I think it's a nice design. That angled top plate
reminds me of the MZ-S. Really it looks like a very
fat -S. Porky digicam!
Dude, it's late!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
--- Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sometimes feel like
I'm arriving too late in the game. So many of you
have been at it for so
long, film is old, and you look forward to digital.
Am I wasting my time in
pursing 35mm SLR photography with such vigor?
Whatever, dude!
I just got my
Ok,
Time to spill my guts to you fine folks. I need some help. It's a silly
matter that I've had since starting shooting. Ok, here's the equipment
first, cameras MZ-5n, MZ-S, flash units, AF330FTZ and AF360FGZ, lens
example, my 28-105mm zoom. Ok, mix and match the flashes to the cameras
Thanks for the boost Deb!!!
However, while I don't really scan my prints, when I do work, it's with
Photoshop 7 :) Free of course...only the best ;-)
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: Debra Wilborn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:50 AM
Debra,
No flames from me. I use PaintShop Pro and Picture Window rather than
Photoshop. I tried Elements and didn't really care for the interface.
Since all I am doing is correcting scanning problems (Like Wheatfield,
I prefer to fix things in the camera, rather than later), I find that
some
Ian Macdonald,
IP CS Macdonald,
Wolli,
Somerton 2340.
Phone: 02 67606229
Fax answering machine: 02 67606257
So 'stupid' is a substance - less dense than water and insoluble. But creeks
flow. At least all those I've seen do - most of the time. All the 'stupid'
would be washed downstream. I don't find this one funny at all.
Still thick as two planks.
Argh!
Dr E D F Williams
Brad,
Just so you know, in the old days, TTL was kind of poor. The reason
was that flash synch speed was always used automatically by the
camera's program setting. This generally meant that your flash
pictures ended up with the subject well lit but the background
somewhat blacked out. In more
Ian Macdonald,
IP CS Macdonald,
Wolli,
Somerton 2340.
Phone: 02 67606229
Fax answering machine: 02 67606257
Hi,
perhaps they threw him into part of the creek where stuff accumulates.
The Thames close to my house usually flows quite quickly but there
are parts where all the crap that people throw in upstream, often
including pairs of short planks, gathers sometimes for days at a time.
There are a couple
Thanks for the reply Bruce,
Ok, let's see if I'm following so far. What I explained in my email about
the behaviour of the camera and flash is completely normal?I'm glad for the
info on the older cameras and TTL. I totally understand the flash results.
Ok, now the harder part. Ok, wide
Brad,
The general rule of thumb for hand holding is 1/focal length. So if
you are shooting a wide angle lens, slower than 1/60 should be doable.
You should practice a bit and check your results to make sure. You
should always be congnizant of the DOF of the image you are taking. By
being in
Hi Rob,
I like split-image microprism screens for focal lengths up to about
100mm. This probbly partly because that was the supplied screen with
the MX, and what I got used to. I like to have several options for
checking the focus, but I use the ground glass a lot.
From 100mm upwards I like
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)
The Thames close to my house usually flows quite quickly but there
are parts
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 3:25 AM
Subject: Re[2]: Ok, the most stupid question from someone who should know
better (ie HELP NEEDED)
Brad,
The general rule of thumb for hand holding is
Darn, I am really mucking things up. I guess 3 pots of coffee and it being
4:30am may account for some of that ;-)
Bruce, that is the coolest thing. I've filed that into my memory banks now.
Geez, after all the literature I read on photography, I never ran across
that. Thanks!
Brad Dobo
-
I think it's a nice design. That angled top plate
reminds me of the MZ-S. Really it looks like a very
fat -S. Porky digicam!
Dude, it's late!
Late is not in my vocabulary.
I've never messed with or held the existing DSLRs, but I've heard they are
rather bulky by nature of the beast and
This question is somewhat related to the messages. When I first started
with the Pentax A3000, it had the split screen and I found it rather fun. I
doubt any will work on the MZ-S, but is it possible to use that screen in an
AF camera/lens? (switched to MF of course)
Brad Dobo
- Original
Hi Rob,
The latest screen available for the 67II seems the most logical. It has
a grid, but the screen is divided in thirds - both horizontal and vertical.
