM 20-08-03 -0800, you wrote:
Does OEM
9.2.0.1 works well with 8.1.7.4 database ? or in general with all
versions of databases (7.3,8.0,8i,9i ) ? Does it recognise underline db
version and sends
In my experience, OEM doesn't work well with any version.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/20/03 12:59PM
Does OEM 9.2.0.1 works well with 8.1.7.4 database ? or in general with all versions of
databases (7.3,8.0,8i,9i ) ? Does it recognise underline db version and sends commands
appropriately . Any Idea ?
Of
Jay Hostetter
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: OEM
In my experience, OEM doesn't work well with any version.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/20/03 12:59PM
Does OEM 9.2.0.1 works well with 8.1.7.4 database ? or in general
with all
This is a shot in the dark, but try and delete (or rename)
Oracle_Home\sysman\config\omsconfig.properties
At 10:14 PM 7/14/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Hi Listers,
I had OEM repository on my database installed on my PC.
Accidentally I dropped the database. Now I have recreated the database.
But an
Thanks Wolfgang,
The Solution provided by u was great and has worked.
Regards
Munish Bajaj
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 18:00
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
This is a shot in the dark, but try and delete (or rename)
It's still there. It's labeled as Show Tablespace Map in the second
section. Make sure that you have the Tablespace selected before you
right-click.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Tools - Tuning Pack - Tablespace Map
- Kirti
--- Gabriel Aragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm using the OEM 92010 with oracle 92 when I look
for the option SHOW TABLESPACE MAP I can't find it,
I remember using the OEM with 806 oracle DB and that
option was available choosing
Deshpande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: OEM tools
Tools - Tuning Pack - Tablespace Map
- Kirti
--- Gabriel Aragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm using the OEM 92010 with oracle 92 when I look
mmm I dont have the Tuning Pack option in my Tools
menu, I dont understand, it's supossed to be the last
version:
Oracle(R) Entrepise Manager
Version 9.2.0.1.0 Production
Copyright 1998,2002, Oracle Corporation
maybe a bad installation?
--- Kirtikumar Deshpande
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 05:08:12 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: OEM 9i - saving/copying reports between repositories
--0-745746833-1056773292=:94064
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
the files are stored in oem_webstage directory
you will have to copy these files
the files are stored in oem_webstage directory
you will have to copy these files to the other location and give the path.
As you must be knowing the oem reporting server should have the management server running on the same machine.
when you remove default reporting from the console it doesnt
Stephen Lee scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
No No. THOSE guys did replication. Then the worst of the bunch
worked in conjunction with the authors of graduate Math texts to come
up with Advanced Queuing.
somehow this makes me glad i work for cheap places that don't use any of
The old simple snapshot replication is OK. It's just that some of this
later stuff makes you think they rounded up all the guys who have tape on
their glasses and wear suspenders with their pants that are too short, gave
them a drug to put them in an *extra* geeky mood, gave them unlimited
Stephen Lee scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
The old simple snapshot replication is OK. It's just that some of
this later stuff makes you think they rounded up all the guys who
have tape on their glasses and wear suspenders with their pants that
are too short, gave them a drug to put
Title: Message
You
are correct about the chicken/egg problem with the repository. You don't
necessarily require a repository if you are using it as a management console
rather than an application managament framework.
I have
tried to automate various things with OEM jobs and events and
No No. THOSE guys did replication. Then the worst of the bunch worked in
conjunction with the authors of graduate Math texts to come up with Advanced
Queuing.
-Original Message-
I have tried to automate various things with OEM jobs and events and
eventually decided that at and dbms_job
You got it..
I use OEM in the stand-alone mode only, without the repository. However, not all
functionality is
available in this mode. But it will get you going to taste OEM ;)
- Kirti
--- Koivu, Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
OEM question
Hello all,
I'm
Title: OEM question
Lisa,
You can put the catalog in any database. I
have mine in a separate database right now and use rman to back it up. I
run it in archivelog mode of course. It takes less than a minute to back
itup, including the archivelogs. I used to have it with my rman
catalog but
Lisa,
Congrats on the flawless upgrade.
