Hi all,
Today, I went down to the local Pentax service centre to
get my Z-50p repaired. (Its LCD and LED are defected...)
The total cost will be around JPY17,000 (some USD150) and
it will be ready 27th.
I felt curious about the cost and asked the clerk how much
it will be for CLA of an LX.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Peter Smith wrote:
Chris Brogden wrote:
Not to mention a battery drainer. If you want to see annoying, check out
the AF assist on the MZ-30 and MZ-7. It's a strobe flash. I can almost
hear the batteries being sucked dry. :)
What evidence do you have for this
I have the Pentax A24/2.8
I still haven't used it a lot, but it seems quite
sharp and not too prone to flare.
It is also quite fast. I took some night street
pictures with good results.
I bought it in ffordes.co.uk for around US$175.
I hope this helps,
Jaume
(e-mail me if you want some sample
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Recently PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
The Pentax Service Center in Colorado, USA, charges only about $170 US
for a CLA.
Pentax Germany charges about 400 DEM (~$182) for a complete CLA. Of this
money, 16 DEM ($7.20) are for parts and the rest is for labor.
After
Welcome to the LX Guild!! So you got an LX and are selling
an MX. Hey Aaron, our triumph is near!!g
The LX will reign supreme!!
Welcome to the world of the LX, Jerome.
Thanks !
In fact, it's my second LX...and I keep my well-used black MX...I'm only selling
my chrome MX. He is really nice
Hi Shel,
At 19 Mar 2001 06:15:44 -0800,
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote;
This weekend I once again used the 43mm Ltd on an LX body. This is
the third time I've used the combination. It is so sweet. The lens
focuses quickly with just a fingertip action, and is so perfectly
balanced
Hi,
At 19 Mar 2001 14:20:04 -,
"Rob Brigham" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote;
On the other hand, the Sigma is less than one third of the price of the
Pentax! This makes it very much a judgement call. If you are concerned
about flare then consider the FA, otherwise the Sigma is best bang for
My two wedding hell stories:
1. Got to church, snagged pants on something and ripped the seat out of
them. Good thing I always listen to my mother (clean socks and underwear).
2. Hot summer day, Baptist Church (lots of "Amens"), bride sitting outside
in a/c limo. Comes into church for
I bet it is good looking. Still, I prefer black.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Yoshihiko Takinami" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Shel,
At 19 Mar 2001 06:15:44 -0800,
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote;
This weekend I once again used the 43mm Ltd on an LX body. This is
I'd probably prefer black, but, from a cosmetic standpoint, if the
black lens and black body don't match up well, it could look pretty
bad. IAC, I'm not that concerned about appearance except WRT how
the photographs look.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Blakely wrote:
I bet
A scroll of mail from PAUL STENQUIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Sat, 17 Mar 2001 20:31:13 -0500
Read it? y
Way to ebay, Texdance. I think I'm really gonna like having that auto
110 around. I smell big glass. Big, expensive, fully enabled glass.
Paul
Hmmm, there's an 800 f4.0 for 6x7 in one of my
Hi, All Dear Pentaxiers!
Maybe some of you used this lens...
How it performs, especially on the ends; how it resist to flare etc...
I have currently couple of pentax primes and Pentax A 28-80 F3.5 - 4.5 (not
SMC version) and not so happy with it. I'm going to get rid of it but still
want
I've too many ME Supers and have decided to sell a nice looking,
well maintained black body. As with all items I offer to the list,
your satisfaction is guaranteed. Please contact me off list for
details as to condition, price, etc.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is
Hi all,
I also have an A24/2.8. I used to have A28/2.8, but I sold
it to my friend.
A24/2.8 has slight light fall-off in the corners, but very
sharp. Some of my photos in my gallery were taken with it,
including my March PUG submission.
I love the perspective of a 24mm lens.
Sincerely,
Recently PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
The Pentax Service Center in Colorado, USA, charges only
about $170 US
for a CLA.
Pentax Germany charges about 400 DEM (~$182) for a complete
CLA. Of this
money, 16 DEM ($7.20) are for parts and the rest is for labor.
Cheers,
Boz
I think
This weekend I once again used the 43mm Ltd on an LX body. This is
the third time I've used the combination. It is so sweet. The lens
focuses quickly with just a fingertip action, and is so perfectly
balanced on the camera I'm almost moved to tears. By all means, if
you can, try this
IIRC Isn't that what happens as the battery starts to get exhausted?