This would be a great composition tool. Unfortunately, there are no similar
screens for the LX.
So, I would like a screen, similar to
Wow, that's advanced, huh.
I have very little flash experience, because i'm shooting landscapes mostly.
It is still true for older F-lens and older bodys like ZX-7 ?
Gasha
Bruce Dayton wrote:
...
somewhat blacked out. In more recent years, Pentax, among others, has
changed the program so
A Gregory L. Hansen posted this on 26/10/2002 7:08pm and there have been a
bunch of follow-ups. I don't know if anyone here posted to it, I'm sure
some of you have seen it, but for the benefit of others I pasted it. May
check it out? If I'm a total moron and everyone reads that newsgroup, just
Hi Steve,
on 26 Oct 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
I do have a question, however. How difficult is it to use the MZ-S
shape but recast it in polycarbonate? I realize that it would require
new mfg lines that cast plastic instead of bend metal, screw fittings
would be needed, etc., etc., but the
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:15:27 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
I'm interested to learn of other PDMLers focus screen preferences. I guess that
there are really three main types as per the recent LX screens, split image,
full matt and matt with grid. As you know I have sold a few screens recently
Hi Brad
I never use my SMC-A2.8/28mm
Jens, Denmark
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Dan Scott [mailto:daniel559;directvinternet.com]
Sendt: 27. oktober 2002 06:55
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: What lenses do you have? (poll)
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 12:02 AM, Brad Dobo
Hey there Heiko,
Of course we all are speculating, but I can see 2 of your points makes sense
to me, but the description of a new MZ flagship or whatever one may call it,
seems to be looking like a Nikon or Canon clone. Correct me here if I am
wrong, but that would be breaking a long-standing
Hi Brad,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:23:27 -0400, Brad Dobo wrote:
I hear a lot of Nikon and Epson. I just wonder
about how many people here that own a digital Pentax product (Optios) invest
large sums of money in the so-called digital darkroom area. From what I
gather, those that speak about
- Original Message -
From: arkibladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 5:07 AM
Subject: SV: What lenses do you have? (poll)
Hi Brad
I never use my SMC-A2.8/28mm
Jens, Denmark
Yo Jens,
Why do you not use it? Also, I was really fresh when I
'Allo Jan,
It was not a blanket statement, I always assume since you and others post
here you must have and use Pentax gear. I was aware that Pentax does not
make printers, scanners, (or, not because of your message, a DSLR) Perhaps
I wrote poorly, it was really directed to those that use
I hear a lot of Nikon and Epson. I just wonder
about how many people here that own a digital Pentax product (Optios)
invest
large sums of money in the so-called digital darkroom area. From what I
gather, those that speak about Epson and Nikon and Canon are not using
Pentax cameras. Just some
Hi all
This is a very long thread based on the fact, that one Taiwaneese magasine
didn't have a picture of the future/new Pentax DSLR, that is going to
replace the abandoned (MZ-S-like) one, and used a two year old picture.
We seem to know, it's going to have a 16x24mm 5 megapix CCD (?), a
Absolutely! In Richmond, near the bridge, I've seen some of that foam on my
Sunday morning strolls. It certainly looks like stupid. Very unpalatable.
D
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original
Hi Brad,
on 27 Oct 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
Of course we all are speculating, but I can see 2 of your points makes
sense to me, but the description of a new MZ flagship or whatever one
may call it, seems to be looking like a Nikon or Canon clone. Correct
me here if I am wrong, but that
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debra,
No flames from me. I use PaintShop Pro and Picture Window rather than
Photoshop. I tried Elements and didn't really care for the interface.
