> On 12/21/22 15:59, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> >> On 16 Sep 2022, at 12:12, Cian Ferriter wrote:
> >>
> >>> A typical NVGRE encapsulated packet starts with the ETH/IP/GRE
> >>> protocols. Miniflow extract will parse just the ETH and IP headers. The
>
> On 16 Sep 2022, at 12:12, Cian Ferriter wrote:
>
> > A typical NVGRE encapsulated packet starts with the ETH/IP/GRE
> > protocols. Miniflow extract will parse just the ETH and IP headers. The
> > GRE header will be processed later as part of the pop action. Add
> > support for parsing the
> On 16 Sep 2022, at 12:12, Cian Ferriter wrote:
>
> > The subtable signatures being specialized here were found in an NVGRE
> > tunnel scenario.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cian Ferriter
> > ---
>
> Sorry for the late response, but I was rather busy.
> Changes look good to me, and did basic testing
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev On Behalf Of Eelco Chaudron
> > Sent: Wednesday 14 December 2022 11:17
> > To: Finn, Emma
> > Cc: d...@openvswitch.org; i.maxim...@ovn.org
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [v8] odp-execute: Add ISA implementation of
> set_masked
> > IPv6 action
> >
> >
> >
> > > > On 12/5/22 22:31, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > > > > This commit add support to for DPDK v22.11.1, it includes the
> > > > > following changes.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. ci: Reduce DPDK compilation time.
> > > > > 2. system-dpdk: Update vhost tests to be compatible with DPDK 22.07.
> > > > >
> > > >
> On 12/5/22 22:31, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > This commit add support to for DPDK v22.11.1, it includes the following
> > changes.
> >
> > 1. ci: Reduce DPDK compilation time.
> > 2. system-dpdk: Update vhost tests to be compatible with DPDK 22.07.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:24 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Frode, do you know the approximate timeline on when we could expect
> >>>
> >>> As explained above, without landing this ... never :-)
> >>> But speaking of timeline - we'd prefer to get this resolved for
> >>> Debian/Ubuntu before
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:32 PM Ian Stokes wrote:
> >
> > This commit add support to for DPDK v22.11, it includes the following
> > changes.
> >
> > 1. ci: Reduce DPDK compilation time.
> > 2. system-dpdk: Update vhost tests to be compatible with DPDK 22.07.
> >
> >
> Hi Ian,
>
> Cc: Thomas and John
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:52 PM Ian Stokes wrote:
> > diff --git a/.ci/linux-build.sh b/.ci/linux-build.sh
> > index 23c8bbb7a..0aa90e55e 100755
> > --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh
> > +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh
> > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ function install_dpdk()
> >
: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2] dpdk: Update to use v22.11.
>
> On 11/23/22 12:52, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > This commit add support to for DPDK v22.11, it includes the following
> > changes.
> >
> > 1. ci: Reduce DPDK compilation time.
> > 2. system-dpdk: Update vhost tests to be compatible with DPDK
> The current version of meson used for building DPDK is 0.49.2.
>
> This has the restriction of holding the required python version to 3.9.
>
> A recent change [1] in DPDK bumped requirements on meson to 0.53.2.
>
> Update the version of meson used to build DPDK to 0.53.2 to remove the
>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 1:16 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/3/22 13:11, David Marchand wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:51 PM Ilya Maximets
> > wrote:
> > > >> Can we bump meson to that new version on all branches?
> > > >
> > > > I would not expect an issue, but I did not test
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 1:16 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > On 11/3/22 13:11, David Marchand wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:51 PM Ilya Maximets
> wrote:
> > >> Can we bump meson to that new version on all branches?
> > >
> > > I would not expect an issue, but I did not test it.
> > >
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Ian Stokes wrote:
> >
> > A recent change [1] in DPDK bumped requirements on meson to 0.53.2.
> >
> > [1] https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=909ad7b80e5e
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
>
> Now that rc2 is out, I was about to resend my dpdk-latest series
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stokes, Ian
> > Sent: Monday 3 October 2022 18:12
> > To: Phelan, Michael ; d...@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: ktray...@redhat.com; i.maxim...@ovn.org;
> > maxime.coque...@redhat.com
> > Subject: RE: [branc
> Update OVS CLI and relevant documentation to use DPDK 21.11.2.