As I understand your statement about OEM you are correct. But you can
place the OEM repository on any old server, like the development one or
Linux and then run the OEM using it. Of course there is the issues of
licensing if you use your play station
When a OEM export job is created, the agent on the database server runs the exp
utility through a tcl script.
same for rman. on the database server you should find a rman.tcl file.
after executing the export job i run the following tcl commands through the same oem
export job.
file rename
John,
EM 4.0 is currently in beta and is available only to
customers who are part of the beta program.
Cheers,
Gaja
--- John Weatherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Is anyone aware of when OEM 4 will be available.
I've been looking around
on Metalink and can't seem to find anything
We got around it by dropping the natural and failover nodes from OEM,
modifying the oratab files to contain only the databases active the
node, bounce the dbsnmp agents, rediscover the nodes and change the
oratab files back to their original. The trick is in the discovery of
the services on that
How can Start of Collection of ALL (Multiple) Performance Reports be automated in OEM
9.2 , before a Transactions' Run ?
There Exist about 100 such Performance Reports in OEM .
Manually starting Collection of these individually in OEM takes too much effort
collection has to be started much
I have seen some folks record the performance data and then play it back in
OEM. I think it is there in the performance manager add in. Is that what
you want?
How different you expect this to be from STATSPACK?
Babu
Rich,
Was your sys schema accidentally analyzed? It may pay to drop stats on all
the sys objects using BOTH
(1) analyze
and (2) dbms_stats
HTH
Arup
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:03 AM
Hey all,
Thanks but there's no stats on those. As I said, the controlfile I/O is
what hits high, which would seem to indicate that v$datafile is the problem.
Thanks,
Rich
Rich JesseSystem/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA
It was actually released at Oracle World recently, and has a short paragraph
on page 11 of Oracle Magazine.
You can find the release here:
http://www.oracle.com/features/ow02/index.html?_ow_oem.html
And the new product page is already up here, with a few streaming demos:
Title: RE: OEM 4
And there will be one patch to match each of the original Mozart Symphonies too ...
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't
Title: RE: OEM 4
As
long as it's not Bartok.
Pat.
-Original Message-From: Jamadagni, Rajendra
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003
12:49 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
RE: OEM 4
And there will be one patch to match each
:
And they have an Instant PHB feature, too.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse, Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: OEM 4
Why isn't this press release on Oracle's sites? I also
wonder why
Why isn't this press release on Oracle's sites? I also wonder why there's
no info (even a lame Contact your salespersons) on how to actually obtain
the product.
The Manager-2-Go feature sounds useful. I wonder...
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL
I run this URL now and again, that's how I found the article:
http://www.newsnow.co.uk/newsfeed/?search=Oracle
Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
Systems Admin Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
And they have an Instant PHB feature, too.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse, Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: OEM 4
Why isn't this press release on Oracle's sites? I also
wonder why
More info needed.
But see if you can ping the mail server.
Make sure you are actually using the mail server you think you are and not
solaris's sendmail.
Try putting MS exchange host and IP in /etc/hosts
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Don wrote:
we are stumped.
We have installed OEM 9.2, the console,
What are the command-line tests that you have attempted ?
I presume that the mail or mailx command from the Solaris server IS able to send
you emails to your email address -- viz the SMTP mail forwarder is configured
correctly on your Unix server ?
Hemant
--- Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we
You need to log in as sysman/oem_temp through the gui. The userid/passwd
you defined are for the database, not the management server.
John P Weatherman
Database Administrator
Replacements Ltd.
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
I believe the OEM ca sets up the username/password of the owner of the
management server repository. That is the uname/password used to start the
management server. The username password you use to login to OEM defaults
to sysman/sysman. That should get you in, but do remember to change the
The username password you use to login to OEM defaults to sysman/sysman.
I just reread my response, and saw I botched the default password. The
password is actually oem_temp.
Steve McClure
-Original Message-
Sardina
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of
some rights has to granted to the user n for setting up the repository u
may need to modify ur register entry for the mgmt svr. check out the
installation notes to the set the values of key in the registry.
Regards,
Sathyanarayanan
|+
|| Mike
Did you ever discover the rogue instance? I would be interested in learning
why it wasn't being discovered.
Phil Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DBA, Operations Group
SkillSoft, Learning Solutions for the Human Enterprise
506.462.1124(w)
506.447.0334(c)
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday,
Not yet. I have found some interesting tidbits in metalink and
will get back to this. However, they have me in training this
week so I am not doing much research, just hitting the few
immediate fires I can during breaks. :(
I'll let you know if I find something though.