Since all I am doing is correcting scanning problems (Like Wheatfield,
I prefer to fix things in
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another supposedly dedicated photofinishing lab (fuji recommended)
near to where I live blew it when they did me some 8x10s. One had pink snow
and the other had a green dog. They couldn't see anything wrong.
I don't ask much, really I don't.
Brad wrote:
I can't see it
because of that and the cost to make it happen, especially since the MZ-S
was a sales flop.
I've been told it has sold more than expected.
I love it though, it's professional enough for me, and
really, Pentax isn't in the professional business concerning 35mm,
Bruce wrote:
For low volume production items the cost is in the tooling and setting up
production, and not the materials.
Thats why the story provided by Pentax UK, all new slr's from the same chassis, makes
sense.
I'm not convinced the MZ-S as building block for the whole Pentax slr
Brad wrote:
Ok, here is my preference. The screen that came on the MZ-S because of the
focus spots. I know little about screens, but I looked at the other one for
the MZ-S with grid, and would take it in a second, if it also had the AF
points, and it doesn't.
Not true. The MZ-S grid
First Prize - Most interesting combination of questions in one posting
category
With nothing useful to say,
Steve
TEST DO NOT READ
J.C. O'Connell mailto:hifisapi;gate.net
My Business references Websites: http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/jco/
I admit that I've decided to put other major purchases on hold and start
squirreling away spare money for a bigger purchase. If this thing is
really between 1200-1500 USD, then I might very well buy one. I
currently enjoy using the E-10 I have access to; this idea of a having
Pentax DSLR is
Just a question. I use Micrografx Picture Publisher Pro 10, which I
really like. Anoyone else use this product?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get prints from my slides in one of two ways:
1. Scan it myself on the old HP PhotoSmart at
2400dpi, tweak it for contrast, etc and then print
it (max 8x10) on my epson 880. For this cheap
equipment I get some pretty fantastic results.
2. Bring it to the custom lab that has a Nikon
8000
I've gotten unsubscribed 3 time in the last month.
What is going on?
JCO
Thats all well and good, spin doctors are really worth
the money. But its been what 4 years since they started
this project, if time is money in business than
the 5 year girl on the corner selling lemonade
seems to have more sense. How long does
it possibly take to bring the DSLR on the market
Not if you kept skimming it off the top The creeks I know
sort of meander like sludge, don't rivers flow And be careful
water makes planks swell and then your cap wont fit you anymore
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Prefer grid screens, and as soon as my MZS is here its the
first thing I'll buy after the grip. I suppose it depends a
lot on what you shooting, I think grid screens
work well with landscape photographers for eg.
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: Just say No to burn-out Re: Photographic Training
Micrografx (soon to be Corel) Picture Publisher or Corel PhotoPaint.
PaintShop Pro 7 doesn't do adequate
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: Just say No to burn-out Re: Photographic Training
printing, you will need to move to Photoshop Elements, Photoshop,
Micrografx (soon to be Corel) Picture
Please tell me how you came to this conclusion,
do you mean if you scan a pic in photopaint and
and in the same one in photoshop and print
it out on the same machine you get 2 diffirent results?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Well...sure.
At 3:14 AM +100010/27/02, Rob Studdert wrote, or at least typed:
After a quick whip-around to cover the air fare :-)
Rob Studdert
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
Of course it does. I've never had a single problem with Pentax service.
DB
At 9:22 PM -040010/26/02, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote, or at least typed:
They don't need any fancy bugs, since Pentax service doesn't exist in North America.
BR
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake
Don't tell anyone I was taking a break from working on the list. Some people think I'm
not allowed.
You can call volume portraiture a lot of things, but boring it ain't. You do learn a
lot about lighting and posing, and you learn to make quick decisions. Don't take this
the wrong way, but I
Oh wait I have another one, and this is for the
grand prize, winner takes all -
Can you have a proctoscope CLA'd and who would
you recommeded?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 4:34 PM
Subject: Re:
Rob Studdert wrote:
snip-
So if you care I wouldn't mind hearing of your screen type preference (based on
the three main types, 35mm, 645 and 67) and why this is so?