>
> DPDK 21.11.2 contains fixes for the CVEs listed below:
> CVE-2022-28199 [1]
> CVE-2022-2132 [2]
>
> A bug was introduced in DPDK 21.11.1 by the commit 01e3dee29c02 ("vhost: fix
> unsafe vring addresses modifications").
> This
> On 22/09/2022 15:51, Michael Phelan wrote:
> > Update OVS CLI and relevant documentation to use DPDK 19.11.13.
> >
> > DPDK 19.11.13 contains fixes for the CVEs listed below:
> > CVE-2022-28199 [1]
> > CVE-2022-2132 [2]
> >
> > A bug was introduced in DPDK 19.11.12 by the commit 1e68fe334ff0
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 11:43 AM
> To: Phelan, Michael ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; i.maxim...@ovn.org;
> maxime.coque...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [branch-2.14] dpdk: Use DPDK 19.11.13 release.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 11:43 AM
> To: Phelan, Michael ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; i.maxim...@ovn.org;
> maxime.coque...@redhat.com; david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [branch-2.16, v3] d
> On 29/09/2022 18:00, Michael Phelan wrote:
> > Update OVS CLI and relevant documentation to use DPDK 20.11.6.
> >
> > A bug was introduced in DPDK 20.11.5 by the commit
> > 33f2e3756186 ("vhost: fix unsafe vring addresses modifications").
> > This bug can cause a deadlock when vIOMMU is enabled
> This series is a rebase of dpdk-latest branch on top of commit
> 5046f2e35f62 ("sset, smap, hmapx: Reserve hash map space while cloning.").
>
> This rebase needed some additional work:
> - added Debian packaging jobs in GHA are irrelevant to this branch, and
> had to be disabled,
> - recent
> > On 8/25/22 14:52, David Marchand wrote:
> > > Debian packaging target builds OVS against a packaged DPDK version.
> > > As a result, it is not relevant in the dpdk-latest branch which follows
> > > DPDK development branch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand
> > > ---
> > >
> Ilya Maximets (3):
> releases: Mark 2.17 as a new LTS release.
> Set release date for 3.0.0.
> Prepare for 3.0.1.
>
> Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 2 +-
> NEWS | 5 -
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 8 +++-
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Cian
> > > Ferriter
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 4:07 PM
> > > > To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> > > > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] acinclude: Improve vpopcntdq build check.
> > > >
> > > > Support for vpopcntdq instruction
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev On Behalf Of Cian
> Ferriter
> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 4:07 PM
> > To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] acinclude: Improve vpopcntdq build check.
> >
> > Support for vpopcntdq instruction generation by the compiler was
>
> > > The preprocessor comparison string to check AVX512 capabilities are
> > > lengthy and effecting user readability. Simpify this by aliasing the
> > checks.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Eelco Chaudron
> > > Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G
> > >
> > > ---
> > > v2: rebase on master, added alias for
> The DPDK commit [1] improves the socket layer logs in the vhost library
> to ease log filtering and debugging.
> Update the system-dpdk vhost tests to reflect this change.
>
> [1] c85c35b1d447 ("vhost: improve socket layer logs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G
>
Thanks for the patch Sunil,
> On 7/15/22 20:33, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > On 7/15/22 20:24, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> >>> Looks like new MTU tests are unstable.
> >>> Ian, Michael, could you, please, check?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> >>
> >>
> Looks like new MTU tests are unstable.
> Ian, Michael, could you, please, check?
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
Hey Ilya,
Let me take a look at this, it passed our internal CI so not sure why it's
failed externally, worst case I can revert this as it was really just a nice to
have, if
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G
Thanks Sunil, this patch seems fairy straight forward (fixing typo and
capitalizing comments), I've merged this to master.
Thanks
Ian
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
> Hey! It's been about 9 years since the last major version change.
