[Pce] Anaheim Minutes

Hi all. As some of you may have noticed, the minutes of the PCE meeting in Anaheim have been on line for a few days: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/minutes/pce.htm If you like them, you should thank Dan, our secretary; if you do not, please contact the chairs and explain the issue:

[Pce] Building PCE Agenda for IETF 78

Hi PCE'rs. The draft agenda for IETF 78 has been available for a while, the final version should be published tomorrow, July 2nd. The PCE session is currently planned on Monday at 1 PM (unfortunately again at the same time as RTGWG). If you would like to get a slot in the PCE agenda, send

[Pce] Fwd: Internet Draft Initial Version (-00) Cut-Off Monday, July 5

Hi. Today is cut-off day for ID-00. In case you need to use manual submission and got publication delayed, it is expected behaviour, no need to retry multiple times. Regards, Julien Message original De :Alexa Morris amor...@amsl.com This is a reminder that the

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-12

My mistake! This 2-week WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-12 will end on Friday 24th September at 12 GMT. Good night... Julien Le 09/09/2010 18:37, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi PCE WG. The I-D draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-12 has been stable for a while (except from number

[Pce] PCE Agenda for Beijing

Hi all. The 1st draft of the PCE WG's agenda for IETF 79 is available: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/agenda/pce.html If you have any comments, please contact the chairs. Authors, do not wait for the meeting to start discussing your I-Ds on the mailing list. Regards, JP Julien

Re: [Pce] PCE Agenda for Beijing

Hi. The agenda should be stable now. Presenters, to have the slides available on-line early enough before the meeting, please send them to the chairs/secretary not later than Monday 8th November. Regards, JP Julien Le 27/10/2010 20:18, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi all. The 1st draft

[Pce] Status of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-pathkey-mib-00

Hi all. During our meeting in Beijing, draft-dhody-pce-pcep-pathkey-mib was presented. Not only defines this I-D a MIB module that is useful for the path key mechanism, but also it adresses a requirement explicitly stated in our standard track RFCs (RFC 5520), which means the item has already

[Pce] Fwd: iPOP2011 Call for Presentation

FYI - Call for Presentation 7th International Conference on IP + Optical Network (iPOP 2011) June 2-3, 2010 NEC Tamagawa Plant, Kanagawa, Japan

Re: [Pce] New Version of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Hi. Chair hat off, so non-authoritative answer. :-) I tend to agree that good enough is enough, especially with respect to an expensive optimality which might not be my fellow's optimality... Thanks, Julien Le 16/02/2011 22:27, Daniel King a écrit : Although you make an excellent point,

[Pce] PCE Meeting in Prague

Hi readers of the PCE list. The request period for a time slot in the PCE agenda during IETF 80 is opened and will last till Monday March 14. If you need one, please sent an e-mail to the chairs and secretary, including the estimated duration, a title and/or the corresponding document

Re: [Pce] PCE Agenda for Prague

draft. Regards, JP Julien Le 16/03/2011 18:53, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi PCE'rs. The draft agenda for our upcoming meeting is on line: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/agenda/pce.html Please send your comments to the chairs and secretary by next Sunday, March 20. Thanks JP Julien

[Pce] Fwd: Internet Draft Initial Version (-00) Cut-Off Monday, July 4

Hi. Beware of the date and note the comment about manual posting. Julien Message original De :Internet-Drafts Administrator internet-dra...@ietf.org Pour : IETF Announcement list ietf-annou...@ietf.org This is a reminder that the Internet Draft Initial Version (-00)

[Pce] Building the PCE Agenda

Hi PCErs. It is time to start sending your requests for slots during the PCE meeting in Quebec (should you need one). Please include: - a title or an I-D to point to (we will reuse its title), - an estimated duration (try to focus on issues, avoid full I-D descriptions), - _JP_, _Dan_ and

[Pce] Poll on draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-07

Hi PCE WG. The updated charter is on line, it is now time to move some of our work forward. There has been much discussion and work about draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures (version 7 already, formerly 2 I-Ds). This message starts a poll on adoption of

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

Le 20/09/2011 17:08, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi PCE WG. The framework for hierarchical PCE has been there for long, discussed several times and was pending the charter update. This is a poll for adopting draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06 as WG document. Please reply to this message to express

[Pce] Building the PCE Agenda

Hi PCE WG. If you intend to present during our meeting in Taipei, please send a message to _both_ chairs and secretary not later than Monday 31st October. Include the I-D/presentation title, the estimated duration and the (forecast) presenter's name. Like last time, please keep in mind that

