A friend at work has asked me to teach him how to use his camera
better. I can do that but his main interest is low light photography
and I have a little experience in that so I am hoping that someone
here can recommend a good site to aid calculating exposure and so
forth. unfortunately he
on 20.01.04 0:08, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh my GOD Robert, I just opened a PIF file - and guess what happened ?!?!?
Nothing? ;-)
Sometimes it is really good to be different :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Smooth tire, or knobby, Cotty?
Or do I want to know?
g
-frank
Studded.
Har!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Oh my GOD Robert, I just opened a PIF file - and guess what happened ?!?!?
Cheers,
Cotty
I don't know :o)
You won a million dollars?
I wish.
What happened?
Nothing.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Cotty wrote:
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'd really like a pentax K to Leica screw 39 adapter so I could use a
couple of my M/K lenses on my V*er Bessas, possible do you think?
Entirely possible with a
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Gosh, Cotty, how many times have I wished I had a little machine shop.
There are always little parts I need I could toss off in an hour or so.
Right
now there are about three of them, and not even a little job shop in this
area
that I have been able to
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
No reason you can't machine the proper helical and cam on the adapter. Would
just require that the K-mount lens be set to infinity when used on the RF
camera.
Yes! Of course. What a fabulous idea. I'm not switched on with RF
technology. That sounds a
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Well, if I get an e-mail wherein the subject line thanks me for buying them
lunch, I ~know~ it's gotta be fake!!
So Frank is it true that you have the deepest pockets and the shortest
arms east of the Rockies? ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I have always wanted to visit England just so I could go somewhere for a
drink
that wasn't called, Joe's Bar Grill grin.
Hey, you know Joe?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
On 19/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Walking on thin ice on that tainted beef thing, Bill.
Didn't it turn out that the infected cow had a link to Canada? Like, it's
feed was traced to a rendering plant near Edmonton or something?
Or maybe not, I don't really know. I just figure if we're
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Sure, in the pages of What Photo! or Digicams Rock magazines, but come
on - this is the BBC.
The BBC has been dumbing itself down steadily over the years - I'm in
no way surprised to find that nowadays (especially in a web presence)
it is no different
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Selling advertising is what media does today. That is all they are
interested
in. Long gone are the days when they were interested in helping their
readers.
Except, of course, Public Radio and Television which are only interested in
providing a media for
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I think it would be a great idea if all PDMLers going to GFM would put
together a modest portfolio of favorite shots. Think of the fun around PDML
central.
I will be bringing some prints.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Something interesting
http://www.alias.com/eng/etc/fakeorfoto/quiz.html
I managed an 8/10.. one of them, I must say, is particularly well done.
Cheers,
Ryan
Hi all
Thanks for the input on this.
Two points:
Focussing not a problem as long the register is correct as it will be only
wide angles [sp.17mm fisheye and poss. 28mm] so zone focussing etc. is no
problem.
I actually have a spare t6 converter [the aperture linkage jammed and it
seemed cheaper to
Nick Clark wrote:
Hi Malcolm
The King and Tinker is actually in Whitewebbs Lane. It's at
the opposite end of the golf course to the Rose and Crown, to
the right of Whitewebbs House, which is now a restaurant. If
you come out of the drive to Whitewebbs House, turn right,
it's in the dip
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:51:16 +1000
Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something interesting
http://www.alias.com/eng/etc/fakeorfoto/quiz.html
I managed an 8/10.. one of them, I must say, is particularly well
done.
Cheers,
Ryan
6/10 here, but I did not look at the answers. I might do that
Cotty wrote:
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
[. . .]
My point exactly. Except that the BBC is more than just Public
Television, as I understand the term as used in north America. The BBC is
there to provide a service of information and, overseen by 12 governors
who stand
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
Which brings up a question. Is it only BBC programming one pays for, or
do you have to add a bit for ITV?
I can't imagine ITV is free!
ITV is free, as are Channel4 and Channel5. And if you pay for a
digital encoder (from 30 pounds I believe, one off)
I believe it's Tuesday today and the link is dead. Was it working ONLY on
Monday? ;)
Cory
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: WWII RAF photos on line
I did say that it would be starting on
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
Which brings up a question. Is it only BBC programming one pays for, or
do you have to add a bit for ITV?