> And there were lots of large and important changes in OVS in that
> long time frame. Nevertheless, removal of the kernel datapath
> sources from the OVS's git tree seems like a notable enough point
> in time to mark it with a
> This adds 8 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
> test Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G
> Co-authored-by: Sunil Pai G
Thanks for the re-work on this, as discussed at the community call this week,
> This adds 4 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
> test Quality of Service (QoS) functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
>
Thanks for the re-work on this, as discussed at the community call this week,
this patch seems to be low risk and expands our unit tests for
> This patchset introduces actions infrastructure changes which allows
> the user to choose between different action implementations based on
> CPU ISA by using different commands. The infrastructure also
> provides a way to check the correctness of the ISA optimized action
> version against the
> Hey Sunil,
> Thanks for the comments, I've left some responses inline. Let me know
> what you think.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pai G, Sunil
> > Sent: Wednesday 13 July 2022 14:51
> > To: Phelan, Michael ; d...@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com;
> This patchset optimizes for two cases when using shared mempools.
>
> If there are ports with different MTUs, that usually leads
> to multiple shared mempools being created because mempool
> mbuf size and hence creation is based from MTU.
>
> In fact, a port with a smaller MTU could share a
> > Any response to these queries? I’m uncomfortable TBH with this feature
> going in to 2.18 unless these are addressed/resolved. From an Intel
> perspective we’re more than happy to test and review but there are
> genuine issues to be discussed I feel below before merge.
>
> I tend to agree
nk this is
safe enough.
Thanks
Ian.
> Regards
> Amber
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Phelan, Michael
> > > Sent: Monday 11 July 2022 14:49
> > > To: d...@openvswitch.org
> > > Cc: Stokes, Ian ; acon...@redhat.com;
: Amber, Kumar
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 10:52 AM
To: f...@sysclose.org; m...@redhat.com; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Cc: Ilya Maximets ; Van Haaren, Harry
; Stokes, Ian
Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/14] Rename flags with CKSUM to CSUM
Hi Flavio, Mike,
I did have a quick look over the patch-set
> Make the simple match functions used during lookup non-static to allow
> reuse of these functions in the AVX512 DPIF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cian Ferriter
> Tested-by: Harry van Haaren
>
Thanks for the patch series Cian, given that this was discussed at the
community call for exception I've
> Currently mempools for vhost are being assigned before the vhost device
> is added. In some cases this may be just reusing an existing mempool but
> in others it can require creation of a mempool.
>
> For multi-NUMA, the NUMA info of the vhost port is not known until a
> device is added to the
> The patchset introuduces IPv6 optimized MFEX profiles
> with AVX512 which can deliver upto 20% to 30% gain in
> performance over the existing scalar data-path.
>
> Hashing Optimization are also included which can further
> improve performance by approximately 10%.
>
> The patch also removes
> >> Without running set command first the string matching
> >> fails on get command beacuse DPCLS prio value is different
> >> for different default builds like with --enable-autovalidator
> >> build auto-validator prio is set to 255 and if the build
> >> is a scalar than generic value is default
> Without running set command first the string matching
> fails on get command beacuse DPCLS prio value is different
> for different default builds like with --enable-autovalidator
> build auto-validator prio is set to 255 and if the build
> is a scalar than generic value is default 255.
>
> The
> The mfex pcap generation script is improved for varied length
> traffic and also removes the hard coded mfex_pcap and instead uses
> the script itself to generate complex traffic patterns for testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Amber
> Acked-by: Cian Ferriter
Thanks Amber/Cian & Eelco for the
> From: Seamus Ryan
>
> This adds 4 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
> test rate limiting functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seamus Ryan
> Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
> Co-authored-by: Michael Phelan
>
Thanks for the patch Michael.
>From what I can se all comments
> -Original Message-
> From: Phelan, Michael
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 11:19 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; acon...@redhat.com;
> i.maxim...@ovn.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Phelan, Michael
>
> Subject: [PATCH] tests: Add
> -Original Message-
> From: Phelan, Michael
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 11:21 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; acon...@redhat.com;
> i.maxim...@ovn.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Phelan, Michael
>
> Subject: [PATCH] tests: Add
> This adds 4 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
> test rate limiting functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seamus Ryan
> Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
> Co-authored-by: Michael Phelan
>
> ---
> v3:
> - Removed NEWS entry.