John P Weatherman
The instance should be listed in the oratab file, the listener.ora file and
the snmp_rw.ora file. It is automatically added to the snmp_ro.ora file at
agent start up.
Ensure that the Intelligent Agent is running. If any changes need to be
made to any of the previously mentioned files, stop and
this is why I gave up on OEM.
it sometimes discovers things and sometimes not. I just use Dba Studio now.
-Original Message-
[mailto:Reginald.W.Bailey;jpmorgan.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 5:14 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
The instance should be listed in the
Hmm, thanks to all who are replying. It looks like the instance is not
making
it into either snmp_rw.ora, snmp_ro.ora or the services.ora. I have
manually
edited them, but when I restart the agent, it wipes out the manual entries
in
the snmp_ro.ora and the services.ora.
The oratab and listener
John,
Try this
On the client node:
1. Make sure all instances are in oratab listener.ora.
2. Stop the agent.
3. rm $ORACLE_HOME/network/agent/*.q
4. rm $ORACLE_HOME/network/agent/services.ora
5. rm $ORACLE_HOME/network/admin/snmp_r*.ora
6. start the agent
7. Check the pertinent log files in
LOL, don't I hear THAT all the time!
-Original Message-
Thomas F
Sent: 18 October 2002 14:24
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
this is why I gave up on OEM.
it sometimes discovers things and sometimes not. I just use Dba Studio now.
-Original Message-
Is this UNIX or Windows?
Where is your oratab file located and what is your ORACLE_HOME directory?
The discovery process looks in your oratab (which can be located anywhere as
long as the ORATAB environment variable is defined) or the Windows registry
to locate all of the ORACLE_HOMEs that are in
Has this instance ever been successfully discovered before? I've found that
if I delete it from OEM it will then discover the database.
Mike
From: John Weatherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OEM can't
When you do a lsnrctl status is there anything different for the instance that isn't
discovered and the ones that are?
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hmm, thanks to all who are replying. It looks like the instance
Er, what I meant to say in my last email is to delete the node from OEM and
then rediscover all of the databases on it fresh.
Mike
From: John Weatherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OEM can't seem
Scrap OEM. Seriously, we ran into way too many of these little annoying problems. We
decided that we had better things to do with our time. Have you had to re-register all
of your jobs, yet? That one was a real pain.
Jay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/18/02 09:38AM
Hmm, thanks to all who are
I agree with Jay. Everytime I use OEM there are 10 or 20 annoying
little things that make it incredibly frustrating to use.
Jared mentioned a while back that the new product manager for OEM is on
this list. Maybe he could set up something (like a *big* mailbox) to
take suggestions for
Check the log files in the log directory. If the agent fails to log into
the instance, it will be in the log files. They are found at
$TNS_ADMIN/network/log.
The agent will always wipe out the snmp_ro.ora and services.ora files upon
restarting. It should include entries from oratab and the
Beth,
I heard that the new project manager is Gaja. We can expect a better
product from him and his team.
Ruth
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:54 AM
I agree with Jay. Everytime I use OEM there are 10
Gaja is the new project manager. some of the people also working on the
product are John Beresniewicz and (I believe) James Morle.
Should be a really good product when they are done with it
--- Ruth Gramolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beth,
I heard that the new project manager is Gaja. We
Gaja is not active on the list due to his new workload...
... but he receives 'oracle-l updates' whenever we talk ;)
- Kirti
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I agree with Jay. Everytime I use OEM there are 10 or
Are there entries in your oratab for this instance? After adding this
entry, if not there, recycle the IA and try again.
Phil Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DBA, Operations Group
SkillSoft, Learning Solutions for the Human Enterprise
506.462.1124(w)
506.447.0334(c)
-Original Message-
It is in the oratab. I have cycled several times
John P Weatherman
Database Administrator
Replacements Ltd.