I can't imagine ITV is free!
Keith,
In the UK everyone with a televison set pays a licence fee (about £10/$15
a month). The money raised pays
Germany has a similar system.
Sven
Zitat von Chris Stoddart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
Which brings up a question. Is it only BBC programming one pays for, or
do you have to add a bit for ITV?
I can't imagine ITV is free!
Keith,
In the UK everyone
Batteries were dead meaning the camera wouldn't work or just that the
indicator was showing them as empty?
As you've read, there's no trusting the battery indicator.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 18,
Hi!
mw Chris Stoddart wrote:
So come to the UK, the only country where you need a licence to own a TV
set :-)
Sorry, I am jumping in the middle of it. But in Israel situation is
exactly the same - you have a TV - you pay the tax. The tax is about
$120 per year.
Boris
What is meant by the strength of the cleaning? If you choose low does that
mean some subtle spots are overlooked, and if you choose high everything is
zapped. Or does it mean that on low a spot just won't be eradicated completely?
Mark Cassino wrote:
No - all you can do is choose the
mike wilson wrote:
Chris Stoddart wrote:
So come to the UK, the only country where you need a licence to own a TV
set :-)
Or a VCR with a monitor. Or even just a VCR with no way of viewing.
It's the TV frequency receiver that's licensed. Bizzare but true.
Or bizarre and properly
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, mike wilson wrote:
So come to the UK, the only country where you need a licence to own a TV
set :-)
Or a VCR with a monitor. Or even just a VCR with no way of viewing.
It's the TV frequency receiver that's licensed. Bizzare but true.
It's the same in Sweden. A
Wow! I wonder how Leica ever made their cameras work then.
Oh! That must be why they are so expensive.
Raimo Korhonen wrote:
But machining the cam and proper linkages might be nearly impossible.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not
A sudden ah-ha experience here.
A short 'K' extention tube (12 or 9 mm?), into a 'K to M42 adapter (both of
these are stock parts), screwed into a M42 to M39 adapter. (Custom, so it is the
correct thickness to make the stack 16.6mm long?) Should be a much cheaper way
to go.
Any machine shop
Hi,
most of the flying saucer photos have been fake snapshots
and the remainder have been what?
--
Cheers,
Bob
But the did have lovely plumage.
At 09:49 AM 1/20/04, you wrote:
The camera wouldn't work. At all. I tried the turn off then on again
trick. Nada. I removed the batteries and put them back in. Zip! The
batteries were dead, flat, they had ceased to be! they were non-batteries!
even nailing
Hello Shel,
Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 6:27:09 PM, you wrote:
SB It might be helpful to know which programs you're comparing it to ...
I should have clarified that! It is no Photoshop but compares well with mid-priced
imaging programs and its free.
For a freeware program it is fairly well
Democrat Presidential candidates.
Regards,
Bob...
There are rotten people in the world that
cannot be cured by magical hippy love.
-- Lynda Barry
From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
most of the flying saucer photos have been fake
Fake movies?
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
most of the flying saucer photos have been fake snapshots
and the remainder have been what?
--
Cheers,
Bob
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
So now all i need is who/ where to do the job [guys like this are not
exactly thick on the ground here...!]
Clive
Antibes
France
Clive, have a mooch around here:
www.srbfilm.co.uk
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Which brings up a question. Is it only BBC programming one pays for, or
do you have to add a bit for ITV?
I can't imagine ITV is free!
Any TV receiver has to be licensed. One license covers a household (about
£100 a year). ITV is funded purely by
I have been looking at getting more storage cards and have looked at
the microdrive angle. I know that Magicstor 2.2gb cards have been
reputed to have problems. But in careful reading, it appears that
there are some incompatible devices (that is the ones who keep
complaining - RebelD, D100,
Virus Characteristics:
This is a mass-mailing worm with a remote access component. The worm arrives in an
email message with the following characteristics:
From: (address may be forged)
Subject: Hi
Body:
Test =)
(random characters)
--
Test, yep.
