p members will be
>>> >> able to choose which theme(s) they want to
>>> >> refine (or not) in a series of sprints with
>>> >> sprint reviews. The same setup with key
>>
_
>> >>
>> >> When the mind is quiet, the sun of your heart will
>> >> shine once again, and you will be free of problems.
>> >> - Robert Adams <http://www.robert-adams.info/>
>> >>
>> >&
am
> >> wondering what the purpose/expected outcome is
> >> for this development process and also there
> >> must be no more than 3 O’s? I understand they
> >>
ill:* World wide Open Space Technology email
list mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>>
*Kopia:* Jake Yeager mailto:jacob.yea...@gmail.com>>
*Ämne:* [OSList] From Open Space to obje
;>to refine (or not) in a series of sprints with sprint reviews. The same
>>>>>setup with key results.
>>>>>
>>>>> Learning as I go as we all do. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Much love,
>>>>> Jake
>>>>&g
>>>> When the mind is quiet, the sun of your heart will shine once again,
>>>> and you will be free of problems.
>>>> - Robert Adams <http://www.robert-adams.info/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:14 PM Thomas Herr
adams.info/>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:14 PM Thomas Herrmann <
>>> tho...@openspaceconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Jake
>>>>
>>>> I don’t fully understand, of course, but am wondering what the
>>>&g
d.
>
> Good night from Sweden
>
> Thomas Herrmann
>
>
>
> Från: OSList <mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org>> För Jake Yeager via OSList
> Skickat: den 5 februari 2020 00:57
> Till: World wide Open Space Technology email list
> mailto:oslist@
rmann <
>>> tho...@openspaceconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Jake
>>>>
>>>> I don’t fully understand, of course, but am wondering what the
>>>> purpose/expected outcome is for this development process and also there
>>
s Herrmann
> >
> > *Från:* OSList *För *Jake
> > Yeager via OSList
> > *Skickat:* den 5 februari 2020 00:57
> > *Till:* World wide Open Space Technology email list
> >
> > *Kopia:* Jake Yeager
> > *Ämne:* [OSList] From Open Space to objectives
process and also there
>>> must be no more than 3 O’s? I understand they are not yet defined, but
>>> should be identified/agreed on in the OST?
>>>
>>> My experience from similar situations is that it is not that well
>>> thought through or that the o
hat well thought
>> through or that the opportunities at hand if choosing to use OST are not
>> fully understood.
>>
>> Good night from Sweden
>>
>> Thomas Herrmann
>>
>>
>>
>> *Från:* OSList *För *Jake
>> Yeager via OSList
&g
er
> via OSList
> *Skickat:* den 5 februari 2020 00:57
> *Till:* World wide Open Space Technology email list <
> oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
> *Kopia:* Jake Yeager
> *Ämne:* [OSList] From Open Space to objectives and key results (OKRs)?
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
&
ann
*Från:* OSList *För *Jake
Yeager via OSList
*Skickat:* den 5 februari 2020 00:57
*Till:* World wide Open Space Technology email list
*Kopia:* Jake Yeager
*Ämne:* [OSList] From Open Space to objectives and key results (OKRs)?
Hi folks,
Anyone have experience using Open Space to de
i 2020 00:57
> *Till:* World wide Open Space Technology email list <
> oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
> *Kopia:* Jake Yeager
> *Ämne:* [OSList] From Open Space to objectives and key results (OKRs)?
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> Anyone have experience using Open Space
list
Kopia: Jake Yeager
Ämne: [OSList] From Open Space to objectives and key results (OKRs)?
Hi folks,
Anyone have experience using Open Space to develop OKRs with a group?
I am facilitating an Open Space event in late February. I plan to use the 25/10
Crowdsourcing method
Worth noting, too, that everything Chris is suggesting moves the group
forward and deeper into open space, supporting their continuing work in
that way. Finishing OS with designed/selected liberating structures, on
the other hand, seems to imply that they're not able to take the work
forward
Building on this:
In the past when a sponsor has been clear about content areas but hasn’t
specified what can be discussed within them we did the following:
1. Make sure you have lots of people there, because diversity of experience and
ideas is helpful.
2. Have the sponsor outline the
yes to what's already been said. and... it sounds like the OS part is
already happening, and you're asking about how to get from there to the
sponsor's three objectives. if that's the question, i'd suggest it's
simply two open spaces (perhaps loosely defined).
the first OS runs as usual and
The sponsor must be quite clear as to the level of delegation they are willing
to give to the participants. Then as Rolf says, you must choose if Open Space
technology is the correct process. You may operate out of an Open Space mind
set!
Under promise and over deliver. Never try to
Hi Jake:
Given the amount of control desired by the sponsor, and your playing
with Liberating Structures , are you sure that Open Space is the most
appropriate format for the desired outcome? I might be wrong: it looks
like a regular workshop, designed around a suitable LS string, might
work
Hi folks,
Anyone have experience using Open Space to develop OKRs with a group?
I am facilitating an Open Space event in late February. I plan to use the
25/10 Crowdsourcing method to prioritize draft objectives (O's) and then
1-2-4-All to develop the key results (KR's) for each objective.
The
22 matches
Mail list logo
