Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-05 Thread Jenny Cameron



I agree. I have used this article in teaching 
midwifery. I ask the students to role play it and it really lifts out the 
message about prenatal testing. Better than me giving a whole lot of statistics. 
Cheers
Jenny

Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACMPresident NT branch 
ACMIPO Box 1465Howard Springs NT 083508 8983 19260419 528 
717



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ken 
  WArd 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 4:11 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] CF 
  screening
  
  
  The 
  article is great, and I wish I'd had it for antenatal visits. So many women 
  think if they have all the tests they'll have a ok baby. We pushed the 
  tests, even though we were supposed to be low intervention. Have the 
  tests if you want, as Robyn says, it doesn't mean you have to terminate. 
  Can anyone tell us if there is pressure following a positive 
  result?
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
ChapmanSent: Sunday, 4 December 2005 3:13 PMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] CF 
screening
This article on the birthinternational site is good for decisions re 
downs, I am sure it could be extrapolated to CF. 
http://www.birthinternational.com/articles/dietsch01.html
Cheers
JudyRobyn Dempsey 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  

  Who says that because testing is available, 
  that you have to terminate?
  The testing allows choice.
  My sister has made friends who have children 
  with CF, they knew they carried the gene and took the attitude " I know 
  what to do with CF kids, it doesn't bother me".
  On! ce again, I read judgment.
  
  Testing allows choice.the choice to 
  terminate, or the choice to prepare for a child with extra 
  needs.
  
  Robyn D



Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! 
Music: Vote on Who's Next and see your favourite band live
  
  

  Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Checked by AVG 
  Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/70 - Release Date: 
  29/09/2005


Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-04 Thread Susan Cudlipp



In my experience, both professionally and 
personally, yes, there certainly is pressure to terminate once given a positive 
result. I do know mothers of DS and other 
syndrome babies who have the test next time round, NOT to terminate, but to 
prepare against the shock at birth. This is certainly a valid reason for 
some, but many doctors in particular cannot understand anyone continuing a 
pregnancy if the baby were to be 'defective'. It is a brave couple indeed who 
continue with their pregnancy in the face of this.

There is a brilliant book "Expecting Adam" by 
Martha Beck which is the story of one couple in this situation.

Sue
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil 
is for good men to do nothing"Edmund Burke

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ken 
  WArd 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 2:41 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] CF 
  screening
  
  
  The 
  article is great, and I wish I'd had it for antenatal visits. So many women 
  think if they have all the tests they'll have a ok baby. We pushed the 
  tests, even though we were supposed to be low intervention. Have the 
  tests if you want, as Robyn says, it doesn't mean you have to terminate. 
  Can anyone tell us if there is pressure following a positive 
  result?
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
ChapmanSent: Sunday, 4 December 2005 3:13 PMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] CF 
screening
This article on the birthinternational site is good for decisions re 
downs, I am sure it could be extrapolated to CF. 
http://www.birthinternational.com/articles/dietsch01.html
Cheers
JudyRobyn Dempsey 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  

  Who says that because testing is available, 
  that you have to terminate?
  The testing allows choice.
  My sister has made friends who have children 
  with CF, they knew they carried the gene and took the attitude " I know 
  what to do with CF kids, it doesn't bother me".
  On! ce again, I read judgment.
  
  Testing allows choice.the choice to 
  terminate, or the choice to prepare for a child with extra 
  needs.
  
  Robyn D



Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! 
Music: Vote on Who's Next and see your favourite band live
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: 
  1/12/2005


Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-03 Thread Judy Chapman
This article on the birthinternational site is good for decisions re downs, I am sure it could be extrapolated to CF.   http://www.birthinternational.com/articles/dietsch01.html  Cheers  JudyRobyn Dempsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Who says that because testing is available, that you have to terminate?  The testing allows choice.  My sister has made friends who have children with CF, they knew they carried the gene and took the attitude " I know what to do with CF kids, it doesn't bother me".  On!
 ce again,
 I read judgment.Testing allows choice.the choice to terminate, or the choice to prepare for a child with extra needs.Robyn D  
		Do you Yahoo!? 
 