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Are there entries in your oratab for this instance? After adding this
Title: RE: OEM can't seem to discover 1 instance
John I had the same issue recently where before the same instance
had been discovered. I had deleted the node after having removed
one instance from the server. Before it discovered all three and
now it discovers only one of two. Go figure. I
John;
At my last job (2 years ago, sorry for the lack of retention of memory)
there were files that were created in the (I believe) network/agent
directory. I think these were the .q files. We had an issue with OEM not
discovering an instance as well. Oracle told us to remove the files and
I believe that the instance needs to be in both the oratab and the
listener.ora files.
Mike
From: Kevin Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OEM can't seem to discover 1 instance
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13
Also, make sure your services.ora in the network/agent directory is correct.
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
John;
At my last job (2 years ago, sorry for the lack of retention of memory)
there were files that were
I believe that it needs to be in oratab, listener.ora, and services.ora
The services.ora is the one that gave me problems last week.
Tim Boles
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:10 PM
Anybody seen
it takes sometime to download the
jinitiator
-Original Message-From: Jeffrey Beckstrom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: quarta-feira, 16 de Outubro de
2002 20:40To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: oem 9.2.x - thin client
Anybody get the web client to work.
But the
one on the error log does not match the version on the
server. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/16/02 4:09:59 PM
it takes sometime to download the
jinitiator
-Original Message-From: Jeffrey Beckstrom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: quarta-feira, 16 de Outubro de
2002 20:40To:
Then you must configure formsweb.cfg in C:\orant\FORMS60\server to use
jinitiator 1.1.8.18 instead of 1.1.8.16
hth
Günter
Jeffrey Beckstrom wrote:
But the one on the error log does not match the version on the server.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/16/02 4:09:59 PM
it takes sometime to
Rahul -
What error messages are you getting??
I had similar problems a while back w/ OEM 2.2, but followed the steps
laid out in Oracle Enterprise Manager 101 (Oracle Press), and it worked
like a champ.
Brian
--
| Brian McGraw /* DBA */ Infinity
What browser are you using? Perhaps you need to turn on Java/JS/cookies?
Just a thought...never had a problem with it myself on v3.
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA
-Original
Hi Patrice,
We usually find that a pretty acceptable monitoring period (for background
alerting etc.) is around a minute for most collections anyway. This of
course depends on the stats you are collecting as well though (if monitoring
for space bound objects you don't want to set this off every
I have used Change Management Pack. It helps manage changes when you need
to capture them , especially when moving from Development, to
Certification/UAT and Production. It can reverse engineer existing
databases and schemas, but it does not put the files in a usable format.
The files are in a
Kawatra V (Vikas) at Aera wrote:
Is there a
No.
--
Regards,
Stephane Faroult
Oriole Software
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Stephane Faroult
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/23/2002 08:58 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: OEM changes
not often... but there were at least 8 or 10 people there who were DBAs
/2002 08:58 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: OEM changes
not often... but there were at least 8 or 10 people there who were
DBAs
and this party was the thank goodness the darned
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/23/2002 08:58 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: OEM changes
not often... but there were at least 8 or 10 people there who were DBAs
and this party was the thank
Now please, please tell me you don't REALLY talk about this geeky stuff at parties!
Jim
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:53 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Wish I could. This was at a party, and the person speaking was an
Oracle employee. We were
not often... but there were at least 8 or 10 people there who were DBAs
and this party was the thank goodness the darned book is done party
so we started talking about writing books and someone said something
about OEM 101 and
I'm usually the one at the party saying (screaming?) NO MORE
Wish I could. This was at a party, and the person speaking was an
Oracle employee. We were talking/ranting about how often Oracle changes
things and he mentioned that OEM was changing AGAIN. That's all he said
Rachel
--- Boivin, Patrice J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rachel,
Could you shed any
Cherie,
I summarised the ports used by Oracle for our Network support specialist and have
copied it below:
Metalink note 69511.1 refers to SNMP and the Oracle agent - hopefully that document or
some of the others listed can help you out.
Oracle TCP IP Ports - for future reference
Oracle
It comes with EE and starting with 8.1.x it includes the diagnostic packs.
Ruth
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 5:00 PM
I think basic functionality of OEM comes with either EE or SE database
purchase; I've
Ruth - I agree that Oracle ships the optional packs with OEM. But we were
told by the sales rep that these were extra-pay options. I checked the
Oracle store at
http://oraclestore.oracle.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=10189
For the Diagnostics Pack, it offers the following prices:
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