-
I like the KX microprism and KX split screen the best.
Hi list
Did any of you get a mail like this (It's strange since I'm not subscibing
to any yahoo list/group):
You cannot reply to this message via email because you have chosen not
to disclose your email address to the group.
To reply:
Dear group,
The foam at the rear door and close to the focusing screen of my MX is
getting sticky. I want to try to replace it.
Searching the internet, I find different thicknesses are available.
Any sugestions what thickness is needed?
Next sunday I intend to visit the Fotografic fair in Houten
I agree. I may not buy a new Pentax auto focus film camera, but wait 6
months to a year to see what Pentax comes out with. I have plenty of film
cameras already and would be more than happy to thin out that collection to
help pay for a new DSLR. My wife and I currently own the EI-200 and have a
Not a bad plug for Kodak, either.
Of course Pentax has a sexier mention in Popsickle Toes -
Why do you always load your Pentax when I'm in the nude?
frank theriault wrote:
Good one, Bill! vbg
He shoots, he scores!
-frank
William Robb wrote:
Kodachrome. As good a Nikon song as
Frank theriault wrote:
I have no idea whether Pentax is # 4, 5 or 15. And quite frankly, I don't
care. I don't buy Pentax stuff as a status symbol.
I agree with that, I bought Pentax because I liked their cameras.
I care more about quality of images, and whether what I own fits
my needs
Hi Henry
Well, I guess the csots of developing the MZ-S body has allready been paid
for by the MS-S sales. I's might probably be cheaper to reuse the MZ-S
framework, rather than starting all over again. The MZ-S sell for appr.
700-800 USD, leaving a little economic space for implementing the
Hi
I use Picture publisher 7 and 8. I allways loved it. Even thoug I have
Photoshop 5.1, I like PP much better.
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Steve Desjardins [mailto:DesJardinS;wlu.edu]
Sendt: 27. oktober 2002 16:00
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Micrografx Picture Publisher Pro 10
Very different results. Sometimes so different that you wouldn't believe it.
But its possible - by careful setting up and calibration - to get results
that are similar.
But even when using the same program and printer all the time its vital that
all settings be standardised, the correct colour
In NA Pentax is 4th among the big 3.
BR
-Original Message-
From: Brad Dobo [mailto:brad.dobo;rogers.com]
I knew Pentax wasn't top dog, but I thought number 4 out of the big four
wasn't so bad. Is Pentax on the way out, or is the sales guy just a
yo-yo?
Hi
I use Picture publisher 7 and 8. I allways loved it. Even thoug I have
Photoshop 5.1, I like PP much better.
Jens
Me too.
Lukasz
When it comes to a common chassis for film and digital, I there's less here than meets
the eye. Some of the major camera structures are going to be very different between
the two types of cameras. There's no film transport mechanism or film plane in a
digital camera, but lots more electronics.
At 01:14 PM 27/10/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Pentax isn't in the business of professional anything. They sell to
whoever buys it. There's a common misconception that MF is Pentax
professional line. It isn't.
Pål
Yes, and Fuji Canada back up Pål's statement.
I finally found which of the three
Hi Dave
Even though I use Super A, I'm not familiar with the AF280T. But an easy way
to cheat the automatics could be NOT to use TTL-mode but Automatic mode
and then cheat the ASA setting (only on the flash)? It can be done with my
Metz flashes.
By the way - I'd use fill flash, not to add
Yes. Ralf Englemann was an active member of the group several years ago, and then
started hiw own on Yahoo. There are a number of people here who are on both groups. He
would seem to just be letting people here know what's going on there.
BR
-Original Message-
From: arkibladt
My Minolta Dimage 7 does the same. It keeps the shutter speed (when zooming)
just fast enough for handheld shots.
Jeff.
- Original Message -
From: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML (Pentax) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:55 AM
Subject: Ok, the most stupid question
- Original Message -
From: Paul Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What lenses do you have? (poll)
What lenses do you have?