Anyway, if the sekonic agrees with the K1000 but not with the SP500 then
the SP500 is probably off (though there is a chance both the sekonic and
K1000 are aff by the same amount). Another thing to check is the lens on
the
Hi all,
I felt much enabled... But no! I have to wait for my
A50/1.4 to come!!
Sincerely,
I'd probably prefer black, but, from a cosmetic standpoint, if the
black lens and black body don't match up well, it could look pretty
bad. IAC, I'm not that concerned about appearance except WRT
Oh Shel! How could you do this? You're selling one of your babies! Black ME
Supers don't grow on trees any more, you know.
If you sell it you'll feel sad...
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Shel Belinkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've too many ME Supers and have decided to sell a
Sas Gabor wrote:
Hi,
I started with a Zenit E about 13 years ago, then upgraded to a
Zenit 12XP, then came a Zenit 19.
[snip]
I would add that in my experience the newer a Zenit is, the less
reliable it is.
[snip]
I guess I am lucky -- I have an old reliable Zenit E sitting in a
Chris,
Thanks for the nice explanation. I've been following this thread and I must
admit there was a point where I was getting a bit confused. Your post
really cleared things up.
I own a zx-m and am considering an auto-focus camera. I'm in no hurry so I
think I'll wait until the release
"Rob Brigham" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the UK you can get lots of second hand MF Sigma 24s for
about 40. There are very few FA 24s second hand and the new price is
540. You could get 13.5 second hand sigmas for the price of a new FA!
Perhaps this means something...
-
This message is from
Pentax no longer services bodies such as my Super Program but I took it
to a 3rd party repair outlet in Minnesota and they quoted me approx $125
for a CLA. Said it would take about 3 weeks though...
I bought my bodies new but they are all approaching 20 years of age
(K-1000, MX and Super
That Pentax's is 13.5 times better than Sigma's? :)
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Rob Brigham" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the UK you can get lots of second hand MF Sigma
24s for
about £40. There are very few FA 24s second hand
and the new price is
£540. You could get
Hi guys,
I got some rools of film back from the lab this
weekend and notice wile scannig them that some frames
have some pinkish vertical stripes. What might have
caused that, bad processing?
Thanks,
Herbet.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your
Spotted in rec.photo.marketplace.35mm
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djqas_ugroup=rec.photo.marketplace
Todd
Subject:
FS:$45 Pentax K mount Auto Bellows LN
Date:
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:43:39 -0500
From:
"chris wakeen" [EMAIL
Hi Listers, especially UK ones...
Does anyone know of a really decent camera shop in the UK, preferably in
the south of England, preferably anywhere between London and Bristol,
that has:
1/ A really good selection of gear, large shop with plenty of room, major
makes, 35mm and medium format,
Does anyone know if the Tak 24/3.5 hood will fit on a K24/2.8?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules for good photographs,
there are only good photographs.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
If you find one, let me know. I cannot recommend ANY of the ones in
Reading!
I presume as you are in Oxfordsire that there is not a good one in
Oxford either?
Rob Brigham
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2001 17:10
To: Pentax List
A scroll of mail from Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 18 Mar
2001 23:21:26 -0500
Read it? y
Cool. Who is in charge? I have a few suggestions...
oh, and if I'm still doing the drudge work, what are the new maintainers doing?
Doug "why are these strings attached to me?" Brewer
With the new
A scroll of mail from Collin Brendemuehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:01:11 -0500
Read it? y
I believe you'll find all of the pure mechanial bodies
to be stepless. The detents are in the dials only, and not
in the mechanism. The linkage is linear between them --
there are no gear
Hey,
seems that I might go around south east asian
country for a while.. I was wondering if any member were around and where to
shoot
Philippe
I stick with the best American manufacturers like Honda and Toyota.
Regards,
Bob...
From: "Paris, Leonard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recently PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
The Pentax Service Center in Colorado, USA, charges only
about $170 US
for a CLA.
Pentax Germany charges about 400
Douglas E Harmon wrote:
:
: http://motorsport.com/photos/alms/ls00/alms-2000-ls-jf-0223.jpg
:
That is an beautiful picture... What lens were you using? I assume a fast
300mm or ???-300 zoom. I am saving the pennys for one in that vein, got any
suggestions Pentax or otherwise?