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda

. If you have any comment, please contact both chairs and secretary. Thank you, JP Julien Le 17/10/2011 14:55, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi PCE WG. If you intend to present during our meeting in Taipei, please send a message to _both_ chairs and secretary not later than Monday 31st October

[Pce] Fwd: New Liaison Statement, LS358 - SG15 OTNT Standardization Work Plan - pce

Hi. It looks like this has not reached the PCE mailing list. Comments are welcome. Julien Message original Title: LS358 - SG15 OTNT Standardization Work Plan - pce Submission Date: 2012-01-31 URL of the IETF Web page: /liaison/1141/ Please reply by 2012-08-27 From: ITU-T

[Pce] The MPLS 2012 International Conference Call For Papers

The MPLS 2012 International Conference, the 15th Annual International Conference on MPLS and Related Technologies, will be held October 28 - 31, 2012, in Washington, DC. The Technical Program Committee is soliciting abstracts summarizing a proposed presentation representing original/unpublished

Re: [Pce] iPOP2012 Call for Presentation (extended deadline: Feb 29)

and a maximum of 1 page, including figures and diagrams, speaker’s name, affiliation, and contact information to the Technical Program Committee at ipop2012-...@pilab.jp. Please see http://www.pilab.jp/ipop2012/ for more details. Kind regards, Hiroaki Harai, Julien Meuric, Eiji Oki iPOP 2012 TPC Co

[Pce] PCE Work in CCAMP

Hi CCAMPers. Following the meeting this morning, I would like to comment on the numerous references to PCE with my chair hat on. First, I am glad to see the PCE architecture being encompassed as a relevant part of various proposals. Nevertheless, as said during several PCE meetings, when it

Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 as a new PCE WG

Hi Dhruv. In any case, what you propose is the expected way of progressing a WG document. Thank you for mentioning it: it is always better when authors open the discussion themselves. Another item to be discussed is on the type of document (standard track / experimental): feedback on this

[Pce] IETF 83 Minutes

Hi all. A first version of the minutes for our meeting in Paris is available: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-pce.html (thank you Dan for taking and polishing them). Should you have any comment, please contact the chairs, CCing our secretary. Regards, Julien

Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 as a new PCE WG

Hi WG. I have not seen any comment on the proposal below, nor on the existing IPR. As a result, authors, could you please submit draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-00 as an experimental I-D? Thanks, Julien Le 04/05/2012 17:12, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi all. Even though some issues

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk

Hi authors. Here is the chair review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02. No blocking issue, but a few fixes to consider. -- Section 1 - Page 4 s/egress in known/egress is known/ - Sub-section 1.1 The last 2 paragraphs of section 1.1 (page 5) duplicate with the penultimate one

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk

Hi. This WG LC has ended. Authors, please address or discuss received comments and publish an updated I-D. Regards, JP Julien Le 08/06/2012 16:37, julien.meu...@orange.com a écrit : Hi all. The document has been stable for a while and the traffic on the list is low: the time seems

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk

Hi Adrian. The 1st purpose you advocate is indeed relevant in the document. Then, there is no reason to drop only the 3rd paragraph. The proposed sub-section looks all right to me and, obviously, it does not preclude to mention it in others I-Ds. I think this addresses my comment. Cheers,

[Pce] Slot Requests for PCE Meeting in Vancouver

Hi PCE WG. The draft agenda for IETF 84 currently schedules PCE in its usual slot, i.e. the same as RTGWG (namely Thursday at 3:20 PM). If you wish for some discussion time in the PCE agenda, please send a request to the chairs and secretary, including the title of associated draft(s),

Re: [Pce] Draft Agenda on Line

Hi all. Presenters having a slot during the PCE meeting next Tuesday are requested to send their slides to the chairs and secretary by *Sunday 29th*. If not, your slot may be moved to the end of our (very tight) agenda... Thanks, Dan, JP Julien Le 20/07/2012 11:12, Julien Meuric a écrit

[Pce] Fwd: Need volunteers for the NomCom

FYI: the NomCom needs more volunteers in the pool for random selection. Message original De : NomCom Chair nomcom-ch...@ietf.org We are currently looking for volunteers to serve on the 2012-2013 NomCom. As you know, the success of the NomCom process depends crucially on

[Pce] Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-06

Hi all and best wishes for 2013. This e-mail starts a WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-06. Please send your comments to the PCE. You may review the document in front of the corresponding extension I-D, which should be last called soon. This WG LC will end on Wednesday January 30,

