://www.independentliving.com
http://www.soundbytes.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sarah
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:10 AM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
That's true. You
:
http://www.independentliving.com
http://www.soundbytes.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nick G
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:25 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
Judy, if you
/ciu_nice_guy
- Original Message -
From: Chris Skarstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
My point exactly, Bob. Cory is probably interested in internet
and properly grounded in order to avoid that anoying 60 herts
hum.
- Original Message -
From: Judy W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
He's
-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
My point exactly, Bob. Cory is probably interested in internet
broadcasting, if I'm wrong correct me on that one, and even a 50
dollar headset mic will serve your needs just fine for that, if used
: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
Yes I am interested in internet broadcasting.
Since I can't seem to get in to over the air radio.
But being a radio snob I am looking for the mic that will give me the best
radio sound.
Corey Cook
EMail
. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
Chris,
You hit the nail on the head! We are not talking conventional
broadcasting
here, we are only talking about the internet where the bandwidth is narrow
to begin
6:18 PM
Subject: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
By saying that it was over rated, i am not saying that something is quote
unquote wrong audio-wise with the 58. What i am saying is wrong with the
58 is its high price tag, which isn't justified. Furthermore, and this is
what pisses
it for and then you need to look at your
budget...
Just my opinion,
Judy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick G
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:19 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
By saying
audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
He's not an audio snob. I think he's right. You have to ask what is the
mic
going to be used for. All of the radio stations I have been in use very
to
evaluate what you want to use it for and then you need to look at your
budget...
Just my opinion,
Judy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick G
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:19 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Clarifying M issue
: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
Judy, if you have a mixer and can spare $69-$79, You can't go wrong with a
Cad GXL2200/2400. The only real difference between the two is that the 2400
has greater SPL, though I believe in a broadcast setting you can't tell, and
that the 2400 is smaller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
He's not an audio snob. I think he's right. You have to ask what is the
mic
going to be used for. All of the radio stations I
]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
He's not an audio snob. I think he's right. You have to ask what is the
mic
going to be used for. All of the radio stations I have been in use
...
Just my opinion,
Judy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick G
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:19 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
By saying that it was over rated, i am
and properly grounded in order to avoid that anoying 60 herts hum.
- Original Message -
From: Judy W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
He's not an audio
to be
shielded and properly grounded in order to avoid that anoying 60 herts
hum.
- Original Message -
From: Judy W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: Clarifying M issue with the 58, was Re: mic
He's
17 matches
Mail list logo