Re: [PacketFence-users] PF and Polycom phones with an ethernet bridge

2015-03-04 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
and could not find anything specific to this situation. Cheers, Boris. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu mailto:switt...@mines.edu wrote: Boris, This config should be covered in the admin guide, at least it is for Cisco and port-security VLAN

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF and Polycom phones with an ethernet bridge

2015-03-03 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Boris, This config should be covered in the admin guide, at least it is for Cisco and port-security VLAN changes. The guide says to use the Voice VLAN interface command but we’ve inadvertently tested recently a trunk interface and PF switched the data Native VLAN on the trunk. I’ve done a

[PacketFence-users] VoIP trunk vs access ports

2015-02-12 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi PF Users, Does anyone know if there are issues with using (Cisco) trunk ports for VoIP phones with attached PC’s instead of PF’s recommended access ports? Some preliminary, inadvertent, testing seemed to show trunk ports work. Here’s a trunk port configuration that we inadvertently tested,

Re: [PacketFence-users] Portal Error

2015-01-15 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi David, Just wondering if this problem was resolved. I’m getting a near identical error after upgrading from 4.3.1 to 4.5.1. Syntax error on line 114 of /usr/local/pf/conf/httpd.conf.d/httpd.portal: Can't use string (0) as a HASH ref while strict refs in use at

Re: [PacketFence-users] Portal Error

2015-01-15 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
p.s., never-mind. I forgot to update the db schema. All is good. On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi David, Just wondering if this problem was resolved. I’m getting a near identical error after upgrading from 4.3.1 to 4.5.1. Syntax error

[PacketFence-users] 3rd party IPAM

2014-10-14 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi PF users, We're wondering if anyone has employed a 3rd party IPAM (DHCP DNS) service, specifically InfoBlox, with Packetfence. I realize this might seem like strange bedfellows, i.e. an open-source NAC with a commercial IPAM. Any reply is appreciated. Steve CSM

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal

2014-06-25 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Fone: 254-295-4658 Phax: 254-295-4221 From: Stephen Wittstruck [switt...@mines.edu] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:08 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal

2014-06-24 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi PF Users Digest, Pardon me if this has been covered already, I looked around. Is there a way to allow any MAC address to be registered via the newly named 'device-registration' portal, once named 'gaming-registration', i.e

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal

2014-06-24 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Administrator Carthage College 262-552-5512 mmcgr...@carthage.edu On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: p.s., I should have added, we have a need to network devices that do not have browsers and are not gaming devices, one example is oscilloscopes. I

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal

2014-06-24 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
-4221 From: Stephen Wittstruck [switt...@mines.edu] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 11:50 AM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal Thank-you Max

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal

2014-06-24 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
of Bandwidth System Engineer University of Mary Hardin-Baylor WWW.UMHB.EDU 900 College St. Belton, Texas 76513 Fone: 254-295-4658 Phax: 254-295-4221 From: Stephen Wittstruck [switt...@mines.edu] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:35 PM

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal

2014-06-24 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Well, it seems simple enough but I haven't been able to make the change Jake suggested? On Jun 24, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Thank-you Jake! On Jun 24, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Sallee, Jake jake.sal...@umhb.edu wrote: in the current dev branch look here

[PacketFence-users] PF 4.2.2 any MAC address via new (renamed) Device-Registration portal

2014-06-23 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi PF Users Digest, Pardon me if this has been covered already, I looked around. Is there a way to allow any MAC address to be registered via the newly named 'device-registration' portal, once named 'gaming-registration', i.e. : https://YOUR_PORTAL_HOSTNAME/device-registration ? This portal

Re: [PacketFence-users] 4.1 dhcpd and pfdhcplistener don't start on server reboot, but will later

2014-03-07 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
) On 2014-02-17, at 16:56 , Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi Louis, No problem, I've been preoccupied too. I needed to finally check-in though because in the middle of March I'll be out for 6 or more weeks and need to have a better handle on all of my PF's statuses before I

Re: [PacketFence-users] 4.1 dhcpd and pfdhcplistener don't start on server reboot, but will later

2014-02-17 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
=== Thanks. Steve On Jan 29, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: === Here are the contents of the file /etc/sudoers.d/10_packetfence pf ALL=NOPASSWD: /sbin/iptables, /usr/sbin

Re: [PacketFence-users] 4.1 dhcpd and pfdhcplistener don't start on server reboot, but will later

2014-02-17 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) On 2014-02-17, at 15:50 , Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi again, It's been 6 weeks since I posted the PF VM sudoer's file but haven't heard from any so thought I should check in. Does anyone see any issues with the sudoers file below