Re: [Pce] Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-06

Hi all. This WG LC has ended. I will send my review soon. Authors, please address and/or discuss the comments received to build a proper update. Thanks, Julien Le 15/01/2013 18:34, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi all and best wishes for 2013. This e-mail starts a WG last call on draft-ietf

Re: [Pce] Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-06

8 - The reference section deserves an update: evolving documents, comments addressed in this I-D, missing spaces after commas, authors' first names and surnames in various orders... -- Best regards, Julien Le 15/01/2013 18:34, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi all and best wishes

[Pce] Fwd: Internet Draft Initial Version (-00) Cut-Off Monday, February 18

As a reminder on cut off and secretariat... Message From: Internet-Drafts Administrator internet-dra...@ietf.org This is a reminder that the Internet Draft Initial Version (-00) cut- off is this coming Monday, February 18th, 2013. Please note that, because the AMS office

[Pce] Fwd: Internet Draft Final Submission Cut-Off Monday, February 25

The usual and useful reminder before the week-end... Message original De :Internet-Drafts Administrator internet-dra...@ietf.org This is a reminder that the Internet Draft Final Submission (version -01 and up) cut-off is Monday, February 25, 2013. All Final Version (-01

[Pce] Final Agenda for IETF 86

Hi PCE'rs. The agenda for our meeting in Orlando has been updated: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/agenda/agenda-86-pce Due to the time constraints, we could not accommodate all the received requests. We have thus enforced the same policy as before: new I-Ds should have been discussed on

[Pce] ***SPAM*** 13.751 (5) MPLS2013 Call for Presentation Proposals

On behalf of Ina and the TPC: Dear PCE colleagues, The MPLS 2013 International Conference, the 16th Annual International Conference on MPLS and Related Technologies, will be held November 17-20, in Washington, DC. The Technical Program Committee is soliciting abstracts summarizing a

[Pce] Fwd: RE: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07

KDDI | IP Transport Network Development Dept. +81-(0)80-5945-9138 | www.kddi.com -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 6:13 PM To: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-...@tools.ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Last IPR Check on draft

Re: [Pce] Milestones changed for pce WG

Dear WG, Following the IESG's approval of our new charter text, we have updated our milestones. Note that the list should not be read as an exact list of documents, but rather as a guidelines describing our areas of work. Long term milestones will be updated as we move forward, according to

[Pce] MPLS/SDN 2013 Program Information

The MPLS/SDN 2013 Conference (the 16th annual event) program is now posted and is available at www.mpls2013.com, or specifically Tutorials (Sun): http://www.isocore.com/mpls2013/program/tutorials.htm Technical sessions (Mon-Wed): http://www.isocore.com/mpls2013/program/technical_sessions.htm

[Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints

Dear authors of the aforementioned document, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints? If so, has all this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) A response from each of you is expected.

[Pce] Building PCE Agenda for IETF 88

Hi all. IETF 88 is coming fast. The PCE meeting has been scheduled on Wednesday at 1 PM. If you intend to make an efficient use of a face to face discussion slot, please send a request to the chairs and secretary, including the corresponding ID(s), the expected duration and a presenter's

Re: [Pce] Building PCE Agenda for IETF 88

Hi. We'd like to have the slides on line on Monday. Presenters, if you haven't yet, please provide your slides to the chairs and secretary by Sunday 2nd. Regards, JP Julien Le 25/10/2013 18:13, Julien Meuric a écrit : Hi. You may have noticed that the draft (but tight) agenda

[Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03

Hi again. Following the support expressed in the room during our meeting in Vancouver, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are

Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03

Hi again. The support looks clear. Authors, you may publish the document as draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-00. Thanks, JP Julien Nov. 12, 2013 - Julien Meuric: Hi again. Following the support expressed in the room during our meeting in Vancouver, we would like to get

[Pce] Building London Agenda

Hi all. The _preliminary_ agenda for IETF 89 is on line. PCE WG meeting is currently scheduled on Tuesday, March 4, at 9 AM. If you believe you could use a presentation slot during that meeting, please contact the chairs and secretary, including: - the topic or the I-D title, - the

[Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-10

Hi all. Since many of you are going to dedicate some time to IETF matters over the upcoming days, here comes some homework. This message ignites a 2-week WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-10. It will end on Monday, February 17, 11:59 PM (UTC-12). Thanks, JP Julien

[Pce] I-D Cut-Off

Hi all. Please be aware that the deadline for posting your drafts before IETF 89 is next *Friday*, not a Monday as usual. (Thanks Adrian for the warning.) JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] I-D Cut-Off

Hi again! Before a controversy attract the RFC Editor into the thread, allow me to rephrase: - cut-off is *not* a Monday but a Friday (14th), - reference information is on http://www.ietf.org/meeting/important-dates-2014.html#IETF89 Julien Feb. 10, 2014 - Julien Meuric: Hi all. Please

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-10

Hi all. This last call has ended. We have not seen many reviews. The chairs' will come soon. JP Julien Feb. 03, 2014 - Julien Meuric: Hi all. Since many of you are going to dedicate some time to IETF matters over the upcoming days, here comes some homework. This message ignites a 2

[Pce] Slides from PCE Presenters

Hi all. Please note that the PCE WG is meeting on Tuesday morning, i.e. rather early in the week. We have a tight agenda. Presenters, if you do not want to loose the slot(s) you may have (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/89/agenda/pce), please send your slides to the chairs _and_

[Pce] Fwd: Writable MIB Module IESG Statement

Hi all. FYI. This has been discussed within PCE, it is even better to have an IETF-wide orientation. We will consider this after publishing the MIBs already in the oven. Julien Message original Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:01:43 -0800 From: The IESG i...@ietf.org The

[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-07

Hi all. This message ignites a PCE WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-07. It will end on Monday, March 31, 11:59 PM (UTC-12). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-07

Hi. This WG LC has ended. A great step for one of our oldest I-Ds. JP Julien Mar. 17, 2014 - Julien Meuric: Hi all. This message ignites a PCE WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-07. It will end on Monday, March 31, 11:59 PM (UTC-12). Thanks, JP Julien

Re: [Pce] Terminology for PCE-Initiated LSP (Was I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-questions-02.txt)

Hi all. This thread started to tackle an interesting issue. More feedback would have been much welcome. Let me try to rephrase. What we agree on: the WG (whatever its name) works on PCEP. What may be discussed: is a PCE defined as a path computation function or as a deciding end of a PCEP

[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-questions-04

Hi all. This message ignites a PCE WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-questions-04. It will end on Wednesday, April 23, 11:59 PM (UTC-12). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-questions-04

Hi all. This last call has ended. We have seen interesting discussion. If people who raised comments feel the proposed resolutions are not satisfying, please shout. Otherwise, we will move forward the accordingly updated document. Thanks, JP Julien Apr. 09, 2014 - Julien Meuric: Hi all

[Pce] Fwd: FW: YANG Advice and Editing Session at the next IETF meeting

Hi all. YANG modules are more and more often mentioned in PCE discussions. The following session could be an interesting opportunity to begin with. Regards, JP Julien -Original Message- From: iesg [mailto:iesg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise Sent: 13 May 2014

[Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-questions

Dear authors of the aforementioned document, The usual check to move forward properly: has all IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-questions been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) A response from each of you is expected.

Re: [Pce] Regarding draft-ietf-pce-questions-05

Hi Adrian. Thanks for the update. Your question got lost among the unflagged e-mails (since CC'ed as mailing-list), but the answer would have been: up to you, mainly depending on the time you may have in the near future. As a result: right move. As document shepherd, Dhruv may proceed with

[Pce] Fwd: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area

Hi all. FYI: a starting thread about the Routing Area on the routing-discussion mailing list. Julien -- Forwarded message -- From: *Alia Atlas* akat...@gmail.com mailto:akat...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:57 PM To: routing-discuss...@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] PCEP ERO

Hi Dhruv. PCEP does not mandates more rules on ERO than RSVP-TE, which reminds me of an old discussion in CCAMP. You may want to have a look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrel-ccamp-ero-survey-00 and dive into the associated thread back in 2006. Julien Jun. 16, 2014 - Dhruv Dhody:

[Pce] Building the PCE Agenda

Hi all. The preliminary agenda for IETF 90 has been issued (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/90/agenda.html). It is time to get prepared for Toronto and gather slot requests. Please consider the following algorithm: if ( isWGdoc (my_I-D) ) then considerSlotFor (my_I-D); else {

[Pce] Slides for IETF 90

Hi all. For those who have a slot in the PCE agenda, please send your slides to the secretary and the chairs by Sunday. Late slides will have their slots treated with respect to the chairs' mood... Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list

[Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib

Dear authors of the aforementioned document, Has all IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) A response from each of you is expected. Regards, JP Julien

[Pce] Implementation Feedbacks

Dear implementers, If you have an implementation of one of the following, would you please consider informing the chairs? - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib, - draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions, - RFC 7150. Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-09

indentation column width. For BANDWIDTH object I think you mean 5-15: Unassigned For ENDPOINTS the reference should be to 2.5, not 2.3 == Section 5.5 == Value=q0 should be Value=10 -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 04 July

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-00.txt

Hi Dhruv. I would say that, if the intend was to allow the specified TLV in objects where optional TLVs do not exist, it would not be phrased like this. All the same, it makes no harm to add explicitly allowing optional TLVs in the I-D. By the way, your quotes allows us to catch a weird

Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-12.txt

Hi Young and WSON co-authors. As part of the shepherding of the WSON requirement draft, please find below some comments to address before sending to the IESG. Regards, Julien -- Globally, the way the top-level section titles are indented creates troubles to IETF tools, including

Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-12.txt

this. Thanks, Young -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:10 AM Hi Young and WSON co-authors. As part of the shepherding of the WSON requirement draft, please find below some comments to address before sending

Re: [Pce] Regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-09

Hi Dhruv. Just to be sure we're on the same page: the WG LC on this I-D ended on March, 31! All the same, your comments can be taken into account before or alongside the IETF LC (it's up to the editors). Thanks for your review, Julien Jul. 31, 2014 - Dhruv Dhody: Hi Authors, I re-read

Re: [Pce] Request for early allocation of code points for draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext status of draft

Hi Oscar. Sorry for the late response, I have overlooked the part directed to the chairs. Even if suboptimal from the implementer's point of view, the usual procedure is codepoint allocation during RFC publication. Anyway, a process for early allocation is defined: as such, it is not a

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 93

Dear all, You will find on line the agenda for the PCE session of IETF 93: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/agenda/agenda-93-pce Again, defining it has been a tricky exercise. As we result, we need to remind the WG a few things about working at the IETF and consensus-based progress: - if

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 94

. 12, 2015 - Julien Meuric: Hi all, FYI, the PCE session is now scheduled on Tuesday, from 5:10 to 6:40 pm, right before the social event. By the way, Yokohama meeting is number 94: sorry for the typo in the previous e-mail. Regards, Jon, JP & Julien Oct. 05, 2015 - julien.meu...@or

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-05.txt

Hi Ina, Please note that there are pending questions on this I-D: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE Thanks, Julien Oct. 19, 2015 - inami...@google.com: This is just a version refresh,

Re: [Pce] Chair's Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-11

] See below. Thank you, Ina On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Julien Meuric <julien.meu...@orange.com> wrote: - s/Active Stateful PCE: is an extension/Active Stateful PCE: an extension/ ### Replaced as "an Active Stateful PCE that may issue recommendations... [

Re: [Pce] Initial version for liaison text: New Liaison Statement, "Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces"

Hi Daniele, I am sorry, but: - the received document is not clear to me and deserves clarification to be properly commented; - I am strongly surprised by the deep change with respect to the previous version of the response shared before; - the proposed

[Pce] Poll on Adoption of draft-minei-pce-association-group-03

Dear all, Following our discussion during the WG meeting yesterday, do you support the adoption of draft-minei-pce-association-group-03 as a starting point for a new PCE WG item? If not, please motivate your answer. In any case, comments are welcome. Regards, Jon, JP & Julien

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-minei-pce-association-group

Hi all, Nov. 05, 2015 - lber...@labn.net: Loa = Lou = me Does it mean we've all been abused by this fake beard for years?! Anyway, than you for working together during adoption polling: that is a strong move to build the consensus we are trying to judge there. Regards, Julien

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 94

Hi all, FYI, the PCE session is now scheduled on Tuesday, from 5:10 to 6:40 pm, right before the social event. By the way, Yokohama meeting is number 94: sorry for the typo in the previous e-mail. Regards, Jon, JP & Julien Oct. 05, 2015 - julien.meu...@orange.com: Dear PCE WG, The

Re: [Pce] Query on Usage of LSP Identifier TLV in SR

Hi Girish, Due to the very different levels of maturity between stateful-pce and MBB I-Ds, we do not see them merging. MBB I-D was very briefly discussed on the list a while ago, we do not know what the plans of the authors are... Regards, Julien Oct. 12, 2015 - girish...@gmail.com:

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

while the control is still with the WG? Regards, Dhruv -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 19 November 2015 14:56 Hola Diego, The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished. Finished or not, you

[Pce] SDN/MPLS 2015 Info

The SDN/MPLS 2015 Conference program has been posted. It is available at http://www.isocore.com/2015/  or specifically at: Tutorials (Sunday): http://www.isocore.com/2015/tutorials.htm Technical sessions (Mon- Wed):

Re: [Pce] Chair's Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-11

Hi Ina, Thank you for publishing the update. It looks like most comments are incorporated. Just a few remain open, see [JM] below. Cheers, Julien Dec. 03, 2015 - inami...@google.com: All the changes discussed in this thread have been incorporated in version 13 published yesterday

Re: [Pce] Poll on Adoption of draft-minei-pce-association-group-03

Hi all, Support looks clear. Authors, please publish the latest version as draft-ietf-pce-association-group-00. Thanks, Julien Nov. 04, 2015 - Julien Meuric: Dear all, Following our discussion during the WG meeting yesterday, do you support the adoption of draft-minei-pce-association

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04

Hola Diego, The WG LC was started for a 2-week period: you can consider it finished. Finished or not, you are expected to resolve all the received comments and publish an update accordingly, so as to have the I-D ready to be sent to the IESG. Feel free to proceed as soon as you are able to.

[Pce] Fwd: WG Action: Rechartered IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e (6tisch)

F.Y.I.: the 6tisch WG has just been rechartered, "PCE" is explicitly mentioned. Julien Message transféré Date : Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:38:31 -0800 De : The IESG The IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e (6tisch) WG in the Internet Area of

[Pce] Linking Stateful and Stateless Capabilities [Was: Whither Stateless PCE?]

Hi all, [New title to help editors of stateful I-Ds to catch up.] It appears that there is still some shadow on the main stateful I-D. We should make sure that any reader has a good understanding of what is history behavior and what is not, without assuming incremental extensions of IETF

Re: [Pce] Whither Stateless PCE?

Hi Adrian, Based on the evolution of this thread, it looks like it leaves us with the following guidelines: - The case by case basis looks reasonable and should prevail; - Extensions should focus on what is (eventually) useful; - The scope of each work should be explicitly mentioned in I-Ds.

[Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-07

Dear authors of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp, Please find below my shepherd's review of the aforementioned I-D. _Summary_ The document does not need much work to move forward. As discussed with Ina during the IETF week, a few items deserve to be highlighted: - the choice of zero as

Re: [Pce] Whither Stateless PCE?

Hi Ina, hi Stéphane, I am glad to see this discussion progressing, sorry for interrupting. RFC 5440 defines the END-POINTS object, which includes an egress ID. Do not you think it could be considered to unambiguously convey the egress destination-attached

[Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Hi, We have consensus to adopt. Authors, please republish under the name draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-00. Thanks, Jon, JP & Julien Aug. 12, 2016 - Julien Meuric: Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the inte

Re: [Pce] Urgent issue with draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce : PCE advising PCC about no path

Hi all, Chair hat on, I concur with the proposed plan: we need to stick to the current scope of the base stateful I-D and fix pending issues in there, new proposals like "partial delegation" do require a new document. Thank you Dhruv and

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-07

g. Is that OK? Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 29 July 2016 10:16 Dear authors of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp, Please find below my shepherd's review of the aforementioned I-D. _Summary_ The document d

[Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-association-policy

Hi all, Though it is a -00, draft-dhody-pce-association-policy already has a long history: thanks to the authors for the common work. During our meeting in Seoul, it received some support from the room. We now want to know whether the list agrees to adopt it as a foundation for a PCE WG

[Pce] Last IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

Dear authors of the aforementioned I-D, Could you please share with the mailing list whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp and, if so, if it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.)

[Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 97

Hi all, The preliminary agenda for the IETF in Seoul tentatively schedules the PCE session on Wednesday, November 16, at 1:30pm. Should you intend to present something during our face-to-face time, please send a request to the chairs and secretary by Friday, October 28, including: - the

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

Hi, This topic was tackled a while ago in the context of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE It looks like the I-D would benefit from clarification on this matter before sending it to the IESG. Authors, what to do you think?

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98

progress (which scheduled presenters should do as well). If you have a main stream slot, please send your slides to the chairs and secretary by _Friday 24_. Thank you, Jon, JP & Julien Feb. 27, 2017 - Julien Meuric: > Hi all, > > The PCE WG session in Chicago is tentatively schedu

  1   2   >