Yahoo! Music: Vote on Who's Next and see your favourite band live

RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-03 Thread Ken WArd




The 
article is great, and I wish I'd had it for antenatal visits. So many women 
think if they have all the tests they'll have a ok baby. We pushed the 
tests, even though we were supposed to be low intervention. Have the tests 
if you want, as Robyn says, it doesn't mean you have to terminate. Can 
anyone tell us if there is pressure following a positive 
result?

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  ChapmanSent: Sunday, 4 December 2005 3:13 PMTo: 
  ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] CF 
  screening
  This article on the birthinternational site is good for decisions re 
  downs, I am sure it could be extrapolated to CF. 
  http://www.birthinternational.com/articles/dietsch01.html
  Cheers
  JudyRobyn Dempsey 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  



Who says that because testing is available, 
that you have to terminate?
The testing allows choice.
My sister has made friends who have children 
with CF, they knew they carried the gene and took the attitude " I know what 
to do with CF kids, it doesn't bother me".
On! ce again, I read judgment.

Testing allows choice.the choice to 
terminate, or the choice to prepare for a child with extra 
needs.

Robyn D
  
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! 
  Music: Vote on Who's Next and see your favourite band 
live


RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-03 Thread Vedrana Valčić









True. But you get false positives or false
negatives, correct? So there is a chance that you get prepared for a CF child,
and get a healthy one, or prepare for a healthy child and give birth to a sick
baby. But of course, theres a greater chance that a test is correct. 

Anyway, the test is out there, if the
country can afford it they might as well make it routine as long as women are not
pressured into taking it and are the last ones to make an informed decision.



Vedrana













From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Robyn Dempsey
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005
7:29 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] CF
screening







Who says that because testing is available, that you have to
terminate?





The testing allows choice.





My sister has made friends who have children with CF, they
knew they carried the gene and took the attitude  I know what to do with
CF kids, it doesn't bother me.





Once again, I read judgment.











Testing allows choice.the choice to terminate, or the
choice to prepare for a child with extra needs.











Robyn D










Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-02 Thread Susan Cudlipp



I agree - please don't make judgements in the case 
of inherited disorders. I too carry a faulty gene (not CF)which has 
affected all 3 of my children. While I love them all dearly and do not 
regret their lives, I do know that I would NOT have chosen this path 
willingly. I was not able to test for the first 2, did test for the 3rd, 
but was informed (wrongly as it turns out) that females are not 
affected.
Knowing several families with CF and the battles 
they face both in testing issues and in raising affected children I could not 
judge anyone who did not feel that they wanted to continue with a pregnancy if 
the child were to have a serious problem.

It is true that all lives are meaningful and that 
all children should be valued, sadly society still has a very long way to go 
before that ideal is commonplace practice. I have met with much ignorance 
and discrimination regarding my kids, their lives are compromised, they will 
always require care.

They have taught me much and have touched many 
lives, those who take the time to know them value them deeply, however, not 
everyone does. I have met many angels and many ogres!
Raising such children takes a huge commitment 
physically, emotionally and financially,and you fight battles every day to 
make their world a better place.

I have often cared for women who have chosen to 
terminate a child with a genetic fault, as part of my job, and I pride myself on 
giving them the best care I can, without judgement on their decision. I 
figure they have had a hard enough time coming to that place without that. 
I have also had the great joy of caring for women who have chosen to continue 
regardless. With all of these I share some of my own experience so that 
they will know that others have found themselves in similar 
circumstances.

There is no 'right' or 'wrong' answer in such 
situations. People have to come to their own choice according to their own 
circumstances, beliefs and consciences, then they have to find peace with that 
choice, either way it is not easy.

Sue

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do 
nothing"Edmund Burke

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Robyn Dempsey 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 7:06 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] CF screening
  
  My niece has cystic fibrosis. She has had over 10 
  hospitalizations in her 3 years of life. Her mum ( my sister) does the 
  physiotherapy for her every day and night. My niece has to take many 
  preparations as she doesn't absorb fats, which means vitamin deficiencies are 
  common.
  My niece has a permanent pseudo infection in her 
  lungs, this flares up if she gets a cold, which results in a hospital stay. My 
  sister avoids gatherings ( family), if someone is sick. My sister has had so 
  much time off work because she needed to care for my niece, that she gave up 
  work to look after her.
  My sister has decided not to have any more 
  children, as she feels 2 with CF would be too hard. ( being able to give to 
  both the attention they need). 
  I'm sure she would opt for the 
  testingdon't judge unless you've been in the situation.
  
  Robyn Dempsey
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: 
  1/12/2005


RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-02 Thread Nicole Carver



Hi 
Robyn,

I'm 
sorry if it seemed as though I was judging. I will try to explain what I was 
trying to say. 

It's a 
very complex decision to make regarding testing, because it implies that you 
will terminate if the baby has cystic fibrosis. I suppose a pregnancy is only a 
potential life, as even without any inherited or congenital disorders, and 
despite all the tests and treatments available, there are no guarantees of a 
perfect outcome. 

I am a 
Maternal and Child Health Nurse, so know a little about Cystic Fibrosis from 
working with families who have experienced it. I know that there are varying 
degrees of severity, with some people living well into their fifties while 
others don't make it very far at all. 

I 
think it would be hard to terminate a pregnancy for me after having one child 
with any abnormality as you have a relationship with that child, not the 
abnormality. Terminating a subsequent pregnancy for me wouldbe a tragic 
decision to make (not saying at all that I wouldn't make that decision). It 
would be easier I think if I hadn't had a child because you would not know what 
you were losing, although you might appreciate what grief you may be avoiding. I 
hope that your niece and sister do have some joy in their lives, and that your 
niece's condition improves.

Nicole.

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Robyn 
  DempseySent: Friday, December 02, 2005 10:07 PMTo: 
  ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] CF 
  screening
  My niece has cystic fibrosis. She has had over 10 
  hospitalizations in her 3 years of life. Her mum ( my sister) does the 
  physiotherapy for her every day and night. My niece has to take many 
  preparations as she doesn't absorb fats, which means vitamin deficiencies are 
  common.
  My niece has a permanent pseudo infection in her 
  lungs, this flares up if she gets a cold, which results in a hospital stay. My 
  sister avoids gatherings ( family), if someone is sick. My sister has had so 
  much time off work because she needed to care for my niece, that she gave up 
  work to look after her.
  My sister has decided not to have any more 
  children, as she feels 2 with CF would be too hard. ( being able to give to 
  both the attention they need). 
  I'm sure she would opt for the 
  testingdon't judge unless you've been in the situation.
  
  Robyn 
Dempsey


Re: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-02 Thread Janet Fraser



I thought the point was that 
it's a call for routine testing.
IMO routine anything is 
dangerous ground especially since so many prenatal tests have relatively high 
false positives and some problems are not picked up at all. I've just seen a 
woman spend the first 20 weeks of her pregnancy having test after test after 
test as each one threw up a different risk/result only to find out her baby is 
perfectly fine - as far as she knows until birth! I think that is the stuff we 
should be more concerned with. I don't think anyone believes it's wrong to test 
with fully informed consent and a strong desire from the parents but we see too 
little of that and too much routine testing that's treated as talismanic or 
prophylactic. Introducing a routine CF test would just be another hoop for 
parents, another charge to pathology, another wedge inserted between a woman and 
her baby with whom she can't say she's bonding until medical science gives her 
the all clear. I'm wary of anything that gives more control to those performing 
the tests and more stress on consumers, often for no reason. Choosing the test 
for compelling reasons like a family history, of course, is a totally different 
matter.
J

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Nicole 
  Carver 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 11:03 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] CF 
  screening
  
  Hi 
  Robyn,
  
  I'm 
  sorry if it seemed as though I was judging. I will try to explain what I was 
  trying to say. 
  
  It's 
  a very complex decision to make regarding testing, because it implies that you 
  will terminate if the baby has cystic fibrosis. I suppose a pregnancy is only 
  a potential life, as even without any inherited or congenital disorders, and 
  despite all the tests and treatments available, there are no guarantees of a 
  perfect outcome. 
  
  I am 
  a Maternal and Child Health Nurse, so know a little about Cystic Fibrosis from 
  working with families who have experienced it. I know that there are varying 
  degrees of severity, with some people living well into their fifties while 
  others don't make it very far at all. 
  
  I 
  think it would be hard to terminate a pregnancy for me after having one child 
  with any abnormality as you have a relationship with that child, not the 
  abnormality. Terminating a subsequent pregnancy for me wouldbe a tragic 
  decision to make (not saying at all that I wouldn't make that decision). It 
  would be easier I think if I hadn't had a child because you would not know 
  what you were losing, although you might appreciate what grief you may be 
  avoiding. I hope that your niece and sister do have some joy in their lives, 
  and that your niece's condition improves.
  