Attachment: (random filename) 15,872 bytes
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I believe it's Tuesday today and the link is dead. Was it
working ONLY on Monday? ;) Cory
HTTP://www.evidenceincamera.co.uk
I got the hang of the weekly calendar in the end and tried yesterday, with
the same result as you had today.
Mike said it
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
So come to the UK, the only country where you need a licence to own a TV
set :-)
Or a VCR with a monitor. Or even just a VCR with no way of viewing.
It's the TV frequency receiver that's licensed. Bizzare but true.
Yes, that's right. Well spotted
Hi again everybody!
For those who don't know me or don't remember I'm from Rome, Italy and
I've been subscribing the PDML from 1998 to oct 2002 when I gave up as I
couldn't afford the time to wade through all the traffic and chatter.
Now that I have a brand new DSL connection and a new machine
Flavio!!! Good to see you again. Any more calendars?
--- Flavio Minelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi
again everybody!
For those who don't know me or don't remember I'm
from Rome, Italy and
I've been subscribing the PDML from 1998 to oct 2002
when I gave up as I
couldn't afford the time
It almost looks like an incomplete enlarger lens. ???
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:14 PM
To: Pdml
Subject: Re: Asahiflex Takumar ?
It's a section of
You can try if you like.
But remember that we are not talking about a simple adapter here, because the person I
answered to suggested that it be rangefinder-coupled.
It´s easier if you do not have to deal with a K mount lens barrel at first - so you
can just put the proper inner sleeves and cams
Not proven?
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
most of the flying saucer photos have been fake snapshots
and the remainder have been what?
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway.
And they offer his adapter right there for 69.95.
Cotty wrote:
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
So now all i need is who/ where to do the job [guys like this are not
exactly thick on the ground here...!]
Clive
Antibes
France
Clive, have a mooch around here:
Good to have you back.
--
Flavio Minelli wrote:
Hi again everybody!
For those who don't know me or don't remember I'm from Rome, Italy and
I've been subscribing the PDML from 1998 to oct 2002 when I gave up as I
couldn't afford the time to wade through all the traffic and chatter.
Now that I
You missed my point. One can ignor the on lens focusing and build a focusing
mount into the adapter. Only problem with that is you would need to match the
adapter to a specific lens. However, that is all moot because Cotty has posted a
link to a company that sells adapters that will do what the
På 20. jan. 2004 kl. 19.55 skrev Bob W:
Hi,
most of the flying saucer photos have been fake snapshots
and the remainder have been what?
When even the photographer thinks it´s for real. Not all fakes are
intentional.
DagT
Hello Brendan. No, actually I've been doing very little photography.
I'll try to amend that, now.
Thanks for the welcome. I've seen you're enjoying yourself...
Ciao, Flavio
Brendan wrote:
Flavio!!! Good to see you again. Any more calendars?
--- Flavio Minelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi
Thanks Tom. How's with you?
One of the first thing I noticed coming back was your comment on the BBC
program, where you said: Skill at anything takes study and practice. I
have always wondered why there are so many people who do not think that
applies to photography. Woa. Great. Can I borrow it?
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
she wants contact management software, not a database. Act!
is one that i hear a lot of good things about. it's not
specific to photographic uses and i don't see why she needs
something that is that specific.
I'm
Clipping and pasting from my Scrabble list - this
was an exciting bit of news
My poker buddy . just called me from Sundance
and said Word
Wars is the most popular film there by light
years. He showed up 90
minutes early yesterday and was unable to get in,
and today was 2 hours
early and
Mark Cassino wrote:
At 11:41 PM 1/16/2004 -0500, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I enjoy reviewing my slides that way, but doing it too often, of course,
is dangerous and lingering too long on one when you look at it, too, is
bad (not that you are not aware of that.)
Bad for the slide, right? I
You had better start shooting some more !!
--- Flavio Minelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello
Brendan. No, actually I've been doing very
little photography.
I'll try to amend that, now.
Thanks for the welcome. I've seen you're enjoying
yourself...
Ciao, Flavio
Brendan wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
My poker buddy . just called me from Sundance
and said Word
Wars is the most popular film there by light
years. He showed up 90
minutes early yesterday and was unable to get in,
and today was 2 hours
early and
On 20 Jan 2004 at 12:06, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I have been looking at getting more storage cards and have looked at
the microdrive angle. I know that Magicstor 2.2gb cards have been
reputed to have problems. But in careful reading, it appears that
there are some incompatible devices (that is
This weekend, I went toboganning with my youngest daughter. Brought along
the LX with Viv S1 24-48. We had a blast - the temp warmed up (!) to around
-8C, and there was plenty of snow and sun.
We were taking turns going down, and Claire had the camera around her neck
when it way my turn.
Hey, Flavio,
Glad to see you back. And glad to see you're submitting to February PUG.
Your photographs have always inspired me.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Flavio Minelli [EMAIL
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
most of the flying saucer photos have been fake snapshots
and the remainder have been what?
Flying cups
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Now that I have a brand new DSL connection and a new machine at home, I
can easily download all the stuff in a moment and allow the message
count to go up. I'll still have to do the wading, though, but I finally
admitted to myself that I was getting
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'm not sure, but I think it was Act! that hosed my hard drive last week.
Hi Tom, I thought you'd been a bit quiet lately. Never mind lad, it's
kept you out of trouble...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I didn't take the test yet. I might go back later an look again, if I have
time.
I just posted to say that Alias/Wavefront is a Canadian company, based here
in Toronto. I think they came up with some sort of computer animation
software that blew everyone else out of the water, and AFAIK,
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
she wants contact management software, not a database. Act!
is one that i hear a lot of good things about. it's not
specific to photographic uses and i don't see why she needs
something
Christian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
My poker buddy . just called me from Sundance
and said Word
Wars is the most popular film there by light
years. He showed up 90
minutes early yesterday and was unable to get in,
and today
Just spent a few hours doing something I've meant to do for ages. I
printed off a quick contact sheet for every frame of digital I have shot
since getting the camera in Sept 2002. They're all in a binder now, and
there's nothing quite like leafing through, just like the good old days ;-)
I love
Flavio Minelli wrote:
Hi again everybody!
For those who don't know me or don't remember I'm from Rome, Italy and
I've been subscribing the PDML from 1998 to oct 2002 when I gave up as I
couldn't afford the time to wade through all the traffic and chatter.
Flavio? Flavio. hmmm, name has a
I'll ask Them about it tonight, once they're done their probing.
It's so hard to sit on a bike seat the next day... vbg
from the Mother Ship,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: graywolf [EMAIL
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most of the flying saucer photos have been fake snapshots
and the remainder have been what?
Well, visiting aliens, of course. Duh!
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I think it would be a great idea if all PDMLers going to GFM would put
together a modest portfolio of favorite shots. Think of the fun around PDML
central.
I will be bringing some prints.
I always bring a batch of prints.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I think it would be a great idea if all PDMLers going to
GFM would put
together a modest portfolio of favorite shots. Think of the
fun
I just posted to say that Alias/Wavefront is a Canadian company, based here
in Toronto. I think they came up with some sort of computer animation
software that blew everyone else out of the water, and AFAIK, they're now
world leaders in the field.
Originally Canadian, but bought some
I went to Infinex.com and their site has a message that states that :
mail Virus Warning: Somebody send virus through email these days!
If you get a email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the subject is your account
,pease don't open it and delete this kind of email , then run anti-virus
software to
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:45:05 +, Cotty wrote:
'The BBC is financed by a TV licence paid by households. [...]
It's dreadfully off topic, but I've always wondered just how much those
TV licences cost, how frequently, whether it's flat rate or apportioned
by something, like maybe the size of
??? WOW, this a message I sent in march!
Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:59:36 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:59:30 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andre Langevin
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:16:19 +, Cotty wrote:
On Sunday I went with a reporter to film a bloke who flew in the PR unit
(Photo Recon. unit) in a Spitfire during WWII for a piece about the up
and coming online pics mentioned above.
He's fairing well for 84 and recounted some great air
I got a similar email from Keith . . .
