RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Darren Neimke
http://2010wave.blogspot.com Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:29:09 +1100 Subject: Re: Silverlight site. From: jonathanparkerem...@gmail.com To: ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com Maybe change? The download progress has changed from the default to "Loading Silverlight Experience" since yesterday.

Re: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Jonathan Parker
ind Regards, > > Darren Neimke > darren.nei...@live.com > http://2010wave.blogspot.com > > > > > -- > Subject: RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site. > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:23:59 +1000 > From: ross.mckin...@michaelhill.com.au > To: ozsilverlight@oz

RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Darren Neimke
Not really sure what we're trying to achieve with this conversation. Kind Regards, Darren neimkedarren.nei...@live.com http://2010wave.blogspot.com Subject: RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site. Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:23:59 +1000 From: ross.mckin...@michaelhill.com.au To: ozsilver

RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Ross McKinnon
...@bankwest.com.au] Sent: Friday, 12 March 2010 11:19 AM To: ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com Subject: RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site. I’d go even further than that. I’ve never worked for Microsoft so I don’t have a feel for the internal political struggles. My comments are purely as a developer. History

RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Carl . Scarlett
[mailto:ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] On Behalf Of Scott Barnes Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2010 11:50 PM To: ozSilverlight Subject: RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site. My vote is to fold mscom/expression and mscom/silverlight into Silverlight.NET Tim is touching only the tip of the iceberg, as

Re: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Vishwanath Humpy
To be fair, the silverlight app is not too bad once you click past the initial accordion view. On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:34:18 +0530 wrote >Design aside, it’s using one of my libraries – eventr…. From http://eventr.codeplex.com JFrom: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com [mailto:ozsilverlight

RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Jordan Knight
Design aside, it's using one of my libraries - eventr From http://eventr.codeplex.com :) From: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com [mailto:ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] On Behalf Of Scott Barnes Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2010 2:55 PM To: ozSilverlight Subject: Silverlight site.

RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Scott Barnes
sday, March 10, 2010 11:28 PM To: ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com Subject: Re: RE: RE: Silverlight site. What is the story with http://silverlight.net/ ? . Will it disappear? On a positive note it did enlighten me to the silverlight partner program. I haven't heard about that before. It sounds good,

RE: RE: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Tim Heuer
rlight@ozsilverlight.com Subject: Re: RE: RE: Silverlight site. What is the story with http://silverlight.net/ ? . Will it disappear? On a positive note it did enlighten me to the silverlight partner program. I haven't heard about that before. It sounds good, unless you fail to ship a site wit

Re: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Gilbert Corrales
Scott, I kind of see the disclaimer u made as "please criticize what I can't just do" and I see ur point... numeric times u and I and others went on to say how bad of job microsoft has done to centralize all of the silverlight content in a way that is inspiring and communicative (ok not everyone, I

Re: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Stephen Price
Took too long to load, the default load progress indicator should be changed (doesn't MS always say how easy it is to change?). Also took me about a minute to figure out mousing over the text at the bottom would select the panel. Also shouldnt be two sites. Silverlight.net is the place to be. redi

Re: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-11 Thread Joseph Cooney
ehalf Of *Craig Dunn > *Sent:* Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:47 PM > *To:* ozSilverlight > *Subject:* Re: RE: Silverlight site. > > > > oops - not a great advertisement for Silverlight's x-platform ability > > > > http://twitpic.com/17uw53 :-( in safari > > &

Re: RE: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread Vishwanath Humpy
What is the story with http://silverlight.net/ ; ? .  Will it disappear? On a positive note it did enlighten me to the silverlight partner program.  I haven't heard about that before. It sounds good, unless you fail to ship a site within 90 days :-) On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:50:25 +0530 wrote >

RE: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread Scott Barnes
: ozSilverlight Subject: Re: RE: Silverlight site. oops - not a great advertisement for Silverlight's x-platform ability http://twitpic.com/17uw53 :-( in safari On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Vishwanath Humpy mailto:vhu...@rediffmail.com>> wrote: is it not a schoolboy(girl) error to ha

Re: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread Craig Dunn
oops - not a great advertisement for Silverlight's x-platform ability http://twitpic.com/17uw53 :-( in safari On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Vishwanath Humpy wrote: > is it not a schoolboy(girl) error to have the home page unavailable via the > menus? > > once you navigate around you can't g

Re: RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread Vishwanath Humpy
is it not a schoolboy(girl) error to have the home page unavailable via the menus? once you navigate around you can't get back to the home page directly. From: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com [mailto:ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com]on Behalf Of Scott Barnes >Sent: Thursday, 11

RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread David Burela
ilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com [ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] On Behalf Of carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au [carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2010 3:11 PM To: ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com Subject: RE: Silverlight site. I like the foldy display. Unfortunately

RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread Steven Berry
Noticed on the first image the text blows out of the actual frame on the z-axis the B gets blurry. Very different way of showcasing. From: Jonathan Parker [mailto:jonathanparkerem...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2010 3:14 PM To: ozSilverlight Subject: Re: Silverlight site. Doesn&#

Re: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread Jonathan Parker
Doesn't work in Chrome 4. Navigation is broken. They should have customised the loading animation. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Scott Barnes wrote: > http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight > > has been updated. > > > > Thoughts? (i.e. i had nothing to do with it so unload good/bad) > > > > __

RE: Silverlight site.

2010-03-10 Thread Carl . Scarlett
I like the foldy display. Unfortunately it doesn't work for me at work (where I'm stuck with IE6 due to our SOE *pout*). The first time I selected something, half the foldy thing stayed visible and the scrollable selector didn't appear. I couldn't navigate back until I used the browser's back