That's
The LX body and 50mm f1.2 lens I bought on ebay for $550 USD arrived today.
Given the photos with the auction (dusty looking) I was expecting a
"decent" deal for the price, especially given that SMC-M 50 1.2 lenses have
been selling for between $275-$350.
Imagine my surprise when I opened the
I have owned this lens for about four years now, and it is my standard
lens. I traded in a 50 f1.7, a 28 f2.8, and a 28-105 for it, plus some cash.
But it was well worth it. The lens is sharp as a tack, convenient focal
lengths, fast for a zoom, and the colour rendition and contrast rivals
Hi Ken
In this case I think it means flash ready signal in viewfinder and maybe
automatic setting of the camera flash sync speed. For more modern flashes it
also means TTL ability and even automatic flash zooming (like AF500FTZ) with
i.e. Pentax Z- series. This particular flash should be
I was just down at Midwest this afternoon
and had the opportunity to meet one of their
customers from Japan. She needed to replace
her 28-70/4 AL as hers was moisture damaged
and the est. repair cost was $125.
Unfortunately Midwest does not carry Pentax 35mm
so Abdi asked me to assist her with
You mention you use a wireless slave for triggering your Metz MZ40-2 with
your RTF flash, I assume you mean the slave is one that picks up the flash
from your RTF purely optical.
If you buy a second Metz and put that on your PZ1-p you could really
wireless trigger your remote Metz and have TTL.
All of them, new, old, in production, discontinued, used, unused, ...
Did I skip a group? I want that one too.
Frits
Frits,
You say "overview of lenses available". Do you want used items i.e.
discontinued or just items available new?
Regards
Peter
Wow! You found the same dealer I did. That's good! Now we both
know.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 24mm Lens Hoods
"Paris,
From: "Shel Belinkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know if the Tak 24/3.5 hood will fit on a K24/2.8?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes, I know.
The Tak 24/3.5 hood (58mm) fits perfectly on the K 24/3.5 (58mm) , but not
on the K 24/2.8 (52mm)
George
-
This message is
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
You have clarified several considerations that had been floating through my
mind.
Glad to hear. Looking back on what I wrote, if you're interested in
finding out its market value, instead of asking people on the
Shel said:
I've too many ME Supers
Does not compute. Does not compute. Aargh!!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Yep, by golly, Dotline seems to have a picture of the very hood
and cap style you are telling us about. Good deal! I think the
rectangular hoods may do a better job than the tulips, though
I'll have to try them to be sure.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The later Rollei 35 cameras were made in Singapore, not Japan.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperinen viesti-
Lhettj: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Ernest Alejandria wrote:
[snip]
Tarzan who is usually at his best behavior during these solemn
events must have been so taken by the romantic atmosphere of the moment
(notwithstanding the groom crying) that he decided to pick this time to
mount Jane(I'm trying to phrase this as
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Frits J. Wthrich wrote:
Thanks for explaining, I didn't realise the camera doesn't refocus
after the first shot in single AF mode, it makes sense to me now.
Just to throw some more info into the mix, while this may be true for the
Z-1p, the MZ-5n works differently. While
It's a nice camera, indeed. I may get one as a backup for the
PZ-1p. Right now my backup body is a Super Program with the ME
II winder.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chris Brogden
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:41 PM
Nope. I haven't. When focus is correct in the viewfinder, it's
correct on the film, too. There are few times when I even look
at the distance scale on the lens, unless I'm manually going to
use a hyperfocal distance to get max DOF for some kind of action
shot or maybe a landscape sort of a
Yep--that's my HAMA, all right. Ignore what the description says; the hood
does not snap on, it clamps on, just behind the filter (not, as I wrote
earlier, around the filter).
--
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I found a dealer that carries what may be the hood Paul mentioned.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
{snip]
I found a dealer that carries what may be the hood Paul mentioned.
http://www.dotlinecorp.com/dl_cat_A/-A08_lenshood.html
I'm not sure if this is the hood, nor can I determine exactly how it
attaches to the lens
I see that Herb Keppler's 1966 book, The Honeywell Pentax Way, is on EBay
at a Buy-It-Now price of $25. This is the book I was raving about the other
day. Highly recommended.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: (703) 834-4648
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
My biggest gripe was that I could have had it on Friday if I had
picked it up
instead of waiting for the mail... Could have checked it out over the
weekend.