> - Added check to catch error if policer fails to
> On 01/06/2022 14:30, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:11 PM Kevin Traynor
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently mempools for vhost are being assigned before the vhost
> device
> >> is added. In some cases this may be just reusing an existing mempool
> but
> >> in others it can
> On 25 May 2022, at 16:35, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>
> >> This commit reverts the name-change that was done (prio->info).
> >> The change breaks a user visible ovs-appctl command, resulting in
> >> breakage of tools/scripts/user-expectation outside of the OVS
> This commit reverts the name-change that was done (prio->info).
> The change breaks a user visible ovs-appctl command, resulting in
> breakage of tools/scripts/user-expectation outside of the OVS repo.
>
> This commit changes the documentation, command string, and unit tests
> back to the
> Modified the dplcs info-get command output to include
> the count for different dpcls implementations.
>
> $ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/subtable-lookup-info-get
>
> Available dpcls implementations:
> autovalidator (Use count: 1, Priority: 5)
> generic (Use count: 0, Priority: 1)
>
> > Hi Ilya,
> >
> > Please find my replies inline.
>
> Hi all, this patch seems to have hit a wall, I can see there is a v6 that
> came after
> this that has been acked:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20220329101724.3148
> 572-1-kumar.am...@intel.com/
>
> I would like
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Please find my replies inline.
Hi all, this patch seems to have hit a wall, I can see there is a v6 that came
after this that has been acked:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20220329101724.3148572-1-kumar.am...@intel.com/
I would like to see this work go
> >> I'm not sure if we need a NEWS entry for this change as it's
> >> only sort of user-visible. In any case, the current version
> >> of the NEWS entry isn't really informative as it's unclear
> >> for someone, who doesn't know the code, what does it mean.
> >> Even from the developer's point
> > Thanks for the review David, much appreciated.
> >
> > @Ilya Maximets are there any other blockers at this point on this series? I
> > think
> this is good to go from my side also but wanted to check with yourself if
> outstanding issues you've flagged are resolved?
>
> The code changes
> Hello Kumar,
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:13 PM Kumar Amber
> wrote:
> >
> > For packets which don't already have a hash calculated,
> > miniflow_hash_5tuple() calculates the hash of a packet
> > using the previously built miniflow.
> >
> > This commit adds IPv4 profile specific hashing which
> > > > From: Seamus Ryan
> > > >
> > > > This adds 4 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
> > > > test rate limiting functionality.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch Michael, a few comments below.
> > >
> > > I'm still conducting some testing so may have some follow up
> > From: Seamus Ryan
> >
> > This adds 4 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
> > test rate limiting functionality.
> >
>
> Thanks for the patch Michael, a few comments below.
>
> I'm still conducting some testing so may have some follow up comments for full
> review.
Hi
> From: Seamus Ryan
>
> This adds 4 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
> test rate limiting functionality.
>
Thanks for the patch Michael, a few comments below.
I'm still conducting some testing so may have some follow up comments for full
review.
> Signed-off-by: Seamus
> Ilya Maximets (2):
> Set release date for 2.17.1.
> Prepare for 2.17.2.
>
> NEWS | 6 +-
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 8 +++-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Acked-by: Ian Stokes
> Ilya Maximets (2):
> Set release date for 2.16.3.
> Prepare for 2.16.4.
>
> NEWS | 6 +-
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 8 +++-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Acked-by: Ian Stokes
> Ilya Maximets (2):
> Set release date for 2.15.4.
> Prepare for 2.15.5.
>
> NEWS | 6 +-
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 8 +++-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Acked-by: Ian Stokes
> Ilya Maximets (2):
> Set release date for 2.13.7.
> Prepare for 2.13.8.
>
> NEWS | 6 +-
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 8 +++-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Acked-by: Ian Stokes
> Ilya Maximets (2):
> Set release date for 2.14.5.
> Prepare for 2.14.6.
>
> NEWS | 6 +-
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 8 +++-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Acked-by: Ian Stokes
> For packets which don't already have a hash calculated,
> miniflow_hash_5tuple() calculates the hash of a packet
> using the previously built miniflow.
>
> This commit adds IPv4 profile specific hashing which
> uses fixed offsets into the packet to improve hashing
> performance.