Re: [PacketFence-users] 4.1 dhcpd and pfdhcplistener don't start on server reboot, but will later

2014-01-06 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi Louis, Thanks for the fast response. Here's the output you asked for, unfortunately 'pgrep -lf dhcp' doesn't return anything: [swittstr@nac-dev bin]$ pgrep -lf dhcp [swittstr@nac-dev bin]$ [swittstr@nac-dev bin]$ ./pfcmd service pf

[PacketFence-users] 4.1 dhcpd and pfdhcplistener don't start on server reboot, but will later

2013-12-20 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi all, Rebooting the our Centos 6.5 VM host for PF 4.1 fails to start DHCPD and PFDHCPLISTENER, afterwards both will start individually or with a pfcmd restart. This happened in earlier 4.x releases but not 3.x. I'd guess a good linux admin would know a fix for this but thought it best to

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence

2013-12-20 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Michael, I've always found the admin guide on their website to be good, just follow it page for page from the beginning. FWIW, the configuration is far easier and streamlined than it was in the early releases. Steve On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Gottberg, Michael

Re: [PacketFence-users] 4.1 dhcpd and pfdhcplistener don't start on server reboot, but will later

2013-12-20 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) On 2013-12-20, at 20:33 , Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi all, Rebooting the our Centos 6.5 VM host for PF 4.1 fails to start DHCPD and PFDHCPLISTENER, afterwards both will start individually

Re: [PacketFence-users] PFDNS The saga continues

2013-12-10 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
College St. Belton, Texas 76513 Fone: 254-295-4658 Phax: 254-295-4221 From: Stephen Wittstruck [switt...@mines.edu] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 6:23 PM To: Packetfence Users Digest Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PFDNS The saga continues Hi

Re: [PacketFence-users] Cisco Catalyst 3750x stack

2013-11-01 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Jeremy, Thanks for posting this. We haven't yet deployed PF but have tested many versions of the 3750's as standalone, single switches, nothing with stacks though we use them heavily here, some stacks have 8 members. Steve CSM On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Jeremy Plumley jmplum...@gtcc.edu

Re: [PacketFence-users] PFDNS The saga continues

2013-10-09 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
had to reboot the server to recover PFDNS. I'm not a linux admin so don't know any tricks to confirm this except for the ps command, which I didn't try. My apology for the bad info earlier. Steve CSM On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi Jake, I'm

Re: [PacketFence-users] PFDNS The saga continues

2013-09-30 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi Jake, I'm running the exact same platform, i.e. OS and PF, though not in production yet. I couldn't get PFDNS to stop through the GUI. Curiously I tried the others, only PFDHCPLISTENER would stop by using the GUI; it would restart also. Still curious I tried the command line ./pfcmd

Re: [PacketFence-users] not all 4.0.5-2 processes start on server boot

2013-08-27 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
(x110) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) On 2013-08-23, at 3:30 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hello Everyone, I scratch installed 4.0.5-2 (after a yum uninstall.) On server reboots dhcpd

[PacketFence-users] 4.0.5-2 Guest Registration portal shows instead of Captive Portal

2013-08-27 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi Everyone, I'm running a scratch 4.0.5-2 install and the Guest Registration portal shows up instead of the Captive-Portal? Actually 2, one http, one https. I saw this first a couple releases ago. I've removed all the modes in profiles.conf as the Admin Guide directed: To disable the

Re: [PacketFence-users] not all 4.0.5-2 processes start on server boot

2013-08-26 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
wrote: Log will help us a lot ;) Derek -- Derek Wuelfrath dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) On 2013-08-23, at 3:30 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote

[PacketFence-users] not all 4.0.5-2 processes start on server boot

2013-08-23 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hello Everyone, I scratch installed 4.0.5-2 (after a yum uninstall.) On server reboots dhcpd and pfdhcplistener are not starting (radiusd too but we don't use it.) pfdns|1|1663 dhcpd|1|0 pfdetect|0|0 snort|0|0 suricata|0|0 radiusd|1|0 httpd.webservices|1|0 httpd.admin|1|1625

[PacketFence-users] gaming-registration ARP problem and customizing question

2013-08-06 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hello Everyone, I'm running 4.0.4, the gaming-registration webpage doesn't seem to be working; it goes through the motions as if it accepted the MAC address but the address never shows up as registered? As for as I can tell I've configured everything, i.e. the 2 pf.conf [registration] entries

[PacketFence-users] scratch 4.0.4 install configurator broken?

