Hi,
If any one has one of these for sale, could you email me off list at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The plug is now being pulled on Sunday :)
Thanks,
Paul Jones
Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
> Care to make a little wager? I bet Pentax doesn't show any DSLR that goes
> on sale this year.
Would anything shown at Photokina, digital or not, really be on sale by
the end of this year?
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
Paul Jones wrote:
> Heres a group question:
> How fast has your pentax gone? my MZ-S did 270kmh on the back of my last
> motorbike :) not sure what that is in miles, but its fast.
Mine went about 950km/h in the overhead compartment of a 747 :)
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (
This time I can actually vote for three lenses!
My first choice: FA*24mm f/2: Wide, sharp & fast.
Second: K24 f/2.8: Wide, sharp, small & light.
Third: A15/3.5. Lovely lens but not as useful to me as the 24.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
K17/f4 Fish-Eye
FA*24/f2 IF&AL
I have them !!
Michel
.- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang
Subject: RE: Aaron's shop
> This was seen @ Aaron's shop yesterday (Wednesday)
> http://www.chang-sang.com/photos/franks_machine.jpg
>
> Frank's MX with the 24-48 Vivitar Series 1 on it.
Wow Frank. It cleaned up real pretty.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Robert Woerner
Subject: Nikon for Sale
> For Sale:
>
> Mint in the box, I repeat MINT Nikon F2 Photomic A Black.
>
> $500.00
Oh MAN!!
Whats the first 2 digits of the SN?
William Robb
Francis Alviar asked:
> Have you ever brought two different camera systems on
> vacation? Specifically I am referring to a Pentax
> K-mount system with 2 bodies, 4 lenses plus an M42 to
> K-mount adapter plus a Pentax screwmount body with two
> lenses.
It depends on how you define "vacation".
> I don't remember if I've shot any since. Just because the
> situation hasn't arisen where I need it. I'll tell you what,
> though. I'll go out and shoot some more this week and report
> back..asap
Thanks, Vic. Shoot with it only if you want to, though - don't do
so just for me - .
Fred
> Fred, I also have the vivitar 2Xmacro convertor and swear by
> it In fact, I think it's better or, at least more useful, than
> the Pentax 2XS.
Yes, the Vivitar 2X macro TC is a very good all-around TC, and the
macro function is quite effective on some lenses, too.
However, the use of the
> If you really mean "long" I can vouch for the Tokina 100-300/4 MF.
> I see it rather as a 300mm lens possibly unzoommable to 100. It
> certainly isn't light. [...and...] 70-210 and similars are more
> regarded as mid telezooms
What do you mean by "a 300mm lens possibly unzoommable to 100",
Flav
Hey gang,
Well, I decided I had some idle time, and since I've never been formally
trained in photography, I took a course. It's Introductory Photography I
and it is after the first night (today) BASIC. I was the first to the
classroom, and chatted with my instructor and he loved the fact that
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> In case anyone has forgotten, the Print-Off is still in the
> works. Unfortunately, I still only have 3 submissions.
> I think I am going to have to put a deadline on this thing now.
I think that's just what I ne
Well..
it's confirmed..
I'm not going crazy -
Here's the links:
http://www.chang-sang.com/photos/tele.jpg (this is at 105 and focussed and
shot - 1/125 f3.5)
http://www.chang-sang.com/photos/wide.jpg (this is at 35mm without
re-focussing zooming out from the Tele same aperture and shutter)
Ugly
This was seen @ Aaron's shop yesterday (Wednesday)
http://www.chang-sang.com/photos/franks_machine.jpg
Frank's MX with the 24-48 Vivitar Series 1 on it.
Honking lens huh.. :)
CHeers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18
In a message dated 9/19/02 10:28:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Yes,
On a recent trip to Savannah, GA I took everything because I couldn't make a
decision concerning what NOT to carry. Someday, I hope this changes as
lugging three camera bags on vacation is a pain. I guess I carry the m
For Sale:
Mint in the box, I repeat MINT Nikon F2 Photomic A Black.
$500.00
With regard,
Robert
___
GO.com Mail
Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com
What's all this "K mount only" stuff, why not
include the screwmounts??? My fav is the 24mm F3.5
SMCT. Awesome lens with virtually zero distortion
JCO
- Original Message -
From: Robert Woerner
Subject: Re: M42 or K-mount (or both) - OT
> Yes,
>
> On a recent trip to Savannah, GA I took everything because I
couldn't make a decision concerning what NOT to carry. Someday,
I hope this changes as lugging three camera bags on vacation is
a
In case anyone has forgotten, the Print-Off is still in the
works. Unfortunately, I still only have 3 submissions.
I think I am going to have to put a deadline on this thing now.
I am thinking, the end of October as a submission deadline.
If you are participating in this thing, I would appreciate
Yes,
On a recent trip to Savannah, GA I took everything because I couldn't make a decision
concerning what NOT to carry. Someday, I hope this changes as lugging three camera
bags on vacation is a pain. I guess I carry the motto "Be prepared" too far.
I took all of my K-mount manual bodies(3),
FA 24/2
FA 20/2.8
A 24/2.8
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnold Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:30 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: SMC Pentax Super Wide K-Mount Lens Poll
>
>
> Hello again, no
Continuing our Pre-Photokina patent watch, Pentax has filed two
applications in technology related to a digital SLR.
20020131776 Digital camera
20020130964 Digital camera and ejection mechanism for memory card in
mobile instrument
They are related to circuit board, battery and mem
9/19/2002 3:13:48 PM, "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Arnold,
>
>You don't have a category of "other" but I only have one super wide
>angle, a Vivitar 19mm f/3.8-22.0.
>I'd appreciate anyone else's word on their experience with one.
>
Hi Keith,
I had one for about 8 yearsI f
Hi,
1) A16/2.8 Fish-eye
and if that was not available, then
2) K17/4 Fish-eye,
3) K18/3.5
William in Utah.
9/19/2002 12:30:25 PM, "Arnold Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello again, now here comes my SMC Pentax Super Wide K-Mount Lens Poll:
>
>Please imagine that you were having no sup
Motorbikes dont have a brain of there own, so they do what they you tell
them to, except when its wet :)
Heres a group question:
How fast has your pentax gone? my MZ-S did 270kmh on the back of my last
motorbike :) not sure what that is in miles, but its fast.
Regards,
Paul
- Original Messag
I would never take my P67 on a vacation, way too
bulky once you consider taking a few lenses.
For medium format on the go, I like my folding RF
Zeiss Super Ikonta C ( 6X9 cm ). It's got a sharp
Tessar Lens ( when stopped down to f8 or smaller)
and its actually smaller than a 35mm SLR when folded.
Frank, the difference is that, unlike bulls, motorcycles don't have
inherently bad attitudes. I'm not afraid to approach even a herd of
motorcycles, but a herd of bulls? And while a red flag may excite a bull, a
checkered flag would cause my bike to slow down and enter the paddock.
ps. To se
I have a job in Syracuse this weekend...do any of you know of any
decent photo shops there?
Thanks.
tv
Keith Whaley wrote:
>
> Arnold,
>
> You don't have a category of "other" but I only have one super wide
> angle, a Vivitar 19mm f/3.8-22.0.
>
> Probably nearly equivalent to the SMC A 20mm f/2.8.
Oooops! I should have said the K 18 f/3.5!
= rest snipped =
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: err umm
> In terms of PUG, the themes are pretty liberally interpreted.
In fact, for me,
> that's part of the fun of looking through the gallery on
themed months: to see
> how many ways folks can interpret the same theme.
Having several Spotmatics, which are pretty similar to the K1000, except in
screwmount, I can tell you that I've had mine out in the rain on occasion, with
no problems. Of course, I try to keep things covered, and wipe off as much as
possible, but they have gotten rather wet (at least on the outs
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: Running with bulls (semi-OT, but with pictures)
>
> Really! Up to now, I've rather liked your comments here and
there. I'd
> just as soon keep it insipid, rather than get all het-up over
a
> bullfight or two...
I'm so glad you like
SH!!
I was thinking of snagging this lens :)
I wasn't sure if it was the same one you had Frank.. but knowing that it
is.. I'd be keenly interested :)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:56 PM
I've recently got back the first few rolls taken with my Vivitar S1 3.8 24-48
zoom (I assume yours is a Series 1, Peter?), and I must say, I'm blown away by
it.
At 24mm, no distortion whatsoever. Lines are straight, right out to the edges.
And it's sharp right out to the edges as well. This is
How about I bet a 2002 Pentax D-SLR and you bet a 2002 Canon D-SLR?
Heads I win, tales you lose!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 September 2002 21:19
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: more Photkina information
>
>
Running with bulls? You've got (a lot) more nerve than me!
Pat White
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Daniel J. Matyola
> Subject: Re: Running with bulls (semi-OT, but with pictures)
>
> > Actually, I think the bull run is more human than the bull
> fights
> > themselves. At least in the run, the bulls seem to gore or
> trample more
Arnold,
You don't have a category of "other" but I only have one super wide
angle, a Vivitar 19mm f/3.8-22.0.
Probably nearly equivalent to the SMC A 20mm f/2.8.
PK-A/R mount
9 elements, 8 groups, multi-coated
97 deg. accept. angle
Min. focus 0.2 meters [that's 8", folks!] Might be a great macr
Arnold.
1. 15mm F3.5 A - a right corker.
2. 20mm F4 M - pocket marvel
3. 20mm F2.8 A - little bit bigger, little bit sharper.
And I have had 'em all.
Peter
Francis Alviar wrote:
> Have you ever brought two different camera systems on vacation?
I do it all the time: 35mm and 645.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
Photography and writing
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Subject: Re: Running with bulls (semi-OT, but with pictures)
> Actually, I think the bull run is more human than the bull
fights
> themselves. At least in the run, the bulls seem to gore or
trample more
> humans than in the corrida.
Don't g
On my recent vacation to the Magdellan Islands in the Gulf of St.
Lawrence, I brought my MX, along with a k-mount short zoom, a long zoom
and a wide angle prime. I also brought my Leica CL. I used the k-mount
stuff for colour, and the CL for b&w. I brought the CL in addition to
the MX as it's a
If I were a betting man, I'd wager they'll show a DSLR that goes on sale
next year.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: more Photkina information
> Care to make
This is no answer to the concrete question but I think it's worth to be
mentioned:
Some months ago I got a
+++ Kenko 2x KAX Macro Teleplus MC7 +++
on ebay and thought it would be a nice thing to play with. The price was
raesonable and no real risk. And I found: the results are very fine! It
mak
Actually, I think the bull run is more human than the bull fights
themselves. At least in the run, the bulls seem to gore or trample more
humans than in the corrida.
Dan
William Robb wrote:
> I am wondering what is causing your misgivings about the series
> of pictures? For myself, they leave
Perhaps there comes a zoom-lens-poll later?
Regards
Bernd
--original message--
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:34:09 -0700
From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arnold Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SMC Pentax Super Wide K-Mount Lens Poll
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PR
Care to make a little wager? I bet Pentax doesn't show any DSLR that goes on sale this
year.
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Whether we get a D-SLR soon or not, only time will tell. We can still
hope. Without hope the world would be a poorer place. You try to
destroy our hope with n
- Original Message -
From: Juan J. Buhler
Subject: Running with bulls (semi-OT, but with pictures)
> Again, I tried to edit things coherently so they work as a
group, and
> ended up with 20 frames out of 65 or so. I have very mixed
feelings
> about these images, but still wanted to go
Arnold,
My first choice is for the write in candidate - Fisheye 17-35 zoom. I
have one of these and have found it to be more versatile and usable
than just a straight fisheye. Many scenes call for wider than a 15-20
rectilinear, but not a full 180 degree fisheye. The only lens that
can handle
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Peter Alling wrote:
> I think I'd actually like to see that. Then again all things considered
> probably not.
This comes back to the procotology camera someone sent out a week or so
ago, doesn't it?
--
http://www.infotainment.org
"The destructive character is ch
Arnold,
Why did you leave out the fisheye zoom? Truly the most unique lens in
the ultra wides from any manufacturer.
Bruce
Thursday, September 19, 2002, 11:30:25 AM, you wrote:
AS> Hello again, now here comes my SMC Pentax Super Wide K-Mount Lens Poll:
AS> Please imagine that you were hav
Hi,
Thursday, September 19, 2002, 1:22:23 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> Keith wrote:
>> ?? 'Chamboulé' is not in my Larousse Français-Anglais Dictionnaire!
> I don't know what it means either but it does _sound_ like a
> good verb for describing the digital SLR market
> mike
> (whacking great
I think I'd actually like to see that. Then again all things considered
probably not.
At 07:44 PM 9/19/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>On Thursday 19 September 2002 15:28, Rob Brigham wrote:
> > Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in?
>Pamela Anderson?
>--
>Frits J. Wüthrich
>(Sent with K
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Frits J. [iso-8859-1] Wüthrich wrote:
> On Thursday 19 September 2002 15:28, Rob Brigham wrote:
> > Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in?
> Pamela Anderson?
She traded in her sillicon implants for one with a smaller megapixel
rating. :)
--
http://www.infota
On Thursday 19 September 2002 15:28, Rob Brigham wrote:
> Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in?
Pamela Anderson?
--
Frits J. Wüthrich
(Sent with Kmail)
I posted another gallery to my site. This time they are color
pictures, taken with a couple of disposable cameras just before and
just after I run with the bulls in Pamplona this year. No pictures of
the running itself because, well, I was running. I had a couple of
Pentax cameras in the car whil
Considering the fact that Adorama sells the next, waterproof version, for something
like $180 -- I am not terribly surprised seeing Cameraland prices.
But as far as msrp goes -- I have no idea, but "wow!".
Best,
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Hello again, now here comes my SMC Pentax Super Wide K-Mount Lens Poll:
Please imagine that you were having no super wide-angle lens for your
K-mount camera. Also imagine that you have more than enough money and a
good opportunity to buy a k-mount SMC Pentax super wide-angle lens. What
lens would
No, but I can read you just fine.
At 04:30 PM 9/19/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>testing 1...2...3, can you hear me
- Original Message -
From: Francis Alviar
Subject: M42 or K-mount (or both) - OT
>
> Have you ever brought two different camera systems on
> vacation?
Yes, 35mm and 4x5. Or more recently, 35mm and 6x7. I might have
taken all 3 on a trip once.
William Robb
This message is from the Pe
Help! I'm in a bit of a quagmire. Well, not really.
I just have some spare time today so I decided to ask
the group this question:
Have you ever brought two different camera systems on
vacation? Specifically I am referring to a Pentax
K-mount system with 2 bodies, 4 lenses plus an M42 to
K-mo
I have had no experience, but I have heard many good things about their
binoculars. I did try out their new digital binoculars, and they certainly
felt good in hands and seemed really sharp. The digital pictures they take,
however, ain't so good :)
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Ignati
I think I heard a "4", but I must have been mistaken ...
> no
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Feroze Kistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 19 September 2002 15:31
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: testing
> >
> >
> > testing 1...2...3, can you hear me
> >
> >
>
>
no
> -Original Message-
> From: Feroze Kistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 September 2002 15:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: testing
>
>
> testing 1...2...3, can you hear me
>
>
testing 1...2...3, can you hear me
At the indicated speed on the camera. You can use this on many older
cameras to see the shutter curtains functioning.
> -Original Message-
> From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 September 2002 17:54
> To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Dry firing (was sillyc
Hello, dear PDMLers,
here are the results of the Pentax 28-35mm wide angle k-mount lens poll.
Everybody's first choice got 3 points. 2nd and 3rd choices got 2 and 1
points, respectively. Thus were obtained the winners, and the winners
are.
1st place (50 points): SMC Pentax-FA 1:1.8 31mm Lim
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>NO NO NO. Your camera fires even if there is no film in it. This
avoids the great problems of trying to convince it the film has wound
successfully. Have you never tested a camera in a shop without film in?
The shutter still fires.<
at what s
I will test properly with my MZ-30 tonight. Although I am sure I have
had a misfeed in the past, I cannot state categorically this is the case
without verification.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 September 2002 17:49
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Now that's an interesting question. I'm not able to do any
direct research since I don't own any other ZX models.
At 05:33 PM 9/19/2002 +0100, you wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >
> > At 04:37 PM 9/19/2002 +0100, you wrote:
> > >Th
"Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" wrote:
>
> It will not have a K mount. If you want a K mound DSLR, find a good machinist.
> You folks just don't get it.
Well then, suppose you TELL us.
keith whaley
> From: "Rob Brigham"
> ... is "designed for professional digital still camera applications"...
Mike Ignatiev wrote:
>
> Have anyone had any experience with those? Specifically, I am interested in PCF V
>20x60, which seem to be available for circa $139 from Cameraland.
> Also, anyone has dealt with this merchant?
>
> Best,
> Mishka
This set is called "top of the [full sized binocular]
If they think that they can sell enough, then it is worth it. For Pentax ("I haven't
bought anything new in 20 years!") why bother. Right now IS and HSM are in the realm
of rumor for Pentax: a patent is not a product announcement. Minolta announced 3
lenses quite some time ago with their versio
> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very funny, Mark!! I like your sense of humor.
Kathy
>
> >
> >> "also would like some advise regarding the upcoming pug
> theme >> 'juxtaposition' for december:
>
> Personally, I'm beside myself wondering what to do...
>
> --
> Mark Roberts
> www.robert
<< antasctic (120-300 f2.8!), and they have IS...
Note that they are only going to be available in Sigma
Nikon and Canon mounts... >>
Yes, we are still working on that AF1.7x adapter with a nikon lens mount,
don't you know. Now where did I put it..
Kind regards
Peter
Perhaps I should have cut out everything except the line I was replying to.
Yes I know that modern cameras, (since at least 1940 something advance the
film and cock the shutter at the same time). Some allow you to cock the
shutter
without advancing the film to facilitate multiple exposures but t
I think you'll like it.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: James Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:36:23 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax Super Takumar 1:2.8/105 (Was: Pentax Gear)
I have bought the Super Takumar 1:2.8/105 for $85CDN
($10 taxes).
Got to
Agfa multicontrast stuff, smells like antifreeze,
sweet aroma, not like the ilford fixer or stop bath.
Microphen and perceptol both smell nasty to.
oh the berger copper tonning solution has that anti
freeze smell to.
--- Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What developer have you been usin
Some of the older models don't, (no Pentax cameras that I am aware of),
the manufactures supplied a cardboard insert that put a false leader with a
small gap where the sprocket would sit to fool the camera into thinking it
was loaded.
At 04:20 PM 9/19/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>NO NO NO. Your camer
What developer have you been using?
At 10:13 AM 9/19/2002 -0400, Brendan wrote:
>don't drink the developer :-) despite the fact it
>tastes good
>
>--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > I snagged a FREE (yep.. free) 35mm Enlarger a few
> > weeks back from a guy who
> > just wante
Wee.My socks match
I'm planning to go to a friends cabin in Madawaska for
Thanksgiving(Canadian one)an do some fall colours with the
6x6 and 35mm.
Hopefully ther sun will be out this year.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Did the tell you that you hav
Rob Brigham wrote:
> They need to wait for the Pentax to be released before they can
> backwards engineer it. Do I read this right that this means Sigma
> now have IS for their own bodies too? It must have been some work to
> backwards engineer both Nikon and Canon systems...
