https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
acme-tiny-0.1-10.20160810git5a7b4e7.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385534
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839
--- Comment #2 from Sundeep Anand ---
Thanks for the review. Updated package:
SPEC URL:
https://bitbucket.org/sundeep_co_in/python-pkgs/downloads/python-django-notifications-hq.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384917
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #2 from Dan Callaghan ---
To make life easier on RHEL7 (so that we don't have to depend on the whole
EPEL7 Python 3 stack).
Internally in our Jenkins we are running rpmdeplint tests on both Python 2 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Yeah I was just checking spec for py3 compatibility before posting any review.
I see setup.py says its compatible with py3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #31 from Andrew Elwell ---
Hi, is there any movement on this? If not I'll start a new package based on the
current upsream release of 16.05.5 (http://slurm.schedmd.com/download.html)
Andrew
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385534
Bug ID: 1385534
Summary: Review Request: python-ruamel-ordereddict -
ruamel-ordereddict
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #4 from Dan Callaghan ---
Yeah, so are you saying for the Fedora package you would prefer it is built
against and runs in python3 instead of python2? I would leave it as python2 for
EPEL.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
Jared Wallace changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #5 from Dan Callaghan ---
On second thought, rpmdeplint is also exposing a Python API so I guess for
completeness I should really make this package python-rpmdeplint which produces
python2-rpmdeplint and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
you are right. Sorry was busy yesterday and Internet was down. Its just up.
here is what I propose this package spec
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/rpmdeplint.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
--- Comment #14 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Jared Wallace from comment #13)
> Tried running fedora-review on it, but the build failed...
>
> Package pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.x86_64 is already installed, skipping.
> No
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371296
--- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner ---
Are you interested in packaging zsh-completions and zsh-autosuggestions, too?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
This library is needed to update shibboleth stack, I'll take over here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
--- Comment #2 from Jared Wallace ---
Tried the fedora-review tool, which fails since the original post did not have
raw links. So let's fix that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
--- Comment #3 from Jared Wallace ---
Since it wasn't made clear, this package was orphaned and retired:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/orpie/
Not sure now if it requires review or not.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384917
--- Comment #2 from Chandan Kumar ---
Hello Parag,
Thanks for the review.
Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-pykwalify.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Is there some reason why it's python2 and not py3?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chku...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371296
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/zsh-syntax-highlighting
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385180
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/purple-facebook
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual ---
New files with you changes. There several bugs upstream about failing tests. I
have enabled tests but the build will not fail on tests failing. Not all tests
seem to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
--- Comment #4 from Chandan Kumar ---
Hello David,
After doing git grep sseclient and six, found that sseclient and six is not
required but due to present under install_requires in setup.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272174
Luboš Uhliarik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781
--- Comment #2 from Michal Vala ---
Spec URL:
https://github.com/sparkoo/sunflow/releases/download/v0.07.3.8097f6d/sunflow.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385223
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-rangehttpserver
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
Guido Grazioli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
--- Comment #5 from David Moreau Simard ---
@Chandan, yes, I did notice the setup.py had extra requirements that were not
expressed in requirements.txt but it looked to me like they were not used.
Thanks for confirming.
I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1385616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385728
Bug ID: 1385728
Summary: Review Request: perl-Specio-Library-Path-Tiny -
Path::Tiny types and coercions for Specio
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: vimwiki - A |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pandas-datareader
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
--- Comment #6 from David Moreau Simard ---
Also, worth mentioning that I've toyed with the idea around also packaging
tests and docs but they are not included in the release tarball.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385223
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
--- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual ---
Thank you for the review!
I will remove the tests for the moment
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme ---
I still have a problem with the requires. The list is:
- 'django>=1.7',
- 'django-model-utils>=2.0.3',
- 'jsonfield>=1.0.3',
- 'pytz'
But you only included django and pytz. In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384917
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pykwalify
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379778
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-diff-match-patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302744
Bug 1302744 depends on bug 1385223, which changed state.
Bug 1385223 Summary: Review Request: python-rangehttpserver - SimpleHTTPServer
with support for Range requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385223
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373019
--- Comment #2 from Juan Orti ---
Hi, thanks for the comments.
I've updated the macros as you said. I will ask upstream to include a license
file.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227981
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016444
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344261
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe you can take a look into bug
#1385856?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package unretired
Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385856
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner ---
Spec URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/daasi/shibboleth/log4shib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/daasi/shibboleth/log4shib-1.0.9-2.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385856
Bug ID: 1385856
Summary: Review Request: log4shib - C++ logging library for
Shibboleth (OpenSAML)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1385856 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385856
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1196920 |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1385856
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197517
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
Maybe you can take a look into bug #1385856?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter |
--- Comment
56 matches
Mail list logo