SMC FA 28-105mm f/4-5,6 Power Zoom
SMC F 70-210mm f/4-5,6
SMC A 50mm f/1,7
SMC A 28mm f/2,8
20-M Mir 20mm f/3,5
Zenitar-K 16mm f/2,8 Fisheye
and my wish list
At 08:20 AM 27/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I've been shooting a lot of slides lately and took a few to a local digital
print place for some quick enlargements. I didn't expect them to measure up
to a custom print but I didn't expect them to be trash either. I thought I'd
get something usable from a
It does.
Jeff.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: Ok, the most stupid question from someone who should know
better (ie HELP NEEDED)
Brad,
Just so you know, in the old days, TTL
Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi Team,
I'm interested to learn of other PDMLers focus screen preferences. I guess that
there are really three main types as per the recent LX screens, split image,
full matt and matt with grid. As you know I have sold a few screens recently
and I was a little
When I was crossing a stream once with my dog by hopping rock to rock, he
jumped right into a stagnant area of coagulated foam, thinking it was solid
earth. He was quite surprised (and angry) to find himself underwater. Now,
THAT's stupid. (Even smart dogs like my Cardigan Welsh Corgi are
So what if the MZ-S was the developing basis for new products and now will
be the basis for the new chassis? I could imagine a new chassis line as
follows:
- a cheaper MZ-S made of polycarbonat replacing MZ-5/MZ-6
- the present MZ-S as semi-pro camera
- the previous MZ-D with minor changes and
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 08:34 AM, William Robb wrote:
We have the same problem with our 2102. Ineex prints are coming
off a Crt printer, which is squishing the image gamma down to
fit the photo paper, and is also setting the white point
automatically. The prints get made with an
Bruce wrote:
For low volume production items the cost is in the tooling and setting up
production, and not the materials.
Thats why the story provided by Pentax UK, all new slr's from the same
chassis, makes sense.
I'm not convinced the MZ-S as building block for the whole Pentax slr
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:31:36 -0500
Robert Soames Wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting speculation - thanks for the post.
How many 'frames' per second can a digital do?
I would have thought with the ability to do small
mpeg movies the frame rate could be up to 40 fps.
Kind regards
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 05:13 AM, arkibladt wrote:
Faktor 1.5 focal means a 29mm will be like a 43mm, the normal lens.
Basicly this doesn't mean very much in every day photography, but
probably
that Pentax will make some new widelangles, rectiliniar and
fish-eye's, in
the near future
Something tells me some of ya'll are putting waay too much thought into
this ... :) It's merely a Deep-South expression about someone's intellect,
which just might be pushing maximum density, put in a very coloful manner.
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After a 30 year absence from photography I'm back and re starting almost where I left
off-fully manual.Only this time with Pentax,the K1000.
I am having great fun with my two M series lenses,28/3.5 and 50/1.4, my 50/2 will be
passed on, I think. My question is,how different is the M135/3.5 from
Hi, Alan,
What people buy and why they buy it is a pretty darned complex issue.
[...]
frank theriault
And never discount stupidity. Folks are pretty dumb on average. When I was
selling cameras and audio I watched a training film which shared some market
research indicating that 75% of
Hi Robert,
on 27 Oct 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
- a cheaper MZ-S made of polycarbonat replacing MZ-5/MZ-6
- the present MZ-S as semi-pro camera
- the previous MZ-D with minor changes and the APS-sized chip
- a MZ-flagship as big as the MZ-D with an integrated, fast winder and
This sounds
Thanks a lot, Bob. You just threw me into an existential quandary ...
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Soames Wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)
Hi,
John,
You're right the 135mm has more reach, but it is also a bit slower. The
M-100mm f2.8 is a bit smaller and faster, so it's easier to focus and hold
steady. There is a bigger K-100mm f2.8 but they are more rare.
