Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Hi All, /Support I'm a believer in the work. For some scenarios that use PCE, especially optical deployments, not having to implement BGP will be a big benefit. The authors have proposed that the intended status should be "experimental," and provide the scope of the experiment in

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03

Hi WG, Correcting my statement: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, dan From: Dan Voyer Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:42 AM To: Dhruv Dhody , "Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" , "Rajarathinam,

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03

HI WG, I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. Thanks, dan From: Dhruv Dhody Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:40 AM To: "Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" , Dan Voyer , "Rajarathinam, Saranya (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" , "Ehsan

[Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-10

Reviewer: Daniel Franke Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG

Re: [Pce] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07: (with COMMENT)

Thank you for the review Roman. We have added a reference to RFC4920. I believe Jon and Dhruv have clarified the "lack of reviews" comment. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker Sent: 13 June 2019 09:00 To: The IESG Cc:

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Benjamin for the detailed review. We have addressed all the NITs, a few further clarifications/thoughts on the other points you raised: >> Section 1.5 >> RFCs 5088 and 5089 are for OSPV and IS-IS discovery mechanisms. Aren't >> those inherently (in some sense) limited to a single IGP

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10.txt

Young Lee Daniele Ceccarelli Jongyoon Shin Daniel King Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10.txt Pages : 21 Date: 2019-06-17 Abstract

Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce

Hi Document Shepherd, Thank you for your detailed review, comments and suggested text. The authors believe we have addressed all the open issue with the last two revisions of the I-D. If you would be so kind as to scan through the changes it would be very much appreciated. Please also find a

Re: [Pce] 答复: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

Hi Haomian, Thank you again for the review and suggestions. We believe we have addressed your comments. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept) Sent: 01 April 2019 08:39 To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09.txt

Young Lee Daniele Ceccarelli Jongyoon Shin Daniel King Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09.txt Pages : 22 Date

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-08.txt

: Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE). Authors : Dhruv Dhody Young Lee Daniele Ceccarelli Jongyoon Shin Daniel King Oscar Gonzalez de Dios

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-11.txt

. -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 01 June 2019 18:28 To: Daniel King ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios ; Fatai Zhang ; Oscar de Dios ; Quintin Zhao ; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-11.txt A new version of I-D

Re: [Pce] IETF last call on draft-ietf-inter-area-as-applicability

Hi, I think it's good to respond, so I will. At least this IESG member took the time to scan the ID, which the authors very much appreciate. BR, Dan. On Fri, 31 May 2019, 17:05 Adrian Farrel, wrote: > Hi, > > I saw only one comment on this document in IETF last call. > > Stephen Farrell's

Re: [Pce] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-09

Thanks again Mike for all your thorough review, and valuable comments/suggestions, and especially text changes! All of these NITS have been squashed in our latest version (v11) which will post once the IESG telechat is complete. BR, Dan and the other authors. -Original Message-

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10

Hi Kyle, Thank you for the review, it is most appreciated! We have addressed all your comments in the latest version of our I-D (v11) but were advised to hold off posting until after the IESG telechat. Comments inline (DK>>) on how we addressed said comments: -Original Message-

Re: [Pce] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10

Hi Roni and Alissa, Thanks both for the review. We have addressed the comments from you both in the latest version (11) but have not posted as it was so close to the IESG telechat. A few comments (DK>>) below on the specific comments: Re: Minor issues: > 1. In section 1.1 last bullet does it

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-07.txt

Path Computation Element (PCE). Authors : Dhruv Dhody Young Lee Daniele Ceccarelli Jongyoon Shin Daniel King Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Filename

Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce

Dear Shepherd, Thank you for the constructive treatment of our I-D. Indeed, the document would benefit from the text updates and we absolutely agree the need to remove any ambigiouty in the procedure text defined. Also, the ASCII art optimisation is always greatfully received. We (the

Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce

Hi Chairs, All, I am also not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Zhangxian (Xian) Sent: 18 March 2019 07:19 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] IPR poll on

Re: [Pce] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-09

Hi Mike, All, We addressed the NITs identified by Mike and recently posted an update (version 10). Thanks again Mike for your review. BR, Dan and the other authors. -Original Message- From: Daniel King On Behalf Of dan...@olddog.co.uk Sent: 26 February 2019 06:19 To: 'Mike McBride

Re: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8306 (5622)

Hi ADs, Yes, as one of the authors, I confirm this was a glitch in the edit. The Errata Report raised should be accepted. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: RFC Errata System Sent: 04 February 2019 17:08 To: quintin.z...@huawei.com; dhruv.i...@gmail.com;

Re: [Pce] Replacing Jon as PCE Co-Chair

Very sorry to see Jon step down, and thanks for all the hard work Chairing Jon, although looking forward to more individual and WG technical PCE contributions from you (again). :) Congratulations Dhruv! (Welcome back Adrian.) :) BR, Dan. From: Pce On Behalf Of BRUNGARD,

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07.txt

. -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 13 December 2018 14:03 To: Daniel King ; Haomian Zheng Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07.txt has been

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-07.txt

Doh! Indeedy, my script failed at the ToC generation! Will fix and upload a new version. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: 06 December 2018 14:21 To: Daniel King ; Farrel Adrian Cc: pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-07.txt

Dear PCE'rs, Please find a new version of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions (07) addressing comments from the most excellent Dhruv, our Document Shepherd. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 05 December 2018 19:53 To: Oscar de Dios ; Daniel King

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt

Excellent, thanks Dhruv. Let me get with the other authors and discuss. So far, I don’t see an issue. Thanks for the suggestions. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: 28 November 2018 15:16 To: Daniel King Cc: pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt

BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 05 November 2018 11:29 To: Oscar de Dios ; Daniel King ; Fatai Zhang ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios ; Quintin Zhao ; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt A new version of

Re: [Pce] Working group last call (including final IPR check) for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

Hi Chairs, all. I am also not aware of any IPR that would apply to this I-D. BR, Dan. From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com] Sent: 27 October 2017 08:41 To: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoi...@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] Best Wishes for the future of PCE WG !

.@att.com>; Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>; King, Daniel <d.k...@lancaster.ac.uk>; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> Subject: Best Wishes for the future of PCE WG ! Dear WG, Almost 12 years since we started the PCE WG ! More than 30 RFCs, many re-charterings, clos

Re: [Pce] IPR on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis

Hi Chairs, Yes, I am also aware of IPR. This has been specifically disclosed and highlighted previously. Thanks, Dan. -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com] Sent: 24 April 2017 23:38 To: Jonathan Hardwick ;

[Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09

Reviewer: Daniel Franke Review result: Has Issues I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98

To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> Cc: Julien Meuric <julien.meu...@orange.com>; JP Vasseur <j...@cisco.com>; Daniel King <dan...@olddog.co.uk>; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98 Thanks for the update! It will be great

[Pce] New (01) version of PCEP Experimental Codepoint Allocation

Hi All, We just posted a new version of the I-D based on comments received from the list. Experimental Codepoint Allocation for Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-01 Updates include: - Suggested

Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability

Hi Dhruv, Great review! Thanks for the detailed comments. We will digest and update/discuss accordingly. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com] Sent: 31 March 2016 05:21 To: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicabil...@ietf.org Cc:

[Pce] [rfc-dist] RFC 7491 on A PCE-Based Architecture for Application-Based Network Operations

Hi All, Just a heads up that the ABNO Framework I-D was recently published as RFC7491 - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7491. Thanks to the ABNO authors/contributors and Alia for sponsoring the I-D and helping polish the document in the final stages. BR, Dan.

Re: [Pce] 'Re: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-00'

Hi All, Unfortunately the contents of the email from Joydeep was removed when it arrived at the list. Below is the original message/question. If the segment routing authors could respond, I am sure it would be appreciated. BR, Dan. From: Joydeep Banerjee joydeepb.2...@gmail.com

[Pce] FW: [CCAMP] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting (December 18, 20:00 UTC)

Just an FYI on the upcoming TE topology YANG model (interim) meeting. Date/Time: December 18, 20:00 UTC. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/current/msg00027.html No call info has been posted as yet. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-boun...@ietf.org] On

[Pce] IETF 91 Minutes for PCE Session

Hi Folks, Please note the IETF 91 minutes were uploaded: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/pce/minutes?item=minutes-91-pce.html If you have any amendments or updates please let us know. Thanks again to Jon for taking the minutes BR, Dan.