2013-08-06 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hello again, Long story short I yum removed Packetfence 4.0.4-2 then reinstalled but the configurator tells me: Error! An error condition has occured. See server side logs for details. Then the packetfence logs show: Aug 07 00:21:25 httpd.admin(0) ERROR: Caught exception in

Re: [PacketFence-users] 3.6.1 Gaming console self-registration problem

2013-07-30 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Great! Thanks Fabrice. On Jul 30, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Fabrice DURAND fdur...@inverse.ca wrote: Hello, fixed since 4.0.2. Regards Fabrice Le 2013-07-29 17:50, Stephen Wittstruck a écrit : Hi again Arthur, Just found your Jan. 22 post, also. Another good question raised, I think

Re: [PacketFence-users] Re-visiting skip_mode?

2013-07-29 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi Arthur, I just saw your Jan. 10 post (I optimistically keep unread digest posts in my inbox..) You've raised some very interesting points and I'm wondering if you received any replies or have any updates. Thank you. Steve Wittstruck Colorado School of Mines On Jan 10, 2013, at 1:32 PM,

Re: [PacketFence-users] 3.6.1 Gaming console self-registration problem

2013-07-29 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi again Arthur, Just found your Jan. 22 post, also. Another good question raised, I think. Any updates? Steve CSM On Jan 22, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Arthur Emerson III arthur.emer...@msmc.edu wrote: We are just wrapping up our spring semester move-in rush, and have registered about 2,500 new

[PacketFence-users] customVLAN expansion

2013-07-25 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hello Olivier, I think I owe you a very belated Thank you regarding custom VLAN expansion, we last talked about this in May of last year. You mentioned then the desire to expand the number of custom VLANs beyond 5 but couldn't say when due to the web install and new admin projects.

Re: [PacketFence-users] No interfaces found with configurator

2013-07-18 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hello Ludovic, I updated from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 and still didn't see any interfaces on the configurator network webpage. After playing with iptables, i.e. starting, then stopping, etc., I finally saw interfaces on configurator's network webpage

Re: [PacketFence-users] No interfaces found with configurator

2013-07-18 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
with another Packetfence reinstall. I imagine a Linux wizard may have some ideas why, for me, at least I can finish the configuration. Thank you Inverse! On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi again Ludovic, I've found if I do a 'yum reinstall packetfence

Re: [PacketFence-users] No interfaces found with configurator

2013-07-12 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi Mark, Did you ever get this fixed? I have the exact same problem using a Centos 6.4 VM. I just started installing 4.0.1 yesterday. Ifconfig -a looks fine: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:AF:00:96 inet addr: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Bcast:bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb

Re: [PacketFence-users] No interfaces found with configurator

2013-07-12 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Ah... Thanks for the quick reply. I'll let you know if 4.0.2 made a difference. Steve On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:55 PM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 2013-07-12 4:27 PM, Stephen Wittstruck wrote: Did you ever get this fixed? I have the exact same problem using a Centos 6.4

Re: [PacketFence-users] Cisco 3750X-POE SNMP 2C problem?

2013-03-28 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
that too and upgrade it to 15.0(2)SEx. Thanks again. Steve On Mar 25, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Arthur Emerson III arthur.emer...@msmc.edu wrote: Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Has anyone successfully used PF with Cisco 3750X-POE switches? PF isn't getting a response for a SNMP 2C

Re: [PacketFence-users] Cisco 3750X-POE SNMP 2C problem?

2013-03-28 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Arthur, P.s., what is the switch type you're using in switches.conf? I've only found one PF documentation for 3750's: type = Cisco::Catalyst_3750 Steve On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Stephen Wittstruck switt...@mines.edu wrote: Hi Arthur, Thanks for the reply. Yes, I can try SNMPv1

[PacketFence-users] Cisco 3750X-POE SNMP 2C problem?

2013-03-22 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hi PF Community, Has anyone successfully used PF with Cisco 3750X-POE switches? PF isn't getting a response for a SNMP 2C connection. Mar 22 18:10:52 pfsetvlan(21) ERROR: error creating SNMP v2c read connection to 138.67.244.20: No response from remote host 138.67.244.20

Re: [Packetfence-users] Multiple normal VLAN's on same switch

2010-07-30 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
Hello Olivier, Tal: Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't the new node 'Category' field provide a way of placing devices into different VLAN's? I haven't tried it yet but seems like a way to change a newly registered device from the 'Normal' VLAN or switch specific VLAN to another of your choice.

Re: [Packetfence-users] 1.9.0 web admin error

2010-06-09 Thread Stephen Wittstruck
That was easy... if you follow the instructions! Thanks Olivier! On Jun 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Olivier Bilodeau wrote: Hi Steve, Steve Wittstruck wrote: I just upgraded to snapshot 1.9.0 and get the following error in a red banner across the top of PF GUI: