So Braswell emails me last night and asks what the deal with the Reagan
funeral is. Like I'd know.
Anyway, he shows up here at 3 today and we head down to get what we can get
-
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/reagan/index.htm
Yeah, I took Charles Braswell to a sushi restaurant.
tv
This could be entitled Why I hate autofocus, there are lots of
technical difficulties, with this shot
it's not good enough for a print or for the PUG but I though it was
amusing. Anyone who would like
an explanation can ask for it. Comments welcome.
Hi Rob,
that's interesting. Would you please share some power supply knowledge
with us? As it is not so much OT by now many people archive their
pictures digitally. Is there anything one can do to minimise chance of
such catastrophic failure?
Thanks
-fra-
Hi,
John Francis wrote:
Oh, you can go pretty fast in one. A college friend of mine found that
out the hard way; he came round a bend on a country lane to find a group
of hikers spread out all across the road. He managed to avoid them all,
but was less fortunate in avoiding the tree branch
Hey tv,
Thanks for that very entertaining account! I think you've just about made it
as cosy as it can get for anyone who didn't go. Did you actually keep a log
as you went? Certainly appreciate the detail.. great stuff. Some comments:
Almost missed you there in the background-
Hi,
John Francis wrote:
The Vitesse does pretty well with that 120HP, too - not surprising in a
car that weights about 1800lbs dry. I've had one up to around 120mph.
And then.. You can bump it up to 2.5litres by just putting the the
crank and pistons from the 2.5PI. The
What, it focused on something, I think. VBG
Bruce
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 12:07:29 AM, you wrote:
PJA This could be entitled Why I hate autofocus, there are lots of
PJA technical difficulties, with this shot
PJA it's not good enough for a print or for the PUG but I though it was
PJA
Adrian,
I have seen a few comments in the past about a 6x7 adapter for this
lens but have never seen anything in a Pentax catalog to support this. The
rear of the lens from just behind the focusing collar is removable and would
probably allow some sort of short mount adapter to be
Treena asked:
Rather less strange is that I like to fight Florentine -- with
a sword in each hand. [...]
but how do you swing from chandeliers with both hands full like that?
I have an extraordinarily talented mouth.
innocent look
My, this thread took an interesting turn ...
On Jun 9, 2004, at 6:40 PM, Bob W wrote:
There are some very dramatic photos here:
http://www.davidcortner.com/astro/vtransit/
which is a link on the Astro Photo of the Day page:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
Theres a good pic on Spaceweather.com as well.
Cheers,
On 10 Jun 2004 at 9:08, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
Hi Rob,
that's interesting. Would you please share some power supply knowledge
with us? As it is not so much OT by now many people archive their
pictures digitally.
Hi Frantisek,
I guess it's closer to on topic than Triumps :-)
For anyone
Sorry, I missed Cesar's OP.
On Jun 9, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
With all the gear around, and the ability to try it out - not just what
Pentax sent, but also other people's gear - it is hard not to be
enabled on
the mountain.
When I saw Stan's FS list I knew it was
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:39:41 -0700
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Giving up on the FA 28-70/4
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
The FA*24/2 produces extremely contrasty images.
Certainly not what I have found. I had
Hi,
John Francis wrote:
Mine was the ragtop, too. The aerodynamics of that car conspire to make
the front end *extremely* light over 100mph. I think the car would have
gone faster than 120, but I chickened out; I was steering with just the
lightest touch of my fingertips, and still felt as if I
On 10 Jun 2004 at 2:12, alexanderkrohe wrote:
I don't know the FA31ltd but from the pictures I have
seen it has a totally different color reproduction .
I don't believe that anyone can make truly relative comparisons regarding
contrast/colour unless the tests are made in a controlled
Hi!
So, for those that are as weak as me - you may want to stay away
from Grandfather Mountain :-)
Thanks for the advice. I am really, really weak... Particularly when
it comes to K lenses... There is a 135/2.5 in a local store, and an
F1.7AF. Must resist. Can't resist. It's futile.
Kostas, may
Hi!
This could be entitled Why I hate autofocus, there are lots of technical
difficulties, with this shot
it's not good enough for a print or for the PUG but I though it was amusing. Anyone
who would like
an explanation can ask for it. Comments welcome.
Hi Rob,
thank you for your very informative post! I also had too many
mysterious software failures and hangs which many could be attributed
to badly designed key components. Like in enlarging, one component in
the chain (e.g. vibration of table or badly painted wall) can ruin the whole print, no
I've thrown up some people snapshots, about 3 pages worth, and some reactions
regarding my GFM trip, about 4 paragraphs worth.
Hope no one takes offense at my stupid sense of humor and at any poor or
unflattering photos that I took of them.
Remember, I consider these SNAPSHOTS, not really
Sheesh, it might help if you had a url, don't you think?
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/gfm/gfm.html
Doe Sigh. I am still tired.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Boris Liberman wrote:
Kostas, may be thinking of focal lengths would help.
That's exactly the problem Boris! I have my K135/3.5 (incl.
dedicated hood and case) with me to p/ex (if they give me more that
$2.50 or something). But can I let go? Am I actually *hoping* for an
I've scanned Ilford XP2 and Portra 400BW on a HP S20 and Canon 4000. The Portra has an
orange mask. If you use a scanner that uses an infared channel for dust and scratch
removal, scanning the film in color mode enable DS removal. I scanned the Ilford in
BW, color and positive modes, and the
Two copies still available at
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/offer-listing/080651356X//104-6292511-6419145?condition=all
I got the one in collectable condition!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Nice snaps Marnie! Almost puts all of you in my own backyard :) Priceless
capture of Bill Owens too.. Btw, what lens were you using for the third and
fourth shots on page 1? Interesting bokeh
Regards,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Finally somebody posts a pic of me that isn't completely Feral!
Thanks for sharing Marnie, it is a shame that your trip wasn't a bit more
enjoyable. Me, well, I had a blast and just went to bed for the first time
in around 49 hours, only to be woken an hour later by two coughing babies.
At
Kostas,
You are correct, it is the M 20/4 I got from Stan.
Though I do not understand OP...
Taking a break from tv?s novel,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 5:08 AM
Sorry, I missed
Nice shot Christian.
The colours look great and the detail is very fine.Looks like that equipment combo
works
very well.:-)
Dave
http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id16.html
17-year periodical cicadas of Brood X have begun emerging and molting
I, on the other hand, had a APS UPS burst into flame. If I had not been sitting
at the computer when it happened, it would have burned the house down. I will
never trust their equipment again.
--
Rob Studdert wrote:
Most UPS will maintain a system without mains power for 15 minutes or so and
I like the one with the foreground flowers. Adds
perspective and color contrast.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/gfm/imgp9420_std.jpg
John
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those who aren't tired of this wonderful affair,
I have added 4
more pics to my little gallery - sorry,
Any Olympus OM-1 lovers here?
Cord Camera on 5th Ave in Columbus has a near-mint OM-1 with 50/1.4 lens.
No shiny marks from metal stab loops.
Really, really clean.
It doesn't have a shoe mounted.
Gary wants to get about $300 for it.
Collin
I'd expect that the 70-200IS is one of Canon's best lenses. That focal
length range is very heavily used by many sorts of pros, and Nikon and
Canon have been knocking themselves out to make a great 70-200 in order
to win sales from pros. Pentax has made fewer versions of a 70-200/2.8
kind of
Reagan was a dumb blonde, obviously the current government is stirring up
this mess in order to turn up some republican converts. Otherwise I doubt
very much that 90% of the country really gives a rip.
Nice pictures though, all of them are good, a few are great, I think my
favorite is the one
Like, so absolutely!
Ok, stop it now Cotty!
Christian
No no - it's 'Coddy'
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
well, all know is that after using Cotty's lens, I am seriously considering
switching to Canon, and I don't take that decision lightly...
tan.
OTOH, tv loved the EOSK 50mm 1.2
I'll ask the company who did the adapter ring if they would do another.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Cotty, has anyone mentioned that you must have
been, like, hanging out with
teenagers to like pick up this awesome slang???
Sooo uncool!
I'm still a teenager!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Really? I just looked it up and one meaning for the word trolling is
to move around : RAMBLE according to M-W.com...
yeah, it means the same thing here - I just somehow imagined that I would
be trawling ebay cos then I'd haul in my catch and throw back all the
rubbish to pull out the gems. I
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:34:13 +0100, Cotty wrote:
Cotty, has anyone mentioned that you must have
been, like, hanging out with
teenagers to like pick up this awesome slang???
Sooo uncool!
I'm still a teenager!
You're only as old as the person you feel. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Does Jeepgirl have a real name, and has she left the building?
keith whaley
Christian wrote:
-Original Message-
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=
80
tom you need a new shirt from GFM 2001:
really - just snaps not photographs :) and a
couple of inside jokes for
the attendees
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/pdmlcentralsign.jpg
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/carolinarhododendron.jpg
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/mountainlaurel.jpg
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/namelessplant_hmmm.jpg
Thanks, Doug! That clears up a lot of things for me. I appreciate it!
keith
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:34:13 +0100, Cotty wrote:
Cotty, has anyone mentioned that you must have
been, like, hanging out with
teenagers to like pick up this awesome slang???
Sooo uncool!
I'm still a
Does trolling mean something different in your parts, Cotty? I know
that back when I was hitchhiking in Ireland, I was told to
always ask
for a lift instead of a ride. ;)
You mean like fanny pack ? ;-)
Don't you mean a bum bag? ;)
Amita
Finally somebody posts a pic of me that isn't completely Feral!
Thanks for sharing Marnie, it is a shame that your trip wasn't a bit more
enjoyable. Me, well, I had a blast and just went to bed for the first time
in around 49 hours, only to be woken an hour later by two coughing babies.
At
In a message dated 6/10/2004 4:40:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice snaps Marnie! Almost puts all of you in my own backyard :) Priceless
capture of Bill Owens too.. Btw, what lens were you using for the third and
fourth shots on page 1? Interesting bokeh
Regards,
Ryan
Hi,
I just bought this gem, and looking for others having some experience
with it. Above all, i'd like to see some photos taken with it...
BDimitrov's page says: The aperture ring has no click-stops, but
mine seems to have them. Is it a modified one, or ...?
Thanks,
Gabor
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
BTW hi Kostas
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Johnpentax is in the building (after off-loading an M85/2.0 on ebay
the other day).
Welcome (back?) John!
Kostas
In a message dated 6/10/2004 4:48:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for sharing Marnie, it is a shame that your trip wasn't a bit more
enjoyable. Me, well, I had a blast and just went to bed for the first time
in around 49 hours, only to be woken an hour later by two
Sorry, Marnie, but I'm confused. (Confudion is a personal strength of
mine) Where is this site?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/10/04 06:17AM
I've thrown up
I succumbed to the temptation after all (no prices for guessing that
:-) and exchanged £120 for a K135/2.5 and an AF Adapter F. I was
offered £30 for the K135/3.5 in box with hood, and decided to keep it.
We had discussed in the past (Rob?) that the manual recommends against
using the adapter
On Jun 10, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Shawn K. wrote:
Reagan was a dumb blonde, obviously the current government is
stirring up
this mess in order to turn up some republican converts. Otherwise I
doubt
very much that 90% of the country really gives a rip.
Isn't it tedious how someone always has to
Hi,
I just bought this gem, and looking for others having some experience
with it. Above all, i'd like to see some photos taken with it...
BDimitrov's page says: The aperture ring has no click-stops, but
mine seems to have them. Is it a modified one, or ...?
Thanks,
Gabor
Boz meant that it doesn't
In a message dated 6/10/2004 11:20:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, Marnie, but I'm confused. (Confudion is a personal strength of
mine) Where is this site?
Steven Desjardins
-
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/gfm/gfm.html
I should have made that
I just bought this gem, and looking for others having some
experience with it. Above all, i'd like to see some photos taken
with it...
http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/85compar/
I no longer have the lens. I've since replaced it with a Kenko
85/2.5 Soft lens (which also has stopped-down
Paul, I dont think there is such thing as an apolitical image of a
politician, particularly one as high profile and as contra-versial as
RR.
Antonio
On 10 Jun 2004, at 20:34, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jun 10, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Shawn K. wrote:
Reagan was a dumb blonde, obviously the current
Shawn K. wrote:
Reagan was a dumb blonde, obviously the current government is stirring up
this mess in order to turn up some republican converts. Otherwise I doubt
very much that 90% of the country really gives a rip.
Not true, Reagan was very loved by much of the country. You are
obviously
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't it tedious how someone always has to inject there personal
politics into a thread about images?
But it makes it so much easier to identify them for the kill file. : )
Mark
Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did Roberts post the group shot?
Three of them:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfm2004.htm#group
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I'll jump in with a I've seen the photoshop attempts and they don't
look the same - I much prefer the real thing. I have my eyes on the
lookout for a good deal.
Bruce
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 11:55:01 AM, you wrote:
F By the way, you should brace yourself - someone is bound to jump in
F with
LOL. Just in case you get pregnant?
Antonio
On 10 Jun 2004, at 20:51, Andre Langevin wrote:
I keep mine, just in case...
-Original Message-
From: Shawn K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reagan was a dumb blonde, obviously the current government
is stirring up this mess in order to turn up some republican
converts. Otherwise I doubt very much that 90% of the
country really gives a rip.
I was just
That would be cool...
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:17 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: RE: long glass
well, all know is that after using Cotty's lens, I am seriously
considering switching to Canon, and I don't take
In a message dated 6/10/2004 12:18:03 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Three of them:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfm2004.htm#group
--
Mark Roberts
-
Nice recount and pics. Thanks.
Marnie aka Doe I sort of like the middle group shot the best.
What's really tedious is Reagan's speeches!!
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege
On Jun 10, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Shawn K. wrote:
Reagan was a dumb blonde,
Same to ya!!!
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dalal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't it tedious how someone always has to inject there personal
Tremendous photos, Marnie!!
You really captured the spirit of the event. They'd be even better in bw,
taken with film, on a Pentax. vbg
I owe you an e-mail off-list. Sorry, it's all I can do to keep up with the
list right now (like you, still feeling kind of burned out from GFM!).
cheers,
Yes, Yes, YES!!
I'm glad I wasn't the only one to think so. I was beginning to think myself
paranoid (or worse!), but really, it's obvious when you think about it,
isn't it?
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J.
Hey Tom and all,
I modified a 67-K adapter to 67EF and have used the 800ED/6.7, 200
and 55-100mm with great success... fyi,
-Ryan
tom wrote:
That would be cool...
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:17 AM
To: pentax list
800/6.7 for 6x7? Holy frijole.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: long glass
Hey Tom and all,
I modified a 67-K adapter to 67EF and have used the
800ED/6.7, 200 and
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, Yes, YES!!
I'm glad I wasn't the only one to think so. I was beginning
to think myself paranoid (or worse!), but really, it's
obvious when you think about it, isn't it?
We thought about staging a walkout
Yup, it's more fun on the digital slr though.
-Ryan
tom wrote:
800/6.7 for 6x7? Holy frijole.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: long glass
Hey Tom and all,
I modified a 67-K
Sorry if you get this message twice but it does not
seem to have come through ...
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:39:41 -0700
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Giving up on the FA 28-70/4
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
The
Shawn,
You deserve a seriously vicious dope-slap.
Nobody gives a rat's ass about your opinion of President Reagan or your
guess as to everybody else's EXCEPT the people who care enough about him to
start a stupid flame war over your blatantly political comment.
Your photo comments are appreciated
Sorry that is the message that does not seem to have
come through I hit the wrong button ...
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: alexanderkrohe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Giving up on the FA 28-70/4
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:
If you feel young enough people, you can go to jail. Even here in Georgia
:-)
CW
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're only as old as the person you feel. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Giving up on the FA 28-70/4
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:51:24 -0700
On 10 Jun 2004 at 2:12, alexanderkrohe wrote:
I don't know the FA31ltd but from the pictures I
have
seen it has a totally different color reproduction
.
I don't believe that anyone can
Really nice work!
Can someone explain the Giving up on the FA 28-70/4 subject to me, I have one
in need of a clean (fungus) wouldn't want much for it, I'll keep it for
spares otherwise.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: alex wetmore [EMAIL
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
Can someone explain the Giving up on the FA 28-70/4 subject to me, I have one
in need of a clean (fungus) wouldn't want much for it, I'll keep it for
spares otherwise.
http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss%40pdml.net/msg185702.html
is my
And one of the most unpopular to the rest of the world, particularly
Latin America (remember Honduras and Nicaragua?) and Iraq (where he
setup Sadam Hussein with a nice set of weapons to kill his own people),
or perhaps Afghanistan (where his policies left Bin Laden and co. setup
and nice
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, William M Kane wrote:
Idea is this. Everyone posts there x-numbered picture from their *ist
D . . . say maybe their 4321st picture? The number shouldn't be too
high to start with, since some people don't have THAT many pictures . .
With my Sony PS I have rolled over
Aah thanks. They seem prone to these ailments. I would recommend SMC Pentax-M
35-70/2.8-3.5 although shorter in focal length range but perhaps not suitable
for your camera body. Great lens all the same, I won't part with mine.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message
don't be so ridiculous. Whether you liked him or not, Reagan
was the most popular President in American history and his
funeral is an important news event.
I'm no Reagan fan, but I liked Tom's photos a lot, and I can appreciate
them regardless of who is being honored.
Amita
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep, you should have. Pictures of politicians normally evoke
political comentary, both positive and negative. Mind you
pics of flowers to too so I am not sure you would be safe
with them either. Actually, come
On 10 Jun 2004 at 11:56, graywolf wrote:
I, on the other hand, had a APS UPS burst into flame. If I had not been sitting
at the computer when it happened, it would have burned the house down. I will
never trust their equipment again.
Wow, I personally own two big units including one that
hm, pure class...
tv took some really good photos, he showed them to the list. end of story.
at no time did he mention anything political. It was purely for
entertainment value, as the procession etc was such big news in DC. (I
know, I was there at the time remember)...
get over yourself
I own a Super A as well as a P30 and P50. It's true that the (earlier) Super
A is superior to the other two (TTL flash and shutter priority). One thing I
like ablut both P30 and P50 is the very soft release. The P50 has a
beautiful design as well.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought Tom's photos were excellent, particularly the riderless horse,
which I think is as good an example as any I've seen in the press of that
image.
Now there I'd disagree with you. I've seen wider shots which give more
of the total atmosphere; Tom's is too tight a shot for my
On 11 Jun 2004 at 0:29, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Toms pics were nice, pro-reagan patriotic pics - particularly the one
of the horse.
Oh come on, grow up, Americans voted him in, they are just seeing him out the
way that they do people who held his level of governance. Toms pics were
Tom, you did nothing wrong. This is just good photojournalism. People
shouldn't put their own political commentary onto something that is
apolitical. Just because the funeral procession was for a political
figure does not make it a political event. He was the leader of our
country, but he
-Original Message-
From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought Tom's photos were excellent, particularly the riderless
horse, which I think is as good an example as any I've seen in the
press of that image.
Now there I'd disagree with you. I've seen wider
I'm no fan of Reagan, or his politics. Quite the contrary. But, the man
just died. Like it or not, he was a very popular President of the world's
most powerful country. And, he just died. We should show some respect, to
him, the office of president, the country, and those who are grieving.
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/reagan/index.htm
SUPER stuff tv.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
How could Tom's pics be pro-Reagan? Tom showed us his views of the event.
I saw nothing Reagan in them at all. Had I been there I would have taken
the same images so I could the sense of what happened at the state funeral.
Jim A.
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
On 10/6/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
Bob, perhaps you should ask the photographer to remove the patriotic
political pics too in your usual diplomatic manner. Just to be fair.
Antonio
Unbelievable.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Or you could buy from a list member who has some quality 645 gear for
sale...
Stan
On Jun 10, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this 645n on eBay (item # 3820509724) for $1100.
It ends in 12 hours!
Included : 80 - 160 mm zoom lens, 220 film back
I found it
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/onyx.jpg
Black labs are better than yellow!
(Ash went out and rescued a dog while I was at GFM, Phyllis wanted a look)
tv
I'm in this group. I was never a fan of Reagan or his politics, but he
earned his funeral. Of Tom's pics, I like the hearse passing in front of
the Washington Monument the most.
Andrew Robinson
frank theriault wrote:
I'm no fan of Reagan, or his politics. Quite the contrary. But, the
man
Toms pics were nice, pro-reagan patriotic pics - particularly the one
of the horse.
There's something wrong with you pal.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On the other hand, one might say your ignorance of how the sitting
government does things shows a level of immaturity.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege
Tom, you did
Thank you.
You've just provided the impetus I needed to send you to Trash heaven.
You've turned indecision to firm action.
'Bye, little man.
Oh, and PLONK!
keith whaley
* * *
Shawn K. wrote:
Ill take the opportunity to slander the name of the biggest idiot in the
history of American politics any
On 10 Jun 2004 at 14:50, alexanderkrohe wrote:
Sure shooting newspapers, brick walls, roof tops and
filigree branches in bright back light gives
important insights into the properties of the optics.
But I think such tests are overrated - the actual
image impression in practical use is IMO
But but, I just put all YOUR messages in the trash bin!! Little..,.
Little.., uh GUY!!! YOU LITTLE GUY, your messages are going in the trash
right now, PLONK (whatever the hell that means)
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10,
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