[Pce] PCE Meeting Time/Location RE: PCE Session in IETF 91

of the agenda (and summary for the routing area meeting). Daniel (King) and Ramon (Casellas) have agreed to be our proxies and chair the session. Johnathan (Hardwick) will be in charge of the minutes. Enjoy IETF 91, JP Julien

[Pce] Implementation Experience for H-PCE (draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions)

Hi All, The authors of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions are updating the document and it would be really useful to include a section on Implementation Experience section, as per RFC6982 (RFC6982). Would any early implementers of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions please send me any details

[Pce] Implementation Experience for draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery

Hi All, Following on from my request for H-PCE implementation experience. I would like to highlight some European Research that utilized the DNS-based PCE Discovery proposal: Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Name System(DNS)

Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-questions

Hi Co-Chairs, Dhruv, et al. I am not aware of any IPR regarding this I-D. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 22 May 2014 11:13 To: draft-ietf-pce-questi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Last IPR Check

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-06.txt

Authors : Quintin Zhao Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Zafar Ali Ramon Casellas Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-06.txt Pages : 22

Re: [Pce] NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02

Dhody; Daniel King; Diego R. Lopez Subject: NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02 Hi,folks: In the current DNS based PCE discovery draft, we use NAPTR to lookup PCE service and query SRV record and AAA record for a DNS domain name. In the draft, we only uses NAPTR flags 'a','s

Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-04

Thanks Oscar! This will really help improve the readability of the draft. We will update the draft, but also respond to each of the points specifically and clarify any technical issues. Br, Dan. From: Oscar González de Dios [mailto:ogon...@tid.es] Sent: 17 June 2013 17:09 To:

Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Hi Julien JP, No IPR, as far as I am aware. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 21 May 2013 10:54 To: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedu...@tools.ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Last IPR Check on

[Pce] ABNO Updated - draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture-01

of the architecture - Placeholder for survivability and redundancy - General readability and nit fixes We know several people are working on text for additional use cases, and we look forward to seeing those contributions! Br, Dan Adrian. -Original Message- From: Daniel King [mailto:dan

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt

: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 28 June 2012 16:59 To: Daniel King Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt Hi Dan. Thanks for addressing my comments. I believe there is just one question pending, about section 4.7

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt

. Title : The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS Author(s) : Daniel King Adrian Farrel Filename: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt Pages

Re: [Pce] IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk

Dear Julien, all, I am also unaware of any IPR associated with the H-PCE I-D. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: julien.meu...@orange.com [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 08 June 2012 15:42 To: Daniel King; Adrian Farrel; Quintin Zhao; Fatai Zhang Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject

[Pce] PCE Agenda Requests for IETF83

Hi All, IETF 83 is rapidly approaching so it's time to create the PCE agenda. If you would like to request a slot for the PCE working group session please email me (CC'ing our Chairs) with the topic/draft name and the amount of time you would like. Please let us have your requests no later than

[Pce] IETF 82 Minutes are Availible

Hi All, Our IETF 82 PCE session minutes are online: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/minutes/pce.htm If you have any corrections or updates please email them to me, and CC the chairs, by Friday, 9th December. Br, Dan.

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda [Presentation Slides]

Hi All, Please send me, CC'ing our co-chairs, your slides for IETF 82 no later than Monday, 14 November . This will allow us to upload the slides before the WG session. This is especially useful for our non-native English speakers to review and print out the slides before our session, and for

Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-07

Hi Julien, All, First, a disclosure. I am a co-author. Second, I support the document! Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 22 August 2011 10:27 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll on

[Pce] Scribe Volunteer needed for PCE session @ IETF 81

Hi All, Alas, I am not able to attend IETF 81 so the working group will need a scribe to take the minutes during our PCE session. Please let me and the co-chairs know if you would like to volunteer. Your assistance would be very much appreciated! Br, Dan.

[Pce] The Applicability of the PCE to Computing Protection and Recovery Paths

Hi All, At IETF 79 we briefly discussed how computing paths for service protection and recovery is important for P2MP services. Indeed the latest version of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures includes a section on to explore how protection may be an issue for inter-domain P2MP

[Pce] New Version of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Hi All, We have created a new version of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures (07). http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-07.t xt This version was created to fix a number of minor edits, raise the issue of manageability and help facilitate

Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt as a PCE WG document

: Daniel King dan...@olddog.co.uk Date: October 11, 2010 11:28:10 PM GMT+02:00 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: olivier.dug...@orange-ftgroup.com, f...@tid.es, qz...@huawei.com Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt Hi PCE'rs, Please find a new version of our pce-inter

[Pce] IETF 78 Draft PCE Minutes

Hello PCE'rs, The draft minutes for our IETF 78 meeting have been uploaded to: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/minutes/pce.htm Please suggest any corrections by August 21, 2010. Br, Dan. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-04

successfully submitted by Daniel King and posted to the IETF repository. Filename:draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk Revision:04 Title: The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS GMPLS Creation_date: 2010-07

Re: [Pce] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-05.txt

Hi All, This new version resolves a single Discuss from Tim Polk regarding the construction of associated SVECs. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 07 June 2010 23:30 To:

Re: [Pce] AD review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-08.txt

Thanks Adrian. A new version of the ID has been posted to address your comments. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 31 March 2010 17:47 To: pce@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-08.txt

Hi all, This version fixes a typo and some small nits. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:15 AM To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements

Hi all, I would also like to echo the sentiments of Dan and Julien. The guidance draft-ietf-pce-manageability-requirements gives has been extremely useful in helping authors and contributors make sure their work, when relevant, has the necessary Manageability Considerations sub-sections and

Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-00.txt

-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Meral Shirazipour Sent: 07 March 2010 15:51 To: Daniel King Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-00.txt Hi Daniel, Here are 1-2 quick comments on the draft: Section 5: I would add

Re: [Pce] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07

forwarded message: From: Daniel King dan...@olddog.co.uk Date: February 2, 2010 7:15:10 PM CEST To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07 Hi All, This new version of our draft incorporates a number of minor updates, specifically

Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-00.txt

Resend. Strangely the original email never made it to the list. -Original Message- From: Daniel King [mailto:dan...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: 06 March 2010 14:15 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action:draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-00.txt Howdy all, I recently submitted a new

Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-04.txt

Howdy all, Adrian identified a number of items during his AD review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-03.txt. Itaru and I have endeavoured to resolve the issues raised by Adrian. We believe the document is better for his suggestions and would appreciate any comments regarding this new version.

[Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07

Hi All, This new version of our draft incorporates a number of minor updates, specifically: - Updated Trust Legal Provisions as per Dec 28 (2009) bulletin. - Clearer introductory text - Slightly expanded Section 3.1.1 (P2MP Computation TLV in the Existing PCE Discovery Protocol) - Clearer

Re: [Pce] question on draft-king-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt

Hi Yongli, Thanks for reviewing the draft. In response to your questions: 1. The Parent PCE will determine the likely domain paths from the source to the destination. The Parent PCE will then send an edge-to-edge request to a Child PCE in the ingress domain (ingress-to-edge), and requests to a

Re: [Pce] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-06.txt

Hello all, We recently uploaded a new version of: Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-06 Changes include: - Based on feedback

[Pce] A new version of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk

Hi PCE'rs, I hope everyone is enjoying the holidays. If you're looking for some reading material we recently submitted a new version (03) of the H-PCE draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt Notable updates include: - Assumptions and Requirements This section

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-04.txt

Hi JP, thanks for the clarifications and suggestions! Br, Dan. From: JP Vasseur [mailto:jvass...@cisco.com] Sent: 17 December 2009 18:17 To: Daniel King Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-04.txt Hi Dan, On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Daniel

Re: [Pce] draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Hi Vishwas, Good point. This is mentioned in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-05. Specifically, where a sequence of PCE IDs is required: a. put each PCE ID in a separate object b. allow a sequence of objects So, if we have to have a sequence of PCEs it would be better to

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-04.txt

Hi JP, All, As a co-editor of the P2MP Solutions (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-05) I would like to state that the authors of the P2MP Requirements (draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-04) added all the additional requirements that we identified during the development of the P2MP solutions

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions (was WG Last Call on I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-04.txt)

Hello Dhruv, Thank you for your comment. I agree that the bit should be swapped so the PCE sends a compressed format by default. We will update the text accordingly during our next revision. Br, Dan. From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of dhruv dhody Sent:

[Pce] Draft PCE Minutes for IETF 76

Hello PCE mailing list, Please find the draft pce minutes for our IETF 76 session: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/minutes/pce.htm If you have any comments or requests please email the chairs and myself. I did have one question. A David made a point during Greg's PCE TED

Re: [Pce] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-02.txt

Thanks Julien, good comments. We will take these and Filippo's and update accordingly. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange-ftgroup.com Sent: 09 September 2009 18:43 To: i-nishi...@cb.jp.nec.com;

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-lee-pce-ted-alternatives-01.txt

Hi Young, et al. I thought the draft was well written and an interesting area for discussion. I had the following general comments. a) A key goal of the work is to gather necessary network management information for offline complex path computation. Its logical to assume that the complex

Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-yasukawa-pce-vpn-req-05.txt as a new WG document ?

Hi JP, et al. I am in favor of adopting this work as a WG document. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 7:28 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adopting

Re: [Pce] Objective Function I-D : Last Call Done

Hello Adrian Objective Function authors, I think the document is ready to progress. I have reviewed it and have no comments, except that is a useful document. Br, Dan. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 24 August