https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.10.4-3.fc25, lame-3.99.5-8.fc25 has been pushed
to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.0-3.fc26, lame-3.99.5-8.fc26 has been pushed
to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.0-3.fc26 lame-3.99.5-8.fc26 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1449467 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.0-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-72ed1ea3c5
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.10.4-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-01143cb336
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #30 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1449884
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #28 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #27 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
While surprised that nobody else beat me to it, I have ITP'd lame in bug
1449467.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1449467
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #26 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
It looks like MP3 encoding is being allowed now, so the lame backend could be
enabled here too once lame itself is added.
In the meantime, can we please get an actual review so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #25 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #24)
> This is not an acceptable response to any of my feedback. What has been
> going on in the past is not a factor my review of this now,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #24 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #15)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #8)
> > Initial review notes:
> >
> > - libmad is now in Fedora, so that module can be enabled
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #21 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free.spec
SRPM URL:
https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.11.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #20 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #19)
> ... I don't think we really want a package called "-ugly" in Fedora.
IIUC the plugin packages are named "good", "bad", and "ugly"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #19 from Matthew Miller ---
Given comment #1:
> There are two reasons for including a package in -ugly: 1) license of
> included code or dependent library is "stronger" than LGPL (usually GPL),
> and/or 2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Bug 1397261 depends on bug 1433758, which changed state.
Bug 1433758 Summary: Review Request: a52dec - Small test program for liba52
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433758
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Wim Taymans changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wtaym...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #17 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free.spec
SRPM URL:
https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.11.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #16 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #14)
> Yaakov, please enable a52dec plugin as well. It's on its way to Fedora (bug
> 1433758).
I can't enable it until it's actually in.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #15 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #8)
> Initial review notes:
>
> - libmad is now in Fedora, so that module can be enabled
Per comments above, it's been removed upstream.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #13)
> (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #12)
> > Turned out that mad-plugin was removed from the repo:
>
> Well, that answers my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(yselkowi@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #6)
> (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #5)
> > I wonder why do we have libmad plugin enabled. AFAIK mad development was
> > halted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1433758
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yselk...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa ---
Initial review notes:
- libmad is now in Fedora, so that module can be enabled
- Please split AppStream metainfo file out into a separate source file and
install it that way
- Also,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Bug 1397261 depends on bug 1396139, which changed state.
Bug 1396139 Summary: Review Request: libmad - MPEG audio decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396139
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #6 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #5)
> I wonder why do we have libmad plugin enabled. AFAIK mad development was
> halted ~12 years ago or so. On the contrary mpg123'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #3 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free.spec
SRPM URL:
https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.10.0-4.fc26.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #1 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
There are two reasons for including a package in -ugly: 1) license of included
code or dependent library is "stronger" than LGPL (usually GPL), and/or 2)
software patents. The
43 matches
Mail list logo