On 06/05/2015 04:24 AM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
If I have a choice to debug a recursive (control) object chain using
my toolkit vs. your toolkit, I'll choose mine.
totally.
i very much prefer your toolkit as well, as it allows me to blindly
answer the question why is my patch
On 06/04/2015 10:24 PM, katja wrote:
There's also a way to build Jessie's Pd on Wheezy, described by
IOhannes on pd list.
btw, that way also works to build any external that is packaged for
Debian (and many are, thanks to hans)
fgmadsr
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 06/07/2015 10:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
pd-extended already comes with a menu-entry
for report a bug that links to that page
Yeah, it does, but I've never really used it much so I'm not used to it.
Moreover, I have to say I was insecure this was working, really, with all
the
The offset can be set as argument and it works
I can't seem to make it work, how do you do it? can you send me a patch?
It seems [cycle~] will only work with tables that are 512 in size. It can
be of any size in max now, but the help of Max 7 says: This wavetable may
be of any size, *but
On 06/07/2015 09:27 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Hi, there's a bug in [sgn~] when the block size is equal to 1! I have an
attached patch to show this.
thanks for the report.
Not sure if the list is the best channel to report bugs, I assume there had
to be a better channel to report,
yeah, we have slide~ for logarithmic ramps and rampsmooth~ in max is
inteded to be only a linear ramp smoother, so I find it weird that there's
this option in the code, I guess it shouldn't be there if the idea is to
make them compatible.
Anyway, I was trying to make it in a patch and I did it :)
You can substitute the copysign function with this ugly thing:
[expr $f1*if($f2==0, 1, $f2/abs($f2))]
cheers,
jan
On 06/07/2015 10:39 PM, Jan Baumgart wrote:
It's spelled copysig in expr.
But I couldn't get it to work.
copysig in expr only takes one argument, whereas the c math function
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list
pd-list@lists.iem.at wrote:
Hi list,
tldr; Sourceforge has bundled malware with older Windows binaries for Gimp
and apparently moved an old Sourceforge repo for nmap to a mirror where the
nmap author does not have access.
On 06/05/2015 04:24 AM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
For example, looking at a patch... *2 seconds of eyeballs doing their
thing*... oh, there is the fanout.
vs...
Oh, _everything's_ a trigger. Thinking... *2-2000 seconds of
thought*... oh, there is the dogmatic trigger.
thanks
no, but it's obviously more inefficient :)
it could be simpler if you were to use [change~], that was the tricky part
for me
2015-06-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Peter P. peterpar...@fastmail.com:
* Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com [2015-06-06 17:17]:
the other day I implemented, just for fun,
On 06/04/2015 02:57 PM, Julian Brooks wrote:
JUst double-checked to be sure and
sudo apt-get install pd-iemlib
definitely working here.
pd-iemlib has only been added in Debian/jessie.
btw, pd-iemtab has only been added *now*.
fmdsar
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi Alexandre,
I checked the cycle~ behaviour against the Max5 doc, and it appears to
work as described. Only clicking to view the current buffer contents is
not implemented (yet). The offset can be set as argument and it works.
The second inlet controls the phase, which amounts to more or less
I'm assuming this copysign function is like the [sgn~] object in zexy,
right? If not, what would it be? cheers
2015-06-07 16:57 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com:
hi there, I was checking the source of expr (find it attached) and saw
this copysign function that I needed for a
Hi Alexandre,
another bug, now in [slide~], it needs a ramp up value that is small, so
the ramp down works. On the other hand, ramp down value can be zero and
ramp up will still work. Check attached file.
Fixed this one too. I will try to fix cycle~ too before updating all
binary packages.
It's spelled copysig in expr.
But I couldn't get it to work.
copysig in expr only takes one argument, whereas the c math function
takes two arguments:
float copysignf(float x, float y);
It returns the absolute value of x with the sign of y.
Smells like a bug to me...
cheers,
Jan
On
some people were saying expr does internal double precision calculation, is
it true? i dont think so...
2015-06-07 3:10 GMT-03:00 Cyrille Henry c...@chnry.net:
Le 07/06/2015 04:48, Max a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merci Cyrille,
in the formula the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi claude, thank you for the enlightenment.
m.
On 2015년 06월 07일 09:57, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
On 07/06/15 01:38, Chris McCormick wrote:
So the ** operator behaves differently from pow(x, 2).
It's more likely that:
- x ** 2
means:
-
On Sam, 2015-06-06 at 12:37 -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote:
To save extra discussion energy and *possibly* let the “cat out of the
bag” let me say this: just wait a bit, something good is in the works
to offer a solution to many of these problems.
I'm looking forward!