The M-135/3.5 is an old favorite and dirt cheap for the quality it
Well, the 135mm pulls in more - graeter magnification. But the 100mm is
faster=brighter screen/vievfinder=easier focusing/better in low light -
about half a stop. Which one you prefere really depends on what you are
shooting. I find the 100mm better for indoor shooting and protraits - the
135mm
...and there's a rare 2.8/105mm - quite nice!
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Rfsindg;aol.com]
Sendt: 27. oktober 2002 19:48
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Simple K1000 Lens Question
John,
You're right the 135mm has more reach, but it is also a
...and a 2.5/135mm (qiute rare) whoich is great! (unfortunately I let mine
go...)
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Gill [mailto:johngill;email.com]
Sendt: 27. oktober 2002 18:45
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Simple K1000 Lens Question
After a 30 year absence from photography I'm
I had the same experience with prints from slides, disappointing results,
dull colors, no comparison to the slides. It was the same with every local
lab I tried, digital or conventional process.
Then I got this tip to try Overlake Photo in Bellevue.
http://www.overlakephoto.com/main.html
I had a
Is it OK to say that now? Sheesh!
I hope the DSLR based on the MZ-S chassis is true; they would be the first
company to bring out a companion DSLR at a reasonable price. Up to now the
price disparity between digital and film has been rediculous; look at the
difference in price between the Nikon
Good question, I've been wondering about it to.
From: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML \(Pentax\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ok, the most stupid question from someone who should know better
(ie HELP NEEDED)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:55:51 -0500
Ok,
Time to
Now I feel like a complete idiot!
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What lenses do you have? (poll)
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:02:47 -0500 (CDT)
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Paul Eriksson wrote:
What lenses do you have?
[snip]
I
I missed the second part, I could not find this thread in the archives. Can
someone please point in the right direction.
From: Paul Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What lenses do you have? (poll)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:25:38
IIRC only MZ-S does this and my MZ-5n did not. This takes into account as much
available light as possible - IMO a Good Thing because it results in flash pictures
with available light feeling. If you do not like it, select your favourite
aperture/shutter speed manually..
All the best!
Raimo
I shot a car this morning. It's a lot of work. Ten rolls of 120, two
rolls of 35mm. (I used Provia F for a change. I want to see if all you
Fuji lovers are right.) But the best part of the morning was that I
saved a camera and lens. I was working out of the back of my PT Crusier,
which is a lot
Lenses . hm?
35mm
A 50 f/1.4
F 50 f/2.8 Macro
FA 28-105 f/4-5.6
FA 80-320 f/4-5.6
2.0x TC
645n
---
645 FA 45-85 f/4.5
645 FA 80-160 F/4.5
1.4x TC
2.0x TC
Helicoid Extension Tube
Wish List
A 85 f/1.4 I would give anything
Actually, I can't find them in the recent archives, either. Maybe I just
imagined it.
Anyway...
35mm K-mount:
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
M 20/4
M 24-35/3.5
A 50/1.4
K 85/1.8
M 100/4 macro
FA 80-320/4-5.6
50mm ext. tube
Rear Converter-A 2X-S (still looking to sell)
chris
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002,
Many or all of those messages never made it to the archives - or, if they
did make it, they didn't stay there. (The internet isn't exactly the
repository of the definite.)
Actually, I can't find them in the recent archives, either. Maybe I just
imagined it.
Chris Brogden
Rob Studdert wrote:
My favourite screen by far is full matt, I find most any elements on
the screen
distracting, I prefer it for manual focus however I do usually have
fast lenses
mounted.
How about you?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
Matt. If lining up the edges of things is important, I can do it
Sigma 28 f5.8 AF
M 28 f2.8
M 28 f3.5
M 35 f3.5
A 50 F1.7
A 50 f2
A 135 f2.8
M 135 f3.5
FA28-105 f4-5.6 powerzoom
F 100-300 f4-5.6
A 35-105 f3.5 (my favorite lens)
A 70-210 f4
- Original Message -
From: Paul Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