BTW, Buy It Now worked just fine here as there was no reserve and
PayPal
worked fine as well. I think if someone wants to use a
Here is one USA source for Hama lens hoods. I've never done
business with them but it appears that you can order online.
http://www.dotlinecorp.com/dl_cat_A/-A08_lenshood.html
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that Herb Keppler's 1966 book, The Honeywell Pentax Way, is on EBay
at a Buy-It-Now price of $25. This is the book I was raving about the other
day. Highly recommended.
Just as a heads-up to anyone who's thinking of buying it, you can
Ritz Camera (http://www.ritzcam.com) is posting a Vivitar 35-200 f/2.9 to
f/4.5 PK (RL Edition) zoom, "like new in box" (10-), for $145. This may be
what my records call Vivitar's 35-200 f/3-4.5 zoom that came out in 1986.
(Surprising it's not a PKA.) If you like a superwide focal range but
Len Paris wrote:
Yep, by golly, Dotline seems to have a picture of the very hood
and cap style you are telling us about. Good deal! I think the
rectangular hoods may do a better job than the tulips, though
I'll have to try them to be sure.
I use the Hama rectangular on a 24mm f2.8. Works
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://camerex.com/discus/
Scroll down to Pentax SMC 85-210/f3.5 w/Caps Hood (Extremely Rare),
posted February 2.
He's asking $350 or best offer; it's in great condition and includes the
specially made screw-on metal hood. For the record, in June 1999 KEH was
http://camerex.com/discus/
Scroll down to Pentax SMC 85-210/f3.5 w/Caps Hood (Extremely Rare),
posted February 2.
He's asking $350 or best offer; it's in great condition and includes the
specially made screw-on metal hood. For the record, in June 1999 KEH was
selling two: $364 in EX and $399
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that Herb Keppler's 1966 book, The Honeywell Pentax Way, is on EBay
at a Buy-It-Now price of $25. This is the book I was raving about the other
day. Highly recommended.
Good catch, Paul, but the price is too high. Anyone looking for
Keppler's book, or other
Cropped to protect the scandalous:
http://bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/boys.jpg
tv
"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
Oh, and at the same wedding, the girl who caught the bouquet
was wearing
a short dress and no panties...I have a funny shot of some 10 year old
boys getting an eyeful. Maybe I'll
Alexander wrote:
Any word on the rumored new Pentax-FA 18mm f/2.8 ultra-wide-angle lens?
Might it be the next FA* lens?
REPLY:
Well, since its already "known" it shouldn't be that far away. There's a Japan camera
show in a few days. If we're lucky it will be shown there. I don't know
Oh, and at the same wedding, the girl who caught the bouquet was wearing
a short dress and no panties...I have a funny shot of some 10 year old
boys getting an eyeful. Maybe I'll scan that one tonight.
tv
Never mind the boys, how about a shot of the girl sans panties.
Paulo Ernest
Alexander Grigolia wrote:
Could I please have some user comments on the Pentax-FA* 28-70mm f/2.8
AL zoom lens? Not lens test results. But "in the field" working thoughts.
Ease of manual focus. Balance on the camera. Quality of construction.
REPLY:
In my opinion (I know many would
Bush, Chaney, and Clinton were walking to OZ on the yellow brick road.
(They were also taking pixtures of the surrounding scenery with their
cameras, which is why this posting is on-topic. Chaney and Bill were using
Pentax PZ1p's, but George had to use a Minolta QTSD...)
They talk-
Bush says, Oh,
I think I remember a post on the filmscanners list saying the RFS3600
had buggy software, and that Kodak had released a new version.
I'd check Kodak's site. Also, Vuescan should have support for it soon
(or now).
tv
"Juan J. Buhler" wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Gerald Cermak wrote:
Even
Herbet, could you post a couple of scans so I can have a look?
TIA
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "herbet brasileiro" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 19, 2001 10:51 AM
Subject: Stripes on film
Hi guys,
I got some rools of film back from the lab this
weekend and
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: LX 43mm
This weekend I once again used the 43mm Ltd on an LX body.
This is
the third time I've used the combination. It is so sweet.
The lens
focuses quickly with just a fingertip action, and is so
perfectly
balanced on the
You wouldn't think ten-year-olds could be that lascivious. :-)
You can definitely tell that they had a better angle of view
than the camera!
