Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Justine Caines
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff Dear Sue and all What an amazing thread!! Choice is the key. The choices that are respected and funded are those that prop up the medical monopoly of the big business of birth. So all you wonderful midwives out there, start/keep saying it. There are no

Re: [ozmidwifery] How long before synto is used?

2006-06-17 Thread Angela Thompson
Hi, As you say it will always depend on the hospital policy.However, Iimagine the best way to gain an independent answer might be to review the evidence - A guide to effective evidence in pregnancy childbirth (Enkin et al) may be helpful, though it may also be slightly outdated. Alternatively,

Re: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Stephen Felicity
"if we trulysupport choice then surely even 'bad' choices should be respected?" Why? Solely in the name of blindly supporting "choice" as a concept? How does this benefit Mothers and babes?We also have the choice to beat our children, men have the choice to rape women, and we can also

RE: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Roberta Quinn
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff From: Susan Cudlipp "The reply was 'I DONT CARE- I WANT TO BE INDUCED' How can the ob refuse in this instance?" In my experience, many women don't understand that being induced can result in a very different birthing experience for themselves and their

RE: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Nicole Carver
Hi Emily, Good on you! As far as induction and c/s on demand the rule of weighing up the benefits vs risks still applies. Some women's emotional state may make it sensible although regrettable, to concur with their wishes. However, if you have been caring for a woman throughout her

Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Jennifairy
Susan Cudlipp wrote: Choice is an interesting concept: if we truly support choice then surely even 'bad' choices should be respected? Yeah see this is where a persons rights as a medical consumer gets tricky. How do we define 'bad' choices whilst being

RE: Re: [ozmidwifery] How long before synto is used?

2006-06-17 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
Sally, It is up to wonderful women midwives like you to keep women's chances alive - don't give up! What hope will we have if the best chance we have at choice no longer wish to work in the system? We need to infiltrate the system to get anywhere. Don't underestimate the power and ability you

[ozmidwifery] VBAC'er in Narre Warren (VIC)

2006-06-17 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
A mum on my forums is after a VBAC after a traumatic birth and lives in Narre Warren. She is going public, so I was wondering if anyone could suggest a good woman centred option for her, I dont think she is comfortable with a homebirth just yet, but I have suggested she read The Thinking

Re: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Susan Cudlipp
By 'bad' I meant -choices that I or most midwives would disagree with - such as social (non-medically indicated) induction or elective C/S. They might be 'bad' choices in my view but there are plenty of intelligent women out there whose views are opposite to mine. I may disagree, I may

Re: Re: [ozmidwifery] How long before synto is used?

2006-06-17 Thread Susan Cudlipp
time and time again I saw them raw with grief because they felt they were unable to give the care these women needed and were entitled to. I so relate to what you have said Sally. It is hard to work in the system and maintain your integrity as a midwife. Considering the vast majority of

Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Susan Cudlipp
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff My point here was that this woman DID have this explained very carefully by a patient ob who did not want to induce her, and still she wanted it done. And we see so often those who come in time and time again trying very hard to get induced - some women

[ozmidwifery] Kath's story

2006-06-17 Thread Andrea Quanchi
I was 'with' a woman on thursday night when she birthed that left me on a real high Kath has been seeing me for her whole pregnancy and we had discussed birthing at home many times but she had decided that she wanted to go to the hospital to birth. perhaps if it was my second baby I might

RE: [ozmidwifery] Kath's story

2006-06-17 Thread Nicole Carver
Hip Hip Hooray! I, and I'm sure everyone else on this list, enjoyed hearing about your wonderful experience with Kath. It's stories like that that keep us all going. Thankyou. Nicole Carver. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrea Quanchi

[ozmidwifery] quote of the week

2006-06-17 Thread Jane Wines
There is not a single report in the scientific literature that shows obstetricians to be safer than midwives for low risk or normal pregnancy and birth. So if you are among the over75 percent of all women with a normal pregnancy, the safest birth attendant for you is not a doctor but a

Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Andrea Robertson
One aspect of choice that needs to be considered is that even when all the pros and cons are weighted carefully and a very informed choice is made, there is no guarantee that the option chosen will prove to be the best in the final analysis. Mistakes can still be made and decisions thought to

Re: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Lynne Staff
Hi Emily, Could you please email me off list? Re your supervisor's request. Regards, Lynne - Original Message - From: Emily To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:49 AM Subject: Re: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff hi all i have

RE: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Roberta Quinn
On the contrary, very well said. -Original Message- From: Andrea Robertson This is a tricky area - informed choice is really a myth, as so many vested interests come into play, but we must support women once they have made a considered decision. To do less would be to undermine her

Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread MH
I agree... so often women in early labour present over and over, demanding intervention. The reasons for non intervention are explained very clearly, there is no ambiguity of information from midwives or medical staff... the risks of undesirable outcomes- forceps, c/s, fetal distress etc, being

Re: [ozmidwifery] Kath's story

2006-06-17 Thread Judy Chapman
I just love hearing stories like that Andrea. Congratulations to you both. Cheers Judy --- Andrea Quanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was 'with' a woman on thursday night when she birthed that left me on a real high Kath has been seeing me for her whole pregnancy and we had discussed

Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Judy Chapman
So true Andrea. Many years ago a woman consented to be admitted with a transverse lie at term but rejected any treatment. She was a mulipara. Many times over the next week the dangers were explained (such explanation was well documented) and she declined CS. Finally she consented and it was

[ozmidwifery] Consent, information and outcomes (reply to Judy's story - long)

2006-06-17 Thread Heartlogic
Judy said: .admitted with a transverse lie at term but rejected any treatment. She was a mulipara. Many times over the next week the dangers were explained (such explanation was well documented) and she declined CS. Finally she consented and it was scheduled for the next day. That

Re: [ozmidwifery] Kath's story

2006-06-17 Thread Ceri Katrina
thanks for sharing Andrea. I love hearing stories like this one. :-) Katrina (who is 40/40 today) On 18/06/2006, at 12:10 AM, Andrea Quanchi wrote: I was 'with' a woman on thursday night when she birthed that left me on a real high Kath has been seeing me for her whole pregnancy and we had

RE: [ozmidwifery] How long before synto is used?

2006-06-17 Thread Megan Larry
We talk about choices, but look what we will do for free cash ??? Megan (whose 4th was bornon histiming2 weeks before the magic date) Baby bonus creates hospital havoc18jun06 THE introduction of the baby bonus on July 1, 2004, caused more than 1000 scheduled births to be