>
>
> The mfex pcap generation script is improved for varied length
> traffic and also removes the hard coded mfex_pcap and instead uses
> the script itself to generate complex traffic patterns for testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Amber
>
So in general I think this approach is a bit more
> This patch avoids calculating the software hash of the packet again
> if the optimized miniflow-extract hit. In cases of scalar miniflow
> extract, the normal hashing calculation is performed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Amber
Thanks for looking at this, seems straight forward enough. Think this
> -Original Message-
> From: Amber, Kumar
> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 12:24 PM
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; echau...@redhat.com; Ferriter, Cian
> ; f...@sysclose.org; Van Haaren, Harry
> ; Amber, Kumar
> Subject: [PATCH v8 1/4] dpif-netde
> This patch adds the scalar hash calls to the autovalidator.
> It also adds checks for comparing the scalar hash against
> the profile based hash calculated as part of AVX512 MFEX implementations.
>
> The per profile AVX512 optimized hash was added to the autovalidator
> in the last commit. The
Hi All,
This meeting is a follow up to the call earlier this week.
This week Sunil presented 3 different approaches to integrating DMA-Dev with
OVS along with the performance impacts.
Hi All,
The goal of this meeting is to ensure that all of DPDK DMA-dev library, DPDK
Vhost library (consuming DMA-dev for acceleration) and OVS (as an end user of
the DPDK DMA & VHost libraries) are working well together; and that the
maintainers & contributors to those libraries are aware of
> 15/03/2022 12:14, Stokes, Ian:
> > > 15/03/2022 11:27, Stokes, Ian:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > We'd like to put a public meeting in place for the stakeholders
> > > > of DPDK and OVS to discuss the next steps and design
Hi All,
We'd like to put a public meeting in place for the stakeholders of DPDK and OVS
to discuss the next steps and design of the DMA-DEV library along with its
integration in OVS.
There are a few different time zones involved so trying to find a best fit.
Currently the suggestion is 2PM
Hi All,
We'd like to put a public meeting in place for the stakeholders of DPDK and OVS
to discuss the next steps and design of the DSA library along with its
integration in OVS.
There are a few different time zones involved so trying to find a best fit.
Currently the suggestion is 2PM
> 15/03/2022 11:27, Stokes, Ian:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We'd like to put a public meeting in place for the stakeholders
> > of DPDK and OVS to discuss the next steps and design of
> > the DSA library along with its integration in OVS.
>
> There is no DSA
Hi All,
We'd like to put a public meeting in place for the stakeholders of DPDK and OVS
to discuss the next steps and design of the DSA library along with its
integration in OVS.
There are a few different time zones involved so trying to find a best fit.
Currently the suggestion is 2PM
> On 04/03/2022 10:12, Suneetha Kalahasthi wrote:
> > FAQ is updated to reflect the latest DPDK for OVS branch 2.15 and 2.16
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suneetha Kalahasthi
> > ---
> > Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> >> Thanks for the patch, in general this looks ok to me, but I realize Ilya
> >> had a
> few comments on the v1. I think these are addressed here but maybe Ilya would
> like to confirm before sign off?
> >
> > Thanks, Ian.
> > I'll take a look at this patch tomorrow.
> >
> >>
> >> @Ilya
> The subtable search function can be used at any time by a PMD thread.
> Setting the subtable search function should be done atomically to
> prevent garbage data from being read.
>
> A dpcls_subtable_lookup_reprobe() call can happen at the same time that
> DPCLS subtables are being sorted. This
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev On Behalf Of Kumar Amber
> > Sent: Wednesday 9 February 2022 09:50
> > To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: Amber, Kumar ; david.march...@redhat.com
> > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] system-dpdk.at: Add warning log in mfex fuzzy
> test.
> >
> > Some
> On 08/02/2022 12:52, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 5:24 PM Kevin Traynor
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This patch updates OVS to use DPDK RTE_ETH namespaces.
> >>>
> >>> DPDK commit 295968d17407 ("ethdev: add namesp
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 5:24 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
> >
> > This patch updates OVS to use DPDK RTE_ETH namespaces.