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001 at 18:56:40 -0600 (CST), Chris Brogden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, William Robb wrote:
Think all NIB 50mm 1.7 lenses were packed in f2.0 boxes? :-)
Only for the US market, I think.
Actually, it's the other way around. f2 lenses in the US are
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LX 43mm
Sure Shel, I would love to. You still havemy address?
I have the
LX, just send that 43 up here, I'll
Len Paris wrote:
You wouldn't think ten-year-olds could be that lascivious. :-)
You've got to be kidding...what agony it was being 10...
You can definitely tell that they had a better angle of view
than the camera!
I had the same angle (I innocently walked that way), but figured a
pz-1p,
- Original Message -
From: "Rodger Whitlock"
Subject: Re: Interesting
Oh, that sounds like you are close to getting the fine
50mm f/4
macro for the price of a lousy f/2 job. What incredible luck!
I got my 50mm f4 macro for CAN$40.00. That is about the same
price as the 50mm
William Robb wrote:
Sure Shel, I would love to. You still havemy address? I have the
LX, just send that 43 up here, I'll gladly give it a whirl.
I would add that the LX and the 77mm is also a swell
combination. I used the 77 at the wedding on Saturday for almost
all the portraits. Have I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wedding Hell (Redux)
Len Paris wrote:
You wouldn't think ten-year-olds could be that
lascivious. :-)
You've got
These are good links...thanks.
tv
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Good catch, Paul, but the price is too high. Anyone looking for
Keppler's book, or other books about Pentax, would be well served by
doing a search on http://abebooks.com/
Other on line sources for books are http://bibliofind.com/
Tom writes:
You can definitely tell that they had a better angle of view
than the camera!
I had the same angle (I innocently walked that way), but figured a
pz-1p, 28-70/2.8 and af500ftz on a bracket wasn't sneaky
enoughprobably would have given her a sunburn.
This is the reason
Skip,
SF1 or SF1n comes with a 2CR5 battery pack. It is the grip of the camera
itself, where you see the big letters SF1.
The 4 AA battery grip is a bit fatter, but goes the same place, as the
handgrip. It is available separately. An ebay guy in Augusta, GA seems to
have an endless
William Robb writes:
Always remember, the computer is the enemy. They are vampires of
time.
Damn, I just realised that the amount I'm about to spend on a PC could buy
me a 77mm Limited at local prices.
By the time I add a couple of film scanners and a printer it gets even more
. I have a PC operating on
Windows ME. I'd like to ask members of the list who are more
knowlegable if
there is any precaution I can undertake to prevent problems
that may arise,
if and when power goes off. .
Good advice from William here..
Turn your computer
Inbred, maybe.
How come she only has 4 toes?
This is the south, that's pretty typical.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
I am sure it would have done wonders for my recent
passport photo. I looked kinda blue and corpse-like :)
Honestly, I was alive at the time. I think it was the
worst photo in history - certainly the worst one ever
of me. And I am stuck with it for 10 years :(
Ok, so that's what a Y-44 filter
Love the silver and black. Hate all-black (and
all-blacks, but don't tell em I said so). It is so
morbid and boring.
Nikon and Canon are great systems to own, but I'm
sure
Pentax is also a fine system. Besides, I like its
silver-and-black retro look. :)
A Minolta was recommended to me. I think because it
was cheaper. I think I look too young to have money.
People generally think I am about 8-10 years younger.
But I had seen the Pentax MZ-30 brochure and nothing
else was going to make me happy. It was a manual
Minolta too. Probably thought I was
I see some magician has disappeared the glass ;)
An Asahi Pentax Magic Image attachment? Huh?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, petit miam wrote:
A Minolta was recommended to me. I think because it
was cheaper.
Or the spiff was better. :)
I think I look too young to have money. People generally think I am
about 8-10 years younger. But I had seen the Pentax MZ-30 brochure and
nothing else was
Hmmm, what exactly does "mint" mean again? I think
someone needs a dictionary, perchance. Still ROTF.
Okay, people, count the mistakes, inaccuracies, and
misleading bits in
this auction:
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with
I have (2) Spotmatic F that will require some work to bring it up to par.
I am searching for a good reliable repair shop that will have parts on
hand and will have experience working with the screw mount camera bodies
and lenses.
Any recommendations as to whom I can use?
Thanks,
Evan Dong
89 matches
Mail list logo