  Nicole.
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Robyn 
DempseySent: Friday, December 02, 2005 10:07 PMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] CF 
screening
My niece has cystic fibrosis. She has had over 
10 hospitalizations in her 3 years of life. Her mum ( my sister) does the 
physiotherapy for her every day and night. My niece has to take many 
preparations as she doesn't absorb fats, which means vitamin deficiencies 
are common.
My niece has a permanent pseudo infection in 
her lungs, this flares up if she gets a cold, which results in a hospital 
stay. My sister avoids gatherings ( family), if someone is sick. My sister 
has had so much time off work because she needed to care for my niece, that 
she gave up work to look after her.
My sister has decided not to have any more 
children, as she feels 2 with CF would be too hard. ( being able to give to 
both the attention they need). 
I'm sure she would opt for the 
testingdon't judge unless you've been in the situation.

Robyn 
Dempsey


RE: [ozmidwifery] CF screening

2005-12-02 Thread Vedrana Valčić








If it was me who triggered your responses 
I dont have a problem with anyone who choses to have an abortion for
whatever reason and I live my life trying not to judge anyone or anyones
choices. 



I was just trying to imagine how I would
feel if I was a sick child who read an article about how a test is available, which
wasnt there at the time I was born. Im sure Id be thinking
about how miserable my parents actually are because of me, since some would
take the test and have an abortion because of a child just like myself and
would wonder whether my mom would have had an abortion with me had she lived in
a time when a test was available. But this is just me and my thoughts.



On the other side, Im also aware that
caring for a sick child usually means giving your life as it was away, that it
requires a huge commitment as you said and that its not something anyone
would wish for, either for him/herself, or for a child.





Vedrana













From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Susan Cudlipp
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005
12:57 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] CF
screening







I agree - please don't make judgements in the case of
inherited disorders. I too carry a faulty gene (not CF)which has
affected all 3 of my children. While I love them all dearly and do not
regret their lives, I do know that I would NOT have chosen this path
willingly. I was not able to test for the first 2, did test for the 3rd,
but was informed (wrongly as it turns out) that females are not affected.





Knowing several families with CF and the battles they face
both in testing issues and in raising affected children I could not judge
anyone who did not feel that they wanted to continue with a pregnancy if the
child were to have a serious problem.











It is true that all lives are meaningful and that all
children should be valued, sadly society still has a very long way to go before
that ideal is commonplace practice. I have met with much ignorance and
discrimination regarding my kids, their lives are compromised, they will always
require care.











They have taught me much and have touched many lives, those
who take the time to know them value them deeply, however, not everyone
does. I have met many angels and many ogres!





Raising such children takes a huge commitment physically,
emotionally and financially,and you fight battles every day to make their
world a better place.











I have often cared for women who have chosen to terminate a
child with a genetic fault, as part of my job, and I pride myself on giving
them the best care I can, without judgement on their decision. I figure
they have had a hard enough time coming to that place without that. I
have also had the great joy of caring for women who have chosen to continue
regardless. With all of these I share some of my own experience so that
they will know that others have found themselves in similar circumstances.











There is no 'right' or 'wrong' answer in such
situations. People have to come to their own choice according to their
own circumstances, beliefs and consciences, then they have to find peace with
that choice, either way it is not easy.











Sue











The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men
to do nothing
Edmund Burke







- Original Message - 





From: Robyn
Dempsey 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, December
02, 2005 7:06 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery] CF
screening











My niece has cystic fibrosis. She has had over 10
hospitalizations in her 3 years of life. Her mum ( my sister) does the
physiotherapy for her every day and night. My niece has to take many
preparations as she doesn't absorb fats, which means vitamin deficiencies are
common.





My niece has a permanent pseudo infection in her lungs, this
flares up if she gets a cold, which results in a hospital stay. My sister
avoids gatherings ( family), if someone is sick. My sister has had so much time
off work because she needed to care for my niece, that she gave up work to look
after her.





My sister has decided not to have any more children, as she
feels 2 with CF would be too hard. ( being able to give to both the attention
they need). 





I'm sure she would opt for the testingdon't judge
unless you've been in the situation.











Robyn Dempsey









No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: 1/12/2005