Roman
On 07/06/15 20:38, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sam, 2015-06-06 at 12:37 -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote:
To save extra discussion energy and *possibly* let the “cat out of the
bag” let me say this: just wait a bit, something good is in the works
to offer a solution to many of these problems.
I'm
On 07/06/15 09:52, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
an alternative plan that'd be great.
I think it was Socrates said something about code words:
https://github.com/pure-data/deken
Cheers,
Chris.
--
http://mccormick.cx/
___
Hi Jan,
Thanks for pointing this out. I had seen the logic juggling with
RAMPSMOOTH_GEOMETRIC and RAMPSMOOTH_LINEAR, but hadn't came to the
conclusion the default behaviour was incorrect. I changed the code for
now, but could make the change possible at run-time, as it was intended.
But as we
yeah, I can't load these objects for some reason, I wonder why is that, I'm
on mac os and extended 42, any idea?
I didn't know they were in cyclone... But I remember we discussed about
them, not all of them are part of zexy actually. Zexy's only got 3 out of
these, whixh are: ~, ~ and ==~
It
Hi Alexandre,
The nettles are the cyclone bin-ops objects we discussed before:
!-, !/, ==~, !=~, ~, =~, ~, =~, !-~, !/~, %~, +=~
They are part of the cyclone library object, which may or may not be
part of your distribution. The source code is in
externals/miXed/cyclone/shadow/nettles.c, hence
one issue that stands out in the case of expr is that its official manual
and code distribution is hosted in sharok's website, so I guess he needs to
be involved.
2015-06-07 18:40 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com:
Great, I'll try to remember all bugs I found and test the
I got nothing against the bug tracker, and I'll report it soon, let me just
test all the functions carefully.
thanks for the info
cheers
2015-06-07 19:38 GMT-03:00 Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com:
If you don’t want to use the bug tracker, it makes sense to write up a
list of expr bugs you’ve
Great, I'll try to remember all bugs I found and test the object for even
more issues that there may be and then report them.
But I'd still like to know if anyone can fix this. I'm not sure how the
authorship works in this particular example. I know it's an extra feature
in vanilla, not
I can't get imodf($f1) to load into expr either, and it's one of the listed
functions in the website, it doesn't seem to be the same problem with
copysig. It's on my list to report soon, but if anyone finds a way to
load it please let me know. cheers
2015-06-07 19:46 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres
On Jun 7, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com wrote:
such as why would it have to be concentrated in one person”?
Because that’s how the existing extended setup was originally built and
maintained.
Why the build farm is gone and how hard would it be to put it all
Actually, the linear version is already in cyclone's code.
You can choose at compile time by not setting
#define RAMPSMOOTH_GEOMETRIC
cheers,
jan
On 06/06/2015 10:26 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
I have another bug to report, now in [rampsmooth~].
According to its help file, it should
If you don’t want to use the bug tracker, it makes sense to write up a list of
expr bugs you’ve found and move the discussion to pd-dev. I think everyone can
agree that finding and fixing said bugs is a good thing we would all want to
see happen.
Nutshell: yes, we can fix it and update it.
well, if you want efficiency, why not just use the [slide~] object for Pd
in cyclone?
2015-06-07 13:45 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com:
no, but it's obviously more inefficient :)
it could be simpler if you were to use [change~], that was the tricky part
for me
2015-06-07
On Jun 7, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com
mailto:por...@gmail.com wrote:
such as why would it have to be concentrated in one person”?
Because that’s how the existing extended setup was originally built and
maintained.
Why the build farm is gone and how hard
* Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com [2015-06-07 18:36]:
well, if you want efficiency, why not just use the [slide~] object for Pd
in cyclone?
I guess I was just curious. Thank you for your vanilla port of it
Alexandre.
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at
Well, I'm worried about the bugs in expr and that they get fixed actually,
there are more bugs I found by the way. Now Shahrokh doesn't seem to be
working on it and making updates anymore. I remember I complained about
something in 2009 to him and it never got fixed. I could list them all as
well,
On Jun 7, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com
mailto:por...@gmail.com wrote:
such as why would it have to be concentrated in one person”?
Because that’s how the existing extended setup was
Hi Jonathan,
Whoops, looks like more words were needed after all, heh. :)
On 07/06/15 23:51, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
I'm using github for the nw.js port atm, too. But I see way less
potential for future shenanigans from a non-commercial host
with a long track record.
I don't
Hi Alexandre,
Thanks for your investigations and bug reports - that is important work.
On 08/06/15 05:40, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
But I'd still like to know if anyone can fix this. I'm not sure how the
authorship works in this particular example. I know it's an extra
feature in
37 matches
Mail list logo