About the only thing you can be certain of nowadays is that the
one person who *didn't* send you that virus-laden email is the
person whose name appears in the From: field.
Viruses grab From addresses as well as To addresses (and
may even relay the virus
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:02:47 + (GMT), Chris Stoddart wrote:
In the UK everyone with a televison set pays a licence fee (about
10/$15 a month).
Oops, guess I should've waited a little longer. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
With the Aliens apparently, just to mix the threads a bit.
At 07:02 PM 1/20/04, you wrote:
Did he leave them somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: Brendan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cameras in the Snow-was:
I've got the same problem, the browser times out trying to reach the web site.
At 07:22 PM 1/20/04, you wrote:
Just tried the Pentax User's Gallery and couldn't connect. Anyone know
what's up? I was going to send in a photo for the next gallery. (Today's
the deadline, right?)
--
Mark Roberts
Hi,
It's dreadfully off topic, but I've always wondered just how much those
TV licences cost, how frequently, whether it's flat rate or apportioned
by something, like maybe the size of the picture tube or something.
Care to enlighten me Cotty, or any of our other UK bretheren (and
sisteren
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:09:58 +, Bob W wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/licencefee/
it's free if you're blind!
Harumph!
Bureaucracy at work. :-|
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
I just want you all to note two (2) things:
1) I changed the subject line to reflect my throwing a new topic into
Cory's Funeral Thread (and that was even before Wheatfield, in another
thread, so correctly pointed out the poor manners in not doing so), and;
2) At least I had some Pentax
Moi aussi. Mon ordinateur a dit quelque chose comme could not make a
connection.
Heureusement, mon photo pour fevrier etait deja envoyer.
salut a tous,
francois theriault
doing my bit for the global village
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it
How magnanimous of them.
At 09:09 PM 1/20/04, you wrote:
Hi,
It's dreadfully off topic, but I've always wondered just how much those
TV licences cost, how frequently, whether it's flat rate or apportioned
by something, like maybe the size of the picture tube or something.
Care to enlighten
I'll think about it. I'll pull mine out once everyone gets good and
hammered.
vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
And what in the past has ever give you the impression that I could speak
French?
Especially with that Canadian accent of yours? :-
At 09:52 PM 1/20/04, you wrote:
Moi aussi. Mon ordinateur a dit quelque chose comme could not make a
connection.
Heureusement, mon photo pour fevrier etait deja
Hey, just trying to broaden the cultural horizons of the list, is all.
Besides:
1) You don't have to speak French, only read it,
2) I doubt that whatever I wrote is anything resembling real French (I was
just faking it), and,
3) Even if you couldn't read it, don't lose any sleep over it.
Looking at the mangled syntax of that last message, I should add English to my
list of problematic languages. Oh, well I could still grow up to be President.
At 10:01 PM 1/20/04, you wrote:
And what in the past has ever give you the impression that I could speak
French?
Especially with that
Your forgiven Frank :D
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I just want you all to note two (2) things:
1) I changed the subject line to reflect my
throwing a new topic into
Cory's Funeral Thread (and that was even before
Wheatfield, in another
thread, so correctly pointed out
Nice, now your going to force me to finally finish
mine!
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Been
finally doing things to my website. I would
like folks to take a look and
let me know what they think of the changes.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Bob W wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/licencefee/
it's free if you're blind!
Incredibly, no; you still have to pay even if you are blind!
(albeit half price)
--
--Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:09 PM 20/01/2004, Cotty wrote:
Just spent a few hours doing something I've meant to do for ages. I
printed off a quick contact sheet for every frame of digital I have shot
since getting the camera in Sept 2002. They're all in a binder now, and
there's nothing quite like leafing through,
Well, of course. You can still listen to the dialogue, right? :)
chris
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Bob W wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/licencefee/
it's free if you're blind!
Incredibly, no; you still have to pay even if you are blind!
(albeit
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I think it would be a great idea if all PDMLers going to GFM would put
together a modest portfolio of favorite shots. Think of the fun around PDML
central.
I will be bringing some prints.
I
Still down here at 1230am wed
sigh
(at least I got my wet picture sent a couple of days ago)
annsan
96 matches
Mail list logo