>
>
I must a
It's generally a rugged beast. It should be able to withstand a few rain
drops. Just don't dunk it,
or equivalent. Just remember this advice is free so don't complain if it's
bad. (I have just
admitted to smashing up a couple of cameras).
At 05:17 PM 9/19/2002 +0530, you wrote:
>rather a ba
They need to wait for the Pentax to be released before they can
backwards engineer it. Do I read this right that this means Sigma now
have IS for their own bodies too? It must have been some work to
backwards engineer both Nikon and Canon systems...
> -Original Message-
> From: MPozzi [
Fantasctic (120-300 f2.8!), and they have IS...
Note that they are only going to be available in Sigma
Nikon and Canon mounts...
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are photos of newly announced Sigma lenses:
> http://www.photim.com/Infos/UneInfo.asp?N=680
> and short info o
Fantasctic (120-300 f2.8!), and they have IS...
Note that they are only going to be available in Sigma
Nikon and Canon mounts...
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are photos of newly announced Sigma lenses:
> http://www.photim.com/Infos/UneInfo.asp?N=680
> and short info o
This is not my experience at all. Any 'electronic' camera I have ever
used flashes an 'E' and locks up if the film wont load. (MZ-30, MZ-S,
mjuii, Ixus etc)
Also, I have noticed on the MZ-S that when the film is finished and
rewinds you cannot fire the shutter again until you open and close the
The shutter is cocked either independantly or by movement of the take up
spools. It has nothing to do with film advancement unless really old
cameras do it this way (I would be surprised). My Zenit E and P30T both
recock the shutter even if there is no film in them.
> -Original Message-
Don't think of it as advancing the film. Think of it as cocking the shutter.
At 12:34 PM 9/19/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Cheers Jostein, I was on the verge of sacrificing a roll of film to test
>this last night, but I thought... Nah, let Jostein do it!!
>
>The big question is whethter all cameras
The only modern camera that I've experience with that sensed weather the film
loaded or not is the zx-m. If film is loaded and it isn't advancing the
shutter
still fires, the camera just doesn't count frames. If I remember correctly
this
is consistent with many other older model cameras that I
"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> --
>> Mark Roberts
>> www.robertstech.com
>> Photorgaphy and writing
> ^^^
>
>Maybe you should stick to one or the other?
>
>HAR!
Yikes! That sig's been like that for
No info on this particular model, but I'm very pleased with my 8x24
compacts. Hope you have a good, solid tripod for those 20x60's as every
heartbeat will be magnified by a factor of 20 8-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Ignatiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
NO NO NO. Your camera fires even if there is no film in it. This
avoids the great problems of trying to convince it the film has wound
successfully. Have you never tested a camera in a shop without film in?
The shutter still fires.
> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAI
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> --
> Mark Roberts
> www.robertstech.com
> Photorgaphy and writing
^^^
Maybe you should stick to one or the other?
HAR!
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Arathi wrote:
> >
> >> "also would like some advise regarding the upcoming pug theme
> >> 'juxtaposition' for december: anything in particular? or
> >> anything at
I particularly liked this shot with a Pentax recently...
http://groups.msn.com/APMembersGallery/donerumble.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&;
PhotoID=8378
> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 September 2002 14:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: err
Hi Rob,
The only way I can see that they can convince a film camera that
it can fire is to convince it that there _is_ film there. With
all the Pentax models I've seen, that means using a mechanical
method to fool it into thinking that. With others that use
LEDs, the solution is much simpler.
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Arathi wrote:
>
>> "also would like some advise regarding the upcoming pug theme
>> 'juxtaposition' for december: anything in particular? or
>> anything at all?
>> thanks."
>
>Don't know about anyone else but I'm just going to throw
>something tog
- Original Message -
From: "David Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Aaron's shop
> They have a new, this year, course at Alexander Mckenzie
> High school in Richmond Hill. $180.00 Can. for 8 weeks
> 3 hours e
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