> >
> > DPDK commit 295968d17407 ("ethdev: add namespace") [0] added RTE_ETH
> > namespaces for ethdev enums and macros in DPDK 21.11.
> >
> > As compatibility for the older names
> -Original Message-
> From: Van Haaren, Harry
> Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:17 AM
> To: Eelco Chaudron ; Amber, Kumar
>
> Cc: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; Ferriter, Cian ; Stokes,
> Ian ; i.maxim...@ovn.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dpif-netdev: fix vlan an
> > On 2/2/22 13:57, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > >>> -Original Message-
> > >>> From: Ferriter, Cian
> > >>> Sent: Friday 28 January 2022 16:32
> > >>> To: William Tu ; d...@openvswitch.org
> > >>> Subject: R
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ferriter, Cian
> > Sent: Friday 28 January 2022 16:32
> > To: William Tu ; d...@openvswitch.org
> > Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] acinclude: Detect avx512 vpopcntdq compiler
> support.
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: dev On Behalf Of
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Marchand
> > Sent: Wednesday 19 January 2022 17:26
> > To: d...@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: Stokes, Ian ; Phelan, Michael
> ; Ferriter, Cian
> > ; i.maxim...@ovn.org; ktray...@redhat.com
> > Subject: [PATCH] s
> From: Kumar Amber
>
> This patch adds error checking of packet hashes to the mfex
> autovalidator infrastructure, ensuring that hashes calculated by
> optimized mfex implementations is identical to the scalar code.
>
> This patch avoids calculating the software hash of the packet again
> if
> This commit adds the AVX512 implementation of the push_vlan action.
> The implementation here is auto-validated by the miniflow
> extract autovalidator, hence its correctness can be easily
> tested and verified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emma Finn
Hi Emma, thanks for the patch.
I think given the
> This commit adds the AVX512 implementation of the pop_vlan action.
> The implementation here is auto-validated by the miniflow
> extract autovalidator, hence its correctness can be easily
> tested and verified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emma Finn
Hi Emma, some comments below.
> ---
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Finn, Emma
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 9:43 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org; Van Haaren, Harry ;
> Amber, Kumar ; Stokes, Ian ;
> i.maxim...@ovn.org
> Cc: Finn, Emma
> Subject: [PATCH v5 6/8] odp-execute: Add ISA i
> This commit adds a new command to allow the user to switch
> the active action implementation at runtime. A probe function
> is executed before switching the implementation, to ensure
> the CPU is capable of running the ISA required.
>
> Usage:
> $ ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/action-impl-set
> This commit introduced the auto-validation function which
> allows users to compare the batch of packets obtained from
> different action implementations against the linear
> action implementation.
>
> The autovalidator function can be triggered at runtime using the
> following command:
>
> $
> -Original Message-
> From: Finn, Emma
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 9:43 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org; Van Haaren, Harry ;
> Amber, Kumar ; Stokes, Ian ;
> i.maxim...@ovn.org
> Cc: Finn, Emma
> Subject: [PATCH v5 2/8] odp-execute: Add function poi
> -Original Message-
> From: Finn, Emma
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 9:43 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org; Van Haaren, Harry ;
> Amber, Kumar ; Stokes, Ian ;
> i.maxim...@ovn.org
> Cc: Finn, Emma
> Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] odp-execute: Add function
> On 12/15/21 16:13, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> >> From: Rosemarie O'Riorden
> >>
> >> If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
> >> to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
> >> structures. OVS doesn't
> From: Rosemarie O'Riorden
>
> If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
> to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
> structures. OVS doesn't work in multi-process mode, so there is no need
> to litter a filesystem.
>
> Reported-at:
> On 09/12/2021 15:21, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > This commit adds support for DPDK v21.11, it includes the following
> > changes.
> >
> > 1. ci: Install python elftools for DPDK 21.02.
> > 2. ci: Update meson requirement for DPDK 21.05.
> > 3. netdev-dpdk: Fix build with 21.05.
> > 4. ci: Compile DPDK
> On 12/9/21 16:24, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 1:27 PM Ian Stokes wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This commit adds support for DPDK v21.11, it includes the following
> >>> changes.
> >>>
> >>> 1. ci: Install python
1 - 100 of 969 matches
Mail list logo
